pravoПравоприменениеLaw Enforcement Review2542-15142658-4050Dostoevsky Omsk State University10.24147/2542-1514.2020.4(3).46-68pravo-355Research ArticleПРИМЕНЕНИЕ НОРМ ПРАВА ОРГАНАМИ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОЙ ВЛАСТИTHE LAW ENFORCEMENT BY PUBLIC AUTHORITIESПравовое регулирование ответственности и разрешения споров, возникающих из налоговых отношений, в Грузии, Молдове и Российской ФедерацииLegal regulation of liability for tax offnces and tax dispute resolution in Georgia, Moldova and Russian Federationhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0767-9661ШепенкоРоман АлексеевичShepenkoRoman A.

доктор юридических наук, профессор кафедры административного и финансового права

Doctor of Law, Professor, Department of Administrative and Financial Law

r.shepenko@inno.mgimo.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9805-2962НаниЛияNaniLia

аспирант кафедры административного и финансового права

PhD student, Department of Administrative and Financial Law

l.nani.mustajbasic@gmail.comМосковский государственный институт международных отношений Министерства иностранных дел Российской Федерации, г. МоскваРоссияMGIMO University, MoscowRussian Federation20201510202043Правоприменение4668Copyright © Шепенко Р.А., Нани Л., 20202020Шепенко Р.А., Нани Л.Shepenko R.A., Nani L.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://enforcement.omsu.ru/jour/article/view/355

Рассматривается правовое закрепление ответственности за нарушения в сфере налогообложения и механизма разрешения налоговых споров в Грузии, Молдове и России. Отмечается схожесть подходов к правовому регулированию таких отношений. Тем не менее выделяются отличительные черты в регламенатции, вытекающие из ограничения территориального правового действия норм Грузии и Молдовы.

The subject. For many years, Georgia, Moldova and Russia were part of the same state, which a priori indicates the existence of a similar legal system. Despite the positive experience of the European Economic Community, the trends that the USSR faced at the end of the XX century were reversed: the former republics gained independence and started to form their own legal systems. It seems appropriate to put forward the hypothesis that the newly formed States should have used a common legal heritage and/or tried and tested foreign examples of normative acts. However, this does not seem to be the case.Purpose of the study. The article represents an attempt to verify the aforementioned hypothesis and deals with selected provisions of the national legislation of Georgia, Moldova and Russia that, from one hand, relate to taxation and, from the other, are of general character, i.e. can be applied not only to particular cases.Methodology. The research was carried out with the application of the formally legal interpretation of legal acts as well as the comparative analysis of Georgian, Moldovian and Russian legal literature. Structural and systemic methods are also the basis of the research,The main results. The content of tax laws determines the chosen model of the distribution of law provisions on liability for breach of tax legislation, i.e. the fact whether such laws contain provisions on liability. The compulsory administrative stage of dispute resolution has proven to be ineffective for taxpayers, tax representatives and third parties. As for the international resolution of tax disputes there is a wide diversity of applicable means (particularly, arbitration which is not characteristic for the national order) and of specific dispute resolution mechanisms. Conclusions. Despite certain differences, the legal regulation of liability and dispute resolution in Georgia, Moldova and Russia is very similar. However, it is necessary to take into account the distinctive features arising from the limitation of the territorial legal effect of the norms of Georgia and Moldova.

