Formation of a doctrinal approach to public danger as a sign of crimes and administrative offenses
https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2024.8(4).93-102
Abstract
The purpose of the scientific article is to, based on an analysis of the concept and essence of public danger, offer scientifically based conclusions related to the understanding of whether acts should be differentiated on the grounds of “nuisance” and “danger” into administrative offenses and crimes. The achievement of the formulated goal was made possible by solving the following scientific problems: defining the concept and essence of the social danger of an act; disclosure of the content of concepts of the nature and degree of social danger of an act, clarification of their criminal legal and social functions; clarification of the influence of public danger on the criminalization of an act and the categorization of crimes.
The methodological basis was the universal principles of scientific knowledge: objectivity, the relationship of phenomena and their characteristics, the unity of theory and practice. In solving the identified problems, the work also used other general scientific and special scientific methods of cognition, successfully tested by legal doctrine, including analysis and synthesis, deduction and induction.
This article analyzes its concept as distinguishing an administrative offense from a crime. The essence and criteria for forming the degree of public danger are determined. Conditions are established that influence the formation of this characteristic for certain types of administrative offenses. The relationship between social danger and its degree in case of recidivism, preparation or attempted crime, and statute of limitations is analyzed.
About the Authors
A. N. Alexandrov
Putilin Belgorod Law Institute of Ministry of the Interior of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexey N. Alexandrov – PhD in Law, Associate Professor, Head
AuthorID: 691376
71, Gor’kogo ul., Belgorod, 308024
O. A. Dizer
Putilin Belgorod Law Institute of Ministry of the Interior of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Oleg A. Dizer – Doctor of Law, Associate Professor; Deputy Head for Scientific Work
AuthorID: 312006
71, Gor’kogo ul., Belgorod, 308024
T. A. Nedostypenko
Putilin Belgorod Law Institute of Ministry of the Interior of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tatyana A. Nedostypenko – Senior Lecturer, Department of Criminal Law
AuthorID: 1059820
71, Gor’kogo ul., Belgorod, 308024
References
1. Bakhrakh D.N., Rossinsky B.V., Starilov Yu.N. Administrative law, Textbook for students of higher educational institutions studying in the specialty “Jurisprudence“, 3rd ed. Moscow, Norma Publ., 2008. 815 p. (In Russ.).
2. Malusha V.A. Correlation between the social danger of crime and the harmfulness of the offense. Nauka, tekhnika i obrazovanie = Science, technology and education, 2021, no. 5 (80), pp. 54–56. (In Russ.).
3. Alekhin V.P., Korzhov D.M. On the issue of the social danger of an administrative offense. StudNet, 2021, no. 2, pp. 58–66. (In Russ.).
4. Gogin A.A. On the issue of signs of offenses. Pravo i politika = Law and politics, 2008, no. 7, pp. 1595–1600. (In Russ.).
5. Nikolaev A.M. Social danger of acts as a distinctive feature of their criminality. Probely v rossiiskom zakonodatel'stve = Gaps in Russian legislation, 2011, no. 5, pp. 160–162. (In Russ.).
6. Fefelov P.A. Mechanism of criminal legal protection: main methodological problems, Doct. Diss. Yekaterinburg, 1993. 50 p. (In Russ.).
7. Volzhenkin B.V. The social danger of the criminal and the basis of criminal liability. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii. Pravovedenie, 1963, no. 3, pp. 90–98. (In Russ.).
8. Solov’ev A.N. The concept of crime (Theoretical, legislative and law enforcement aspects), Cand. Diss. Volgograd, 2000. 235 p. (In Russ.).
9. Kogan V.M. Social mechanism of criminal legal influence, Monograph, ed. by V.N. Kudryavtsev. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1983. 183 p. (In Russ.).
10. Bezverkhov A.G. Administrative prejudice in the criminal legislation of Russia: origins, realities, prospects. Vestnik Samarskoi gumanitarnoi akademii. Seriya: Pravo = Bulletin of the Samara Humanitarian Academy. Series: Law, 2011, no. 2, pp. 39–52. (In Russ.).
11. Tarbagaev A.N. Administrative responsibility in criminal law. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii. Pravovedenie, 1992, no. 2, pp. 62–68. (In Russ.).
12. Yamasheva E.V. On the issue of restoring the institution of administrative prejudice in the criminal law of Russia. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2009, no. 10, pp. 69–79. (In Russ.).
13. Dizer O.A., Surgutskov V.I. On the public danger of certain administrative offenses. Yuridicheskaya nauka i praktika: Vestnik Nizhegorodskoi akademii MVD Rossii = Legal science and practice: Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2017, no. 4, pp. 319–320. (In Russ.).
14. Akhtanina N.A. Social danger as a sign of an administrative offense. NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya = NB: Administrative law and administration practice, 2019, no. 6, pp. 30–36. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2019.6.32494. (In Russ.).
15. Martsev A.I. Social harmfulness and social danger of crime. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii. Pravovedenie, 2001, no. 4 (237), pp. 148–155. (In Russ.).
16. Voplenko N.N. Concept, main signs and types of offense. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 5: Yurisprudentsiya = Bulletin of Volgograd State University. Series 5: Jurisprudence, 2005, no. 7, pp. 6–17. (In Russ.).
17. Gogin A.A. Criteria for the classification of illegal acts in the spheres of economic, antimonopoly and environmental relations, in: Gosudarstvennoe i munitsipal'noe pravo: teoriya i praktika, Collection of articles of the international scientific and practical conference, Perm, November 10, 2016, Perm, Aeterna Publ., 2016, pp. 32–41. (In Russ.).
18. Zherebkin V.E. Logical analysis of the concepts of law. Kyiv, Vishcha shkola, 1976. 150 p. (In Russ.).
19. Dizer O.A. Administrative and legal protection of public morality, Doct. Diss. Thesis. Omsk, 2019. 59 p. (In Russ.).
20. Shevchenko Yu.P., Kositsin I.A. Administrative offense and crime: what is the difference?. Vestnik Omskoi yuridicheskoi akademii = Bulletin of the Omsk Law Academy, 2017, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 40–44. DOI: 10.19073/2306-1340-2017-14-4-40-44. (In Russ.).
21. Ondar A.-B.S. Public Danger: Problems of Definition. Aktualʹnye problemy rossiiskogo prava = Actual Problems of Russian Law, 2023, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 85–94. DOI: 10.17803/1994-1471.2023.151.6.085-094. (In Russ.).
22. Gogin A.A. Correlation of the concepts of social danger and social harmfulness of offenses. Yuridicheskaya nauka i praktika: Vestnik Nizhegorodskoi akademii MVD Rossii = Legal science and practice: Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2019, no. 1, pp. 102–107. DOI: 10.24411/2078-5356-2019-10114. (In Russ.).
23. Antonov A.G. On the relationship between the categories “social danger of crime” and “personality of the criminal”. Gosudarstvo i pravo = State and Law, 2019, no. 11, pp. 125–129. DOI: 10.31857/S013207690007479-8. (In Russ.).
24. Guzeeva O.S. Public danger of crime: constitutional, legal and criminal legal analysis. Lex Russica, 2021, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 95–106. DOI: 10.17803/1729-5920.2021.172.3.095-106. (In Russ.).
25. Murzinov A.I. Crime and administrative offence, Cand. Diss. Thesis. Moscow, 1983. 24 p. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Alexandrov A.N., Dizer O.A., Nedostypenko T.A. Formation of a doctrinal approach to public danger as a sign of crimes and administrative offenses. Law Enforcement Review. 2024;8(4):93-102. https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2024.8(4).93-102
Views:
113
Email this article 