<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">pravo</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Правоприменение</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Law Enforcement Review</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2542-1514</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2658-4050</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Dostoevsky Omsk State University</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24147/2542-1514.2020.4(1).5-13</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">pravo-281</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ТЕОРИЯ И ИСТОРИЯ ПРАВОПРИМЕНЕНИЯ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>THEORY AND HISTORY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>К вопросу о правоприменении: влияние римского права на российский конституционализм</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Law enforcement issues: influence of the Roman law on Russian constitutionalism</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2213-0127</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Бабурин</surname><given-names>Сергей Николаевич</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Baburin</surname><given-names>Sergey N.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>доктор юридических наук, профессор, заслуженный деятель науки Российской Федерации, главный научный сотрудник</p><p> </p><p>SPIN-код: 1212-8135; AuthorID: 790520 </p><p> </p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Doctor of Law, Professor, Honoured Lawyer of the Russian Federation, head researcher </p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">info@baburin.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Институт государства и права Российской академии наук, г. Москва&#13;
Омский государственный университет им. Ф.М. Достоевского, г. Омск</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow&#13;
Dostoevsky Omsk State University, Omsk&#13;
RSCI SPIN-code: 1212-8135, AuthorID: 790520</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2020</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>03</day><month>04</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>4</volume><issue>1</issue><issue-title>Правоприменение</issue-title><fpage>5</fpage><lpage>13</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Бабурин С.Н., 2020</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2020</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Бабурин С.Н.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Baburin S.N.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://enforcement.omsu.ru/jour/article/view/281">https://enforcement.omsu.ru/jour/article/view/281</self-uri><abstract><p>Современное правоприменение рассматривается в гармонии с духовно-нравственными основами правовой культуры через использование идей и подходов римского права. Также преследуется цель выявить влияние римского публичного права на российский конституционализм. В исследовании использованы методы диалектической логики, сравнительно-исторический, формально-юридический и др. Утверждается, что российский конституционализм, слабо учитывая римско-византийские истоки национального русского права, ошибочен своим отрицанием национальной культурно-исторической традиции в адаптации европейских правовых институтов и принципов. Ныне исключительную роль играют духовно-нравственные и религиозные критерии дальнейшего развития государств. Определение роли римского права в российском конституционализме включает в себя высокую оценку нормативного значения институтов и принципов римского права и нравственную миссию римского права в процессе правоприменения. </p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><sec><title>The subject</title><p>The subject. Modern law enforcement is considered in harmony with the spiritual and moral foundations of legal culture through the use of ideas and approaches of Roman law.</p></sec><sec><title>The purpose</title><p>The purpose. An attempt has been made to assess the influence of Roman Law on Russian constitutionalism and modern law enforcement on the basis of the spiritual and moral traditions of Russian legal culture.</p></sec><sec><title>The methodology</title><p>The methodology. Methods of dialectical logic, analysis and synthesis, comparative-historical, formal-legal methods were used. The main method is comparison of foundations of Roman law with the basic principles of Russian constitutionalism.