pravoПравоприменениеLaw Enforcement Review2542-15142658-4050Dostoevsky Omsk State University10.52468/2542-1514.2021.5(3).34-44pravo-522Research ArticleТЕОРИЯ И ИСТОРИЯ ПРАВОПРИМЕНЕНИЯTHEORY AND HISTORY OF LAW ENFORCEMENTЛегитимность полицииPolice legitimacyhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6942-7059КлеймёновМ. П.KleymenovM. P.

Клеймёнов Михаил Петрович – доктор юридических наук, профессор, заслуженный деятель науки Российской Федерации, Омский государственный университет им. Ф.М. Достоевского заведующий кафедрой уголовного права и криминологии, Новосибирский государственный университет экономики и управления профессор кафедры уголовного права и национальной безопасности

644077, г. Омск, пр. Мира, 55а,

630099, г. Новосибирск, ул. Каменская, 56

SPIN-код РИНЦ: 4431-6452;

AuthorID: 596245

Mikhail P. Kleymenov – Doctor of Law, Professor, Honoured Scientist of the Russian Federation; Dostoevsky Omsk State University Head, Department of Criminal Law and Criminology; Novosibirsk State University of Economics and Management Professor, Department of Criminal Law and National Security

55a, Mira pr., Omsk, 644077,

56, Kamenskaya ul., Novosibirsk, 630099

RSCI SPIN-code: 4431-6452;

AuthorID: 596245

klim798@mail.ruСедельцевМ. В.SedeltsevM. V.

Седельцев Михаил Владимирович – кандидат юридических наук, адвокат

644001, г. Омск, ул. Лермонтова, 127/1

РИНЦ AuthorID: 524123

Mikhail V. Sedeltsev – PhD in Law, advocate

127/1, Lermontova ul., Omsk, 644001

RSCI AuthorID: 524123

siberianbear2008@yandex.ruОмский государственный университет им. Ф.М. Достоевского; Новосибирский государственный университет экономики и управленияРоссияDostoevsky Omsk State University; Novosibirsk State University of Economics and ManagementRussian FederationОмская областная коллегия адвокатовРоссияOmsk Regional Bar ChambeRussian Federation202130092021533444Copyright © Клеймёнов М.П., Седельцев М.В., 20212021Клеймёнов М.П., Седельцев М.В.Kleymenov M.P., Sedeltsev M.V.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://enforcement.omsu.ru/jour/article/view/522

Выявляются критерии легитимности полиции и причины ее делегитимации. Отмечается, что центральным звеном легитимности полиции выступает общественное доверие, признание, ведущее к сотрудничеству народа и власти. Оценки легитимности формируются на основе изучения общественного мнения – официальной процедуры мониторинга. Такое изучение в принципе должно устанавливать «проблемные зоны» деятельности полиции, имеющие отношение к нарушениям законности, насилию, жестокому обращению, провокациям, побуждению в прямой или косвенной форме кого-либо к совершению противоправных действий, иным должностным злоупотреблениям. Делается вывод, что официальный мониторинг общественного мнения о деятельности полиции, как минимум, должен дополняться результатами независимых правовых и социологических исследований, нацеленных на установление этих «проблемных зон».

The subject of the article is assessment of public confidence in the police and the legality of its activities by the opinion of the Russian population. The purpose of the research is to identify the reasons that affect the assessment of the police legitimacy, its perception by the population. The authors also dare to identify the role of "problem areas" of police activity (related to different violations of the law) in people assessment.

The methodology of the research includes: sociological survey among Russians, comparative criminological, statistical, hermeneutic methods, expert assessments.

The main result, scope of applications. The central link of the police legitimacy is public trust, recognition, leading to the cooperation between the people and the authorities. Legitimacy assessments are formed based on the study of public opinion – the official monitoring procedure. The website of the Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs provides information on the results of monitoring public opinion about the activities of the police, but an analysis of its content allows us to note its superficiality and unconvincing optimism. This is obviously affected by the shortcomings of the departmental legal regulation of the process of monitoring public opinion about the activities of the police, which, judging by the questionnaire questions (there are only three of them), is rather imitative in nature. We believe that the official monitoring of public opinion on the activities of the police, at a minimum, should be supplemented by the results of independent sociological studies aimed at establishing "problem areas" of police activity related to violations of the law, violence, ill-treatment, provocations, inducing someone, directly or indirectly, to commit illegal actions, other official abuses. Otherwise, the regulatory requirements for the activities of the police, which establish the foundations of its legitimacy, cannot be fully implemented. The survey of 362 citizens conducted by the authors allows to state that, with a fairly high assessment of the activities of the Russian police, respondents pay attention to the existence of such problems as: the lack of transparency of police activities and the presence of formal and informal means of evading the legality of police activity, the tolerance of justice authorities to police lawlessness, intoxication with power by police officers, the impact of police brutality on social and legal despair, violation of the law in the name of achieving its falsely understood goals. The extreme case of perverted official zeal is the execution of illegal orders. There are quite widespread ideas in public opinion that entrepreneurs often become victims of extortion by the police, that the police take bribes from medium and small businesses, that you can buy off police officers. At the same time, the results of the study indicate that a significant part of the population is determined to cooperate with the police.

