pravoПравоприменениеLaw Enforcement Review2542-15142658-4050Dostoevsky Omsk State University10.52468/2542-1514.2025.9(1).142-151pravo-1056Research ArticleПРАВОПРИМЕНЕНИЕ В МЕЖДУНАРОДНОМ ПРАВЕTHE LAW ENFORCEMENT IN INTERNATIONAL LAWПравовые аспекты статистической деятельности в ЕС: проекция на ЕАЭСLegal aspects of statistical activity in the EU: projection on the EAEUhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2946-5744КасьяновР. А.KasyanovR. A.

Касьянов Рустам Альбертович – доктор юридических наук, профессор кафедры европейского права

119454, г. Москва, пр. Вернадского, 76

Rustam A. Kasyanov – Doct. of Law, Professor, European Law Department

76, Vernadskogo pr., Moscow, 119454

rprof@mail.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5376-1749ЕвдокимовМ. А.EvdokimovM. A.

Евдокимов Михаил Андреевич – кандидат юридических наук, руководитель юридической практики

630099, г. Новосибирск, ул. Советская, 37

Mikhail A. Evdokimov – PhD in Law, Head of the Legal Practice

37, Sovetskaya ul., Novosibirsk, 630099

evdokimov.m.a@ya.ruhttps://orcid.org/0009-0006-7308-6003ГулиевШ. А.GuliyevSh. A.

Гулиев Ахмед оглы Шамиль – магистр права, аспирант кафедры интеграционного права и прав человека

119454, г. Москва, пр. Вернадского, 76

Shamil A. Guliyev – Master of Law; PhD Student, Department of Integration Law and Human Rights Law

76, Vernadskogo pr., Moscow, 119454

shiatunnabi313@gmail.comМосковский государственный институт международных отношений (университет) Министерства иностранных дел Российской ФедерацииРоссияMGIMO UniversityRussian FederationООО «Компания БКС»РоссияBrokerCreditService LtdRussian Federation20252303202591142151Copyright © Касьянов Р.А., Евдокимов М.А., Гулиев Ш.А., 20252025Касьянов Р.А., Евдокимов М.А., Гулиев Ш.А.Kasyanov R.A., Evdokimov M.A., Guliyev S.A.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://enforcement.omsu.ru/jour/article/view/1056

Рассматриваются вопросы эволюции правового регулирования статистической деятельности в Европейском Союзе (ЕС) и Евразийском экономическом союзе (ЕАЭС). Выделяется уровень унификации (гармонизации, стандартизации) статистической деятельности в интеграционных объединениях через анализ учредительных договоров и ключевых правовых актов рассматриваемых интеграционных объединений. Проводится сравнительный анализ правового регулирования статистической деятельности в ЕС и ЕАЭС в разрезе организационного механизма осуществления статистической деятельности. Установив основные характеристики указанных организационных механизмов, авторы раскрывают перспективы и анализируют проблемы правоприменения в сфере реализации статистической деятельности интеграционных объединений. Выделяя общее и особое, делается вывод о сходстве ключевых черт статистической деятельности (наличие сходных принципов ее осуществления, наличие программ ее осуществления и развития) и ключевых отличиях (наличие двухуровненой организационной структуры, более широкого спектра правовых актов в ЕС), что объясняется, в том числе, историческими особенностями развития ЕС и ЕАЭС.

The Subject of research is the legal regulation of statistical activities in the European Union (the EU) and the Eurasian Economic Union (the EAEU) in the context of the organizational mechanism of statistical activities.

The purpose of research is the analysis of the main characteristics of organizational mechanisms of statistical activities, the prospects and problems of law enforcement in the field of statistical activity of integration associations.

The research methods include both theoretical (analysis, synthesis, deduction, induction, analogy) and special legal methods of cognition (formal legal and comparative legal).

The main results and the scope of application. Provisions for implementation of organization of statistical activities are reflected in the primary treaties of both the EU and the EAEU. The both integration associations have similar principles lying on basis of regulation of statistical activities, including the organization of the mechanism of interaction between national competent authorities and supranational bodies of integration associations. However, regulation at the level of secondary law complements the norms of primary law and the principles to varying degrees.

In the framework of the legal support for statistical activities, the focus of the EAEU, in contrast to the EU, is on the development of legal instruments for its implementation due in particular to the fact that the EAEU covers much fewer spheres than the EU. At the same time, both the EU and the EAEU face problems of law enforcement which come from the lack of a unified reporting methodology, the desire of states to maintain sovereignty.

