<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">pravo</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Правоприменение</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Law Enforcement Review</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2542-1514</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2658-4050</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Dostoevsky Omsk State University</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24147/2542-1514.2019.3(3).125-134</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">pravo-254</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ПРИМЕНЕНИЕ НОРМ ПРАВА СУДЕБНЫМИ ОРГАНАМИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>THE LAW ENFORCEMENT BY THE JUDGES</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Судебное административное процессуальное право v. административное судебное право</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Judicial administrative procedural law v. administrative judicial law</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Терехова</surname><given-names>Лидия Александровна</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Terekhova</surname><given-names>Lydia A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>доктор юридических наук, профессор, Почетный работник Высшей школы, заведующая кафедрой гражданского и арбитражного процесса</p><p>РИНЦ SPIN-код: 1478-7958; AuthorID: 678373</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Doctor of Law, Professor, Honoured worker of Higher education, Head, Department of Civil and Arbitrary Procedure</p><p>RSCI SPIN-code: 1478-7958; AuthorID: 678373</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">lydia@civpro.info</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru">Омский государственный университет им. Ф.М. Достоевского, г. Омск<country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en">Dostoevsky Omsk State University, Omsk<country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2019</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>06</day><month>11</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>3</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>125</fpage><lpage>134</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Терехова Л.А., 2019</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2019</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Терехова Л.А.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Terekhova L.A.</copyright-holder><license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://enforcement.omsu.ru/jour/article/view/254">https://enforcement.omsu.ru/jour/article/view/254</self-uri><abstract><p>Рассматривается поэтапное движение законодательства и научной мысли от неупорядоченного выделения «административных» дел, рассматриваемых судом, к единым процессуальным правилам. Обосновывается авторская точка зрения, что полярные мнения в науке, в совокупности с противоречивыми и непоследовательными действиями законодателя, в настоящее время не позволяют утверждать о наличии новой отрасли права, предметом которой стало бы рассмотрение различных административных дел. Одного лишь законодательного шага – принятия Кодекса административного судопроизводства – при существующей терминологической путанице, неопределенности с предметом и методами регулирования, недостаточно для утверждения новой отрасли права.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><sec><title>The subject</title><p>The subject. The paper deals with the search for the place of judicial administrative procedural law in the system of Russian law.</p><p>The purpose of the paper is to identify is the judicial administrative procedural law an independent branch of Russian law.</p></sec><sec><title>Methodology</title><p>Methodology. The author uses the methods of analysis and synthesis, as well as dialectic approach. The formal-legal interpretation of the Code of Administrative Proceedings, the Code of Administrative Offences, the Commercial Procedure Code, the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation and is also used.</p><p>The main results and scope of their application. The adoption of the Code of Administrative Proceedings in Russia in 2015 revealed many problems in science and legislation. A legislative decision to adopt the Code of Administrative Proceedings is considered as a political decision taken without a proper scientific basis and contrary to established scientific doctrine. Definitions of such basic concepts as "administrative process", "administrative dispute", "administrative justice", and others have not been developed in the period up to 2015 and to date, There is a mention of "administrative legal proceedings" as one of the types, along with civil, criminal and constitutional types of legal proceedings, in the Constitution of the Russian Federation. But administrative procedural legislation is referred to the joint jurisdiction of the Russian Federation and the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, in contrast to other procedural laws, in the Constitution of the Russian Federation. </p><p>       Representatives of the science of civil procedural law, with reference to legal theorists, called judicial administrative procedural law (which is referred to the Code of Administrative Proceedings) the secondary formation, a sub - branch of the fundamental (profiling) branch of civil procedural law. The purpose of judicial administrative procedural law – enforcement of substantive law and conflict resolution in the field of administrative and other public relations. It is noted that the public-legal dispute is not limited to the interaction of the citizen with the executive power. Civil procedural regulation of judicial review of cases arising from public relations is a procedural mechanism of judicial protection of constitutional rights, freedoms and legitimate interests. The Code of Administrative Proceedings lowers the status of cases arising from public legal relations to the status of cases arising from administrative legal relations.</p><p>       Representatives of the science of administrative law and procedure, on the contrary, believe that the adoption of the Code of Administrative Proceedings becomes the final act in the formation of a new branch of law – administrative judicial law, although it is a political decision and it’s rules are practically copied from the Civil Procedure Code. At the same time, it is recognized that the Code of Administrative Proceedings needs scientific support, which still needs to be created. An alarming factor is the fact that some scientists propose to include cases concerning imposition of administrative sanctions in the this forming branch of law, although it mixes in fact disputes between individuals and a public entity and imposition of administrative sanctions to the offender by the court.