pravoПравоприменениеLaw Enforcement Review2542-15142658-4050Dostoevsky Omsk State University10.52468/2542-1514.2024.8(3).62-71pravo-958Research ArticleПРИМЕНЕНИЕ НОРМ ПРАВА ОРГАНАМИ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОЙ ВЛАСТИTHE LAW ENFORCEMENT BY PUBLIC AUTHORITIESПравовое обеспечение социальных гарантий для лиц, занятых в гиг-экономике: российский и зарубежный опытLegal support of social guarantees for persons employed in the gig economy: Russian and foreign experiencehttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5288-2568МироноваС. М.MironovaS. M.

Миронова Светлана Михайловна – доктор юридических наук, доцент, профессор кафедры теории права и государственно-правовых дисциплин

400066, г. Волгоград, ул. Гагарина, 8

Svetlana M. Mironova – Doctor of Law, Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Theory of Law and State and Legal Disciplines

8, Gagarina ul., Volgograd, 400066

smironova2019@yandex.ruВолгоградский институт управления – филиал РАНХиГСРоссияVolgograd Institute of Management – branch of RANEPARussian Federation202424092024836271Copyright © Миронова С.М., 20242024Миронова С.М.Mironova S.M.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://enforcement.omsu.ru/jour/article/view/958

Положение гиг-работников оказывается менее защищено с точки зрения их прав и предоставляемых им гарантий. В связи с этим возникает необходимость определения того, какие социальные гарантии и каким категориям гиг-работников должны быть предоставлены, а также возможных мер социальной защиты таких лиц. Рассматриваются особенности предоставления социальных гарантий гиг-работникам, а также защиты их прав через институт профсоюзов, дается определение понятий «гарантии гигработников» и «социальные гарантии гиг-работников».

Делается вывод, что уплата взносов на пенсионное и социальное страхование гиг-работниками зависит от ряда факторов: размер дохода (есть минимально не облагаемый доход), время работы (полный или неполный рабочий день). Зарубежный опыт показывает, что самозанятые могут обращаться за помощью как в специально создаваемые для них профсоюзы, так и в те, которые защищают права и других категорий работников. В Российской Федерации пошли по пути создания специализированного профсоюза для самозанятых и работников платформ.

The subject. Legal support of social guarantees for persons employed in the gig economy: russian and foreign experience

The purpose of the article is to reveal the features of providing social guarantees to gig workers, as well as protecting their rights through the institution of trade unions, to give the concept of “guarantees of gig workers”, “social guarantees of gig workers” The methodology includes systematic approach, comparative method, formal-logical method, formal-legal method, analysis, synthesis.

The main results of the research. The situation of gig workers appears to be less protected in terms of their rights and the guarantees provided to them. In this regard, there is a need to determine what social guarantees should be provided to which categories of gig workers, as well as possible measures of social protection for such persons. There is a need to once again ensure the rights of workers employed in self-employment or platform employment. A definition of guarantees for gig workers is proposed: guarantees are the means, methods and conditions by which the implementation of the rights granted to gig workers in the field of employment and their social security is ensured. Social guarantees for gig workers can be defined as a set of social and legal obligations of the state to workers employed in the gig economy (self-employment, platform employment), aimed at creating the necessary conditions for them to perform their work and meet their social needs and professional interests.

In cases where a gig worker is, in some respects, close in his legal status to an employee under an employment contract (full-time work, etc.), his pension and social insurance should give him the maximum opportunity for social guarantees in case of temporary disability and in connection with retirement.