Налоговые отношенияправовое регулированиеюридическая ответственностьразрешение споровналоговый спорГрузияМолдоваРоссияTax relationslegal regulationlegal liabilitydispute resolutiontax disputeGeorgiaMoldovaRussiaReferencesოქროცვარიძე ზ. სასოფლო-სამეურნეო დანიშნულების მიწის გამოყენების ეფექტიანობის ამაღლების გზები სამეურნეო მექანიზმის სრულყოფის პირობებში. დისერტაცია. ეკონომიკის მეცნიერებათა კანდიდატის სამეცნიერო ხარისხის. თბილისი, 2006 [Окроцваридзе З. Механизмы совер-шенствования условий повышения эффективности сельскохозяйственного землепользования: дис. … канд. экон. наук. Тбилиси, 2006].Okrotsvaridze Z. The Mechanisms of Improving the Conditions for an Efficient Use of Land for Agricultural Purposes. Cand. Diss. Thesis. Tbilisi, 2006. (In Georg.).Балюк Н.Н. 101 термин налогового права: краткое законодательное и доктринальное толкование / Н.Н. Балюк и др.; рук. авт. колл. Н.А. Соловьева. – М.: Инфотропик Медиа, 2015. – 452 с.Balyuk N.N., Zamulko V.V., Krasyukov A.V. et al. 101 Terms of Tax Law: a Brief Legislative and Doctrinal Interpretation. Moscow, Infotropic Media, 2015. 452 p. (In Russ.).Абрамчик Л.Я. Налоговое право Белоруссии / Л.Я. Абрамчик // Налоговое право стран Восточной Европы. Общая часть: Беларусь, Польша, Россия, Словакия, Украина, Чехия / отв. ред. М.В. Карасева (Сенцова), Д.М. Щекин. – М.: Волтерс Клувер, 2009. – С. 11–102.Abramchik L.Ya. Tax Law of Belorussia, in: Karaseva (Sentsova) M.V., Schekin D.M. (eds.). Tax Law of Eastern Europe States. The General Part: Belorussia, Poland, Russia, Slovakia, Ukraine, Czech Republic. Moscow, Wolters Kluwer, 2009. P. 11–102. (In Russ.).Gvaramadze T. Sanctions for Tax Code Violations / T. Gvaramadze // Journal of Law. – 2012. – P. 50–55.Gvaramadze T. Sanctions for Tax Code Violations. Journal of Law, 2012, pp. 50–55.Condor I. Drept financiar roman. Partea I. Evolutie. Notiuni generale. Sitemul bugetelor publice / I. Condor. – Bucuresti: Monitorul Oficial, 2000. – 214 p.Condor I. Drept financiar roman. Partea I. Evolutie. Notiuni generale. Sitemul bugetelor publice [Romanian financial law. Part I. Evolution. General terms. The system of public budgets]. Bucharest, Monitorul Oficial, 2000. 214 p. (In Rom.).Братусь С.Н. Юридическая ответственность и законность (очерк теории) / С.Н. Братусь. – М.: Городец-издат, 2001. – 416 с.Bratus' S.N. Legal Liability and Legal Order (a Sketch on Theory). Moscow, Gorodets Publ., 2001. 416 p. (In Russ.).Соловьев О.Г. Налоговые преступления: криминологическая и уголовно-правовая характеристика: уч. пособие. – Ярославль: ЯГУ, 2001. – 66 с. 8. Caraiani Gh. Tehnici vamale de facilitare a comertului international / Gh. Caraiani, G.S. Diaconu. – Bucuresti: Lumina Lex, 2003. – 300 p. 9. Какабадзе С.С. Грузинские документы Ин-та народов Азии АН СССР / С.С. Какабадзе. – М.: Наука, 1967. – 511 с.Solov'yev O.G. Tax Crimes: Criminological and Criminal Characteristic. Yaroslavl, Yaroslavl State University Publ., 2001. 66 p. (In Russ.).Apostol Tofan D. Drept administrativ. Vol. I.administrative / D. Apostol Tofan. – Bucuresti: All Beck, 2003. – Vol. I. – 494 p.Caraiani Gh., Diaconu G.S. Tehnici vamale de facilitare a comertului international [Customs techniques of international trade facilitation]. Bucharest, Lumina Lex, 2003. 300 p. (In Rom.).Bene F.Gh. Cod de bune practice in colectarea creantelor fiscal / F.Gh. Bene. – Bucuresti: C.H. Beck, 2011. – 460 p.Kakabadze S.S. The Georgian Documents of the Institute of the Peoples of Asia of the USSR Science Academy. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1967. 511 p. (In Russ.).Iorgovan A. Drept administrativ roman / A. Iorgovan. Vol. I. – Bucuresti: All Beck, 2005. – Vol. I. – Доступ через справ.-прав. базу данных www.legalis.ro.www.legalis.ro (дата обращения: 15.06.2020). 13. Arama E. Istoria dreptului romanesc / E. Arama. – Chisinau: Tipografia Centrala, 1995. – 236 p.Apostol Tofan D. Drept administrative [Administrative law]. Vol. I. Bucharest, All Beck, 2003. 494 p. (In Rom.).Лазаревский Н. Ответственность за убытки, причиненные должностными лицами / Н. Лазаревский. – СПб.: Слово, 1905. – 32 с.Bene F.Gh. Cod de bune practice in colectarea creantelor fiscal [The code of best practices in the collection of taxes]. Bucharest, C.H. Beck, 2011. 460 p. (In Rom.).Тарасов И.Т. Очерк науки финансового права / И.Т. Тарасов // Золотые страницы финансового права России: в 4 т. – М.: Статут, 2004. – Т. IV. – 618 с. 16. Система советского социалистического права (тезисы). – М.: Юр. изд. НКЮ, 1941. – 17 с. 17. Юридический словарь: в 2 т. / гл. ред. П.И. Кудрявцев. – М.: Гос. изд. юр. лит., 1956. – Т. 2. – 664 с.Iorgovan A. Drept administrativ roman [Romanian administrative law]. Vol. I. Bucharest, All Beck 2005.Григалашвили Е.Г. Результаты реформы налоговой системы Грузии и перспективы ее развития / Е.Г. Григалашвили // Теория и практика общественного развития. – 2013. – № 10. – С. 361–365.Arama E. Istoria dreptului romanesc [History of the Romanian law]. Chisinau, Tipografia Centrala, 1995. 236 p. (In Rom.).Dascalu D., Alexandru C. Explicatiile teoretice si practice ale Codului de procedura fiscala. – Bucuresti: Rosetti. 2005. – Доступ через справ.-прав. базу данных www.legalis.rowww.legalis.ro (дата обращения: 15.06.2020).Lazarevskiy N. Liability for Damages Caused by Public Officials. Saint Petersburg, Slovo Publ., 1905. 32 p. (In Russ.).Stalans L.J. Citizens’ Procedural Expectations for An Upcoming Tax Audit: Their Nature and Formation / L.J. Stalans // Social Justice Research. – 1992. – Vol. 5, iss. 1. – P. 93–107. – DOI:10.1007/BF01048379. 21. Bulding tax culture, compliance and citizenship: A global source book on taxpayer education. – Paris: OECD Publishing, 2015. – 195 p.Tarasov I.T. A Sketch on the Science of Financial Law, in: Golden Pages of The Financial Law of Russia. Vol. IV. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2004. 618 p. (In Russ.).ნადარაია ლ., როგავა ზ., რუხაძე კ., და სხვები. საქართველოს საგადასახადო კოდექსის კომენტარი. წიგნი მეორე. §§ 156-310. თბილისი, 2012. [Надарая Л., Рогава З., Рухадзе К. и др. Комментарий к Налоговому кодексу. Книга вторая. §§ 156-310. – Тбилиси, 2012].The System of Soviet Socialistic Law (Theses). Moscow, Narkomyust Publ., 1941. 17 p. (In Russ.).წიკლაური ი. საგადასახადო დავების განხილვის ქართული მოდელის თავისებურებანი და მისი რეფორმის საჭიროება // სამართლის ჟურნალი. 2012. № 1-2(3-4) [Циклаури И. Особенности грузинской модели разрешения налоговых споров и необходимость ее реформирования // Юридический журнал. – 2012. – № 1–2 (3–4)].Kudrvavtsev P.I (ed.). Legal Dictionary. Part II. Мoscow, Yurid. Lit. Publ., 1956. 664 p. (In Russ.).Dauceanu C. Nota la Decizia nr. 75 din 7 septembrie 1992 a Curţii Supreme de Justiţie / C. Dauceanu // Dreptul. – 1993. – № 2. – Доступ через справ.-прав. базу данных www.legalis.ro (дата обращения: 15.06.2020). 25. Clipa C. Organe si proceduri administrativ-jurisdictionale / C. Clipa. – Bucuresti: Hamangiu, 2013. – 552 p.Grigalashvili E.G. The Results of Reforming The Tax System of Georgia and The Perspectives of Its Development. Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya = The Theory and Practice of Social Development, 2013, no. 10, pp. 361–365. (In Russ.).Sechter F. Controlul administrativ al aplicării si respectării dispoziţiilor legale si supravegherea procurorului – garanţii de asigurare a legalităţii în administraţia de stat / F. Sechter, Gh. Oprescu // Jurnalul national. – 1964. – № 10. – Доступ через справ.-прав. базу данных www.legalis.ro (дата обращения: 15.06.2020).Dascalu D., Alexandru C. Explicatiile teoretice si practice ale Codului de procedura fiscala [Theoretical and practical comments to the Code of tax procedure]. Bucuresti, Rosetti, 2005. (In Rom.).Enescu M. Deciziile autorităţii tutelare ca organe de jurisdicţie / M. Enescu // Studii si cercetari juridice. – 1964. – № 4. – Доступ через справ.-прав. базу данных www.legalis.ro (дата обращения: 15.06.2020).Stalans L.J. Citizens’ Procedural Expectations for An Upcoming Tax Audit: Their Nature and Formation. Social Justice Research, 1992, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 93–107. DOI:10.1007/BF01048379.Dariescu N.C. Drept procedural fiscal / N.C. Dariescu. – Iasi: Lumen, 2009. – 235 p.Bulding tax culture, compliance and citizenship: A global source book on taxpayer education. OECD. Paris, 2015. 195 p. DOI: 10.1787/9789264205154-en.Ciobanu V.M. Tratat teoretic si practic de procedura civila. Teoria generala. Vol. I / V.M. Ciobanu. – Bucuresti: National, 1996. – Vol. I. – 509 p.Nadaraya L., Rogava Z., Ruhadze K. Commentaries to the Tax Code. Sec. 156-310. Tbilisi, 2012.(In Georg.).Dariescu N.C. Discutii si propuneri de lege ferenda cu privire la competent organelor fiscale / N.C. Dariescu, C. Dariescu // Revista Transilvaneana de Stiinte Administrative. – 2009. – № 1 (23). – P. 64–65.Tsiklauri I. Distinctive Features of The Georgian Model of Resolution of Tax Disputes and The Necessity of Its Reformation. The Legal Journal, 2012, no. 1–2 (3–4). (In Georg.).Anitei N.-C. Regulile de competenţă generală, materială, teritorială şi special a organelor fiscale conform dispoziţiilor Noului Cod de procedură fiscal / N.-C. Anitei // Curierul fiscal. – 2016. – № 5. – P. 186–189.Dauceanu C. Nota la Decizia nr. 75 din 7 septembrie 1992 a Curţii Supreme de Justiţie [Note to the Decision nr. 75 from September, 7th, 1992 of the Supreme Court of Justice]. Dreptul, 1993, no. 2. (In Rom.).Кекелия М. Древнегрузинские законодательство, суд и судебный процесс / М. Кекелия. – Тбилиси: Изд. Тбилисского ун-та, 1986. – 313 с.Clipa C. Organe si proceduri administrativ-jurisdictionale [Jurisdictional administrative bodies and procedures]. Bucuresti, Hamangiu, 2013. 552 p. (In Rom.).Джуаншериани Д. Жизнь Вахтанга Горгасала / Д. Джуаншериани // Памятники грузинской исторической литературы. Т. VI / пер. Г.В. Цулая. – Тбилиси: Мецниереба, 1986. – 150 с.Sechter F., Oprescu Gh. Controlul administrativ al aplicării si respectării dispoziţiilor legale si supravegherea procurorului – garanţii de asigurare a legalităţii în administraţia de stat [Administrative control of the implimentation and enforcement of the prosecutor – guaranties for the observance of legality within the state administration]. Jurnalul national, 1964, no. 10. (In Rom.).Судебник Беки и Агбуги / пер. В.Д. Дондуа, И.