Participation of local government authorities in urban planning solutions making
https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2025.9(1).84-93
Abstract
The article summarizes the main trends in the field of participation of local governments in making urban planning solutions. Based on a review of scientific literature, the author clarifies the term “urban planning solution” and reveals its internal structural contradiction, which allows participants of urban planning relations to invest in it content that is beneficial for themselves. By highlighting two leading directions in urban planning – functional and social, the author seeks to find a common basis that allows us to remove the deep contradictions in the relations between developers and the population that underlie urban conflicts. The author is trying to solve a pressing social and organizational-legal problem, how to harmonize the interests of the main participants in urban planning relations – the population, authorities and developers? To answer this question, the author analyzes the criteria for making urban planning decisions, noting the internal differences between them. The purpose of the article is to develop a procedure for making a socially justified and comprehensive urban planning decision, which will optimize the operation of the criteria for making urban planning decisions and achieve consensus between the main participants. Based on a generalization of the practice of interaction between participants in urban planning relations, the author identifies types of urban planning solutions and substantiates the criteria for their quality. Based on the identified structure for making urban planning solutions, the author identifies the main problem points that separate the positions of the population and local authorities and impede the establishment of harmonious urban planning relations. The main types of urban planning solutions are identified, providing for the participation of local governments, from the list of which construction permits are especially highlighted, and factors influencing the choice of one or another type of urban planning solution are highlighted. The requirement for comprehensiveness in making urban planning solutions is substantiated. The final part presents an algorithm for making an effective urban planning solutions.
About the Author
O. M. Roy
Institute of Philosophy and Law of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Oleg M. Roy – Doctor of Sociology, Professor; Leading Researcher
16, Sof’i Kovalevskoi ul., Yekaterinburg, 62010
ResearcherID: S-3643-2016
AuthorID: 641793
References
1. Gogin A.A., Fedorova A.N. Some controversial provisions of the urban planning code of the Russian Federation. Ekspert: teoriya i praktika = Expert: theory and practice, 2021, no. 1 (10), pp. 50–58. DOI: 10.51608/26867818_2021_1_50. (In Russ.).
2. Krasheninnikov I.A. Urban development parameters and favorable environmental conditions. Arkhitektura i sovremennye informatsionnye tekhnologii = Architecture and Modern Information Technologies, 2018, no. 3 (44), pp. 262–275. (In Russ.).
3. Bleil de Souza C., Fayzullaev F.F., Dunichkin I.V. Influence of planning decisions on the local climate of residential building of the Krasnodar region and the Primorsk region. Vestnik MGSU = Monthly Journal on Construction and Architecture, 2019, vol. 14, iss. 8, pp. 954–966. (In Russ.).
4. Kartashova N.P., Popova S.V. Architectural and planning concept for rural parks. Lesotekhnicheskii zhurnal, 2019, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 35–44. (In Russ.).
5. Urban planning solutions. Arkhitektura i stroitel'stvo Rossii = Architecture and construction of Russia, 2005, no. 9–10, pp. 4–12. (In Russ.).
6. Jacobs J. The death and life of great American cities, Transl. from English. Moscow, Novoe izdatel'stvo Publ., 2011. 457 p. (In Russ.).
7. Vysokovskii A.A. Visual images of the urban environment. Moscow, Lokus Standi Publ., 2008. 236 p. (In Russ.).
8. Sanoff G. Participatory design. Practices of public participation in shaping the environment of large and small cities, Transl. from English. Vologda, Project Group 8 Publ., 2015. 169 p. (In Russ.).
9. Sborshikov S.B., Zhuravlev P.A. The life cycle of urban planning solutions: the organizational aspect of their reengineering. Promyshlennoe i grazhdanskoe stroitel’stvo = Industrial And Civil Engineering, 2021, no. 4, pp. 33–39. DOI: 10.33622/0869-7019.2021.04.33-39. (In Russ.).
10. Oktyabrskiy R.D. Impact of the urban construction solutions on the safety population. Problemy analiza riska = Issues of Risk Analysis, 2020, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 66–73. DOI: 10.32686/1812-5220-2020-17-2-66-73. (In Russ.).
11. Koryachentsova S.I. Separate aspects of prosecutorial supervision over the execution of urban planning legislation and compensation for damage from the implementation of urban planning decisions. Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo = Administrative and municipal law, 2020, no. 4, pp. 1–10. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0595.2020.4.32596. (In Russ.).
