Legal mechanisms for purchasing from a sole supplier by certain types of legal entities: grounds, features of recognition and conclusion of a contract
https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2025.9(2).130-139
Abstract
The subject. The author makes an analysis of the legal particularities of purchasing from a sole supplier as compared to other procurement methods applied by certain types of legal entities under the requirements of the Procurement Law, as well as examines the legal issues of concluding a contract with a sole supplier. The object of this study is the relations between the customer and potential sole suppliers within the procurement process and subsequent entry into of the contract, including in case of sole supplier’s evasion to conclude the contract and the customer’s need to force the sole supplier to conclude the contract.
The purpose of the study is to examine the civil law relations that develop when a customer chooses a non-competitive method of purchasing from a sole supplier, concludes a contract with it, as well as to identify legal issues such relations in theory and practice. The research methodology is a combination of both general scientific methods (analysis, synthesis, deduction, induction, statistical method) and specific scientific methods (legal comparative and formal legal methods, as well as legal modeling). The statistical method has been actively used in the evaluation of numerical data. The application of specific scientific methods allowed the author to develop recommendations on improvement of legal regulations and optimizing the customer’s procurement procedures.
The main results and practical application are as follows. The study introduces a number of characteristics that assess the regulator’s impact on the purchasing relations. The stage of pre-contractual relations with a sole supplier is considered by the author both in the context of entering into contractual relations and recognizing the status of a sole supplier in accordance with the Procurement Law. The lack of a unified approach to procurement of this kind, and a specific set of documents that a potential sole supplier will have before concluding a contract, reduces the legal certainty of the relationships that arise during the procurement process.
Conclusions. The author proposes to apply a reasonable approach to select a procurement method, including based on the exceptional nature of procurement from a sole supplier, as well as to avoid uncertainty, to the extent possible, when concluding a contract with a sole supplier.
About the Author
J. N. BelovaRussian Federation
Julia N. Belova – PhD student
6, Miklukho-Maklaya ul., Moscow, 117198
ResearcherID: GLQ-5257-2022
References
1. Vlasenko N.A. Problems of legal uncertainty, Course of lectures. Moscow, Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation Publ., INFRA-M Publ., 2015. 176 p. (In Russ.).
2. Belitsina E.V., Belova Yu.N., Tsander Ya.M. On the issue of ensuring competition in the course of conducting closed procurement procedures within the framework of procurement legislation by certain types of legal entities, in: Zashchita konkurentsii v usloviyakh global’nykh ekonomicheskikh i sotsial’nykh izmenenii, Moscow, Yurist Publ., 2023, pp. 209–217. (In Russ.).
3. Belyaeva O.A. Corporate procurement: problems of legal regulation, Scientific and practical guide. Moscow, Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation Publ., Yurisprudentsiya Publ., 2018. 312 p. (In Russ.).
4. Belyaeva O.A. The Federal law "On procurement of goods, works and services by particular types of legal persons": scope of application in contractual relations. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2014, no. 8, pp. 25–31. DOI: 10.12737/5273. (In Russ.).
5. Ermakova A.V. An arbitrary list of “sole sources” in the procurement regulations - an overview of the practice of the FAS of Russia and the courts, in: Korporativnye zakupki - 2017: Praktika primeneniya Federal’nogo zakona № 223-FZ, collection of reports of the V All-Russian practical conference-seminar, Moscow, PRINT INTAIM Publ., 2017, pp. 15–27. (In Russ.).
6. Tasalov F.A. Procurement. From the terms of reference to the execution of the contract, Monograph. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2018. 256 p. (In Russ.).
7. Zaytseva N.V. The Concept of Relational Contracts in Modern Practice. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2021, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 56–72. DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2021.019. (In Russ.).
8. Lichter A. Conventionalism and contingency in promissory powers. Philosophical Studies, 2023, vol. 180, iss. 5–6, pp. 1739–1792. DOI: 10.1007/s11098-023-01948-0.
9. Kazantsev D.A. Competitive procurement. Methodology and regulatory regulation, Monograph. Moscow, Norma Publ., INFRA-M Publ., 2022. 324 p. (In Russ.).
10. Vaipan V.A., Egorova M.A. (eds.). Legal regulation of economic relations in modern conditions of the digital economy, Monograph. Moscow, Yustitsinform Publ., 2019. 376 p. (In Russ.).
11. Chagin K. Purchases from a single supplier under Law no. 223-FZ. Progoszakaz.rf, 2019, no. 11, pp. 40–49. (In Russ.).
12. Sheremetyeva A.K., Galieva V.D. Exclusivity of non-competitive procedures as a form of protection of public interests. Pravo i gosudarstvo: teoriya i praktika = Law and State: the theory and practice, 2023, no. 2 (218), pp. 172–174. DOI: 10.47643/1815-1337_2023_2_172. (In Russ.).
13. Tarasov M.Yu., Stupachenko E.V. Purchasing from a single supplier: issues of law enforcement practice and improvement of legislation. Pravo i gosudarstvo: teoriya i praktika = Law and State: the theory and practice, 2023, no. 10 (226), pp. 220–224. (In Russ.).
14. Frolov A.I. Legal consequences of the failed bidding. Khozyaistvo i pravo = Economy and Law, 2023, no. 5, pp. 34–44. (In Russ.).
15. Balantsev E.V. Corporate purchases, A guide for suppliers. Moscow, Pravo Dostupa Publ., 2019. 45 p. (In Russ.).
16. Demkina A.V. Pre-contractual legal relationship-obligation: fundamentals of theory, Monograph. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2021. 272 p. (In Russ.).
17. Belov V.A. (ed.). Civil law. Actual problems of theory and practice, in 2 volumes, 2nd ed. Moscow, Yurait Publ., 2015. Vol. 1. 484 p. (In Russ.).
18. Shershenevich G.F. Textbook of Russian civil law. Mosow, Bashmakov Brothers Publ., 1911. 851 p. (In Russ.). 19. Ioffe O.S. The law of obligations, Textbook. Moscow, Yuridicheskaya literatura Publ., 1975. 880 p. (In Russ.).
19. Meier D.I. Selected works, in 3 volumes. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2022. Vol. 1. 848 p. (In Russ.).
20. Sakharova I. The Power to Contract and the Offer-and-Acceptance Analysis of Contract Formation. Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence, 2024, vol. 37, iss. 1, pp. 361–285. DOI: 10.1017/cjlj.2023.19.
21. Volos A.A., Volos E.P. The weak side in civil law relations: comparative legal research, Monograph, ed. by E.V. Vavilin. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2019. 184 p. (In Russ.).
22. Volos E.P. Features of a Weaker Party in a Civil Law Relationship in Modern Economic and Legal Conditions.
23. Aktualʹnye problemy rossiiskogo prava = Actual Problems of Russian Law, 2022, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 94–101. DOI: 10.17803/1994-1471.2022.142.9.094-101. (In Russ.).
24. Sarkisyan V.V. The problem of the application of pre-contractual liability to the procedure of agreement conclusion at auctions. Konkurentnoe pravo = Competition law, 2022, no. 1, pp. 31–34. (In Russ.).
25. Postovalova S.O. Refusal to conclude a contract when making purchases under Law No. 223-FZ. Vestnik Instituta goszakupok, 2020, no. 8, pp. 8–9. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Belova J.N. Legal mechanisms for purchasing from a sole supplier by certain types of legal entities: grounds, features of recognition and conclusion of a contract. Law Enforcement Review. 2025;9(2):130-139. https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2025.9(2).130-139