pravoПравоприменениеLaw Enforcement Review2542-15142658-4050Dostoevsky Omsk State University10.24147/2542-1514.2019.3(1).108-118pravo-217Research ArticleПРИМЕНЕНИЕ НОРМ ПРАВА СУДЕБНЫМИ ОРГАНАМИTHE LAW ENFORCEMENT BY THE JUDGESЭффективность противодействия преступности в сфере правосудия путем применения наказанияCombating crime in the sphere of justice: effectiveness of punishmenthttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6942-7059КлейменовМихаил ПетровичKleymenovMikhail P.

доктор юридических наук, профессор, заслуженный деятель науки Российской Федерации, заведующий кафедрой уголовного права и криминологии. SPIN‐код: 4431‐6452; AuthorID: 596245.

Doctor of Law, Professor, Honoured Scientist of the Russian Federation, Head,

klim798@mail.ruИвановЕвгений СергеевичIvanovEvgeniy S.

соискатель кафедры уголовного права и криминологии

applicant for PhD degree, Department of Criminal Law and Criminology

jf-omsu@mail.ruОмский государственный университет им. Ф.М. Достоевского, г. ОмскРоссияDostoevsky Omsk State University, OmskRussian Federation20192604201931Правоприменение108118Copyright © Клейменов М.П., Иванов Е.С., 20192019Клейменов М.П., Иванов Е.С.Kleymenov M.P., Ivanov E.S.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://enforcement.omsu.ru/jour/article/view/217

На основе концепции уголовно‐правового реагирования характеризуется практика назначения наказания за четыре группы преступлений в сфере правосудия: угрожающих безопасности правосудия, подрывающих его справедливость, препятствующих обоснованному вынесению судебных решений и их исполнению. Выявлены различные модели уголовно‐правового реагирования на отдельные категории преступлений, определены возможности коррекции судебной практики.

The subject. The system of crimes against justice includes four groups of acts, each of which encroaches on a separate group of public relations: crimes that threaten the security of justice, crimes that undermine its justice, crimes that prevent the reasonable adjudication and crimes that execution of judicial decisions.The purpose of the paper is to confirm or refute the hypothesis that the criminal legal response in Russia to groups of crimes in the sphere of justice is not adequate to the degree of their social danger.The methodology. The concept of criminal legal response was chosen as a methodological basis for the analysis of the practice of sentencing. This concept highlights the following types of criminal legal response: lack of response; very weak response – the number of convicts does not exceed 10; weak response – the number of convicts is small, calculated in dozens; adequate response – the number of convicts and penalties correspond to the criminological characteristics of the crime; intensive response – the inevitability of punishment is ensured by the enforcement of rules; punitive response – the norm is applied on the basis of the "letter, not the spirit" of the law; reflexive response – the imposition of punishment "their" in conditions of increased public attention, "resonance" of the case; protest response – judicial practice is in conflict with ill‐conceived legislative innovations.The main results and scope of their application. The weakest, very weak criminal‐legal response or complete absence of criminal‐legal response in the sphere of justice is the most typical in Russia. It is explained by various factors, and the professional lack of competence and the motive of “protection of the honor of the uniform” appear most frequent. The criminal‐legal impact is punitive in relation to the insult of public officer (art. 319 of the Russian Criminal Code). Criminal liability for insulting a public officer is anachronism in the context of full or partial decriminalization of insults in general (art. 130 of the Russian Criminal Code) and beatings (art. 116 of the Russian Criminal Code).Conclusion. The purpose of the study is reached the hypothesis is confirmed partially – in relation to the inadequacy of criminal penalties for insulting a public officer. Decriminalization of art. 319 of the Russian Criminal Code is necessary. Save it in the current Criminal Сode leads to a "witch hunt", in addition to receiving a criminal record every year by thousands of people (that stain not only their biography but also biography of their loved ones). There is art. 5.61 "Insult" in Russian Code of administrative offences. It is proposed to supplement art. 5.61 of the Code of administrative offences of the fourth part: "insulting a public officer during the performance of their official duties" simultaneously with the de‐ criminalization of art. 319 of the Criminal Code.

