pravoПравоприменениеLaw Enforcement Review2542-15142658-4050Dostoevsky Omsk State University10.24147/2542-1514.2019.3(4).5-23pravo-264Research ArticleТЕОРИЯ И ИСТОРИЯ ПРАВОПРИМЕНЕНИЯTHEORY AND HISTORY OF LAW ENFORCEMENTОсновные этапы реципирования римского права в европейскую юриспруденциюThe main stages of Roman law assimilation into European jurisprudencehttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8601-1098МетелевСергей ЕфимовичMetelevSergey E.

доктор экономических наук, кандидат юридических наук, профессор, советник ректора

SPIN-код: 8196-0123, Web of Science ResearcherID: C-7970-2012

Doctor of Economics, PhD in Law, Professor, Rector’s advisor

RSCI SPIN-code: 8196-0123, Web of Science ResearcherID: C-7970-2012

metelev1955@bk.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0778-1511ЗульфугарзадеТеймур ЭльдаровичZulfugarzadeTeymur E.

кандидат юридических наук, доцент, доцент кафедры гражданско-правовых дисциплин

SPIN-код: 1238-3713, Web of Science ResearcherID: K-3752-2012

PhD in Law, Associate Professor; Associate Professor, Department of Civil Law Disciplines

RSCI SPIN-code: 1238-3713, Web of Science ResearcherID: K-3752-2012

zulfugarzade.te@rea.ruОмский государственный университет им. Ф.М. Достоевского, г. ОмскРоссияDostoevsky Omsk State University, OmskRussian FederationРоссийский экономический университет им. Г.В. Плеханова, г. МоскваРоссияPlekhanov Russian University of Economics, MoscowRussian Federation20192412201934Правоприменение523Copyright © Метелев С.Е., Зульфугарзаде Т.Э., 20202020Метелев С.Е., Зульфугарзаде Т.Э.Metelev S.E., Zulfugarzade T.E.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://enforcement.omsu.ru/jour/article/view/264

Предпринята попытка систематизации основных этапов проникновения основ римского права в юридические концепции европейских государств, происходящего с момента их зарождения в конце XII в. до начала их сведения в национальные кодифицированные акты в XVIII в. Отмечается, что в этот период в европейских университетах и других научных школах наблюдалось преобладание преподавания римского права, в том числе Свода гражданского права (Corpus iuris civilis) – Дигестов Юстиниана, ставших основным текстом для проведения юридических исследований. Особое внимание уделено периоду между возникновением первых университетов в странах континентальной Европы и разработкой в XVIII в. национальных кодифицированных правовых актов.

The subject of the article is periodization of the stages of Roman law assimilation into European jurisprudence.

The purpose of the article is to o allocate independent stages of reception of the Roman law by legal science of the European countries.

The methodological basis of research is analysis and interpretation of legal literature devoted to genesis of European jurisprudence. Taking into account that methodology as a specific branch of scientific activity appeared relatively recently, this work is mainly devoted to historical and legal issues of acceptance and subsequent reception of Roman law by European legal science, which in turn means focusing on more easily protected private law, which has a much longer history of formation and development compared to other legal systems.

Results, scope of application. The paper attempts to systematize the main stages of penetration of the foundations of Roman law in the main legal concepts of the European States, occurring from the moment of their origin at the end of the XII century up to the beginning of their unification in the national codified acts in the XVIII century. There was a predominance of teaching of Roman law and, in particular, the Code of civil law (Corpus iuris civilis), – Digests of Justinian, – which became the main text for legal research. The Roman law, however, did not have a complete monopoly, and therefore the paper examines the fundamental conceptual approaches of Canon law and moral theology. Their own systems of legal norms were also developed in Canon law on a completely different basis in compare with Roman law. Those sytems in a critical dialogue with the approaches inherent in Roman law, actually paved the way to natural law, which served as the basis for the creation of modern normative legal acts, including codified ones. The work takes into account the considerable scale of Europe, which influenced the historical development of jurisprudence in its various parts, in connection with which the European legal science existed for centuries until the emergence of national codified legal acts objectively predetermined the need to focus mainly on their own national legal systems. Special attention is paid to the period of time between the emergence of the first universities in continental Europe and the development of national codified legal acts in the XVIII century.