Nowadays statistical activities are carried out separately within the framework of sectoral legal acts, but the digitalization has a potential to bring a greater unification of the regulation of statistical activities within each of the integration associations.

Европейский Союз / ECЕвропейская комиссияЕвростатстатистическая деятельностьЕвразийский экономический союз / ЕАЭСЕвразийская экономическая комиссияофициальная статистическая информацияNACEБанк РоссииотчетностьEuropean Union / EUEuropean CommissionEurostatstatisticsEurasian Economic Union / EAEUEurasian Economic Commissionofficial statistical informationNACEBank of RussiareportingReferencesDidier E. Do Statistics “Perform” the Economy? / E. Didier // Do Economists Make Markets? / eds. D. MacKenzie, F. Muniesa, S. Leung-Sea. – Princeton University Press, 2008. – P. 276–310. – DOI: 10.1515/9780691214665-012.Didier E. Do Statistics “Perform” the Economy?, in: MacKenzie D., Muniesa F., Leung-Sea S. (eds.). Do Economists Make Markets?, Princeton University Press, 2008, pp. 276–310. DOI: 10.1515/9780691214665-012.Mussari R. EPSAS and the unification of public sector accounting across Europe / R. Mussari // Accounting, Economics and Law. – 2014. – Vol. 4, iss. 3. – P. 299–312. – DOI: 10.1515/ael-2014-0019.Mussari R. EPSAS and the unification of public sector accounting across Europe. Accounting, Economics and Law, 2014, vol. 4, iss. 3, pp. 299–312. DOI: 10.1515/ael-2014-0019.Kasyanov R. A. The EU Experience as a Model for the Development of a Single Financial Market Regulation in the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) / R. A. Kasyanov // European Company and Financial Law Review. – 2019. – Vol. 16, iss. 5. – P. 592–621. – DOI: 10.1515/ecfr-2019-0021.Kasyanov R.A. The EU Experience as a Model for the Development of a Single Financial Market Regulation in the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU). European Company and Financial Law Review, 2019, vol. 16, iss. 5, pp. 592– 621. DOI: 10.1515/ecfr-2019-0021.Syrpis P. The relationship between primary and secondary law in the EU / P. Syrpis // Common Market Law Review. – 2015. – Vol. 52, iss. 2. – P. 461–487. – DOI: 10.54648/COLA2015029.Syrpis P. The relationship between primary and secondary law in the EU. Common Market Law Review, 2015, vol. 52, iss. 2, pp. 461–487. DOI: 10.54648/cola2015029.Дьяченко Е. Б. Применение права ЕАЭС национальными судебными органами и развитие межсудебного диалога / Е. Б. Дьяченко // Правоприменение. – 2022. – Т. 6, №. 4. – С. 244–260. – DOI: 10.52468/2542-1514.2022.6(4).244-260.Diyachenko E.B. Application of the EAEU law by national courts and development of judicial dialogue. Pravoprimenenie = Law Enforcement Review, 2022, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 244–260. DOI: 10.52468/2542-1514.2022.6(4).244-260.Евдокимов М. А. Союз рынков капитала ЕС: правовой механизм : дис. … канд. юрид. наук / М. А. Евдокимов – М., 2022. – 277 с.Evdokimov M.A. The Capital Markets Union: Legal Mechanism, Cand. Diss. Moscow, 2022. 277 p. (In Russ.).Sehnálek D. The European Perspective on the Notion of Precedent – are EU and Czech Court Decisions Source of Law? / D. Sehnálek // European Studies - The Review of European Law, Economics and Politics. – 2020. – Vol. 7, iss. 1. – P. 125–153. – DOI: 10.2478/eustu-2022-0050.Sehnálek D. The European Perspective on the Notion of Precedent – are EU and Czech Court Decisions Source of Law?. European Studies - The Review of European Law, Economics and Politics, 2020, vol. 7, iss. 1, pp. 125–153. DOI: 10.2478/eustu-2022-0050.Krommendijk J. The highest Dutch courts and the preliminary ruling procedure: Critically obedient interlocutors of the Court of Justice / J. Krommendijk // European Law Journal. – 2019. – Vol. 25, iss. 4. – P. 394–415. – DOI: 10.1111/eulj.12322.Krommendijk J. The highest Dutch courts and the preliminary ruling procedure: Critically obedient interlocutors of the Court of Justice. European Law Journal, 2019, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 394–415. DOI: 10.1111/eulj.12322.