pravoПравоприменениеLaw Enforcement Review2542-15142658-4050Dostoevsky Omsk State University10.24147/2542-1514.2017.1(1).38-47pravo-43Research ArticleСтатьиПРОМЕЖУТОЧНЫЕ РЕЗУЛЬТАТЫ И ПРЕДЕЛЫ ГАРМОНИЗАЦИИ ПРЯМЫХ НАЛОГОВ В ЕВРОПЕЙСКОМ СОЮЗЕINTERMEDIATE RESULTS AND LIMITS OF HARMONIZATION OF DIRECT TAXES IN THE EUROPEAN UNIONПономареваК. А.PonomarevaK.

Кандидат юридических наук, старший преподаватель кафедры государственного и муниципального права;

ResearcherID: N-7562-2016

PhD in Law, Assistant Professor, Department of State and Municipal Law;

ResearcherID: N-7562-2016

karinaponomareva@gmail.comОмский государственный университет им. Ф.М. ДостоевскогоРоссияDostoevsky Omsk State UniversityRussian Federation201722032017113847Copyright © Пономарева К.А., 20172017Пономарева К.А.Ponomareva K.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://enforcement.omsu.ru/jour/article/view/43

УДК 347.9

В статье представлен анализ налоговой гармонизации в сфере прямого налогообложения в Европейском Союзе. Автор выделяет несколько важных моментов, являющихся отправными точками европейской интеграции в сфере налогового права: налоговую гармонизацию в сфере прямых налогов, запрет дискриминации и ограничения конкуренции, а также ведущую роль основных свобод в деле европейской интеграции.В статье подчеркивается особая роль Европейского суда справедливости в формировании налогового права Европейского Союза.

УДК 347.9

The article is devoted to analysis of tax harmonization in the area of direct taxation in the European Union. Questions of positive and negative integration, common market and tax harmonization are analyzed.The author mentions the following benchmarks of the European tax integration: these are tax harmonization in the area of direct taxation, prohibition of discrimination and of unfair competition, leading role of fundamental freedoms in field of European integration.The direct effect of EU law is brought into light. The international treaty is a special source of law of Member States and it used in cases which can't be regulated by national legislation or by acts of integration law.Directives and regulations as sources of EU secondary law are described in the article. Their special features are also brought into light.International EU agreements and acts of cooperation in the area of taxation are also brought into light. The special role of soft law is also mentioned in the article.The special role of the European Court of Justice in forming of EU tax law is emphasized.The conclusion of the article is in the statement of importance of taxation in the forming of internal market in integration community.The expected results are important both from theoretical and practical points of view and include:working out the legal framework of direct taxation and finding out actual problems of integration tax law mentioning modern trends of cross-border taxation;recommendations of improving of harmonization mechanisms in the EAEU and improving of the Russian Tax Code.