С. Долидзе. – Тбилиси: АН ГССР, 1960. – 82 с.Enescu M. Deciziile autorităţii tutelare ca organe de jurisdicţie [Decisions of the guardianship authorities as jurisdictional bodies]. Studii si cercetari juridice, 1964, no. 4. (In Rom.).Ковалевский М. Закон и обычай на Кавказе: в 2 т. / М. Ковалевский. – Майкоп: Афиша, 2006. – Т. 2. – 319 с.Dariescu N.C. Drept procedural fiscal [Procedural tax law]. Iasi, Lumen, 2009. 235 p. (In Rom.).Эсадзе С. Историческая записка объ управленiи Кавказомъ: в 2 т. / С. Эсадзе. – Тифлис, 1907. – Т. I. – 616 с.Ciobanu V.M. Tratat teoretic si practic de procedura civila. Teoria generala [Essay on the theory and practice of civil procedure. General theory]. Vol. I. Bucharest, National, 1996. 509 p. (In Rom.).Чихладзе Н.В. Актуальные вопросы формирования налоговой системы Грузии / Н.В. Чихладзе // Фи-нансы и кредит. – 2005. – № 26(194). – С. 62–68.Dariescu N.C., Dariescu C. Discutii si propuneri de lege ferenda cu privire la competent organelor fiscale [Discussions and proposals de lege ferenda in respect to the competence of tax authorities]. Revista Transilvaneana de Stiinte Administrative, 2009, no. 1 (23), pp. 52–66. (In Rom.).Арешидзе Г. Государственное строительство и правление в новой Грузии / Г. Арешидзе // Кавказ. Ежегодник КАСМИ. – Ереван: Кавказский ин-т СМИ, 2006. – С. 46–76.Anitei N.-C. Regulile de competenţă generală, materială, teritorială şi special a organelor fiscale conform dispoziţiilor Noului Cod de procedură fiscal [Rules on general, subject matter, territorial and special competence of tax authorities purusant to the provisions of the new Code of tax procedure]. Curierul fiscal, 2016, no. 5, pp. 186–190. (In Rom.).Кадагидзе Н. Особенности решения вопросов, возникающих в грузинском административном судопроизводстве в процессе рассмотрения споров, вытекающих из отношений трудового права / Н. Кадагидзе // Южнокавказский юридический журнал. – 2011. – № 02. – С. 107–110.Kekeliya M. Ancient Georgian Legislation, Court and Judicial Procedure. Tbilisi, Tbilisi University Publ., 1986. 313 p. (In Russ.).Dascalu D. Tratat de contencios fiscal / D. Dascalu. – Bucuresti: Hamangiu, 2014. – 1056 p.Dzhuansheriani D. The Life of Vahtang Gorsala in Monuments of Georgian Historical Literature. Vol. 4. Tbilisi, Metsniereba Publ., 1986. 150 p. (In Russ.).Fanu-Moca A. Contenciosul fiscal / A. Fanu-Moca. – Bucureşti: C.H. Beck, 2013. – 480 p.The Code of Laws of Beka and Agbuga. Тbilisi, Academy od Science of Georgian SSR Publ., 1960. 82 p. (In Russ.).Clima N. Litigii fiscale / N. Clima, A. Rotaru // Manualul judecătorului pentru cauze civile. Ed. 2. – Chisinau.: TipograCentrala, 2013. – С. 632–703.Kovalevskiy M. Law and Custom in the Caucasus. Maycop, Afisha Publ., 2006. 319 p. (In Russ.).Dastic A. Contenciosul administrativ in Republica Moldova: teza de doctor in drept / A. Dastic. – Chisinau, 2006. – 165 p.Esadze S. A Historical Note on the Administration of Caucasus. Book 1. Тiflis, 1907. 616 p. (In Russ.).ადამიანის უფლებები და საქართველოს საკონსტიტუციო სასამართლოს სამართალწარმოების პრაქტიკა. 