социальные гарантиигиг-работникисамозанятыеплатформенные работникисоциальное обеспечениепенсионное обеспечениестраховые взносыпрофсоюзыsocial guaranteesgig workersself-employedplatform workerssocial securitypension provisioninsurance premiumsunionsИсследование выполнено за счет гранта Российского научного фонда № 22-28-00914, https://rscf.ru/project/22-28-00914/.The study was supported by the grant of the Russian Science Foundation No. 22-28-00914, https://rscf.ru/project/22-28-00914/.ReferencesBozzon R. Independent or Dependent? European Labour Statistics and Their (In)ability to Identify Forms of Dependency in Self-employment / R. Bozzon, A. Murgia // Social Indicators Research. – 2022. – Vol. 160. – P. 199– 226. – DOI: 10.1007/s11205-021-02798-1.Bozzon R., Murgia A. Independent or Dependent? European Labour Statistics and Their (In)ability to Identify Forms of Dependency in Self-employment. Social Indicators Research, 2022, vol. 160, pp. 199–226. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-021-02798-1Прекарная занятость: истоки, критерии, особенности / под ред. Ж. Т. Тощенко. – М. : Весь Мир, 2021. – 400 с.Toshchenko Zh.T. (ed.). Precarious employment: origins, criteria, features. Moscow, Ves' Mir Publ., 2021. 400 p. (In Russ.).Тощенко Ж. Т. Прекариат – новый социальный класс / Ж. Т. Тощенко // Социологические исследования. – 2015. – № 6. – С. 3–13.Toshchenko Zh.T. Precariat – a new social class. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya = Sociological Studies, 2015, no. 6, pp. 3–13. (In Russ.).Tang S. Socioeconomic differentiation among food delivery workers in China: The case of Nanjing / S. Tang, P. Hao // Transactions in Planning and Urban Research. – 2023. – Vol. 2, iss. 4. – P. 502–516. – DOI: 10.1177/27541223231216500.Tang S., Hao P. Socioeconomic differentiation among food delivery workers in China: The case of Nanjing. Transactions in Planning and Urban Research, 2023, vol. 2, iss. 4, pp. 502–516. DOI: 10.1177/27541223231216500.Conaty P. Not Alone - trade union and co-operative solutions for self-employed workers / P. Conaty, A. Bird, Ph. Ross. – Co-operatives UK, 2016. – 92 p. – URL: https://www.union-coops.uk/publications/not-alone (дата обращения: 10.11.2023).Conaty P., Bird A., Ross Ph. Not Alone - trade union and co-operative solutions for self-employed workers. Co-operatives UK Publ., 2016. 92 p. Available at: https://www.union-coops.uk/publications/not-alone (accessed November 10, 2023).Синявская О. В., Бирюкова С. С., Горват Е. С., Карева Д. Е., Стужук Д. А., Чертенков К. О. Платформенная занятость в России: масштабы, мотивы и барьеры участия : аналит. докл. — М. : НИУ ВШЭ, 2022. – DOI: 10.17323/978-5-7598-2494-7.Sinyavskaya O.V., Biryukova S.S., Gorvat Ye.S., Kareva D.Ye., Stuzhuk D.A., Chertenkov K.O. Platform employment in Russia: scale, motives and barriers to participation, Analytical report. Moscow, HSE Publ., 2022. DOI: 10.17323/978-5-7598-2494-7. (In Russ.).Malfettes L. The Repression of Illegal Work Challenged by False Self-Employment / L. Malfettes. – French Gendarmerie Officers Academy Research Centre, December 2022. – 4 p. – (The CREOGN Research Notes; Iss. 80). – URL: https://www.gendarmerie.interieur.gouv.fr/crgn/content/download/33657/file/NOTE_CREOGN_80_repression-illegal_work_EN.pdf (дата обращения: 10.11.2023).Malfettes L. The Repression of Illegal Work Challenged by False Self-Employment, The CREOGN Research Notes; Iss. 80. French Gendarmerie Officers Academy Research Centre Publ., December 2022. 4 p. Available at: https://www.gendarmerie.interieur.gouv.fr/crgn/content/download/33657/file/NOTE_CREOGN_80_repression-illegal_work_EN.pdf (accessed November 10, 2023).Koutsimpogiorgos N. Conceptualizing the Gig Economy and its Regulatory Problems / N. Koutsimpogiorgos, J. van Slageren, A. Herrmann, K. Frenken // Policy & Internet. – 2020. – Vol. 12, iss. 4. – P. 525–545. – DOI: 10.1002/poi3.237.Koutsimpogiorgos N., van Slageren J., Herrmann A., Frenken K. Conceptualizing the Gig Economy and its Regulatory Problems. Policy & Internet, 2020, vol. 12, iss. 4, pp. 525–545. DOI: 10.1002/poi3.237.Tug M. А. Future of the gig economy / M. А. Tug, P. Basar // PressAcademia Procedia. – 2023. – Vol. 17. – P. 203–231. – DOI: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2023.1796.Tug M. А., Basar P. Future of the gig economy. PressAcademia Procedia, 2023, vol. 17, pp. 230–231. DOI: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2023.1796.Harris S. D. Workers, Protections, and Benefits in the U.S. Gig Economy / S. D. Harris. – September 2018. – 41 p. – URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3198170 (дата обращения: 10.11.2023).Harris S.D. Workers, Protections, and Benefits in the U.S. Gig Economy. September 2018. 41 p. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3198170.Qiao S. Who are the gig workers? Evidence from mapping the residential locations of ride-hailing drivers by a big data approach / S. Qiao, G. Huang, A. G.