Правоприменениеинтеграцияналоговое правоЕвропейский Союзпрямые налогиЕвропейский суд справедливостиналоговый суверенитетгармонизацияLaw enforcementintegrationtax lawEuropean Uniondirect taxesEuropean Court of Justicetax sovereigntyharmonizationReferencesТолстопятенко Г.П. Европейское налоговое право. Сравнительно-правовое исследование / Г.П. Тол-стопятенко. – М.: НОРМА, 2001. – 336 с.Tolstopyatenko G.P. European tax law: comparative study. Moscow, Norma Publ., 2001. 336 р. (In Russ.).Нorizontal Tax Coordination within the EU and within States / ed. M. Lang, P. Pistone, J. Schluch, C. Staringer. – Amsterdam: IBFD, 2012. – 352 p.Lang M. et al. (eds.). Нorizontal Tax Coordination within the EU and within States. Amsterdam, IBFD Publ., 2012. 352 р.O’Shea T. Tax Harmonization vs. Tax Coordination in Europe: Different Views / T. O’Shea // Tax Notes Inter-national. – 2007. – Vol. 46, № 8. – P. 811–814.O’Shea T. Tax Harmonization vs. Tax Coordination in Europe: Different Views. Tax Notes International, 2007, Vol. 46, no. 8, pp. 811–814.Самсонов Е.А. Международная налоговая координация в системе налогового планирования / Е.А. Самсонов // Известия Волгоградского государственного технического университета. – 2014. – № 4 (131). – С. 47–49.Samsonov E.A. International tax coordination in the system of tax planning. Izvestiya Volgogradskogo gosu-darstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta, Investia VSTU 2014, no. 4 (131), pp. 47–49. (In Russ.).Погорлецкий А.И. Международное налогообложение / А.И. Погорлецкий. – СПб.: Изд-во Михай-лова В.А., 2006. – 382 c.Pogorletskiy A.I. International taxation. St. Petersburg, Mihailov Publ., 2006. 382 p. (In Russ.).Devereux M.P. What Do We Know about Corporate Tax Competition? / M.P. Devereux, S. Loretz // National Tax Journal. – 2013. – Vol. 66. – P. 745–774.Devereux M.P., Loretz S. What Do We Know about Corporate Tax Competition? National Tax Journal, 2013, Vol. 66, pp. 745–774.Pistone P. The Requirements of the EU Internal Market: Steering the Development of Direct Taxes towards a Fair Mix of Positive and Negative Integration / P. Pistone // Horizontal Tax Coordination within the EU and within States / ed. M. Lang, P. Pistone, J. Schluch, C. Staringer. – Amsterdam: IBFD, 2012. – Р. 331–348.Pistone P. The Requirements of the EU Internal Market: Steering the Development of Direct Taxes towards a Fair Mix of Positive and Negative Integration, in: Lang M. et al. (eds.). Нorizontal Tax Coordination within the EU and within States. Amsterdam, IBFD Publ., 2012, pp. 331–348.Schön W. Tax Competition in Europe – the legal perspective / W. Schön // EC Tax Review. – 2000. – Vol. 2. – P. 90–105.Schön W. Tax Competition in Europe – the legal perspective. EC Tax Review, 2000, Vol. 2, pp. 90–105.Englisch J. Tax Coordination between Member States in the EU – Role oft he ECJ / J. Englisch // Horizontal Tax Coordination within the EU and within States / ed. M. Lang, P. Pistone, J. Schluch, C. Staringer. – Amsterdam: IBFD, 2012. – Р. 3–52.Englisch J. Tax Coordination between Member States in the EU – Role oft he ECJ, in: Lang M. et al. (eds.). Нorizontal Tax Coordination within the EU and within States. Amsterdam, IBFD Publ., 2012, pp. 3–52.Grau A., Herrera P.M. The link between tax coordination and tax harmonization / А. Grau, P.M. Herrera // EC Tax Review. – 2003. – Vol. 12. – P. 28–36.Grau A., Herrera P.M. The link between tax coordination and tax harmonization. EC Tax Review, 2003, Vol. 12, pp. 28–36.Malherbe J. Direct Taxation in the Case-Law of the European Court of Justice / J. Malherbe, P. Malherbe, I. Richelle, E. Traversa. – Brussels: Larcier, 2008. – 336 р.Malherbe J., Malherbe P, Richelle I., Traversa E. Direct Taxation in the Case-Law of the European Court of Justice. Brussels, Larcier Publ., 2008. 336 p.Terra B.J.M. European Tax Law / B.J.M. Terra, P.J. Wattel. – 6th edition. – Kluwer Law International, 2012. – 896 р.Terra B.J.M., Wattel P.J. European Tax Law, 6th ed. Kluwer Law International, 2012. 896 p.Englisch J. Wettbewerbsgleichheit im grenzüberschreitenden Handel / J. Englisch. – Tübingen: Mohr Sie-beck, 2008.Englisch J. Wettbewerbsgleichheit im grenzüberschreitenden Handel. Tübingen, Mohr Siebeck, 2008.Van Thiel S. Free Movement of Persons and Income Tax Law / S. Van Thiel. – Amsterdam: IBFD, 2002.Van Thiel S. Free Movement of Persons and Income Tax Law. Amsterdam, IBFD Publ., 2002.Mortelmans К. The Common Market, the Internal Market and the Single Market, What is in a Market? / K. Mortelmans // Common Market Law Review. – 1998. – Vol. 35. – P. 101–136.Mortelmans К. The Common Market, the Internal Market and the Single Market, What is in a Market? Common Market Law Review, 1998, Vol. 35, pp. 101–136.Kemmeren Е. Source of Income in Globalizing Economies: Overview of the Issues and a Plea for an Origin-Based Approach / Е. Kemmeren // Bulletin for International Taxation. – 2006. – Vol. 11. – P. 441–442.Kemmeren Е. Source of Income in Globalizing Economies: Overview of the Issues and a Plea for an Origin-Based Approach. Bulletin for International Taxation, 2006, Vol. 11, pp. 441–442.