The concept of law in the social sciences and the construction of reality: philosophy, economics, law (Part 2)

   Introduction. The foundation of this approach lies in the concept of distinct functions of laws. From this perspective, the principal role of social laws is their involvement in shaping social reality. Considering the swift and large-scale transformations in culture and civilization, it becomes crucial to examine the speed and depth with which legislative activity adapts to these shifts.

   Purpose. This article aims to point out a paradoxical situation. In the interconnected system of education, law, and governance, all these components exert, at minimum, mutually constraining effects.

   Overcoming this predicament might necessitate a fundamental rethinking of laws in their societal context.

   Methodology. The dialectical approach posits that any object under investigation should not be studied in isolation, but rather, at minimum, in conjunction with at least one otherт object. Similarly, in the realm of knowledge, the fundamental unit of knowledge is the categorical opposition. Consistent with this principle, law will be examined alongside concepts such as: 'justice', norm, realism, education, and myth. Special discussion will be dedicated to the paradox of an unjust law.

   Results. Part I of this article established that social laws serve as vital tools for shaping social reality. The accelerating rate of societal change since the late 20^th century significantly influences the evolution of social laws. This study explores the relationships between law and the notions of justice, norm, realism, education, and myth. It illustrates the historical impact of both progressive and regressive laws on educational development. A deep connection is shown between legislative activity and myth-making, taking into account its ties to narrative, discourse, and the broader narcissistic shift in contemporary culture. The article suggests a productive reorientation of the discussion from the inherent laws of scientific disciplines to the communication rules governing scientists within those fields. Humanists and social scientists, regardless of their personal motives, play a crucial role in legitimizing new laws. Philosophical and economic perspectives on social laws are here augmented by a historical-cultural approach, through which myth and myth-making are analyzed. The paper also addresses the mutual influence of legislative activity and education, demonstrating how they can either accelerate, impede, or ignore each other's progress.

   Conclusion. A multidisciplinary approach to understanding law necessitates recourse to historical and cultural events, prompting an exploration of our subject from at least three standpoints: legal, philosophical, and economic. The study confirmed the constructive affinity between the notions of myth and narrative, and social reform and myth-making. Moreover, an additional aspect in grasping the essence of social laws is their contribution to the optimization of resource production, distribution, and utilization within society, which is invariably accompanied by diverse communicative practices. Authors' contributions. Section 1 prepared by V.I. Razumov; sections 2-4 prepared by A.A. Sapunkov; section 5 prepared by V.I. Razumov, A.A. Sapunkov, P.A. Orekhovsky jointly. In all other respects, authors made equivalent contributions to the publication.

1. Orekhovsky P.A., Razumov V.I., Sapunkov A.A. The concept of law in the social sciences and the construction of reality: philosophy, economics, law. Pravoprimenenie = Law Enforcement Review, 2024, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 15–24. DOI: 10.52468/2542-1514.2024.8(3).15-24.

2. Orekhovsky P., Razumov V. Narcissism: variations on a theme (to the results of the discussion). Idei i idealy = Ideas and ideals, 2022, vol. 14, iss. 4, pt. 2, pp. 401–415. DOI: 10.17212/2075-0862-2022-14.4.2-401-415. (In Russ.).

3. Orekhovsky P., Razumov V. The onset of narcissistic culture: consequences for education, science and politics. Idei i idealy = Ideas and ideals, 2021, vol. 13, iss. 3, pt. 1, pp. 84–102. DOI: 10.17212/2075-0862-2021-13.3.1-84-102. (In Russ.).

4. Orekhovsky P.A., Razumov V.I. The discrete charm of apartheid: the reverse side of narcissistic culture. Siberian Socium, 2022, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 8–23. DOI: 10.21684/2587-8484-2022-6-2-8-23. (In Russ.).

5. Alekseev S.S. The ascent to the law. Searches and solutions. Moscow, Norma Publ., 2001. 752 p. (In Russ.).

6. Nersesyants V.S. Philosophy of law, Textbook for universities. Moscow, Norma Publ., 2005. 656 p. (In Russ.).

7. Letters from G.F. Puchta to F.K. Savigny as a backgound source material on German philosophy of law in the 2^nd quarter of the 19^th century, transl. from German by N.E. Aslamov. Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Filosofiya = RUDN Journal of Philosophy, 2011, no. 1, pp. 69–84. (In Russ.).

8. Savigny F.C. von. Vom Beruf unserer Zeit für Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft. Heidelberg, J.C.B. Mohr Publ., 1840. 198 p. (In German).

9. Gorban V.S., Gruzdev V.S. Philosophical and legal heritage of V.S. Nersesyants. Pravo i politika = Law and Politics, 2022, no. 10, pp. 15–22. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0706.2022.10.39090. (In Russ.).