Римское правоюриспруденциярецепцияДигесты Юстинианакодексглоссаторыправовой гуманизместественное правоисторическая школаRoman lawjurisprudencereceptionDigests of Justiniancodeglossatorslegal humanismnatural lawhistorical schoolReferencesWallinga T. The common history of European legal scholarship / T. Wallinga // Erasmus Law Review. – 2011. – Vol. 4, iss. 1. – P. 3–20.Wallinga T. The common history of European legal scholarship. Erasmus Law Review, 2011, vol. 4, iss. 1, pp. 3–20.Бирюков А.А. Рецепция римского частного права и сервитуты в дореволюционной России / А.А. Бирюков // История государства и права. – 2013. – № 15. – С. 12–14.Biryukov А.A. Reception of Roman private law and servitudes in pre-revolutionary Russia. Istoriya gosudarstva i prava = History of State and Law, 2013, no. 15, pp. 12–14. (In Russ.).Lokin J.H.A. Hoofdstukken uit de Europese codificatiegeschiedenis / J.H.A. Lokin, W.J. Zwalve. – The Hague: Boom, 2006. – 490 s.Lokin J.H.A., Zwalve W.J. Hoofdstukken uit de Europese codificatiegeschiedenis [Chapters from the European codification history]. The Hague, Boom Publ., 2006. 490 p. (In Dutch).Schlosser H. Grundzüge der Neueren Privatrechtsgeschichte, Rechtsentwicklungen im europäischen Kontext / H. Schlosser. – Stuttgart: UTB, 2005. – 332 s.Schlosser H. Grundzüge der Neueren Privatrechtsgeschichte, Rechtsentwicklungen im europäischen Kontext [Fundamental features of recent private law history and legal developments in the European context]. Stuttgart, UTB Publ., 2005. 332 p. (In German).Stein P. Regulae iuris. From Juristic Rules to Legal Maxims / P. Stein. – Edinburgh University Press, 1966. – 206 p.Stein P. Regulae iuris. From Juristic Rules to Legal Maxims. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press, 1966. 206 p.Зайцева Л.А. Рецепированное римское право как один из основополагающих источников германского права / Л.А. Зайцева, Л.В. Зайцева // История государства и права. – 2015. – № 18. – С. 14–18.Zaytseva L.A., Zaytseva L.V. Adopted Roman law as one of basic sources of the German law. Istoriya gosudarstva i prava = History of State and Law, 2015, no. 18, pp. 14–18. (In Russ.).Schrage E.J.H. Rechtsquellen aus der Sicht der Glossatoren / E.J.H. Schrage // Iuris vincula. Studi in onore di Mario Talamanca. – Naples: Jovene, 2001. – P. 409–424.Schrage E.J.H. Rechtsquellen aus der Sicht der Glossatoren [Sources of law from the point of view of Glossators], in: Iuris vincula. Studi in onore di Mario Talamanca. Naples, Jovene Publ., 2001, pp. 409–424. (In German).Stelzer W. Zum Scholarenprivileg Friedrich Barbarossa (Authentica «Habita») / W. Stelzer // Deutsches Archiv fur Erforschung des Mittelalters. – 1978. – No. 34. – S. 123–165.Stelzer W. Zum Scholarenprivileg Friedrich Barbarossa (Authentica «Habita») [To The Friedrich Barbarossa’s Scholar's Privilege (Authentica “Habita”)]. Deutsches Archiv fur Erforschung des Mittelalters, 1978, no. 34, pp. 123–165. (In German).Setz W. Lorenzo Vallas Schrift gegen die Konstantinische Schenkung / W. Setz. – Tubingen: Max Niemeyer, 1975. – 262 s.Setz W. Lorenzo Vallas Schrift gegen die Konstantinische Schenkung [Lorenzo Valla's letter against the Constantine’s granting]. Tubingen, Max Niemeyer Publ., 1975. 262 p. (In German).Huizinga J. Abaelard / J. Huizinga // Handelingen en Levensberichten van de Maatschappij der Nederlandsche Letterkunde te Leiden Jaarboek, 1934-1935. – Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1935. – S. 66–82.Huizinga J. Abaelard, in: Handelingen en Levensberichten van de Maatschappij der Nederlandsche Letterkunde te Leiden Jaarboek, 1934-1935. Leiden, E.J. Brill Publ., 1935, pp. 66–82. (In Dutch).Schrage E.J.H. Utrumque Ius. Eine Einführung in das Studium der Quellen des mittelalterlichen gelehrten Rechts / E.J.H. Schrage. – Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1992. – 137 s.Schrage E.J.H. Utrumque Ius. Eine Einführung in das Studium der Quellen des mittelalterlichen gelehrten Rechts [Utrumque Ius. An introduction to the study of the sources of medieval scholar law]. Berlin, Duncker & Humblot Publ., 1992. 137 p. (In German).Duynstee M. L’enseignement du droit civil à l’université d’Orléans du début de la guerre de cent ans (1337) au siège de la ville (1428) / M. Duynstee. – Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostermann, 2010. – 253 p.Duynstee M. L’enseignement du droit civil à l’université d’Orléans du début de la guerre de cent ans (1337) au siège de la ville (1428) [The teaching of civil law at the University of Orléans from the beginning of the Hundred Years War (1337) to the siege of the city (1428)]. Frankfurt, Vittorio Klostermann Publ., 2010. 