Пономарева К.А. Проблемы налогового суверенитета в практике Суда Европейского Cоюза по вопро-сам прямого налогообложения / К.А. Пономарева // Актуальные проблемы российского права. – 2015. – № 3. – С. 151–155.Ponomareva K.A. Problems of tax sovereignty in the practice of the European Court of Justice on the issues of direct taxation. Aktualnye problemi rossiiskogo prava = Actual problems of Russian law. 2015, no. 3, pp. 151–155. (In Russ.).Eden S. The Obstacles Faced by the European Court of Justice in Removing the “Obstacles” Faced by the Taxpayer: the Difficult Case of Double Taxation / S. Eden // British Tax Review. – 2010. – № 6. – P. 610–628.Eden S. The Obstacles Faced by the European Court of Justice in Removing the “Obstacles” Faced by the Taxpayer: the Difficult Case of Double Taxation. British Tax Review, 2010, no. 6, pp. 610–628.Lang M. Der Anwendungsvorrang der Grundfreiheiten auf dem Gebiet des Steuerrechts / M. Lang // Ge-staltung der Rechtsordnung: Festschrift für Joachim Lang. – 2011.Lang M. Der Anwendungsvorrang der Grundfreiheiten auf dem Gebiet des Steuerrechts, in: Gestaltung der Rechtsordnung, Festschrift für Joachim Lang. 2011.Баранова К.К. Практика Европейского суда справедливости в сфере прямого налогообложения / К.К. Баранова, В.Б. Белов // Современная Европа. – 2010. – № 1. – С. 112–127.Baranova K., Belov V. Practice of European Court in the field of direct taxes. Sovremennaya Evropa = Con-temporary Europe, 2010, no. 1, pp. 112–127. (In Russ.).Miller A. Principles of international taxation / A. Miller, O. Lynne. – 4th ed. – Bloomsbury Professional, 2014. – 766 р.Miller A., Lynne O. Principles of international taxation, 4th ed. Bloomsbury Professional, 2014. 766 p.Hindelang S. Europarechtliche Determinanten nationalen Steuerrechts: WHI-Paper 06/2013 / S. Hindelang, H. Köhler. – URL: http://www.whi-berlin.eu/tl_files/WHI-Papers%20ab%202013/WHI-Paper-6-2013.pdf.Hindelang S., Köhler H. Europarechtliche Determinanten nationalen Steuerrechts, WHI-Paper 06/2013. Available at: http://www.whi-berlin.eu/whi-papers-2013.html.Hindelang S. The Free Movement of Capital and Foreign Direct Investment: The Scope of Protection in EU Law / S. Hindelang. – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Hindelang S. The Free Movement of Capital and Foreign Direct Investment: The Scope of Protection in EU Law. Oxford University Press, 2009.Hofstätter M. The Merger Directive / M. Hofstätter, D. Hohenwarter-Mayr // Introduction to European Tax Law on Direct Taxation / ed. by M. Lang et al. – 2nd ed. – Vienna: Linde, 2010. – P. 131–153.Hofstätter M., Hohenwarter-Mayr D. The Merger Directive, in: Lang M., Pistone P., Schuh J., Straringer C. (eds.). Introduction to European Tax Law on Direct Taxation, 2nd ed. Vienna, Linde Publ., 2010, pp. 131–153.Пономарева К.А. Правовые позиции Суда Европейского Союза по вопросам прямого налогообложе-ния / К.А. Пономарева // Вестник Омского университета. Серия «Право». – 2015. – № 1 (42). – С. 98–103.Ponomareva K.A. Legal position of court of justice of the European Union on questions of direct taxation. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya “Pravo” = Herald of Omsk University. Series “Law”, 2015, no. 1 (42), pp. 98–103. (In Russ.).Пономарева К.А. Общая консолидированная база корпоративного налога как один из вариантов гар-монизации прямых налогов в Европейском Союзе / К.А. Пономарева // Актуальные проблемы российского права. – 2016. № 1 (62). – С. 205–212.Ponomareva K.A. Common consolidated corporate tax base as an option for harmonization of direct taxes in the European Union. Aktualnye problemy rossiiskogo prava = Actual problems of Russian law, 2016, no. 1 (62), pp. 205–212. (In Russ.).Lodin S.-O. Home State Taxation / S.-O. Lodin, M. Gammie. – Amsterdam: IBFD, 2001.Lodin S.-O., Gammie M. Home State Taxation. Amsterdam, IBFD Publ., 2001.Пономарева К.А. Справедливое и эффективное налогообложение корпораций в ЕС: План действий / К.А. Пономарева // Налоговед. – 2015. – № 11. – С. 81–87.Ponomareva K.A. Taxing corporations fairly and efficiently in the EU: Action Plan. Nalogoved, 2015, no. 11, pp. 81–87. (In Russ.).

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.