</p><p>The main results and scope of their application. The problem of influence of Roman law on Russian constitutionalism and, in general, on the basis of modern Russian law enforcement is raised. If universalism and individualism should be believed as the foundations of classical Roman law, then the basis of Russian law is community and social solidarity. In Russia collective property and joint work as well as ancestral structure in the form of a rural community reached the modern times, while in ancient Rome their disappearance was the basis of the formation of Roman law. National peculiarities of the Russian legal and political systems are determined by cultural-historical (civilizational) circumstances, especially by the natural and climatic factors. It was in the communal world of Russia that the idea of Christian equality has formed the basis of the model of life, while in Western Europe the community has followed the path of individualization of the individual and differentiation of elites and masses according to the criteria of social success. The absolute belief in law as a phenomenon   of   social   planning   and   a   tool   for   compromise   between   different   parts   of society, inherited from Roman law, formed the Romano-German and Anglo-Saxon worldview, but it did not take root in Russian legal culture. Modern Russian constitutionalism, while poorly considering the Roman-Byzantine origins of national Russian law, is wrong in its denial of the national-cultural and historical adaptation of European legal institutions and principles.</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusions</title><p>Conclusions. One of the important results of the study is the conclusion that the social value of Roman law in Russian Constitutionalism includes the moral mission of Roman law and a high assessment of the normative value of the heritage of Roman law. The value depravity of the current Constitution of the Russian Federation can be eliminated, its defects can and should be corrected on the basis of the Roman law tradition, but this should be done only by adequately assessing the own experience of law enforcement, the thousand-year state- legal and spiritual development of the Russian civilization.</p></sec></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Римское право</kwd><kwd>конституция</kwd><kwd>конституционализм</kwd><kwd>рецепция</kwd><kwd>традиция</kwd><kwd>духовные ценности</kwd><kwd>исторические особенности</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Roman law</kwd><kwd>constitution</kwd><kwd>constitutionalism</kwd><kwd>reception</kwd><kwd>tradition</kwd><kwd>spiritual values</kwd><kwd>historical features</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Дигесты Юстиниана. Т. 1. Книги I-IV. / отв. ред. Л.Л. Кофанов. – М.: Статут, 2002. – 584 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kofanov L.L. (ed.). Justinian's Digestes. Vol. 1. Books I-IV. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2002. 584 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Авакьян С.А. Государственно-правовые институты: понятия и формирование (Применительно к деятельности Советов) / С.А. Авакьян // Авакьян С.А. Размышления конституционалиста: избр. статьи. – М.: Изд-во Моск. Ун-та, 2010. – С. 80–90.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Avak'yan S.A. State-legal Institutions: Concepts and Formation (In Relation to the Activities of the Soviets), in: Avak'yan S.A. Razmyshleniya konstitucionalista: Izbr. stat'i. Moscow, Izd-vo Mosk. Un-ta, 2010. P. 80-90. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Хвостов В.М. Система римского права. Учебник / В.М. Хвостов. – М.: Спарк, 1996. – 522 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Khvostov V.M. The System of Roman Law. Moscow, Spark Publ., 1996. 522 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Alicic S. Sulla difesa dei diritti civili in Serbia in riferimento ad alcuni concetti giuridici romani. Narodni tribune e potere negative / S. Alicic // I Seminario eurasiatico di Diritto romano / I Евразийский семинар по римскому праву. Dusanbe, 14-15 ottobre 2011. –Душанбе, 2013. – С. 111–126.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Alicic S. Sulla difesa dei diritti civili in Serbia in riferimento ad alcuni concetti giuridici romani. Narodni tribune e potere negative [On the defense of civil rights in Serbia in reference to some Roman legal concepts. Narodni grandstands and negative power], in: I Seminario eurasiatico di Diritto romano. I Evrazijskij seminar po rimskomu pravu. Dusanbe, 14-15 oktobre 2011. Dushanbe, 2013. P. 111-126. (In Ital.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Гай. Институции / под ред. В.