Conclusions. The public demand for the police is relevant, the honor and main meaning of which is to protect the interests of all people and serve justice. People need such policemen who will demonstrate not strength and power, but simple human complicity. This is the main secret of the legitimacy of the police. Another secret lies in the orientation of personnel policy towards professionals in the police: their selection, training and support in difficult situations.

Легитимность полицииполицейская провокациякоррупциянезаконный приказпрофессионализмРоссияLegitimacy of the policepolice provocationcorruptionillegal orderprofessionalismRussiaReferencesНосов С. И. Легитимность и легальность как правовые категории / С. И. Носов // Юрист. – 2020. – № 8. – С. 43–49. – DOI: 10.18572/1812-3929-2020-8-43-49.Nosov S.I. Legitimacy and legality as legal categories. Yurist = Jurist, 2020, no. 8, pp. 43–49. DOI: 10.18572/1812-3929-2020-8-43-49. (In Russ.).Worden R. Mirage of Police Reform: Procedural Justice and Police Legitimacy / R. Worden, S. McLean. – University of California Press, 2017. – xii, 254 p. – DOI: 10.1525/luminos.30.Worden R., McLean S. Mirage of Police Reform: Procedural Justice and Police Legitimacy. University of California Press, 2017. xii + 254 p. DOI: 10.1525/luminos.30.Лозовская С. В. Роль выборов в обеспечении легитимности государственной власти / С. В. Лозовская // Государственная власть и местное самоуправление. – 2020. – № 11. – С. 41–45. – DOI: 10.18572/1813-1247-2020-11-41-45.Lozovskaya S.V. The role of elections in securing legitimacy of the government. Gosudarstvennaya vlast' i mestnoe samoupravlenie = State Power and Local Self-government, 2020, no. 11, pp. 41–45. DOI: 10.18572/1813-1247-2020-11-41-45. (In Russ.).Тимко С. А. Новая процедура мониторинга общественного мнения о деятельности полиции: критический взгляд / С. А. Тимко // Вестник Сибирского юридического института МВД России. – 2017. – № 2 (27). – С. 70–75. – DOI: 10.51980/2542-1735_2017_2_70.Timko S.A. A new procedure for monitoring public opinion of policing: a critical view. Vestnik Sibirskogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii = Vestnik of Siberian Law Institute of the MIA of Russia, 2017, no. 2 (27), pp. 70– 75. DOI: 10.51980/2542-1735_2017_2_70. (In Russ.).Sekhon N. Police and Limit of Law / N. Sekhon // Columbia Law Review. – 2019. – Vol. 119, no. 6. – P. 1711– 1772.Sekhon N. Police and the limit of the law. Columbia Law Review, 2019, vol. 119, no. 6, pp. 1711–1772.Thaman S. Constitutional Rights in the Balance: Modern Exclusionary Rules and the Toleration of Pjlice Lawlessness in the Search for Truth / S. Thaman // The University of Toronto Law Journal. – 2011. – Vol. 61, no. 4. – P. 691–735.Thaman S. Constitutional Rights in the Balance: Modern Exclusionary Rules and the Toleration of Pjlice Lawlessness in the Search for Truth. University of Toronto Law Journal, 2011, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 691–735.Meares T. Lawful or Fair? How Cops and Laypeople Perceive Good Policing / T. Meares, T. Tyler, J. Gardener // Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. – 2015. – Vol. 105, no. 2. – P. 297–343.Meares T., Tyler T., Gardener J. Lawful or Fair? How Cops and Laypeople Perceive Good Policing. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 2015, vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 297–343.Adler J. "The Greatest Thrill I Get is When I Hear a Criminal Say, 'Yes, I Did it'': Race and the Third Degree in New Orleans, 1920–1945 / J. Adler // Law and History Review. – 2016. – Vol. 34, no. 1. – P. 1–44.Adler J. "The Greatest Thrill I Get is When I Hear a Criminal Say, 'Yes, I Did it'': Race and the Third Degree in New Orleans, 1920–1945. Law and History Review, 2016, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 1–44.McLemore B. Procedural Justice, Legal Estrangement and the Black People’s Grand Jury / B. McLemore // Virginia Law Review. – 2019. – Vol. 105, no. 2. – P. 371–395.McLemore B. Procedural Justice, Legal Estrangement and the Black People’s Grand Jury. Virginia Law Review, 2019, vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 371–395.Hagan J. Dual-process theory of racial isolation, legal cynicism, and reported crime / J. Hagan, B. McCarthy, D. Herda, A. C. Chandrasekher // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. – 2018. – Vol. 115, no. 28. – Р. 7190–7199. – DOI: 10.1073/pnas.17222/10115.Hagan J., McCarthy B., Herda D, Chandrasekher A.C. Dual-process theory of racial isolation, legal cynicism, and reported crime. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018, vol. 115, no. 28, pp. 7190–7199. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.17222/10115.Joh E. E. Breaking the Law to Enforce It: Undercover Police Participation in Crime / E. E. Joh // Stanford Law Review. – 2009. – Vol. 62, no. 1. – P. 155–198.Joh E.E. Breaking the Law to Enforce It: Undercover Police Participation in Crime. Stanford Law Review, 2009, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 155–198.Кузьмин А. В. Уголовно-правовая охрана личности сотрудников правоохраниительных органов : дис. … канд. юрид. наук / А. В. Кузьмин. – Ставрополь, 2015. – 226 с.Kuz’min A.V. Criminal and legal protection of the personality of employees of law enforcement agencies, Cand. Diss. Stavropol, 2015. 226 p. (In Russ.)Филиппов П. А. Преступления против порядка управления: теоретико-правовые проблемы и доктринальная модель уголовного закона : дис. … д-ра юрид. наук / П. А. Филиппов. – М., 2015. – 621 с.Filippov P.A. Crimes against the order of management: theoretical and legal problems and the doctrinal model of criminal law, Doct. Diss. Moscow, 2015. 621 p. (In Russ.)Клейменов М. П. Полицейский произвол: мифы и реальность / М. П. Клейменов // Всероссийский криминологический журнал. – 2021. – Т. 15, № 1. – С. 46–54. – DOI: 10.17150/2500-4255.2021.15(1).46-54.Kleymenov M.P. Abuse of power by the police: myths and reality. Vserossiiskii kriminologicheskii zhurnal = Russian Journal of Criminology, 2021, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 46–54. DOI: 10.17150/2500-4255.2021.15(1).46-54. (In Russ.).Лошкарев В. В. Прокурор в системе противодействия незаконным финансовым операциям с использованием судебных решений / В. В. Лошкарев // Законность. – 2018. – № 9. – С. 16–18.Loshkarev V.V. A public prosecutor in the system of countering illegal financial transactions with usage of court resolutions. Zakonnost', 2018, no. 9, pp. 16–18. (In Russ.).Роганов С. А. Проблемы применения норм преюдиции в уголовном процессе при производстве по уголовным делам в сфере экономической деятельности / С. А. Роганов, А. Б. Старокоров // Ленинградский юридический журнал. – 2017. – № 4. – С. 139–148.Roganov S.A., Starokorov A.B. Problems of applying the norms of prejudice in criminal proceedings in criminal cases in the sphere of economic activity. Leningradskii yuridicheskii zhurnal, 2017, no. 4, pp. 139–148. (In Russ.).Абашева Ф. А. Усмотрение судьи при принятии им решений, вытекающих из гражданских правоотношений в порядке ст. 90 УПК РФ / Ф. А. Абашева // Российский судья. – 2017. – № 6. – С. 24–26.Abasheva F.A. Judicial discretion at making judgments resulting from civil-law relations in order of Article 90 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. Rossiiskii sud'ya = Russian Judge, 2017, no. 6, pp. 24–26. (In Russ.).Гирько С. И. Вопросы злоупотребления правилами подведомственности и подсудности при рассмотрении гражданских дел / С. И. Гирько, И. В. Ильин // Современный юрист. – 2018. – № 2. – С. 17–24.Girko S.I., Ilin I.V. Revisiting the issues of abuse of subject matter and court jurisdiction rules with the civil procedures. Sovremennyi yurist, 2018, no. 2, pp. 17–24. (In Russ.).Кондраткова Н. В. К вопросу о противодействии рейдерству в России / Н. В. Кондраткова, В. С. Дмитриевский // Российский следователь. – 2020. – № 9. – С. 32–36. – DOI: 10.18572/1812-3783-2020-9-32-36.Kondratkova N.V., Dmitrievskiy V.S. On raidership combating in Russia. Rossiiskii sledovatel’ = Russian Investigator, 2020, no. 9, pp. 32–36. DOI: 10.18572/1812-3783-2020-9-32-36. (In Russ.).Криницин А. Б. Миф о жертве в поздних романах Ф.М. Достоевского / А. Б. Криницин // Litera. – 2016. – № 2. – С. 56–70. – DOI: 10.7256/2409-8698.2016.2.19126.Krinitsyn A.B. The Myth of Sacrifice in Dostoevsky’s Later Novels. Litera, 2016, no. 2, pp. 56–70. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8698.2016.2.19126. (In Russ.).Бриллиантов А. О признаках приказа, неисполнение которого сотрудником органа внутренних дел влечет уголовную ответственность (ст. 286.1 УК) / А. Бриллиантов // Уголовное право. – 2012. – № 4. – С. 17– 21.Brilliantov A.V. Criteria for the order, failure to which the employee body of internal affairs entails criminal liability. Ugolovnoe pravo, 2012, no. 4, pp. 17–21. (In Russ.).