-O. Yeh // Cities. – 2023. – Vol. 132. – Art. 104112. – DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2022.104112.Qiao S., Huang G., Yeh G.-O.A. Who are the gig workers? Evidence from mapping the residential locations of ride-hailing drivers by a big data approach. Cities, 2023, vol. 132, art. 104112. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2022.104112.Лютов Н. Л. Влияние нетипичных форм занятости на социально-экономическое развитие / Н. Л. Лютов // Уровень жизни населения регионов России. – 2020. – Т. 16, № 1. – С. 43–50. – DOI: 10.19181/lsprr.2020.16.1.4.Lyutov N.L. The Influence of Atypical Employment on Socioeconomic Development. Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii = Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia, 2020, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 43–50. DOI: 10.19181/lsprr.2020.16.1.4. (In Russ.).Лютов Н. Л. Социальные и трудовые отношения в условиях экономического кризиса: соблюдение баланса интересов / Н. Л. Лютов // Журнал российского права. – 2016. – № 1. – С. 30–38. – DOI: 10.12737/17229.Lyutov N.L. Social and Labour Relations During Economic Crisis: How to Balance the Interests. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2016, no. 1, pp. 30–38. DOI: 10.12737/17229. (In Russ.).Черных Н. В. Единство трудового права и развитие нетипичной занятости: проблемы взаимодействия / Н. В. Черных // Lex russica. – 2020. – Т. 73, № 9. – С. 21–29. – DOI: 10.17803/1729-5920.2020.166.9.021-029.Chernykh N.V. The Unity of Labor Law and Development of Atypical Employment: Interaction Problems. Lex Russica, 2020, vol. 73, no. 9, pp. 21–29. DOI: 10.17803/1729-5920.2020.166.9.021-029. (In Russ.).De Stefano V. The Rise of the 'Just-in-Time Workforce': On-Demand Work, Crowd Work and Labour Protection in the 'Gig-Economy' / V. De Stefano // Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal. – 2016. – Vol. 37, iss. 3. – P. 471–504.De Stefano V. The Rise of the 'Just-in-Time Workforce': On-Demand Work, Crowd Work and Labour Protection in the 'Gig-Economy'. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 2016, vol. 37, iss. 3, pp. 471–504.Филипова И. А. Влияние цифровых технологий на труд: ориентиры для трудового права : моногр. / И. А. Филипова. – Н. Новгород : Нижегор. гос. ун-т им. Н.И. Лобачевского, 2021. – 106 с.Filipova I.A. The Impact of Digital Technologies on Labor: Guidelines for Labor Law, Monograph. Nizhny Novgorod, Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod Publ., 2021. 106 p. (In Russ.).Risak M. The Concept of ‘Worker’ in EU Law: Status Quo and Potential for Change : ETUI Report 140 / M. Risak, Th. Dullinger. – Brussels : European Trade Union Institute, 2018. – 66 p.Risak M., Dullinger Th. The Concept of ‘Worker’ in EU Law: Status Quo and Potential for Change, ETUI Report 140. Brussels, European Trade Union Institute Publ., 2018. 66 p.Defossez D. The employment status of food delivery riders in Europe and the UK: Self-employed or worker? / D. Defossez // Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law. – 2021. – Vol. 29, iss. 1. – P. 25–46. – DOI: 10.1177/1023263X211051833.Defossez D. The employment status of food delivery riders in Europe and the UK: Self-employed or worker?. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 2021, vol. 29, iss. 1, pp. 25–46. DOI: 10.1177/1023263X211051833.Schor J. Dependence and precarity in the platform economy / J. Schor, W. Attwood-Charles, M. Cansoy, I. Ladegaard, R. Wengronowitz // Theory and Society. – 2020. – Vol. 49, iss. 5–6. – P. 833–861. – DOI: 10.1007/s11186-020-09408-y.Schor J., Attwood-Charles W., Cansoy M., Ladegaard I., Wengronowitz R. Dependence and precarity in the platform economy. Theory and Society, 2020, vol. 49, iss. 5–6, pp. 833–961. DOI: 10.1007/s11186-020-09408-y.Лютов Н. Л. Водители такси, выполняющие работу через онлайн-платформы: каковы правовые последствия «уберизации» труда? / Н. Л. Лютов, И. В. Войтковская // Актуальные проблемы российского права. – 2020. – Т. 15, № 6. – С. 149–159. – DOI: 10.17803/1994-1471.2020.115.6.149-159.Lyutov N.L., Voytkovskaya I.V. Taxi Drivers Performing Work through Online Platforms: What Are the Legal Consequences of Labor “Uberization”?. Aktual'nye problemy rossiiskogo prava = Actual Problems of Russian Law, 2020, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 149–159. DOI: 10.17803/1994-1471.2020.115.6.149-159. (In Russ.).Миронова С. М. Профсоюзы для самозанятых и работников платформ: опыт России и зарубежных стран / С. М. Миронова, З. Г. Литвиненко // Legal Bulletin. – 2023. – Т. 8, № 4. – С. 10–19.Mironova S.M., Litvinenko Z.G. Trade unions for the self-employed and platform workers: experience of Russia and foreign countries. Legal Bulletin, 2023, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 10–19. (In Russ.).

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.