А. Савельева, Л.Л. Кофанова. – М.: Юристъ, 1997. – 368 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Saveliev V.A., Kofanov L.L. (eds.). Gaj. Institutions. Moscow, Yurist Publ., 1997. 368 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Савенков А.Н. Философия права, правовое мышление и глобальные проблемы современной цивилизации / А.Н. Савенков // Трансформация парадигмы права в цивилизационном развитии человечества: доклады членов РАН / под общ. ред. чл.-корр. РАН А.Н. Савенкова. – М.: ИГП РАН, 2019. – С. 9–92.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Savenkov A.N. Philosophy of Law, Legal Thinking and the Global Problems of modern Civilization, in: Savenkov A.N. (ed.) Тransformatyya paradigm prava v zivilizatsionnom razvitii chelovechestva: doklady chlenov RAN. Moscow, IGP RAN, 2019. P. 9-92. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Alliot M. Ueber die Artendes “Rechts-Transfers” / M. Alliot // Entstehungund Wandelrechtlicher Traditionen / hrsg. von Fikentscher W., Franke H. – Muenchen: Alber, 1980. – 820 s.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Alliot M. Ueber die Artendes “Rechts-Transfers” [On the types of "legal transfers"], in: Fikentscher W. von, Franke H. Entstehungund Wandelrechtlicher Traditionen. Muenchen, Alber, 1980. 820 s. (In Germ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Интернационализация конституционного права: современные тенденции: монография / под ред. Н.В. Варламовой и Т.А. Васильевой. – М.: Ин-т государства и права, 2017. – 224 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Varlamova N.V., Vasilieva T.A. (eds.). Internationalization of constitutional law: modern trends. Moscow, IGP RAN, 2017. 224 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Рагимов И.М. Современное государство в эпоху глобальных трансформаций: аналитический доклад / И.М. Рагимов, С.Н. Бабурин, Ю.В. Голик и др. – СПб.: Юридический центр-Академия, 2019. – 344 c.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ragimov I.M., Baburin S.N., Golik Yu.V. et al. Modern State in an Age of Global Transformation: An Analytical Report. Saint-Petersburg, Yuridicheskij centr-Akademiya, 2019. 344 p.  (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Бабурин С.Н. Значение Великой иранской революции для современного мира: духовно-нравственное измерение конституционализма / С.Н. Бабурин // Вестник Московского государственного областного университета. Серия: Юриспруденция. – 2019. – № 3. – С. 116-130.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Baburin S.N. The Significance of the Great Iranian Revolution for the Modern World: Spiritual and Value Dimension of  Constitutionalism. Bulletin of Moscow Region State University. Series: Jurisprudence, 2019, no. 3, pp. 116-130. DOI: 10.18384/2310-6794-2019-3-116-130 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Халиков А. Глобализация прав человека и проблемы национального государства: противоречие универсализации и культурного релятивизма в современном праве / А. Халиков // I Seminario eurasiatico di Diritto romano / I Евразийский семинар по римскому правую. Dusanbe, 14-15 ottobre 2011. Душанбе, 2013. С. 127-141.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Khalikov A. Globalization of human rights and the problems of the nation state: the contradiction of universalization and cultural relativism in modern law, in: I Seminario eurasiatico di Diritto romano I Evrazijskij seminar po rimskomu pravuyu. Dusanbe, 14-15 ottobre 2011. Dushanbe, 2013. P. 127-141. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Махмудзода М. Рецепция римского права в современном гражданском права Республики Таджикистан / М. Махмудзода // I Seminario eurasiatico di Diritto romano / I Евразийский семинар по римскому правую. Dusanbe, 14-15 ottobre 2011. – Душанбе, 2013. – С. 219-225.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mahmudzoda M. The reception of Roman law in modern civil law of Respublic Tadzhikistan, in: I Seminario eurasiatico di Diritto romano. I Evrazijskij seminar po rimskomu pravuyu. Dusanbe, 14-15 ottobre 2011. Dushanbe, 2013. P. 219-225. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Савиньи Ф.К. фон. Система современного римского права. Т. 1 / Ф.К. фон Савиньи. – М.: Статут, 2011. – 510 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Savin'i F.K. von. The system of modern Roman law. Vol. 1. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2011. 510 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Чистяков О.И. Конституция СССР 1924 года / О.