<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">pravo</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Правоприменение</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Law Enforcement Review</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2542-1514</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2658-4050</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Dostoevsky Omsk State University</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24147/2542-1514.2017.1(4).66-74</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">pravo-123</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ПРИМЕНЕНИЕ НОРМ ПРАВА ОРГАНАМИ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОЙ ВЛАСТИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>THE LAW ENFORCEMENT BY PUBLIC AUTHORITIES</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>ВЛИЯНИЕ ИНТЕРНАЦИОНАЛИЗАЦИИ НАЛОГОВОГО ПРАВА НА РОССИЙСКОЕ ПРАВОПРИМЕНЕНИЕ В СФЕРЕ КОРПОРАТИВНОГО НАЛОГООБЛОЖЕНИЯ</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>INFLUENCE OF INTERNATIONALIZATION OF TAX LAW ON RUSSIAN TAX LAW ENFORCEMENT IN THE AREA OF CORPORATE TAXATION</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Пономарева</surname><given-names>К. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Ponomareva</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Кандидат юридических наук, старший преподаватель кафедры государственного и муниципального права</p><p>ResearcherID: N-7562-2016</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>PhD in Law, Assistant Professor, Department of State and Municipal Law</p><p>ResearcherID: N-7562-2016</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">karinaponomareva@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Омский государственный университет им. Ф.М. Достоевского, г. Омск, Россия</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Dostoevsky Omsk State University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2017</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>09</day><month>01</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><volume>1</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>66</fpage><lpage>74</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Пономарева К.А., 2018</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2018</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Пономарева К.А.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Ponomareva K.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://enforcement.omsu.ru/jour/article/view/123">https://enforcement.omsu.ru/jour/article/view/123</self-uri><abstract><p>Рассматриваются тенденции правового регулирования отношений в сфере корпоративного налогообложения с участием иностранного элемента. Выделены основные вопросы, связанные с реализацией норм, регулирующих налогообложение прибыли юридических лиц: налогообложение выплаты роялти, долгового финансирования и внутригрупповых расходов, применение правил тонкой (недостаточной) капитализации, трансфертное ценообразование. Делается вывод о росте роли решений судов, особенно высших судебных инстанций. Наиболее актуальными и вызывающими наибольшее число споров с налоговыми органами вопросами являются налогообложение выплаты роялти, долгового финансирования и внутригрупповых расходов.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><sec><title>Subject</title><p>Subject. The influence of internationalization of tax law on Russian tax law enforcement in the area of corporate taxation is considered in the article.The purpose of the paper is to analyze influence of internationalization of tax law on Russian tax law enforcement in the area of corporate taxation.Methodology. The author uses methods of theoretical analysis, particularly the theory of integrative legal consciousness, as well as legal methods, including formal legal method and methods of comparative law.Results, scope of application. The development of Russian tax legislation is influenced by acts of international organizations, primarily the Action Plan aimed at combating base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS).Trends of regulation of corporate taxation in relationships with participation of a foreign element are considered in the article. The main issues of realization of norms in the area of corporate direct taxation are brought into light, and namely, taxation of royalties, intra-group expenses, thin capitalization rules and transfer pricing. Tax agreements concluded by the Russian Federation do not contain special rules aimed at combating abuses (in contrast, for example, from European anti-avoidance rules).In recent years Russian tax law introduced institutions that had been established and applied in the tax law of foreign countries. These processes are moving forward and are characterized by frequent changes of legislation, which indicates that the concept of deoffshorization and implementation of the BEPS plan is not always elaborated at the stage of adoption of bills.</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusions</title><p>Conclusions. The author comes to the conclusion that the most relevant and most controversial issues are taxation of payment of royalties, debt financing and intra-group expenses. The practice of applying the CFC rules is just starts forming. In addition, there is a tendency to increase the quality and quantity of information sources used by tax authorities to collect evidence, including the expansion of the practice of information exchange.</p></sec></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Налоговое право</kwd><kwd>прямые налоги</kwd><kwd>налог на прибыль</kwd><kwd>правоприменение</kwd><kwd>судебная практика</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Tax law</kwd><kwd>direct taxes</kwd><kwd>corporate income tax</kwd><kwd>law enforcement</kwd><kwd>judicial practice</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><funding-statement xml:lang="ru">Исследование выполнено при финансовой поддержке РФФИ в рамках проекта проведения научных иссле-дований «Правовой режим прямого налогообложения в интеграционных объединениях (опыт Европейского Союза и Евразийского экономического союза)», проект № 17-03-50091.</funding-statement></funding-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Килинкарова Е.В. Налоговое право зарубежных стран: учебник / Е.В. Килинкарова. – М.: Юрайт, 2015. – 354 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kilinkarova E.V. Tax law of foreign countries. Moscow, Yurait Publ., 2015. 354 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Савицкий А.И. Налоговая дискриминация и налоговые льготы / А.И. Савицкий // Налоговед. – 2013. – № 3. – C. 28–37.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Savitskiy A.I. Tax discrimination and tax exemptions. Nalogoved, 2013, no. 3, pp. 28–37. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Хаванова И.А. О теории экономического анализа в налоговом праве (концептуальные основы) / И.А. Хаванова // Журнал российского права. – 2015. – № 5. – С. 111–124.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Khavanova I.A. On Economic Analysis Theory in Fiscal Law (Conceptual Framework). Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2015, no. 5, pp. 111–124. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Зарипов В.М. Кризис концепции налоговой выгоды / В.М. Зарипов // Налоговед. – 2015. – № 6. – С. 18–31.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zaripov V.M. The crisis of concept of tax benefit. Nalogoved, 2015, no. 6, pp. 18–31. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Копина А.А. Налоговый контроль в связи с совершением сделок между взаимозависимыми лицами vs получение необоснованной налоговой выгоды / А.А. Копина // Налоги. – 2016. – № 9. – С. 10–17.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kopina A.A. Tax control in connection with deals between interdependent persons vs. groundless tax benefit. Nalogi = Taxes (Newspaper), 2016, no. 9, pp. 10–17. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Сасов К.А. Обоснованность налоговой выгоды: кризис доктрины или крушение права? / К.А. Сасов // Налоговед. – 2016. – № 11. – С. 24–33.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sasov.A. Validity of tax benefit: crisis of the doctrine or crash of the law? Nalogoved, 2016, no. 11, pp. 313–317. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Зарипов В.М. Налоговая выгода: выше плинтуса / В.М. Зарипов // Zakon.ru – первая социальная сеть для юристов. – 2017. – 20 июля. – URL: https://zakon.ru/blog/2017/6/20/nalogovaya_vygoda_vyshe_plintusa (дата обращения: 28.06.2017).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zaripov V.M. To the issue of tax benefit. Zakon.ru, June 20, 2017. Available at: https://zakon.ru/blog/2017/6/20/nalogovaya_vygoda_vyshe_plintusa. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Завязочникова М.В. Вопросы налогообложения международных компаний в практике российских арбитражных судов / М.В. Завязочникова // Налоговед. – 2013. – № 11. – С. 48–49.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zavyazochnikova M.V. Issues of taxation of international companies in practice of Russian arbitration courts. Nalogoved, 2013, no. 11, pp. 48–49. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Владимирова Т.В. О применении правил недостаточной капитализации к займам между российскими компаниями / Т.В. Владимирова, А.А. Амбрасовская // Налоговед. – 2016. – № 5. – С. 30–41.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vladimirova T.V., Ambrasovskaya A.A. To enforcement of thin capitalization rules to loans between Russian companies. Nalogoved, 2016, no. 5, pp. 30–41. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
