pravoПравоприменениеLaw Enforcement Review2542-15142658-4050Dostoevsky Omsk State University10.52468/2542-1514.2022.6(2).32-49pravo-628Research ArticleТЕОРИЯ И ИСТОРИЯ ПРАВОПРИМЕНЕНИЯTHEORY AND HISTORY OF LAW ENFORCEMENTНейротехнологии в праве и правоприменении: прошлое, настоящее и будущееNeurotechnologies in law and law enforcement: past, present and futureФилиповаИ. А.FilipovaI. A.

Филипова Ирина Анатольевна – кандидат юридических наук, доцент, доцент кафедры трудового и экологического права.

603022, Нижний Новгород, пр. Гагарина, 23

Irina A. Filipova – PhD in Law, Associate Professor; Associate Professor, Department of Labor and Environmental Law.

23, Gagarina pr., Nizhny Novgorod, 603022

irinafilipova@yandex.ruНижегородский государственный университет им. Н.И. ЛобачевскогоРоссияLobachevsky UniversityRussian Federation202221062022623249Copyright © Филипова И.А., 20222022Филипова И.А.Filipova I.A.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://enforcement.omsu.ru/jour/article/view/628

Рассматриваются основные вопросы, которые ставит перед правом развитие нейротехнологий, и вопросы, возникающие в связи с применением нейротехнологий в деятельности правоохранительных органов. Нейротехнологии относятся к быстро развивающимся технологиям, распространение которых в России заявлено в качестве одного из приоритетов. Происходит процесс внедрения нейротехнологий в образование и медицину, в производство и сферу услуг. Использование нейротехнологий на практике вызывает потребность в регулировании правом, а также способствует проникновению данных технологий в правоприменение в связи с появляющимися новыми возможностями, предоставляемыми за счет решений на основе нейротехнологий, и из-за необходимости реагировать на использование нейроустройств людьми в повседневной жизни.

The scope of the research is the necessity for legal regulation of the use of neurotechnologies in various sectors of human activity and the possibility of their application in jurisprudence. Neurotechnology is based on advances in neuroscience that allow us to understand the structure of the brain. The advances in neuroscience are driving the rapid development of neurotechnologies and their spread in modern society. The special importance of neurotechnologies is explained by the fact that, on the one hand, they contribute to the enhancement of artificial intelligence, significantly increasing the amount of data necessary for artificial intelligence for learning, on the other hand, with the help of neurotechnologies, people can increase their capabilities, both physical and mental.

The purpose of the article is to analyze the development of the application of neurotechnologies in practical use and assess the degree of necessity for the right to respond to the use of various neurodevices by people, as well as to study the risks of using solutions based on neurotechnologies in law enforcement.

The methods of conducting this research include the formal logical method, historical and comparative legal methods, the method of systems analysis, the method of abstraction and the method of legal forecasting.

The main scientific results. Taking into consideration the available foreign experience, the history of the use of neurotechnologies in law enforcement to the present day is systematized, the origins of the formation of neuro-law are considered. The level of neurotechnologies achieved today is assessed, the main issues that the development of neurotechnolo- gies pose to law, and the questions that arise in connection with the growing use of neurotechnologies in law enforcement in the world are listed. Analyzed the legal acts and international documents (soft law) aimed at the regulation of neurotechnology nowadays. The short-term prospects for the use of neurotechnologies in law enforcement are formulated and the related needs for changing legal regulation, in particular, the need to recognize a new group of neuro-rights for a person are highlighted.

Conclusions. The further development of neurotechnologies, declared as one of the state priorities in Russia, inevitably intensifies the penetration of neurotechnologies into various sectors of public and state life, including the activities of law enforcement agencies. Therefore, it is necessary to prepare the legal basis for this already today, implementing the relevant provisions into the Constitution of the Russian Federation, criminal, civil, administrative, labor and procedural legislation.