253 p. (In French).Soetermeer F.P.W. Utrumque ius in peciis: die Produktion juristischer Bücher an italienischen und französischen Universitäten des 13. und 14. Jahrhunderts / F.P.W. Soetermeer. – Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostermann, 2002. – 542 s.Soetermeer F.P.W. Utrumque ius in peciis: die Produktion juristischer Bücher an italienischen und französischen Universitäten des 13. und 14. Jahrhunderts [Utrumque ius in peciis: the production of legal books at Italian and French universities of the 13th and 14th centuries]. Frankfurt, Vittorio Klostermann Publ., 2002. 542 p. (In German).Brundage J. Medieval Canon Law / J. Brundage. – London; New York: Routledge, 1995. – 221 p.Brundage J. Medieval Canon Law. London, New York, Routledge Publ., 1995. 221 p.Шумпетер Й.А. История экономического анализа: в 3 т / Й.А. Шумпетер; пер. с англ. под ред. В.С. Автономова. – СПб.: Экономическая школа, 2001. – Т. 1. – 552 с.Schumpeter J.A. A history of economic analysis, in 3 volumes. St. Petersburg, Ekonomicheskaya shkola Publ., 2001. Vol. 1. 552 p. (In Russ.).Feenstra R. L’influence de la scolastique espagnole sur Grotius en droit privé: quelques expériences dans des questions de fond et de forme, concernant notamment les doctrines de l’erreur et de l’enrichissement sans cause / R. Feenstra // La Seconda Scolastica nella formazione del diritto privato moderno. – Milan: Giuffre, 1973. – P. 377–402.Feenstra R. L’influence de la scolastique espagnole sur Grotius en droit privé: quelques expériences dans des questions de fond et de forme, concernant notamment les doctrines de l’erreur et de l’enrichissement sans cause [The influence of Spanish scholasticism on Grotius in private law: some experiments in matters of substance and form, concerning in particular the doctrines of error and unjust enrichment], in: La Seconda Scolastica nella formazione del diritto privato moderno. Milan, Giuffre Publ., 1973, pp. 377–402. (In French).Сравнительное правоведение: национальные правовые системы / под ред. В.И. Лафитского. – М.: Ин-т законодательства и сравнит. правоведения при Правительстве Рос. Федерации: КОНТРАКТ, 2013. – Т. 3: Правовые системы Азии. – 704 с.Lafitskii V.I. (ed.). Comparative law: the national legal systems. Moscow, The Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation Publ., Kontrakt Publ., 2013. Vol. 3. Legal systems of Asia. 704 p. (In Russ.).Cairns J.W. The Creation of the Ius Commune: From Casus to Regula / J.W. Cairns, P.J.D. Plessis. – Edinburgh University Press, 2008. – 320 p.Cairns J.W., Plessis P.J.D. The Creation of the Ius Commune: From Casus to Regula. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press, 2008. 320 p.Rehberg A.W. Ueber den Code Napoleon und dessen Einführung in Deutschland / A.W. Rehberg. – Hannover: Hahn, 1814. – XVI, 319 s.Rehberg A.W. Ueber den Code Napoleon und dessen Einführung in Deutschland [On the Code Napoleon and its introduction in Germany]. Hannover, Hahn Publ., 1814. XVI + 319 p. (In German).Van den Bergh G.C.J.J. Geleerd recht. Een geschiedenis van de Europese rechtswetenschap in vogelvlucht / G.C.J.J. Van den Bergh. – Deventer: Wolters Kluwer, 2007. – 240 s.Van den Bergh G.C.J.J. Geleerd recht. Een geschiedenis van de Europese rechtswetenschap in vogelvlucht [Learned law. A history of European legal science]. Deventer, Wolters Kluwer Publ., 2007. 240 p. (In Dutch).Schumpeter J. History of Economic Analysis / J. Schumpeter. – London: Allen & Unwin, 1954. – 1360 p.Schumpeter J. History of Economic Analysis. London, Allen & Unwin Publ., 1954. 1360 p.Die Begründung des Rechts als historisches Problem / Hrsg. D. Willoweit. – Munchen: R. Oldenbourg, 2000. – 345 s.Willoweit D. (ed.). Die Begründung des Rechts als historisches Problem [The justification of the law as a historical problem]. Munchen, R. Oldenbourg Publ., 2000. 345 p. (In German).Thibaut A.F.J. Rezension über August Wilhelm Rehberg, Ueber den Code Napoléon und dessen Einführung in Deutschland (1814) / A.F.J. Thibaut // Heidelbergische Jahrbücher der Litteratur. – 1814. – No. 7. – S. 1–32.Thibaut A.F.J. Rezension über August Wilhelm Rehberg, Ueber den Code Napoléon und dessen Einführung in Deutschland (1814) [Review of August Wilhelm Rehberg, On the Code Napoleon and its introduction in Germany (1814)]. Heidelbergische Jahrbücher der Litteratur, 1814, no. 7, pp. 1–32. (In German).Bouckaert B. De exegetische school. Een kritische studie van de rechtsbronnen– en interpretatieleer bij de 19de eeuwse commentatoren van de Code Civil / B. Bouckaert. – Antwerpen: Kluwer, 1981. – 60 s.Bouckaert B. De exegetische school. Een kritische studie van de rechtsbronnen– en interpretatieleer bij de 19de eeuwse commentatoren van de Code Civil [The exegetical school. A critical study of the legal sources and interpretation of the 19th century commentators of the Civil Code]. Antwerpen, Kluwer Publ., 1981. 60 p. (In Dutch).

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.