Евдокимов М. А. Правовой механизм Союза рынков капитала ЕС: будет ли обеспечена свобода движения капитала? / М. А. Евдокимов, Р. А. Касьянов // Право. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. – 2023. – Т. 16, № 3. – С. 221–244. – DOI: 10.17323/2072-8166.2023.3.221.244.Evdokimov M., Kas’yanov R. Legal Mechanism of EU Capital Markets Union: Will Free Capital Flow Provided?. Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki = Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 2023, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 221–244 DOI: 10.17323/2072-8166.2023.3.221.244. (In Russ.).Vrabie M. Judicial Review of Administrative Action at National Level under the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and General Principles of EU Law / M. Vrabie // Central European Public Administration Review. – 2020. – Vol. 18, no. 1. – P. 25–49. – DOI: 10.17573/cepar.2020.1.02.Vrabie M. Judicial Review of Administrative Action at National Level under the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and General Principles of EU Law. Central European Public Administration Review, 2020, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 25– 49. DOI: 10.17573/cepar.2020.1.02.Trondal J. Beyond the EU membership-non-membership dichotomy? Supranational identities among national EU decision-makers / J. Trondal // Journal of European Public Policy. – 2002. – Vol. 9, iss. 3. – P. 468–487. – DOI: 10.1080/13501760210139722.Trondal J. Beyond the EU membership- non-membership dichotomy? Supranational identities among national EU decision-makers. Journal of European Public Policy, 2002, vol. 9, iss. 3, pp. 468–487. DOI: 10.1080/13501760210139722.Blom-Hansen J. The origins of the EU comitology system: a case of informal agenda-setting by the Commission / J. Blom-Hansen // Journal of European Public Policy. – 2008. – Vol. 15, iss. 2. – P. 208–226. – DOI: 10.1080/13501760701817716.Blom-Hansen J. The origins of the EU comitology system: A case of informal agenda-setting by the Commission. Journal of European Public Policy, 2008, vol. 15, iss. 2, pp. 208–226. DOI: 10.1080/13501760701817716.Fernández Pasarín A. M. Unveiling Inconsistency: Consensus and Contestation along the Council–Comitology Cycle of EU Policy-Making / A. M. Fernández Pasarín, N. Font // JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies. – 2022. – Vol. 60, iss. 2. – P. 427–444. – DOI: 10.1111/jcms.13244.Fernández Pasarín A.M., Font N. Unveiling Inconsistency: Consensus and Contestation along the Council– Comitology Cycle of EU Policy-Making. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 2022, vol. 60, iss. 2, pp. 427–444. DOI: 10.1111/jcms.13244.Kasyanov R. Towards single market in financial services: highlights of the EU and the EAEU financial markets regulation / R. Kasyanov, A. Kriger // Russian Law Journal. – 2020. – Vol. 8, iss. 1. – P. 111–137.Kasyanov R., Kriger A. Towards single market in financial services: highlights of the EU and the EAEU financial markets regulation. Russian Law Journal, 2020, vol. 8, iss. 1, pp. 111–137.Howarth D. Economic and Monetary Union at twenty: a stocktaking of a tumultuous second decade: introduction / D. Howarth, A. Verdun // Journal of European Integration. – 2020. – Vol. 42, iss. 3 : Economic and Monetary Union at Twenty: A stocktaking of a tumultuous second decade. – P. 287–293. – DOI: 10.1080/07036337.2020.1730348.Howarth D., Verdun A. Economic and Monetary Union at twenty: a stocktaking of a tumultuous second decade: introduction. Journal of European Integration, 2020, vol. 42, iss. 3: Economic and Monetary Union at Twenty: A stocktaking of a tumultuous second decade, pp. 287–293. DOI: 10.1080/07036337.2020.1730348.Zeynalova A. Foreign Direct Investment in the EU / A. Zeynalova. – December 24, 2020. – DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3754769.Zeynalova A. Foreign Direct Investment in the EU. December 24, 2020. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3754769.Iossa A. Cross-Border Social Dumping as a ‘Game of Jurisdiction’–Towards a Legal Geography of Labour Relations in the EU Internal Market / A. Iossa, M. Persdotter // JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies. – 2021. – Vol. 59, iss. 5. – P. 1086–1102. – DOI: 10.1111/jcms.13166.Iossa A., Persdotter M. Cross-Border Social Dumping as a ‘Game of Jurisdiction’ – Towards a Legal Geography of Labour Relations in the EU Internal Market. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 2021, vol. 59, iss. 5, pp. 1086–1102. DOI: 10.1111/jcms.13166.Marco-Fondevila M. Trends in private sector engagement with biodiversity: EU listed companies' disclosure and indicators / M. Marco-Fondevila, I. Álvarez-Etxeberría // Ecological Economics. – 2023. – Vol. 210. – Art. 107864. – DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107864.Marco-Fondevila M., Álvarez-Etxeberría I. Trends in private sector engagement with biodiversity: EU listed companies’ disclosure and indicators. Ecological Economics, 2023, vol. 210, art. 107864. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107864.Джагитян Э. П. Перспективы и риски формирования институциональной структуры банковского регулирования в ЕАЭС / Э. П. Джагитян // Вестник международных организаций. – 2019. – Т. 14, № 2. – С. 245– 274.Dzhagityan E. Shaping the EAEU’s Institutional Framework for Banking Regulation: Perspectives and Risks. Vestnik mezhdunarodnykh organizatsii = International Organisations Research Journal, 2019, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 212– 237. DOI: 10.17323/1996-7845-2019-02-10.Borgesius F. J. Z. The right to communications confidentiality in Europe: protecting privacy, freedom of expression, and trust / F. J. Z. Borgesius, W. Steenbruggen // Theoretical Inquiries in Law. – 2019. – Vol. 20, iss. 1. – P. 291–322. – DOI: 10.1515/til-2019-0010.Borgesius F.J.Z., Steenbruggen W. The right to communications confidentiality in Europe: Protecting privacy, freedom of expression, and trust. Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 2019, vol. 20, iss. 1, pp. 291–322. DOI: 10.1515/til-2019-0010.Malone M. Comparing Canada’s proposed Critical Cyber Systems Protection Act with cybersecurity legal requirements in the EU / M. Malone, R. Walton // International Cybersecurity Law Review. – 2023. – Vol. 4, iss. 2. – P. 165–196. – DOI: 10.1365/s43439-023-00082-1.Malone M., Walton R. Comparing Canada’s proposed Critical Cyber Systems Protection Act with cybersecurity legal requirements in the EU. International Cybersecurity Law Review, 2023, vol. 4, iss. 2, pp. 165–196. DOI: 10.1365/s43439-023-00082-1.Kulczycka J. Challenges in the management of data on extractive waste — the Polish case / J. Kulczycka, E. Dziobek, A. Szmiłyk // Mineral Economics. – 2020. – Vol. 33, iss. 3. – P. 341–347. – DOI: 10.1007/s13563-019-00203-5.Kulczycka J., Dziobek E., Szmiłyk A. Challenges in the management of data on extractive waste – the Polish case. Mineral Economics, 2020, vol. 33, iss. 3, pp. 341–347. DOI: 10.1007/s13563-019-00203-5.Woźniak E. Bioeconomy development factors in the European Union and Poland / E. Woźniak, A. Tyczewska, T. Twardowski // New Biotechnology. – 2021. – Vol. 60. – P. 2–8. – DOI: 10.1016/j.nbt.2020.07.004.Woźniak E., Tyczewska A., Twardowski T. Bioeconomy development factors in the European Union and Poland. New Biotechnology, 2021, vol. 60, pp. 2–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.nbt.2020.07.004.Chugunov D.K. Comprehension of the EU Political and Legal Development / D. K. Chugunov, R. A. Kasyanov, M. A. Evdokimov // Kutafin Law Review. – 2023. – Vol. 9, iss. 4. – P. 713–739. – DOI: 10.17803/2313-5395.2022.4.22.713-739.Chugunov D.K., Kasyanov R.A., Evdokimov M.A. Comprehension of the EU Political and Legal Development. Kutafin Law Review, 2022, vol. 9, iss. 4, pp. 713–739. DOI: 10.17803/2313-5395.2022.4.22.713-739.Dar W. The investor-state arbitration legitimacy crisis: Could AI be its future savior (or resurrector)? / W. Dar, B. Praštalo // Pravni zapisi. – 2023. – Vol. 14, br. 1. – S. 21–58. – DOI: 10.5937/pravzap1-43940.Dar W., Praštalo B. The investor-state arbitration legitimacy crisis: Could AI be its future savior (or resurrector)?. Pravni zapisi, 2023, vol. 14, iss. 1, pp. 21–58. DOI: 10.5937/pravzap1-43940.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.