Нейроправонейроюристнейровизуализация мозгаискусственный интеллектчеловеко-машинная коммуникациянейроправа человекаправо на психическую неприкосновенностькогнитивная свободаNeurolawneurolawyerneuroimaging of the brainartificial intelligencehumanmachine communicationneurorightsright to mental integritycognitive libertyИсследование выполнено при финансовой поддержке РФФИ в рамках научного проекта № 19-011-00320The reported study was funded by Russian Foundation for Basic Research according to the research project No. 19-011-00320ReferencesBudka M. Deep multilabel CNN for forensic footwear impression descriptor identification / M. Budka, A. W. U. Ashraf, M. Bennett, S. Neville, A. Mackrill // Applied Soft Computing. – 2021. – Vol. 109. – Art. 107496. – DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107496.Budka M., Ashraf A.W.U., Bennett M., Neville S., Mackrill A. Deep multilabel CNN for forensic footwear impression descriptor identification. Applied Soft Computing, 2021, vol. 109, art. 107496. DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107496.Taylor J. S. Neuropsychological evidence on appeal / J. S. Taylor, T. Elliott. – Professional Education Systems, 1989. – 59 p.Taylor J.Sh., Elliott T. Neuropsychological evidence on appeal. Professional Education Systems Publ., 1989. 59 p.Дежина И. Г. Мировой ландшафт нейронаук и место России / И. Г. Дежина, Т. М. Нафикова // Мировая экономика и международные отношения. – 2020. – Т. 64, № 9. – С. 37–47. – DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-9-37-47.Dezhina I.G., Nafikova T.M. Global landscape of neuroscience and place of Russia. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya = World economy and international relations, 2020, vol. 64, no. 9, pp. 37–47. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-9-37-47. (In Russ.).Taylor J. S. Neuropsychologists and neurolawyers/J. S. Taylor, A. Harp, T. Elliott // Neuropsychology. – 1991. – Vol. 5, iss. 4. – P. 293–305. – DOI: 10.1037/0894-4105.5.4.293.Taylor Sh.J., Harp A., Elliott T. Neuropsychologists and neurolawyers. Neuropsychology, 1991, vol. 5, iss. 4, pp. 293–305. DOI: 10.1037/0894-4105.5.4.293.Petoft A. Neurolaw: A brief introduction / A. Petoft // Iranian Journal of Neurology. – 2015. – Vol. 14, iss. 1. – P. 53–58.Petoft A. Neurolaw: A brief introduction. Iranian Journal of Neurology, 2015, vol. 14, iss. 1, pp. 53–58.Shen F. X. The overlooked history of neurolaw / F. X. Shen // Fordham Law Review. – 2016. – Vol. 85. – P. 667–695.Shen F.X. The overlooked history of neurolaw. Fordham Law Review, 2016, vol. 85, pp. 667–695.Toward Rehabilitation of Criminals: Appraisal of Statutory Treatment of Mentally Disordered Recidivists // Yale Law Journal. – 1948. – Vol. 57. – P. 1085–1113.Toward Rehabilitation of Criminals: Appraisal of Statutory Treatment of Mentally Disordered Recidivists. Yale Law Journal, 1948, vol. 57, pp. 1085–1113.Ryberg J. Neurointerventions, Crime, and Punishment: Ethical Considerations / J. Ryberg. – New York : Oxford University Press. – 2019. – 250 p. – DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190846428.001.0001.Ryberg J. Neurointerventions, Crime, and Punishment: Ethical Considerations. New York, Oxford University Press, 2019. 250 p. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190846428.001.0001.Sowell E. R. Mapping cortical change across the human life span / E. R. Sowell, B. S. Peterson, P. M. Thompson, S. E. Welcome, A. L. Henkenius, A. W. Toga // Nature Neuroscience. – 2003. – Vol. 6. – P. 309–315. – DOI: 10.1038/nn1008.Sowell E.R., Peterson B.S., Thompson P.M., Welcome S.E., Henkenius A.L., Toga A.W. Mapping cortical change across the human life span. Nature Neuroscience, 2003, vol. 6, pp. 309–315. DOI: 10.1038/nn1008.Coppola F. When the Brain Can Make a Difference: Individualized versus Framework Uses of Neuroscience in Courtrooms / F. Coppola // Criminal Law and Human Condition. – 2020. – Iss. 1. – P. 1–24.Coppola F. When the Brain Can Make a Difference: Individualized versus Framework Uses of Neuroscience in Courtrooms. Criminal Law and Human Condition, 2020, iss. 1, pp. 1–24.A Primer on Criminal Law and Neuroscience: A contribution of the Law and Neuroscience Project, supported by the MacArthur Foundation / ed. by S. J. Morse, A. L. Roskies. – Oxford University Press, 2013. – 320 p. – DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199859177.001.0001.Morse S.J., Roskies A.L. (eds.). A Primer on Criminal Law and Neuroscience: A contribution of the Law and Neuroscience Project, supported by the MacArthur Foundation. Oxford University Press, 2013. 320 p. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199859177.001.0001.Vincent N. A. Restoring Responsibility: Promoting Justice, Therapy and Reform Through Direct Brain Interventions / N. A. Vincent // Criminal Law and Philosophy. – 2014. – Vol. 8, iss. 1. – P. 21–42. – DOI: 10.1007/s11572-012-9156-y.Vincent N.A. Restoring Responsibility: Promoting Justice, Therapy and Reform Through Direct Brain Interventions. Criminal Law and Philosophy, 2014, vol. 8, iss. 1, pp. 21–42. DOI: 10.1007/s11572-012-9156-y.Mora M. N. How Law and Neuroscience became a new field of study / M. N. Mora // Bioethics UPdate. – 2019. – Vol. 5, iss. 2. – P. 75–88. – DOI: 10.1016/j.bioet.2018.10.001.Mora M.N. How Law and Neuroscience became a new field of study. Bioethics Update, 2019, vol. 5, iss. 2, pp. 75–88. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioet.2018.10.001.Eagleman D. M. Pourquoi les sciences du cerveau peuvent éclairer le droit / D. M. Eagleman // Le cerveau et la loi: analyse de l’émergence du neurodroit / ed. by O. Oullier. – Paris : Centre d’analyse stratégique, 2012. – P. 33–52.Eagleman D.M. Pourquoi les sciences du cerveau peuvent éclairer le droit, in: Oullier O. (ed.). Le cerveau et la loi: analyse de l’émergence du neurodroit, Paris, Centre d’analyse stratégique Publ., 2012, pp. 33–52. (In French).Brown T. R. Through a Scanner Darkly: Functional Neuroimaging as Evidence of a Criminal Defendant's Past Mental States / T. R. Brown, E. R. Murphy // Stanford Law Review. – 2010. – Vol. 62, iss. 4. – P. 1119–1208.Brown T.R., Murphy E.R. Through a Scanner Darkly: Functional Neuroimaging as Evidence of a Criminal Defendant's Past Mental States. Stanford Law Review, 2010, vol. 62, iss. 4, pp. 1119–1208.Беляев М. А. «Нейроправо»: есть ли основания? / М. А. Беляев // Дидикин А. Б. Право и нейронауки / А. Б. Дидикин, М. А. Беляев, В. С. Горбань. – Екатеринбург : Издательские решения, 2019. – С. 3–13.Belyaev M.A. "Neuropravo": are there grounds?, in: Didikin A.B., Belyaev M.A., Gorban’ V.S. Pravo i neironauki, Yekaterinburg, Izdatel'skie resheniya Publ., 2019, pp. 3–13. (In Russ.).Tovino S. A. Functional neuroimaging and the law: trends and directions for future scholarship / S. A. Tovino // American Journal of Bioethics. – 2007. – Vol. 7, iss. 9. – P. 44–56.Tovino S.A. Functional neuroimaging and the law: trends