12. Lepyokhin V.A. Influence of political decisions on urban policy. Gradostroitel'stvo = City and town planning, 2012, no. 3 (19), pp. 55–56. (In Russ.).
13. Kharinov I.N., Sinitsyna V.A. Constitutional control bodies of the cis countries: order of formation and competence. Antinomii = Antinomies, 2022, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 131–152. DOI: 10.17506/26867206_2022_22_1_131. (In Russ.).
14. Yanitsky O.N. Substantiation of urban planning decisions in the conditions of publicity. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya = Sociological studies, 1988, no. 4, pp. 20–30. (In Russ.).
15. Makushina A.M. Analysis of the influence of the postmodern worldview on urban planning decisions (projects) of the late XX - early XXI century. Regional'nye arkhitekturno-khudozhestvennye shkoly, 2012, no. 1, pp. 36– 37. (In Russ.).
16. Gudz T.V., Soldatova L.V., Samolovskikh N.V. Principles of legal zoning in the judicial practice. Pravoprimenenie = Law Enforcement Review, 2023, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 105–115. DOI: 10.52468/2542-1514.2023.7(3).105-115.
17. Sukhinina E.A. Analysis of methods for environmental assessment of urban project solutions. Gradostroitel'stvo i arkhitektura = Urban construction and architecture, 2022, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 123–132. DOI: 10.17673/Vestnik.2022.01.16. (In Russ.).
18. Cherepanov K.A. Town-planning conflicts: definition, causes and consequences, participants, resolution. Fundamental'nye i prikladnye issledovaniya: problemy i rezul'taty, 2013, no. 7, pp. 18–25. (In Russ.).
19. Vilner M.Ya. On techniques to maintain quality of town planning solutions. Prirodnye i tekhnogennye riski. Bezopasnost' sooruzhenii = Natural and man-made risks. Safety of structures, 2012, no. 6, pp. 25–29. (In Russ.).
20. Newman P., Thornley A. Urban planning in Europe: International competition, national systems and planning projects. London, Routledge Publ., 2002. xii + 291 p. DOI: 10.4324/9780203427941.
21. Dühr S., Colomb C., Nadin V. European spatial planning and territorial cooperation. London, Routledge Publ., 2010. xxiii + 452 p. DOI: 10.4324/9780203895290.
22. Khandokar F., Price A.D.F., Paranagamage P., Mourshed M., Austin S.A., Moobela C. Barriers to the adoption of sustainability assessment tools in strategic decision making, in: Second International Conference on Whole Life Urban Sustainability and its Assessment (SUE-MoT 2009), 22–24 April, Loughborough, Loughborough University Publ., 2009, pp. 793–804.
23. Petrovskaya E.I. Town planning regulations, environmental codes and criteria for the quality of urban space. Arkhitektura i sovremennye informatsionnye tekhnologii = Architecture and Modern Information Technologies, 2017, no. 2 (39), pp. 268–283. (In Russ.).
24. Bokolo A.J., Petersen S.A. A Smart City Adoption Model to Improve Sustainable Living. 2019. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2631501.
25. Korosteleva M.V., Korosteleva N.V. Participation of citizens in the process of making urban planning decisions at the municipal level: features of legal regulation and law enforcement practice. Paradigmy upravleniya, ekonomiki i prava = Paradigms of management, economics and law, 2021, no. 2 (4), pp. 182–188. (In Russ.).
26. Khatskevich A., Shishchenko E. Problems of counteraction of corruption in the field of registration of transactions with earth. Problemy sovremennoi nauki i obrazovaniya = Problems of modern science and education, 2016, no. 10 (52), pp. 127–130. (In Russ.).
27. Markina M.V., Pylaev A.A. Problems of bringing to administrative responsibility for violation of the requirements of building codes, standards and rules during construction. Voprosy ustoichivogo razvitiya obshchestva, 2020, no. 8, pp. 216–224. (In Russ.).
28. Mareev Yu.A., Kievskaya R.L. Moscow real estate market as an indicator of the effectiveness of urban planning decisions. Promyshlennoe i grazhdanskoe stroitel'stvo = Industrial and civil engineering, 2014, no. 3, pp. 10–15. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Roy O.M. Participation of local government authorities in urban planning solutions making. Law Enforcement Review. 2025;9(1):84-93. https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2025.9(1).84-93
Views:
112
Email this article 