</p></sec></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Административное правоотношение</kwd><kwd>административное судопроизводство</kwd><kwd>административное судебное право</kwd><kwd>административный процесс</kwd><kwd>судебное административное процессуальное право</kwd><kwd>возникающее из публичных правоотношений производство</kwd><kwd>административное правонарушение</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Administrative legal relation</kwd><kwd>administrative proceedings</kwd><kwd>administrative judicial law</kwd><kwd>administrative procedure</kwd><kwd>judicial administrative procedural law</kwd><kwd>proceedings arising from public relations</kwd><kwd>administrative offense</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Дегтярев С.Л. Особенности правоприменения по делам об административном надзоре в гражданском процессе / С.Л. Дегтярев // Арбитражный и гражданский процесс. – 2014. – № 10. – С. 15–20.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Degtyarev S.L. Peculiarities of law-application on cases of administrative supervision and civil procedure. Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess = Arbitrazh and Civil Procedure, 2014, no. 10, pp. 15–20. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шлютер М.С. Административная ответственность за правонарушения в области охраны недр и недропользования / М.С. Шлютер. – М.: Проспект, 2015. – 136 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shlyuter M.S. Administrative responsibility for offenses in the field of subsoil protection and subsoil use. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2015. 136 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Никитин С.В. Проблемы реформирования законодательства об административной ответственности юридических лиц в сфере экономической деятельности / С.В. Никитин // Закон. – 2016. – № 3. – С. 102–108.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nikitin S.V. Problems of reforming the legislation on administrative liability of legal entities in the field of economic activity. Zakon, 2016, no. 3, pp. 102–108 . (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Новиков А.В. Административно-процессуальная форма: научные и правовые реалии / А.В. Новиков // Административное право и процесс. – 2015. – № 11. – С. 70–80.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Novikov A.V. Administrative and Procedural Form: Scientific and Legal Reality. Administrativnoe pravo i protsess = Administrative Law and Procedure, 2015, no. 11, pp. 70–80. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Рясина Н. Двуликий Янус / Н. Рясина // ЭЖ-Юрист. – 2015. – № 9. – С. 3.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ryasina N. Janus. Ezh-Yurist, 2015, no. 9, p. 3. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Гречкина О.В. Развитие научных идей должно основываться на модернизации современного административного процессуального законодательства / О.В. Гречкина // Административное право и процесс. – 2018. – № 9. – С. 7–10.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Grechkina O.V. The Development of Scientific Ideas Should Be Based on Modernization of the Modern Administrative Procedure Legislation. Administrativnoe pravo i protsess = Administrative Law and Procedure, 2018, no. 9, pp. 7–10. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Майоров В.И. О становлении административного судебного права в РФ / В.И. Майоров // Административное и муниципальное право. – 2016. – № 10. – С. 854–858. – DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2016.10.20530.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mayorov V.I. On the formation of administrative judicial law in the Russian Federation. Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo = Administrative and municipal law, 2016, no. 10, pp. 854–858. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2016.10.20530. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Старилов Ю.Н. Административное судопроизводство и административные процедуры: к системному взаимодействию и надлежащему уровню правовой регламентации / Ю.Н. Старилов // Административное право и процесс. – 2018. – № 3. – С. 7–23.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Starilov Yu.N. Administrative Proceedings and Administrative Procedures: on Systemic Interaction and Due Level of Legal Regulation. Administrativnoe pravo i protsess = Administrative Law and Procedure, 2018, no. 3, pp. 7–23. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Административное судопроизводство: учебник / под ред. В.В. Яркова. – М.: Статут, 2016. – 516 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yarkov V.V. (ed.). Administrative proceedings. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2016. 516 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Сахнова Т.В. Административное судопроизводство: проблемы самоидентификации / Т.В. Сахнова // Арбитражный и гражданский процесс. – 2016. – № 9. – С. 35–40.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sakhnova T.V. Administrative Judicial Procedure: Problems of Self-Identification. Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess = Arbitrazh and Civil Procedure, 2016, no. 9, pp. 35–40. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Боннер А.Т. Административное судопроизводство в Российской Федерации: миф или реальность, или спор процессуалиста с административистом / А.Т. Боннер // Закон. – 2016. – № 7. – С. 24–51.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bonner A.T. Administrative proceedings in the Russian Federation: myth or reality, or the dispute between the processualist and the administrationist. Zakon, 2016, no. 7, pp. 24–51. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Carlos de Araujio Cintra A., Pellegrini Grinover A., Rangel Dinamarco C. Teoria Geral do Processo. – 31 ed. – Sao Paulo, Brasil, 2015. – 478 p. – URL: https://forumdeconcursos.com/wp-content/uploads/wpforo/ attachments/34777/1879-TEORIA-GERAL-DO-PROCESSO-31a-ED-2015-1-Candido-Rangel-DINAMARCO.pdf.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Carlos de Araujio Cintra A., Pellegrini Grinover A., Rangel Dinamarco C. Teoria Geral do Processo [General Process Theory], 31st ed. São Paulo, Brazil, 2015. 478 p. Available at: https://forumdeconcursos.com/wp-content/ uploads/wpforo/attachments/34777/1879-TEORIA-GERAL-DO-PROCESSO-31a-ED-2015-1-Candido-Rangel-DINA-MARCO.pdf. (In Portuguese).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Schwartz B. French administrative law and the common-law world / B. Schwartz. – New Jersey: The Lawbook Exchange Ltd., 2006. – 367 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schwartz B. French administrative law and the common-law world. New Jersey, The Lawbook Exchange Ltd., 2006. 367 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Szypszak C. Understanding law for public administration / C. Szypszak. – Sudbury: Jones and Bartlett Publishers, 2011. – xvii, 343 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Szypszak C. Understanding law for public administration. Sudbury, Jones and Bartlett Publ., 2011. xvii + 343 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Comparative administrative law / eds. S. Rose-Ackerman, P.L. Lindseth, B. Emerson. – Cheltenham, Northhampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2017. – xxii, 729 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rose-Ackerman S., Lindset P. L., Emerson B. (eds.). Comparative administrative law. Cheltenham, Northhampton, Edward Elgar Publ., 2017. xxii + 729 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