and directions for future scholarship. American Journal of Bioethics, 2007, vol. 7, iss. 9, pp. 44–56.Takahashi T. Molecular neuroeconomics of crime and punishment: implications for neurolaw / T. Takahashi // NeuroEndocrinology Letters. – 2012. – Vol. 33, iss. 7. – P. 667–673.Takahashi T. Molecular neuroeconomics of crime and punishment: implications for neurolaw. NeuroEndocrinology Letters, 2012, vol. 33, iss. 7, pp. 667–673.Krueger F. An fMRI investigation of the effects of belief in free will on third-party punishment / F. Krueger, M. Hoffman, H. Walter, J. Grafman // Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. – 2014. – Vol. 9, iss. 8. – P. 1143–1149. – DOI: 10.1093/scan/nst092.Krueger F., Hoffman M., Walter H., Grafman J. An fMRI investigation of the effects of belief in free will on third-party punishment. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2014, vol. 9, iss. 8, pp. 1143–1149. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nst092.Makin J. G. Machine translation of cortical activity to text with an encoder–decoder framework / J. G. Makin, D. A. Moses, E. F. Chang // Nature Neuroscience. – 2020. – № 23. – P. 575–582. – DOI: 10.1038/s41593-020-0608-8.Makin J.G., Moses D.A., Chang E.F. Machine translation of cortical activity to text with an encoder–decoder framework. Nature Neuroscience, 2020, no. 23, pp. 575–582. DOI: 10.1038/s41593-020-0608-8.Schwab K. The Fourth Industrial Revolution. What It Means and How to Respond / K. Schwab // Foreign Affairs. – December 12, 2015. – URL: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2015-12-12/fourth-industrialrevolution.Schwab K. The Fourth Industrial Revolution. What It Means and How to Respond. Foreign Affairs, December 12, 2015, available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2015-12-12/fourth-industrial-revolution.Martelli M. F. Forensic Neuropsychology: Fundamentals and Practice / M. F. Martelli // Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation. – 2000. – Vol. 15, iss. 4. – P. 1073–1075. – DOI: 10.1097/00001199-200008000-00011.Martelli M.F. Forensic Neuropsychology: Fundamentals and Practice. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 2000, vol. 15, iss. 4, pp. 1073–1075. DOI: 10.1097/00001199-200008000-00011.Petoft A. Current limits of neurolaw: A brief overview / A. Petoft, M. Abbasi // Médecine & Droit. – 2020. – Iss. 161. – P. 29–34. – DOI: 10.1016/j.meddro.2019.11.002.Petoft A., Abbasi M. Current limits of neurolaw: A brief overview. Médecine & Droit, 2020, iss. 161, pp. 29–34. DOI: 10.1016/j.meddro.2019.11.002.Дидикин А. Б. Нейронаука, действия и юридическая ответственность / А. Б. Дидикин // Дидикин А. Б. Право и нейронауки / А. Б. Дидикин, М. А. Беляев, В. С. Горбань. – Екатеринбург : Издательские решения, 2019. – С. 14–28.Didikin A.B. Neuroscience, action and legal liability, in: Didikin A.B., Belyaev M.A., Gorban’ V.S. Pravo i neironauki, Yekaterinburg, Izdatel'skie resheniya Publ., 2019, pp. 14–28. (In Russ.).Gkotsi G. M. Neuroimaging in criminal trials and the role of psychiatrists expert witnesses: A case study / G. M. Gkotsi, J. Gasser, V. Moulin // International Journal of Law and Psychiatry. – 2019. – Vol. 65. – Art. 101359. – DOI: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2018.05.007.Gkotsi G.M., Gasser J., Moulin V. Neuroimaging in criminal trials and the role of psychiatrists expert witnesses: A case study. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 2019, vol. 65, art. 101359. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2018.05.007.Vincent N. A. Neurolaw and Direct Brain Interventions / N. A. Vincent // Criminal Law and Philosophy. – 2014. – Vol. 8. – P. 43–50. – DOI: 10.1007/s11572-012-9164-y.Vincent N.A. Neurolaw and Direct Brain Interventions. Criminal Law and Philosophy, 2014, vol. 8, pp. 43–50. DOI: 10.1007/s11572-012-9164-y.Горбань В. С. Нейронауки и право: сложная взаимосвязь / В. С. Горбань // Дидикин А. Б. Право и нейронауки / А. Б. Дидикин, М. А. Беляев, В. С. Горбань. – Екатеринбург : Издательские решения, 2019. – С. 29–38.Gorban’ V.S. Neurosciences and law: a complex interconnection, in: Didikin A.B., Belyaev M.A., Gorban’ V.S. Pravo i neironauki, Yekaterinburg, Izdatel'skiye resheniya Publ., 2019, pp. 29–38. (In Russ.).Zyzik R. Neurolaw: A New Paradigm in Legal Philosophy / R. Zyzik // Studies in the Philosophy of Law: Law and Biology / ed. by J. Stelmach, B. Brożek, M. Soniewicka. – Jagiellonian University Press, 2010. – P. 125–134.Zyzik R. Neurolaw: A New Paradigm in Legal Philosophy, in: Stelmach J., Brożek B., Soniewicka M. (eds.). Studies in the Philosophy of Law: Law and Biology, Jagiellonian University Press, 2010, pp. 125–134.Полубинская С. В. Нейродетектор лжи / С. В. Полубинская // Союз криминалистов и криминологов. – 2021. – № 1. – С. 7–14. – DOI: 10.31085/2310-8681-2021-1-204-7-14.Polubinskaya S.V. The neuro lie detector. Soyuz kriminalistov i kriminologov = Union of сriminalists and сriminologists, 2021, no. 1, pp. 7–14. DOI: 10.31085/2310-8681-2021-1-204-7-14. (In Russ.).Smalley E. The business of brain-computer interfaces / E. Smalley // Nature Biotechnology. – 2019. – Vol. 37. – P. 978–982. – DOI: 10.1038/s41587-019-0231-y.Smalley E. The business of brain-computer interfaces. Nature Biotechnology, 2019, vol. 37, pp. 978–982. DOI: 10.1038/s41587-019-0231-y.Gómez M. ¿Es necesario proteger legal y constitucionalmente nuestro cerebro? / M. Gómez // Pauta. – June 27, 2021. – URL: https://www.pauta.cl/ciencia-y-tecnologia/debate-sobre-proyectos-para-para-proteger-elcerebro-y-neuroderechos.Gómez M. ¿Es necesario proteger legal y constitucionalmente nuestro cerebro? Pauta, June 27, 2021, available at: https://www.pauta.cl/ciencia-y-tecnologia/debate-sobre-proyectos-para-para-proteger-el-cerebro-yneuroderechos. (In Spanish).Levy N. Is Neurolaw Conceptually Confused? / N. Levy // Journal of Ethics. – 2014. – Vol. 18, iss. 2. – P. 171– 185. – DOI: 10.1007/s10892-014-9168-z.Levy N. Is Neurolaw Conceptually Confused? Journal of Ethics, 2014, vol. 18, iss. 2, pp. 171–185. DOI: 10.1007/s10892-014-9168-z.Dunagam J. F. Neuro-futures: The brain, politics and power / J. F. Dunagam // Journal of Future Studies. – 2004. – Vol. 9, iss. 2. – P. 1–18.Dunagam J.F. Neuro-futures: The brain, politics and power. Journal of Future Studies, 2004, vol. 9, iss. 2, pp. 1–18.Kolber A. Will There Be a Neurolaw Revolution? / A. Kolber // Indiana Law Journal. – 2014. – Vol. 89. – P. 807–845.Kolber A. Will There Be a Neurolaw Revolution? Indiana Law Journal, 2014, vol. 89, pp. 807–845.Murphy E. R. D. Evidence of memory from brain data / E. R. D. Murphy, J. Rissman // Journal of Law and the Biosciences. – 2020. – Vol. 7, iss. 1. – Art. lsaa078. – DOI: 10.1093/jlb/lsaa078.Murphy E.R.D., Rissman J. Evidence of memory from brain data. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 2020, vol. 7, iss. 1, art. lsaa078. DOI: 10.1093/jlb/lsaa078.