И. Чистяков. – М.: Зерцало-М, 2015. – 224 c.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chistyakov O.I. 1924 Soviet Constitution. Moscow, Zertsalo-M Publ., 2015. 224 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Catalano P. Eurasia e diritto romano / P. Catalano // Roma e America. Diritto romano commune. – 2012. – №. 33 – P. 3-17.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Catalano P. Eurasia e diritto romano [Eurasia and Roman law]. Roma e America. Diritto romano commune, 2012, no. 33, p. 3-17. (In Ital.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Catalano P. Il diritto romano in Asia Centrale / P. Catalano // X colloquio del romanisti del’Europa Centro-Orientale e dell` Asia. Dusanbe, 19-21 ottobre 2005. – Душанбе, 2007. – P. 11-16.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Catalano P. Il diritto romano in Asia Centrale [Roman law in Central Asia], in: X colloquio del romanisti del’Europa Centro-Orientale e dell` Asia. Dusanbe, 19-21 oktobre 2005. Dusanbe, 2007. P. 11-16. (In Ital.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Сакки О. Идея закона (D. 1.3.2) и принципов суверенитета (D 1.3.32 и 1.4.1) в первой книге Дигест. Парадигмы современного конституционализма? / О. Сакки // Дигесты Юстиниана / отв. ред. Л.Л. Кофанов. Т. VIII: Статьи и указатели. – М.: Статут, 2006. – С. 101-120.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sakki O. The Idea of Law (D. 1.3.2) and the Principles of Sovereignty (D 1.3.32 and 1.4.1) in digest's first book. Paradigms of modern constitutionalism?, in: Kofanov L.L. (ed.). Justinian's Digestes. Vol. VIII. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2006. P. 101-120. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Булатов С.Я. Предисловие / С.Я. Булатов // Каролина: Уголовно-судебное уложение Карла V / пер. с средневерхнегерм. С.Я. Булатова. – Астана: ИДЕАЛ-ИС 2009, 2010. – С. 7-31.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bulatov S.Ya. Preface, in: Carolina: Criminal court case of Charles V. Astana, IDEAL-IS Publ., 2009, 2010. P. 7-31. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Полдников Д.Ю. Договорные теории глоссаторов / Д.Ю. Полдников. – М.: Academia, 2008. – 344 c.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Poldnikov D.Yu. Contractual theories of glossators. Moscow, Academia Publ., 2008. 344 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Каролина: Уголовно-судебное уложение Карла V / пер. с средневерхнегерм. С.Я. Булатова. – Астана: ИДЕАЛ-ИС 2009, 2010. – 160 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Carolina: Criminal court case of Charles V. Astana, IDEAL-IS Publ., 2009, 2010. 160 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Покровский И.А. История римского права / И.А. Покровский. М.: Статут, 2004. – 538 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pokrovskij I.A. History of Roman Law. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2004. 538 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Пухан И. Римское право (базовый учебник) / И. Пухан, М. Поленак-Акимовская. – М.: ЗЕРЦАЛО, 1999. – 411 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Puhan I., Polenak-Akimovskaya M. Roman law (basic textbook). Moscow, Zertsalo Publ., 1999. 411 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Багдасарян В.Э. Ценностные основания государственной политики: учебник / В.Э. Багдасарян. – М.: ИНФРА-М, 2018. – 286 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bagdasaryan V.E. The Values of Public Policy. Moscow, INFRA-M Publ., 2018. 286 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кофанов Л.Л. Понятие res publica и civitas в 50-й книге Дигест Юстиниана / Л.Л. Кофанов // Дигесты Юстиниана / отв. ред. Л.Л. Кофанов. Т. VIII: Статьи и указатели. – М.: Статут, 2006. – С. 196-204.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kofanov L.L. The concept of res publica and civitas in the 50th book by Digest Justinian, in: Kofanov L.L. (ed.). Justinian's Digestes. Vol. VIII. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2006. P. 196-204. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Рагимов И.М. О нравственности наказания / И.М. Рагимов. – СПб.: Юридический центр, 2016. – 221 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ragimov I.M. On the morality of punishment. Saint-Petersburg, Yuridicheskij centr, 2016. 221 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Давид Р. Основные правовые системы современности / Р. Давид, К. Жоффре-Спинози. – М.: Междунар. отношения, 2009. – 456 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">David R., Jauffret-Spinosi K. The main legal systems of contemporary time. Moscow, Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2009. – 456 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лукьянова Е.