Преступность в сфере правосудияуголовно‐правовое реагированиерефлексивное реагированиекарательное реагированиепротестное реагированиеоскорблениеоскорбление представителя властидекриминализация оскорбленияобщественная опасностьСrime in the sphere of justicecriminal‐legal reactionreflexive reactionpunitive reactionprotest reactioninsultinsulting a public officerdecriminalization of insultsocial dangerReferencesКлеймёнов И.М. Уголовно‐правовое реагирование / И.М. Клеймёнов // Вестник Омского университета. Серия «Право». – 2016. – № 3 (48). – С. 192–200.Kleymenov I. The criminal legal reaction, its forms and types. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya “Pravo” = Herald of Omsk University. Series “Law”, 2016, no. 3 (48), pp. 192–200. (In Russ.).Minnaar A. The Use of Informers: an Essential Tool in the Fight Against Crime? / A. Minnaar // Southern African Journal of Criminology. – 2011. – № 3 (24). – P. 83–97.Minnaar A. The Use of Informers: an Essential Tool in the Fight Against Crime? Southern African Journal of Criminology, 2011, no. 3 (24), pp. 83–97.Леонтьев А.В. О проблемах эффективности защиты прав человека при проверке заявлений о пытках / А.В. Леонтьев // Адвокат. – 2014. – № 3. – C. 56–61.Leontev A.V. On problems of efficiency of the defence of human rights when examination of claims of torture. Advokat, 2014, no. 3, pp. 56–61. (In Russ.).Лобанова Л.В. Малозначительность деяния: абстрактность законодательного регулирования и трудности правоохранительной реализации / Л.В. Лобанова, А.П. Рожнов // Законность. – 2016. – № 6. – С. 46–50.Lobanova L.V., Rozhnov A.P. A misdemeanor: abstractedness of legislative regulation and difficulties in law‐ enforcement implementation. Zakonnost’, 2016, no. 6, pp. 46–50. (In Russ.).Багаутдинов Ф.Н. Провокация граждан к даче взятки / Ф.Н. Багаутдинов // Законность. – 2011. – № 3. – С. 31–35.Bagautdinov F.N. Provocation of citizens to give a bribe. Zakonnost’, 2011, no. 3, pp. 31–35. (In Russ.).Зенкин А.Н. Провокация преступления как обстоятельство, исключающее преступность деяния / А.Н. Зенкин // Законность. – 2015. – № 6. – С. 26–31.Zenkin A.N. Incitement of crimeasa circumstance excluding criminality of an act. Zakonnost’, 2015, no. 6, pp. 26–31. (In Russ.).Теоретические основы исследования и анализа латентной преступности / под ред. С.М. Иншакова. – М.: ЮНИТИ‐ДАНА: Закон и право, 2011. – 839 c.Inshakov S.M. (ed.). Theoretical bases of research and analysis of latent crime. Moscow, YuNITY‐DANA Publ., Zakon i pravo Publ., 2011. 839 p. (In Russ.).Бабурин В.В. Объективная сторона заранее не обещанного укрывательства преступлений против собственности / В.В. Бабурин, Д.А. Мурин // Законы России: опыт, анализ, практика. – 2016. – № 6. – С. 7–11.Baburin V.V., Murin D.A. The Objective Side Obviously Not Promised Concealment of Crimes Against Property. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika, 2016, no. 6, pp. 7–11. (In Russ.).Радченко А.А. Актуальные вопросы квалификации преступления, предусмотренного ст. 308 УК РФ / А.А. Радченко // Уголовное право. – 2015. – № 6. – С. 40–48.Radchenko A.A. Topical issues of classification of crime defined by article 308 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Ugolovnoe pravo = Criminal Law, 2015, no. 6, pp. 40–48. (In Russ.).Быков В.М. Права потерпевшего в уголовном судопроизводстве России / В.М. Быков // Российская юстиция. – 2015. – № 7. – С. 42–46.Bykov V.M. Rights of victims in criminal proceedings of Russia. Rossiiskaya yustitsiya = Russian Justitia, 2015, no. 7, pp. 42–46. (In Russ.).Барах‐Чайка М. Не прокаженные, но неприкасаемые / М. Барах‐Чайка // ЭЖ‐Юрист. – 2015. – № 35. – С. 1, 3.Barakh‐Chaika M. Lepers, but the untouchables. EZh‐Yurist, 2015, no. 35, pp. 1, 3. (In Russ.).Филиппов П.А. Преступления против порядка управления: теоретико‐прикладные проблемы и доктринальная модель уголовного закона: дис. … д‐ра юрид. наук / П.А. Филиппов. – М., 2017. – 621 c.Filippov P.A. Crimes against the order of management: theoretical and applied problems and doctrinal model of criminal law, Doct. Diss. Moscow, 2017. 621 p. (In Russ.).Олейникова Е.А. Противодействие экстремизму в сети Интернет / Е.А. Олейникова // Законность. – 2016. – № 5. – С. 6–9.Oleynikova E.A. Combating extremism on the Internet. Zakonnost’, 2016, no. 5, pp. 6–9. (In Russ.).

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.