Полубинская С. В. Использование данных нейронаук в доктрине уголовного права и судебной практике / С. В. Полубинская // Труды Института государства и права РАН. – 2019. – Т. 14, № 5. – С. 9–37. – DOI: 10.35427/2073-4522-2019-14-5-polubinskaya.Polubinskaya S.V. Use of neuroscience in criminal law doctrine and criminal sentencing. Trudy Instituta gosudarstva i prava RAN = Proceedings of the Institute of State and Law of the RAS, 2019, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 9–37. DOI: 10.35427/2073-4522-2019-14-5-polubinskaya. (In Russ.).Hoffman M. B. Nine Neurolaw Predictions / M. B. Hoffman // New Criminal Law Review. – 2018. – Vol. 21, iss. 2. – P. 212–246. – DOI: 10.1525/nclr.2018.21.2.212.Hoffman M.B. Nine Neurolaw Predictions. New Criminal Law Review, 2018, vol. 21, iss. 2, pp. 212–246. DOI: 10.1525/nclr.2018.21.2.212.Goodenough O. R. Law and Cognitive Neuroscience / O. R. Goodenough, M. Tucker // Annual Review of Law and Social Science. – 2010. – Vol. 6. – P. 61–92. – DOI: 10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.093008.131523.Goodenough O.R., Tucker M. Law and Cognitive Neuroscience. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2010, vol. 6, pp. 61–92. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.093008.131523.Merkel R. Neuroimaging and Criminal Law / R. Merkel // Handbook of Neuroethics / ed. by J. Clausen, N. Levy. – Springer, 2015. – P. 1335–1362.Merkel R. Neuroimaging and Criminal Law, in: Clausen J., Levy N. (eds.). Handbook of Neuroethics, Springer Publ., 2015, pp. 1335–1362.Harris G. T. Psychopathy and violent recidivism / G. T. Harris, M. Rice, C. A. Cormier // Law and Human Behavior. – 1991. – Vol. 15, No. 6. – P. 625–637. – DOI: 10.1007/BF01065856.Harris G.T., Rice M., Cormier C.A. Psychopathy and violent recidivism. Law and Human Behavior, 1991, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 625–637. DOI: 10.1007/BF01065856.Porter S. Crime profiles and conditional release performance of psychopathic and non-psychopathic sexual offenders / S. Porter, L. ten Brinke, K. Wilson // Legal and Criminological Psychology. – 2009. – Vol. 14, iss. 1. – P. 109–118. – DOI: 10.1348/135532508X284310.Porter S., ten Brinke L., Wilson K. Crime profiles and conditional release performance of psychopathic and non-psychopathic sexual offenders. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 2009, vol. 14, iss. 1, pp. 109–118. DOI: 10.1348/135532508X284310.Olver M. E. Psychopathy, sexual deviance, and recidivism among sex offenders / M. E. Olver, S. C. P. Wong // Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment. – 2006. – Vol. 18, iss. 1. – P. 65–82. – DOI: 10.1007/s11194-006-9006-3.Olver M.E., Wong S.C.P. Psychopathy, sexual deviance, and recidivism among sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 2006, vol. 18, iss. 1, pp. 65–82. DOI: 10.1007/s11194-006-9006-3.Wurtele S. K. Sexual interest in children among an online sample of men and women: Prevalence and correlates / S. K. Wurtele, D. A. Simons, T. Moreno // Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment. – 2014. – Vol. 26, iss. 6. – P. 546–568. – DOI: 10.1177/1079063213503688.Wurtele S.K., Simons D.A., Moreno T. Sexual interest in children among an online sample of men and women: Prevalence and correlates. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 2014, vol. 26, iss. 6, pp. 546–568. DOI: 10.1177/1079063213503688.Ligthart S. Freedom of thought in Europe: do advances in ‘brain-reading’ technology call for revision? / S. Ligthart // Journal of Law and the Biosciences. – 2020. – Vol. 7, iss. 1. – Art. lsaa048. – DOI: 10.1093/jlb/lsaa048.Ligthart S. Freedom of thought in Europe: do advances in ‘brain-reading’ technology call for revision? Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 2020, vol. 7, iss. 1, art. lsaa048. DOI: 10.1093/jlb/lsaa048.Ienca M. Towards new human rights in the age of neuroscience and neurotechnology / M. Ienca, R. Andorno // Life Sciences, Society and Policy. – 2017. – No. 13, iss. 5. – P. 1–27. – DOI: 10.1186/s40504-017-0050.Ienca M., Andorno R. Towards new human rights in the age of neuroscience and neurotechnology. Life Sciences, Society and Policy, 2017, no. 13, iss. 5, pp. 1–27. DOI: 10.1186/s40504-017-0050.Jwa A. S. Enhancing the developing brain: tensions between parent, child, and state in the United States / A. S. Jwa // Journal of Law and the Biosciences. – 2021. – Vol. 8, iss. 1. – P. 1–24. – DOI: 10.1093/jlb/lsab017.Jwa A.S. Enhancing the developing brain: tensions between parent, child, and state in the United States. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 2021, vol. 8, iss. 1, pp. 1–24. DOI: 10.1093/jlb/lsab017.Beriain I. M. ‘Digital pills’ for mental diseases: an ethical and social analysis of the issues behind the concept / I. M. Beriain, M. M. González // Journal of Law and the Biosciences. – 2020. – Vol. 7, iss. 1. – P. 1–19. – DOI: 10.1093/jlb/lsaa040.Beriain I.M., González M.M. ‘Digital pills’ for mental diseases: an ethical and social analysis of the issues behind the concept. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 2020, vol. 7, iss. 1, pp. 1–19. DOI: 10.1093/jlb/lsaa040.Barfield W. Law, Cyborgs, and Technologically Enhanced Brains / W. Barfield, A. Williams // Philosophies. – 2017. – Vol. 2, iss. 1. – Art. 6. – DOI: 10.3390/philosophies2010006.Barfield W., Williams A. Law, Cyborgs, and Technologically Enhanced Brains. Philosophies, 2017, vol. 2, iss. 1, art. 6. DOI: 10.3390/philosophies2010006.Wittes B. Our Cyborg Future: Law and Policy Implications / B. Wittes, J. Chong. – Brookings : Center for Technology Innovation, 2014. – 28 p. – (Series: The Project on Civilian Robotics).Wittes B., Chong J. Our Cyborg Future: Law and Policy Implications, Series: The Project on Civilian Robotics. Brookings, Center for Technology Innovation Publ., 2014. 28 p.Borbón Rodríguez D. A. NeuroRight to Equal Access to Mental Augmentation: Analysis from Posthumanism, Law and Bioethics / D. A. Borbón Rodríguez, L. F. Borbón Rodríguez, M. A. León Bustamante // Revista Iberoamericana de Bioética. – 2021. – No. 16. – P. 1–15. – DOI: 10.14422/rib.i16.y2021.006.Borbón Rodríguez D.A., Borbón Rodríguez L.F., León Bustamante M.A. NeuroRight to Equal Access to Mental Augmentation: Analysis from Posthumanism, Law and Bioethics. Revista Iberoamericana de Bioética, 2021, no. 16, pp. 1–15. DOI: 10.14422/rib.i16.y2021.006.Goering S. Recommendations for Responsible Development and Application of Neurotechnologies / S. Goering, E. Klein, L. Specker Sullivan, A. Wexler, B. Agüera y Arcas, G. Bi, J. M. Carmena, J. J. Fins, Ph. Friesen, J. Gallant, J. E. Huggins, Ph. Kellmeyer, A. Marblestone, Ch. Mitchell, E. Parens, M. Pham, A. Rubel, N. Sadato, M. Teicher, D. Wasserman, M. Whittaker, J. Wolpaw, R. Yuste // Neuroethics. – 2021. – Vol. 14, iss. 3. – P. 365–386. – DOI: 10.1007/s12152-021-09468-6.Goering S., Klein E., Specker Sullivan L., Wexler A., Agüera y Arcas B., Bi G., Carmena J.M., Fins J.J., Friesen