1996-2012 წლების სასამართლო პრაქტიკა / რედ. მ. კოპალეიშვილი. თბილისი, 2013 [Права человека и практика Конституционного суда Грузии. Судебная практика 1996-2012 годов / ред. М. Копалеишвили. –Тбилиси, 2013].Chikhladze N.V. Important Questions of the Formation of the Tax System of Georgia. Finansy i kredit = Finance and Credit, 2005, no. 26(194), pp. 62–68. (In Russ.).Ghid de mediere a conflictelor fiscale / M. Burlacu, S. Rusu, E. Roscovan. – Chisinau: «Cu drag» SRL, 2010. – 14 p.Areshidze G. The Formation of the State and Administration in the New Georgian state. Kavkaz. Ezhegodnik KASMI = Caucasus. The yearly issue of KASMI. Yerevan, 2006. Pp. 46–76. (In Russ.).Krikorian J.D. International Trade Law and Domestic Policy: Canada, the United States, and the WTO / J.D. Krikorian. – Vancouver: UBC Press, 2012. – 320 p.Kadagidze N. The Distinctive Features of Issues Arising from the Georgian Administrative Judicial Procedure in the Course of Reviewing Labor Law Cases. Yuzhnokavkazskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal = South Caucasus Law Journal, 2011, no. 2, pp. 107–110. (In Russ.).Züger M. Arbitration under Tax Treaties: Improving Legal Protection in International Tax Law / M. Züger. – Amsterdam: IBFD Publ., 2001. – 276 p.Dascalu D. Tratat de contencios fiscal [Essay on the tax dispute]. Bucharest, Hamangiu, 2014. 1056 p. (In Rom.).Poalelungi M. Obligatiile pozitive si negative ale statului prin prisma CEDO: teza de doctor habilitat in drept / M. Poalelungi. – Chisinau, 2016. – 324 p.Fanu-Moca A. Contenciosul fiscal [The tax dispute]. Bucharest, C.H. Beck, 2013. 480 p. (In Rom.).Clima N., Rotaru A. Litigii fiscale [Tax Disputes], in: Poalelungi M. Manualul judecătorului pentru cauze civile [The Textbook of Judges for Civil Cases]. Ed. 2. Chisinau, 2013. P. 632–703. (In Rom.).Clima N., Rotaru A. Litigii fiscale [Tax Disputes], in: Poalelungi M. Manualul judecătorului pentru cauze civile [The Textbook of Judges for Civil Cases]. Ed. 2. Chisinau, 2013. P. 632–703. (In Rom.).Dastic A. Contenciosul administrativ in Republica Moldova [The administrative dispute in the republic of Moldova]. Doct. Diss. Thesis. Chisinau, 2006. 165 p. (In Rom.).Dastic A. Contenciosul administrativ in Republica Moldova [The administrative dispute in the republic of Moldova]. Doct. Diss. Thesis. Chisinau, 2006. 165 p. (In Rom.).Kopaleishvili M.V. Human Rights and the Jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court of Georgia. 1996-2012. Tbilisi, 2013. (In Georg.).Kopaleishvili M.V. Human Rights and the Jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court of Georgia. 1996-2012. Tbilisi, 2013. (In Georg.).Burlacu M, Rusu S., Roscovan E. Ghid de mediere a conflictelor fiscale [Guide on the mediation of tax disputes]. Chisinau, «Cu drag» SRL, 2010. 14 p. (In Rom.).Burlacu M, Rusu S., Roscovan E. Ghid de mediere a conflictelor fiscale [Guide on the mediation of tax disputes]. Chisinau, «Cu drag» SRL, 2010. 14 p. (In Rom.).Krikorian J.D. International Trade Law and Domestic Policy: Canada, the United States, and the WTO. UBC Press, 2012. 320 p.Krikorian J.D. International Trade Law and Domestic Policy: Canada, the United States, and the WTO. UBC Press, 2012. 320 p.Züger M. Arbitration Under Tax Treaties: Improving Legal Protection in International Tax Law. Amsterdam, IBFD Publ., 2001. 276 p.Züger M. Arbitration Under Tax Treaties: Improving Legal Protection in International Tax Law. Amsterdam, IBFD Publ., 2001. 276 p.Poalelungi M. Obligatiile pozitive si negative ale statului prin prisma CEDO [Positive and negative obligations of the state within the European Charter of Human Rights]. Doct. Diss. Thesis. Chisinau, 2015. 324 p. (In Rom.).Poalelungi M. Obligatiile pozitive si negative ale statului prin prisma CEDO [Positive and negative obligations of the state within the European Charter of Human Rights]. Doct. Diss. Thesis. Chisinau, 2015. 324 p. (In Rom.).

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.