<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">pravo</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Правоприменение</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Law Enforcement Review</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2542-1514</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2658-4050</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Dostoevsky Omsk State University</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24147/2542-1514.2017.1(3).143-149</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">pravo-106</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ПРИМЕНЕНИЕ НОРМ ПРАВА СУДЕБНЫМИ ОРГАНАМИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>THE LAW ENFORCEMENT BY THE JUDGES</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Судебное разбирательство без спора о праве? Замечания об особом производстве в Италии</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Jurisdiction without conflict? Remarks on non-adverse proceedings in Italy</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Сильвестри</surname><given-names>Э.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Silvestri</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Доктор юридических наук, професор кафедры гражданского процессуального права</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Doctor Law, Associate Professor,Department of Civil Procedure</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">elosabettasilvestri@unipv.it</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Университет Павии</institution><country>Италия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>University of Pavia</institution><country>Italy</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2017</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>03</day><month>10</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>1</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>143</fpage><lpage>149</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Сильвестри Э., 2017</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2017</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Сильвестри Э.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Silvestri E.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://enforcement.omsu.ru/jour/article/view/106">https://enforcement.omsu.ru/jour/article/view/106</self-uri><abstract><p>В данной статье описана процедура особого производства в Италии. После краткогоисторического анализа эволюции концепции особого производства в Италии рассматривается широкий спектр вопросов, касающихся особого производства и урегулированных Гражданским процессуальным кодексом Италии. В статье также анализируется процедура «in chambers», которая является более простой и требует меньше времени, чем обычный порядок судебного разбирательства. По этим причинам процедура «in chambers» применяется все чаще для судебного рассмотрения дел, связанных со спорами о праве, с неочевидными результатами. Относительно вопросов, в которых отсутствует спор о праве, в свете пресловутой перегрузки итальянских судов автор считает, что административные органы могут разрешать их более эффективно.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The subject. This essay describes the procedural treatment of non-contentious matters inItaly. After a brief historical recount on the evolution of the concept of ‘non-contentiousjurisdiction’, from Roman law to the law in force, the chapter emphasizes the extreme varietyof non-adverse proceedings governed by the Code of civil procedure and special statutesas well.The purpose of the article is to understand the ‘default rules’ of non-adverse proceedings(meaning the rules applicable insofar as the law does not ordain otherwise) provided by theCode of civil procedure. These rules outline a procedure in chambers that is simpler andless time-consuming than the ordinary one: for these reasons, the procedure in chambershas been increasingly adopted for the judicial treatment of a few contentious matters, withmixed results.Methodology. The methodological basis for the study: general scientific methods (analysis,synthesis, comparison, description); private and academic (comparative legal, interpretation,formal-legal).Results. It is difficult to foresee whether in the near future more attention will be devotedby Italian legislators to non-contentious jurisdiction so as to lay down rules that are uniformand consistent. In recent decades, Italian civil procedure has been re-written again andagain in the attempt to solve the most serious and enduring problem of the justice system,namely, the excessive length of proceedings.Conclusions. As far as non-contentious matters, in light of the notorious overload of Italiancourts the author believes that they could be handles more efficiently by administrativeauthorities.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Гражданский процесс</kwd><kwd>производство</kwd><kwd>спор о праве</kwd><kwd>упрощенное производство</kwd><kwd>Италия</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Civil procedure</kwd><kwd>non-contentious</kwd><kwd>jurisdiction</kwd><kwd>issue of law</kwd><kwd>nonadverse proceedings</kwd><kwd>Italy</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fernández de Bujan A. Diferencias entre los actos de iurisdictio contenciosa y los actos de la denominadaiurisdictio voluntaria en derecho romano, in: Edtudios de derecho romano en honor de Alvaro d’Ors. Pamplona, Ediciones Universidad de Navarra Publ., 1987, pp. 427–455.