Ph., Gallant J., Huggins J.E., Kellmeyer Ph., Marblestone A., Mitchell Ch., Parens E., Pham M., Rubel A., Sadato N., Teicher M., Wasserman D., Whittaker M., Wolpaw J., Yuste R. Recommendations for Responsible Development and Application of Neurotechnologies. Neuroethics, 2021, vol. 14, iss. 3, pp. 365–386. DOI: 10.1007/s12152-021-09468-6.Inglese S. What Should We Do with People Who Cannot or Do Not Want to Be Protected from Neurotechnological Threats? / S. Inglese, A. Lavazza // Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. – 2021. – Vol. 15. – Art. 703092. – DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.703092.Inglese S., Lavazza A. What Should We Do with People Who Cannot or Do Not Want to Be Protected from Neurotechnological Threats? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2021, vol. 15, art. 703092, pp. 1–6. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.703092.Market report on Pervasive Neurotechnology: A Groundbreaking Analysis of 10,000+ Patent Filings Transforming Medicine, Health, Entertainment, and Business. – SharpBrains, 2015. – 206 p.SharpBrains. Market report on Pervasive Neurotechnology: A Groundbreaking Analysis of 10,000+ Patent Filings Transforming Medicine, Health, Entertainment, and Business. SharpBrains Publ., 2015. 206 p.Cinel C. Neurotechnologies for Human Cognitive Augmentation: Current State of the Art and Future Prospects / C. Cinel, D. Valeriani, R. Poli // Frontiers in Human Neurosciences. – 2019. – No. 13. – P. 1–24. – DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00013.Cinel C., Valeriani D., Poli R. Neurotechnologies for Human Cognitive Augmentation: Current State of the Art and Future Prospects. Frontiers in Human Neurosciences, 2019, no. 13, pp. 1–24. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00013.Сидорова Т. А. Этико-философские аспекты трансфера нейротехнологий через биомедицинское улучшение / Т. А. Сидорова // Вестник Челябинского государственного университета. – 2019. – № 5 (427). – С. 46–54. – DOI: 10.24411/1994-2796-2019-10508.Sidorova T.A. Ethical and philosophical aspects of the transfer of neurothechnology via biomedical enhancer. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, 2019, no. 5 (427), pp. 46–54. DOI: 10.24411/1994-2796-2019-10508. (In Russ.).Pustilnik A. C. Neurotechnologies at the Intersection of Criminal Procedure and Constitutional Law / A. C. Pustilnik // The Constitution and the Future of the Criminal Law / ed. by J. Parry, S. Richardson. – Cambridge University Press, 2013. – P. 109–134. – DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139108034.011.Pustilnik A.C. Neurotechnologies at the Intersection of Criminal Procedure and Constitutional Law, in: Parry J., Richardson S. (eds.). The Constitution and the Future of the Criminal Law, Cambridge University Press, 2013, pp. 109–134. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139108034.011.Clausen J. Help, hope, and hype: Ethical dimensions of neuroprosthetics / J. Clausen, E. Fetz, J. Donoghue, J. Ushiba, U. Spörhase, J. Chandler, N. Birbaumer, S.R. Soekadar // Science. – 2017. – Vol. 356, iss. 6345. – P. 1338–1339. – DOI: 10.1126/science.aam7731.Clausen J., Fetz E., Donoghue J., Ushiba J., Spörhase U., Chandler J., Birbaumer N., Soekadar S.R. Help, hope, and hype: Ethical dimensions of neuroprosthetics. Science, 2017, vol. 356, iss. 6345, pp. 1338–1339. DOI: 10.1126/science.aam7731.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.