Кудрявцев П. А. Генезис понятия приказа, его применение и ответственность за неисполнение в российском законодательстве / П. А. Кудрявцев // Юридический мир. – 2014. – № 5. – С. 45–50.Kudryavtsev P.A. Genesis of the concept of the order, application and responsibility for failure to perform in the Russian legislation. Yuridicheskii mir = Juridical World, 2014, no. 5, pp. 45–50. (In Russ.).Поляков С. Б. Условия российской правовой системы для заказных уголовных дел / С. Б. Поляков // Адвокат. – 2009. – № 5. – С. 68–78.Polyakov S.B. Conditions of the Russian legal system for ordered criminal cases. Advokat, 2009, no. 5, pp. 68–78. (In Russ.).Иванов В. Д. Провокация преступления / В. Д. Иванов, В. А. Черепахин // Российский следователь. – 2013. – № 14. – С. 29–32.Ivanov V.D., Cherepakhin V.A. Provocation of a crime. Rossiiskii sledovatel' = Russian Investigator, 2013, no. 14, pp. 29–32. (In Russ.).Борков В. Н. Провокация преступления: уголовно-правовая оценка действий провокатора и спровоцированного / В. Н. Борков // Законы России: опыт, анализ, практика. – 2019. – № 6. – С. 68–74.Borkov V.N. Provocation of crime: criminal law assessment of actions provocateur and provoked. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika, 2019, no. 6, pp. 68–74. (In Russ.).Bayley D. Police Corruption: What Past Scandals Teach about Current Challenges : Research Report/ D. Bayley, R. Perito. – US Institute of Peace, 2011. – 20 p.Bayley D., Perito R. Police corruption: What Past Scandals Teach about Current Challenges, Research Report. US Institute of Peace, 2011. 20 p.Dordevich S. Collection on Policy on Police Reform in Serbia : Research Report / S. Dordevich, J. Litavski. – Belgrade Centre for Security Policy, 2012. – 40 p.Dordevich S., Litavsky J. Collection on Policy on Police Reform in Serbia, Research Report. Belgrade Centre for Security Policy, 2012. 40 p.Rothstein B. The State and Social Capital: An Institutional Theory of Generalized Trust / B. Rothstein, D. Stolle // Comparative Politics. – 2008. – Vol. 40, no. 4. – P. 441–459.Rothstein B., Stolle D. The State and Social Capital: An Institutional Theory of Generalized Trust. Comparative Politics, 2008, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 441–459.Holston J. "Come to the Street!": Urban Protest, Brazil 2013 / J. Holston // Anthropological Quarterly. – 2014. – Vol. 87, no. 3. – P. 887–900.Holston J. "Come to the Street!": Urban Protest, Brazil 2013. Anthropological Quarterly, 2014, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 887–900.Kocak D. Rethinking Community Policing in International Police Reform: Examples from Asia / D. Kocak. – Ubiquity Press : Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces, 2018. – 68 р.Kocak D. Rethinking Community Policing in International Police Reform: Examples from Asia. Ubiquity Press, Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces, 2018. 68 р.Gaub F. Relationship Therapy: Making Arab Police Reform Work / F. Gaub, A. Walsh. – Paris : European Union Institute for Security Studies (EUISS), 2020. – 62 p.Gaub F., Walsh A. Relationship Therapy: Making Arab Police Reform Work. Paris, European Union Institute for Security Studies (EUISS), 2020. 62 p.Хазова В. Е. Современные тенденции подготовки полицейских кадров в XXI веке / В. Е. Хазова, Е. Ю. Сергеева // Вестник Московского университета МВД России. – 2013. – № 7. – С. 243–246.Hazova V.E., Sergeyeva E.Yu. Current trends of vocational training of police shots in the XXI century. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii, 2013, no. 7, pp. 243–246. (In Russ.).Coulangeon Ph. Professional Ideologies: A Latent Class Analysis of Police Officers' Opinions on the Role of the Police / Ph. Coulangeon, G. Pruvost, I. Roharik, T. Matthews // Revue française de sociologie (English Edition). – 2012. – Vol. 53, no. 3. – P. 347–380.Coulangeon P., Pruvost G., Roharik I., Matthews T. Professional Ideologies: A Latent Class Analysis of Police Officers' Opinions on the Role of the Police. Revue française de sociologie (English Edition), 2012, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 347–380.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.