10. Sapunkov A.A., Sapunkov N.A. Legal reforms as a response to global social challenges (lessons of judicial reform in the second half of the XIX century in Russia), in: Nauchnye trudy, Annual, iss. 19, Omsk, Siberian State University of Physical Culture and Sports Publ., 2014, pp. 188–195. (In Russ.).

11. Lesiv B.V. Legal predictability and prediction of judicial decisions in O.W. Holmes’ theory of law. Pravosudie = Justice, 2023, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 43–66. (In Russ.).

12. Kant I. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, in: Kant I. Works, in 6 volumes, ed. by V.F. Asmus, A.V. Gulyga, T.I. Oizerman, Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 1965, vol. 4, pt. 1, pp. 219–310. (In Russ.).

13. Creveld M. van. The rise and decline of the state, Transl. from English ed. by Yu. Kuznetsov, A. Makeev. Moscow, IRISEN Publ., 2006. 542 p. (In Russ.).

14. Naim M. The end of power, Transl. from English by N. Mezin, Yu. Poleshchuk, A. Sagan. Moscow, AST Publ., 2016. 507 p. (In Russ.).

15. Rodrik D. The globalization paradox, Transl. from English by N. Edel’man. Moscow, Gaidar Institute Publ., 2014. 567 р. (In Russ.).

16. Solov'ev V.S. Justification of good, Collected works in 10 volumes; Vol. 8, 2nd ed. St. Petersburg, Prosveshchenie Publ., 1914. XXXIX + 722 p. (In Russ.).

17. Donskikh O.A., Razumov V.I. WPD-logy as a tool of the improvement of education in the 21^st century. Professional’noe obrazovanie v sovremennom mire = Professional education in the modern world, 2022, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 168–174. DOI: 10.20913/2618-7515-2022-1-20. (In Russ.).

18. Sapunkov A.A. Judicial reform of 1864: unlearned lessons, in: Aktual'nye problemy i perspektivy razvitiya nauchnoi shkoly Khronodiskretnogo monogeograficheskogo sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya, Collection of scientific works, Nizhny Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod branch of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration Publ., 2021, pp. 75–90. (In Russ.).

19. Maleva E.M. The experience of the university reform of 1863 in the system of anti-corruption legal education of the Russian Empire, in: Pravo i politika: istoriya i sovremennost', Collection of conference materials, Omsk, Omsk Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation Publ., 2022, pp. 145–146. (In Russ.).

20. Serov D.O. Russian judges and higher legal education: historical aspect. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher education in Russia, 2013, no. 10, pp. 77–82. (In Russ.).

21. Sapunkov A.A. The history of the general courts of the Russian Empire: judicial chambers as a system– forming body (1866–1917). Moscow, Yurlitinform Publ., 2021. 224 p. (In Russ.).

22. Sapunkov A.A. Judicial chambers in the judicial system of the Russian Empire: the second half of the XIX – early XX centuries, Cand. Diss. Omsk, 2018. 297 p. (In Russ.).

23. Serov D.O. Legal educational qualification and the formation of a corporation of lawyers in the civil service of the Russian Empire. Genesis: istoricheskie issledovaniya = Genesis: historical research, 2016, no. 6, pp. 123–138. DOI: 10.7256/2409-868X.2016.6.20515. (In Russ.).

24. Serov D.O. Prosecutorial investigative personnel of the Russian Empire in the 1850-1860^s: educational level (from the history and prehistory of the judicial reform of 1864). Aktual’nye problemy rossiiskogo prava = Actual problems of Russian law, 2014, no. 11 (48), pp. 2622–2629. (In Russ.).

25. Maleva E.M. Koni A.F. on moral principles in law, in: Dorskaya A.A., Kosovskaya V.A., Alekseeva N.I. (eds.). Krizisnye yavleniya v prave: teoriya, istoriya, puti preodoleniya, Collective monograph, St. Petersburg, Asterion Publ., 2021, pp. 259–264. (In Russ.).

26. Maleva E.M. Morality in law: a historical and theoretical aspect, in: Sotsial'no-pravovye regulyatory obshchestvennykh otnoshenii i vyzovy sovremennosti, Conference proceedings, Irkutsk, Baikal State University Publ., 2021, pp. 57–63. (In Russ.).

27. Shkuratov V.A. Phases of the paradigm (a draft of psychological and historical epistemology). Pt. 2. Russian Psychological Journal, 2007, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 31–43. (In Russ.).

28. Oboturova G.N. Myth in the structure of cognition and activity, Cand. Diss. Thesis. Moscow, 1999. 40 p. (In Russ.).

29. Amel'chenko I.A. Myth as an intention to integrity. Vіsnik Priazovs'kogo derzhavnogo tekhnіchnogo unіversitetu. Serіya: Tekhnіchnі nauki = Reporter of the Priazovskyi State Technical University. Section: Technical sciences, 1997, no. 1, pp. 25–30. (In Russ.).

30. Losev A.F. Dialectics of myth, ed. by A.A. Takho-Godi, V.P. Troitsky. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 2001. 558 p. (In Russ.).