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fernández de Bujan A. Diferencias entre los actos de iurisdictio contenciosa y los actos de la denominadaiurisdictio voluntaria en derecho romano, in: Edtudios de derecho romano en honor de Alvaro d’Ors. Pamplona, Ediciones Universidad de Navarra Publ., 1987, pp. 427–455.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Giuseppe I. Premesse di metodo: i cosiddetti rimedi pretori, in: Giuseppe I. Il problema d’origine del processo extra ordinem. Bologna, Patron Publ., 1965, pp. 137–141.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Giuseppe I. Premesse di metodo: i cosiddetti rimedi pretori, in: Giuseppe I. Il problema d’origine del processo extra ordinem. Bologna, Patron Publ., 1965, pp. 137–141.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Solazzi S. “Iurisdictio contentiosa” e “voluntaria” nelle fonti romane, in: Scritti di diritto romano, III. Napoli, Jovene Publ., 1972, pp. 163–197.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Solazzi S. “Iurisdictio contentiosa” e “voluntaria” nelle fonti romane, in: Scritti di diritto romano, III. Napoli, Jovene Publ., 1972, pp. 163–197.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Denti V. La giurisdizione volontaria rivisitata, Rivista trimestrale di diritto e procedura civile, 1987, pp. 325–329.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Denti V. La giurisdizione volontaria rivisitata, Rivista trimestrale di diritto e procedura civile, 1987, pp. 325–329.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cerino Canova A. Per la chiarezza di idee in tema di procedimento camerale e di giurisdizione volontaria, Rivista di diritto civile, 1987, I, pp. 431–485.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cerino Canova A. Per la chiarezza di idee in tema di procedimento camerale e di giurisdizione volontaria, Rivista di diritto civile, 1987, I, pp. 431–485.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fazzalari E. Giurisdizione volontaria (diritto processuale civile), in: Enciclopedia del diritto, XIX. Milano: Giuffrè Editore Publ., 1970, pp. 330–381.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fazzalari E. Giurisdizione volontaria (diritto processuale civile), in: Enciclopedia del diritto, XIX. Milano: Giuffrè Editore Publ., 1970, pp. 330–381.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Andrioli V. Diritto processuale civile, I. Napoli, Jovene Publ., 1979. 1021 pp.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Andrioli V. Diritto processuale civile, I. Napoli, Jovene Publ., 1979. 1021 pp.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Saredo G. Del procedimento in camera di consiglio e specialmente per gli atti di volontaria giurisdizione, 2nd edn., Napoli, Libreria Nuova Publ., 1874, pp. 29–31.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Saredo G. Del procedimento in camera di consiglio e specialmente per gli atti di volontaria giurisdizione, 2nd edn., Napoli, Libreria Nuova Publ., 1874, pp. 29–31.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Laudisa L. Camera di consiglio – I) Procedimenti in camera di consiglio – Diritto processuale civile, in: Enciclopedia Giuridica Treccani, VI. Roma, Istituto della Enciclopedia Italiana Publ., 2002, pp. 1–17.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Laudisa L. Camera di consiglio – I) Procedimenti in camera di consiglio – Diritto processuale civile, in: Enciclopedia Giuridica Treccani, VI. Roma, Istituto della Enciclopedia Italiana Publ., 2002, pp. 1–17.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Arieta, G. Procedimenti in camera di consiglio, in: Digesto delle discipline privatistiche – Sezione civile, XIV. Torino, UTET Publ., 1996, pp. 435–459.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Arieta, G. Procedimenti in camera di consiglio, in: Digesto delle discipline privatistiche – Sezione civile, XIV. Torino, UTET Publ., 1996, pp. 435–459.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Civinini M.G. I procedimenti in camera di consiglio, I. Torino, UTET Publ., 1994. 949 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Civinini M.G. I procedimenti in camera di consiglio, I. Torino, UTET Publ., 1994. 949 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Silvestri E. Commento all’articolo 720 bis, in: Carpi, F., Taruffo, M. (eds.). Commentario breve al codice di procedura civile, 7th edn. Padova, CEDAM Publ., 2012, pp. 2605–2612.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Silvestri E. Commento all’articolo 720 bis, in: Carpi, F., Taruffo, M. (eds.). Commentario breve al codice di procedura civile, 7th edn. Padova, CEDAM Publ., 2012, pp. 2605–2612.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Graziosi, A. (ed.). I processi di separazione e di divorzio, 2nd edn. Torino, Giappichelli Editore Publ., 2011. 502 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Graziosi, A. (ed.). I processi di separazione e di divorzio, 2nd edn. Torino, Giappichelli Editore Publ., 2011. 502 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Carratta A. Processo camerale (diritto processuale civile), in: Enciclopedia del diritto, Annali, III. Milano, Giuffrè Editore Publ., 2010, pp. 928–959.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Carratta A. Processo camerale (diritto processuale civile), in: Enciclopedia del diritto, Annali, III. Milano, Giuffrè Editore Publ., 2010, pp. 928–959.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Silvestri, E. The Never-Ending Reform of Italian Civil Justice. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1903863.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Silvestri, E. The Never-Ending Reform of Italian Civil Justice. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1903863.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