А. Конституционные риски: учебно-методическое пособие / Е.А. Лукьянова. – М.: Кучково поле, 2015. – 448 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Luk'yanova E.A. Constitutional risks. Moscow, Kuchkovo pole, 2015. 448 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Страшун Б.А. Социализм и демократия (Социалистическое народное представительство) / Б.А. Страшун. – М.: Проспект, 2016. – 216 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Strashun B.A. Socialism and democracy (Socialist people's representation). Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2016. 216 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Марченко М.Н. Проблемы общей теории государства и права: учеб.: в 2 т. Т. 2. Право / М.Н, Марченко. –. М.: ТК Велби, Проспект, 2007. – 656 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Marchenko M. Problems of general theory of the state and law. Vol. 2. Moscow,  TK Velbi, Prospekt Publ., 2007. 656 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit30"><label>30</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Цицерон Марк Туллий.. О государстве. О законах. О старости. О дружбе. Об обязанностях. Речи. Письма / Марк Туллий Цицерон. – М.: Мысль, 1999. – 782 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cicero. The State. Laws. Old Age. Friendship. Responsibilities. Speech. Letters. Moscow, Mysl' Publ., 1999. 782 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit31"><label>31</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Жуков В.И. Сбережение населения: национальные интересы, мораль и право / В.И. Жуков // Трансформация парадигмы права в цивилизационном развитии человечества: доклады членов РАН / под общ. ред. чл.-корр. РАН А.Н. Савенкова. – М.: ИГП РАН, 2019. – С. 282-363.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zhukov V.I. Saving the population: national interests, morality and law, in: Savenkov A.N. (ed.) Тransformatyya paradigm prava v zivilizatsionnom razvitii chelovechestva: doklady chlenov RAN. Moscow, IGP RAN, 2019. P. 282-363. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit32"><label>32</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Керимов Д.А. Методология права: Предмет, функции, проблемы философии права: монография / Д.А. Керимов. – М.: Норма: ИНФРА-М, 2019. – 524 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kerimov D.A. Methodology of law: subject, function, problems of philosophy of law. Moscow, Norma: INFRA-M Publ., 2019. 524 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit33"><label>33</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Куксин И.Н. Справедливость как нравственная, социальная и юридическая категория / И.Н. Куксин, И.В. Чечельницкий // Социальная справедливость и право: проблемы теории и практики : материалы международной научно-практической конференции / отв. ред. Т.А. Сошникова. – М.: Изд-во Моск. гуманитарного университета, 2016. – С. 31-38.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kuksin I.N., Chechel'nitskii I.V. Justice as a moral, social and legal category, in: Soshnikova T.A. (ed.). Social'naya spravedlivost' i pravo: problemy teorii i praktiki. Moscow, Izd-vo Mosk. gumanitarnogo universiteta, 2016. P. 31-38. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit34"><label>34</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Чечельницкий И.В. Справедливость и правотворчество: монография / И.В. Чечельницкий. – М.: Проспект, 2017. – 176 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chechel'nitskii I.V. Justice and law-making. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2017. 176 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit35"><label>35</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Бабурин С.Н. Современное общество между несправедливым законом и справедливым беззаконием / С.Н. Бабурин // Социальная справедливость и право: проблемы теории и практики. Материалы международной научно-практической конференции / отв. ред. Т.А. Сошникова. – М.: Изд-во Моск. гуманит. ун-та, 2016. – С. 19-25.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Baburin S.N. Modern Society between an unjust law and just lawlessness, in: Soshnikova T.A. (ed.). Social'naya spravedlivost' i pravo: problemy teorii i praktiki. Moscow, Izd-vo Mosk. gumanitarnogo universiteta, 2016. P. 19-25. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
