Determination of the actual tax liability for personal income tax: law enforcement analysis
https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2022.6(2).93-105
Abstract
The subject. Currently, the courts are actively using a new term - "valid tax liability", or "the actual amount of tax liabilities". This term is the result of the activities of judicial authorities, however, judicial practice on determining the actual tax liability for personal income tax is only being formed and is unstable. Therefore, the subject of the study of this article is a comprehensive analysis of law enforcement practice in the field of determining the actual tax liability of individuals for personal income tax.
Purpose of the study is to dare to solve the enforcement problems that arise when determining the actual tax liability of individuals for personal income tax.
The methodology. The authors uses the formally legal interpretation of Russian legislation, comparative analysis of Russian and European literature as regards the determination of a valid tax liability.
The main results, scope of application. The authors analyzed the concept of "valid tax liability", and also studied the problems of determining the actual tax liability in the context of the law enforcement practice of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. Based on law enforcement practice, the main problems in determining the actual tax liability are highlighted, to which the authors attribute the incorrect qualification of the object of taxation, the incorrect qualification of the nature of the taxpayer's activity and its status, as well as the incorrect determination of the taxpayer's tax base. The article also touches on the main problems in the reimbursement of the amount of overpaid personal income tax.
Conclusions. When determining the taxpayer's actual tax obligation to pay personal income tax, the tax authorities are guided by a "pro-budget" goal, seeking to increase the tax base due to incorrect qualification of the taxable object, the status of the taxpayer, or questioning the nature of its activities, which leads to the formation of arrears and forms the composition of an administrative offense.
In an effort to restore their violated rights, an honest taxpayer goes to court for protection, where, unfortunately, in the vast majority of cases, they face the formal approach of the courts, which do not reveal either the economic essence of the dispute or properly consider the circumstances of a particular case. Taking into account the above circumstances, the authors draw conclusions about the existence of legal gaps in the system of Russian law in the field of taxation, which they propose to fill by fixing the concept of "valid tax obligation" in the relevant Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. As an example of such replenishment, the authors propose to supplement paragraph 7 of the Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Commercial Court of the Russian Federation of October 12, 2006 No. 53 "On the assessment by arbitration courts of the validity of the taxpayer's receipt of tax benefits", indicating the need to establish a valid tax obligation of the taxpayer, including personal income tax.
About the Authors
N. M. ArtemovRussian Federation
Nikolay M. Artemov – Doctor of Law, Professor, Honored Lawyer of the Russian Federation, Honorary Worker of Higher Professional Education of the Russian Federation; Professor, Department of Financial Law Kutafin MSAL.
9, Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya ul., Moscow, 125993
V. V. Golenev
Russian Federation
Vyacheslav V. Golenev – PhD student, Department of Financial Law, advocate, Moscow Chamber of Advocates Kutafin MSAL. RSCI SPIN-code: 8108-6178: AuthorID: 862868.
9, Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya ul., Moscow, 125993
References
1. Avi-Yona R.S. Globalization, tax competition and the financial crisis of the welfare state. Harvard Law Review, 2000, no. 7, pp. 1573–1676.
2. Avi-Yona R.S. Taxation for the new "New Deal": Short-term, medium-term and long-term options, U of Michigan Public Law Research Paper No. 688, U of Michigan Law & Econ Research Paper No. 20-024. May 17, 2020. 10 p. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3603397 (accessed: 13.11.2020).
3. Ganghof S. The Politics of Income Taxation. A Comparative Analysis. Colchester, ECPR Press, 2006. 208 p.
4. Kohler-Koch B. Governance and Institutional Development, in: European Integration Theory, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2004, pp. 97–115.
5. Schmidt P.K. A General Income Inclusion Rule as a Tool for Improving the International Tax Regime – Challenges Arising from EU Primary Law. Intertax, 2020, vol. 48, iss. 11, pp. 983–997.
