<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">pravo</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Правоприменение</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Law Enforcement Review</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2542-1514</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2658-4050</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Dostoevsky Omsk State University</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24147/2542-1514.2017.1(2).207-211</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">pravo-85</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Третейское разбирательство: обзор журнала «Правоприменение»</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>О новой процедуре создания арбитражного учреждения</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Оn the new procedure for the creation of the arbitration institution (introduction to review)</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Герасименко</surname><given-names>Ю. В.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Gerasimenko</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Доктор юридических наук, Заслуженный юрист Российской Федерации, Уполномоченный по защите прав предпринимателей в Омской области, профессор кафедры конституционного и международного права</p><p>SPIN-код: 7623-0164; AuthorID: 296585</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Doctor of Law, Honored Lawyer of the Russian Federation, Commissioner for the Protection of Entrepreneurs Rights in the Omsk Region, Professor, Department of Constitutional and International Law</p><p>SPIN-code: 7623-0164; AuthorID: 296585</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">omsk.ler@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Терехова</surname><given-names>Л. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Terekhova</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Доктор юридических наук, профессор, заведующая кафедрой гражданского и арбитражного процесса</p><p>SPIN-код: 1478-7958; AuthorID: 678373</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Doctor of Law, Professor, Head, Department of Civil and Arbitrary Procedure</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">lydia@civpro.info</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Омская Академия МВД России</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Omsk Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-2"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Омский государственный университет им. Ф.М. Достоевского</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Dostoevsky Omsk State University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2017</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>29</day><month>06</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>1</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>207</fpage><lpage>211</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Герасименко Ю.В., Терехова Л.А., 2017</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2017</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Герасименко Ю.В., Терехова Л.А.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Gerasimenko Y., Terekhova L.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://enforcement.omsu.ru/jour/article/view/85">https://enforcement.omsu.ru/jour/article/view/85</self-uri><abstract><p>УДК 342.951+347.999</p><p>Вступительная статья информационного характера посвящена особенностям процедуры создания арбитражного учреждения согласно новому Федеральному закону от 29 декабря 2015 г. № 382-ФЗ «Об арбитраже (третейском разбирательстве) в Российской Федерации». Отмечаются трудности объективного характера при создании арбитражных учреждений, проводится критический анализ нововведений закона о создании третейских судов.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>УДК 342.951+347.999</p><p>This informational introductory article is devoted to the peculiarities of the procedure of creation of the arbitration institution according to the new 2015 Federal Law "On arbitration (arbitration proceedings)". The aim of the article is the identification of the new law preconditions to the emergence of administrative barriers in the establishment of arbitral institutions. The study is based on methods of formal law, analysis and synthesis, the sociological method of survey is also used. The results and scope of the results. The article notes the objective difficulties in the establishment of arbitration institutions as well as provides a critical analysis of the innovations in 2015 Federal Law "On arbitration (arbitration proceedings) in the Russian Federation". The procedure for creating the arbitration courts became more bureaucratic and it is focused on filtering such institutions by tightening the requirements. The procedure for creating the arbitration courts can be described as permissive and multi-stage. The second noticeable trend in the 2015 Federal Law is broad sphere of control over arbitration courts and substitution of their competence by a competent court. According to the results of a survey of representatives of the business community authors identify the legislative background of administrative barriers on a way of establishment of arbitration courts. The results of the study can be used in the improvement of legislative procedures for the estab-lishment of arbitration courts. Conclusions. New Law actually creates a "quasi-judicial" bodies, that have highest level of bureaucratization, so arbitration courts lose their main characteristics: contractual and dispositive principles. Novels of Law, aimed at stricter administration and control, are obvious, however, a new quality for arbitration as the most popular form of alternative dispute resolution is still not created.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Административные барьеры</kwd><kwd>арбитражное учреждение</kwd><kwd>третейский суд</kwd><kwd>арбитраж ad hoc</kwd><kwd>совершенствование третейского разбирательства</kwd><kwd>альтернативное разрешение споров</kwd><kwd>внутренний арбитраж</kwd><kwd>международный арбитраж</kwd><kwd>компетентный суд</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Administrative barriers</kwd><kwd>arbitral institution</kwd><kwd>arbitration court</kwd><kwd>arbitration ad hoc</kwd><kwd>improving arbitration</kwd><kwd>alternative dispute resolution</kwd><kwd>domestic arbitration</kwd><kwd>international arbitration</kwd><kwd>the competent court</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