6. Somoev R.G. Debatable issues of reforming the taxation of income of citizens in the Russian Federation, in: Finansovye instrumenty regulirovaniya sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya regionov, proceedings of all-Russian (national) scientific and practical conference, Makhachkala, Alef Publ., 2019, pp. 141–149. (In Russ.).
7. Ryabov A.A. The influence of civil law on tax relations (doctrine, interpretation, practice), Monograph. Moscow, Norma Publ., Infra-M Publ., 2014. 221 p. (In Russ.).
8. Gracheva E.Yu., Boltinova O.V. (ed.). Tax law, Textbook. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2012. 376 p. (In Russ.).
9. Nazarov V.N. Fundamentals of tax law. Moscow, Sputnik+ Publ., 2008. 146 p. (In Russ.).
10. Demin A.V. Tax law of Russia, teaching aids. Krasnoyarsk, RUMTs YuO Publ., 2006. 329 p. (In Russ.).
11. Vinnitskiy D.V. Tax liability and the system of tax liability law. Zakonodatel'stvo, 2003, no. 7, pp. 22–32. (In Russ.).
12. Zapolsky S.V. On the subject of financial law. Pravovedenie, 2002, no. 5, pp. 25–30. (In Russ.).
13. Zapol’skii S.V. Self-financing of enterprises: legal issues. Moscow, Yuridicheskaya literatura Publ., 1988. 158 p. (In Russ.).
14. Vitryansky V.V. Fulfillment of monetary obligations in case of bankruptcy of the debtor. Zakon = Law, 2000, no. 3, pp. 120–121. (In Russ.).
15. Braginskii M.I., Vitryanskii V.V. Contract law: general provisions. Moscow, 1997. 681 p. (In Russ.).
16. Braginskii M.I. Improvement of legislation on capital construction. Moscow, 1982. 144 p. (In Russ.).
17. Sukhanov E.A. (ed.). Civil Law, in 2 volumes. Moscow, 2002. Vol. II, pt. 1. 785 p . (In Russ.).
18. Khimicheva N.I. Tax Law, Textbook. Moscow, BEK Publ., 1997. 335 p. (In Russ.).
19. Pepelyaev S.G. (ed.). Tax law, teaching aids. Moscow, 2000. 796 p. (In Russ.).
20. Ozerov I.Kh. Fundamentals of financial science, a course of lectures, read in St. Petersburg and Moscow university. Moscow, I.D. Sytin Publ., 1909. 534 p. (In Russ.).
21. Mardasova M.E. Legal status of the taxpayer: changes in legislation and judicial legal positions. Vestnik VGU. Seriya: Pravo = Bulletin of VSU. Series: Law, 2020, no. 2, pp. 241–250. (In Russ.).
22. Tropskaya S.S. Legal status of a taxpayer - an individual in the Russian Federation, Cand. Diss. Thesis. Moscow, 2007. 25 p. (In Russ.).
23. Zotov S.A. A look at the concept of the legal status of a taxpayer. Leningradskii yuridicheskii zhurnal = Leningrad Legal Journal, 2015, no. 1, pp. 158–165. (In Russ.).
24. Troshina S.M. Illegal entrepreneurial activity. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Seriya «Ekonomika i pravo» = Bulletin of the Udmurt University. Series "Economics and Law", 2017, no. 4, pp. 140–146. (In Russ.).
25. Solovyov V.A. Private and public interests of subjects of tax legal relations, Cand. Diss. Moscow, 2002. 195 p. (In Russ.).
26. Golenev V.V. Actual tax liability and tax benefit in connection with the introduction of article 54.1 of the tax code of the Russian Federation: analysis of law enforcement approaches of arbitration courts. Yuridicheskaya nauka = Legal Science, 2020, no. 11, pp. 31–42. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Artemov N.M., Golenev V.V. Determination of the actual tax liability for personal income tax: law enforcement analysis. Law Enforcement Review. 2022;6(2):93-105. https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2022.6(2).93-105