Preview

Law Enforcement Review

Advanced search

Hybrid legal regimes: problems of employment

https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2025.9(3).104-113

Abstract

   The article is devoted to the study of a special type of special mixed temporary, including – on a limited territory, intersectoral (interdisciplinary) legal regime, forced to promptly form by the state in response to a threat of large-scale violation of the rights of citizens and state security that was not predicted in advance and not provided with regulatory legal means of counteraction, called a hybrid legal regime. A hybrid legal regime is a type of mixed, but the latter consists of ordinary and special regimes, territorially and temporally localized, limiting the rights of a relatively small number of citizens. The use of mixed regimes does not require prompt adjustment of the regulatory framework. Mixed regimes operate periodically, hybrid ones – one after another, intersecting in time at least by their individual elements. We can talk about a significant time period of hybrid legal regimes – until the completion of the processes of deglobalization and technological transition, stabilization of economic, social and political blocks and relations. A transitional legal regime can be hybrid if it meets the features identified in the course of the study. At the same time, the transitional legal regime for regulating labor relations, which ended in general with the adoption of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation, corresponding to the requirements of the market economy, was not hybrid. During the construction based on the Western model of legal regulation of labor in Russia, there were mistakes and deliberate deviations, but there was no legal and goal-setting uncertainty, legal norms were borrowed through the prism of the existing model or created taking into account local experience. In the modern transition, in the absence of final and intermediate verified models, it is necessary to quickly create or borrow rules from different regimes and quickly, without practical testing on a limited scale, use them in the constructed model. From this point of view, the hybrid legal regime, although outwardly similar to the experimental, but in essence, being forced to be applied in the absence of other (non-experimental) potentially effective sets of legal means, is not such. When developing basic sectoral federal laws in the context of hybrid legal regimes, it is necessary to carefully predict the results of their impact on public relations in the long term. It is advisable to avoid changing basic industry regulations by resorting to special legal regulation, and if this rule is not followed, be prepared to revise the rules introduced on an accelerated basis in the future. In the context of employment and social protection, the study made it possible to substantiate the conclusion that the foundation elements of hybrid legal regimes should be institutions based on traditional spiritual and moral values enshrined in the Constitution of the Russian Federation, which historically determined the emergence of labor law as an independent private-public sector, extending them to new forms of labor organization: institutions of labor protection, social insurance and social partnership.

About the Author

S. Yu. Chucha
Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Sergey Yu. Chucha,  Doctor of Law, Professor; Chief at the Cente, Chief Research Scientist

Interdisciplinary Center for Legal Research of Labor Law and Social Security Law; Department of Trial Law

119019; 10, Znamenka ul.; Moscow

ResearcherID: AAB-6526-2021; AuthorID: 475874



References

1. Chucha S.Yu. Employment, labor and social protection in a hybrid enforcement regime. Pravoprimenenie = Law Enforcement Review, 2024, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 44–52. DOI: 10.52468/2542-1514.2024.8(3).44-52.

2. Pankevich N.V., Rudenko V.V. COVID-19 vaccination in the national security system of the Russian Federation: coordination of private and public interests. Pravoprimenenie = Law Enforcement Review, 2022, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 75–94. DOI: 10.52468/2542-1514. 2022.6(4).75-94.

3. Butakov A.V. From social contradiction to social competition as the basic legal regime (mode) of statehood (Part I). Pravoprimenenie = Law Enforcement Review, 2023, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 5–15. DOI: 10.52468/2542-1514.2023.7(2).5-15.

4. Butakov A.V. From social contradiction to social competition as the basic legal regime (mode) of statehood (Part II). Pravoprimenenie = Law Enforcement Review, 2023, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 5–14. DOI: 10.52468/2542-1514.2023.7(4).5-14.

5. Golovko V.V., Sakhno A.I. Main directions for improving public health legislation in Russia. Pravoprimenenie = Law Enforcement Review, 2023, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 96–104. DOI: 10.52468/2542-1514.2023.7(2).96–104.

6. Litovko K.S. Prevention of the spread of infectious diseases as a guarantee of constitutional rights to health protection and medical care in Russia. Pravoprimenenie = Law Enforcement Review, 2023, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 105–115. DOI: 10.52468/2542-1514.2023.7(2).105-115.

7. Panchenko V.Yu., Petrov A.A. (eds.). Modern theory of legal regimes: theoretical and sectoral approaches, Monograph. Krasnoyarsk, Siberian Federal University Publ., 2017. 296 p. (In Russ.).

8. Isakov V.B. The mechanism of legal regulation and legal regimes, in: Alekseev S.S. (ed.). Problemy teorii gosudarstva i prava, Moscow, Yuridicheskaya literatura Publ., 1987, pp. 245–267. (In Russ.).

9. Alekseev S.S. General permissions and general prohibitions in Soviet law. Moscow, Yuridicheskaya literatura Publ., 1989. 288 p. (In Russ.).

10. Alekseev S.S. Theory of law. Moscow, BEK Publ., 1994. 320 p. (In Russ.).

11. Matuzov N.I., Mal’ko A.V. Legal regimes: concept and types, in: Pravo i politika: sovremennye problemy stanovleniya i razvitiya, Collection of scientific papers, iss. 4, Voronezh, Voronezh State University Publ., 1996, pp. 9–17. (In Russ.).

12. Matuzov N.I., Malko A.V. Legal regimes: questions of theory and practice. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii. Pravovedenie = Proceedings of Higher Educational Institutions. Pravovedenie, 1996, no. 1, pp. 16–29. (In Russ.).

13. Blyakhman B.Ya. Legal regime in the system of regulation of social relations. Kemerovo, Kuzbassvuizdat Publ., 1999. 171 p. (In Russ.).

14. Rodionov O.S. The mechanism of establishing legal regimes by Russian legislation, Cand. Diss. Saratov, 2001. 157 p. (In Russ.).

15. Shamsumova E.F. Legal regimes (theoretical aspect), Cand. Diss. Yekaterinburg, 2001. 213 p. (In Russ.).

16. Gorlenko V.A. Legal regulation regime (theoretical and applied aspect), Cand. Diss. Thesis. St. Petersburg, 2002. 24 p. (In Russ.).

17. Kudryavtsev Yu.A. Democracy as a type of political regime (theoretical and legal aspect), Cand. Diss. Thesis. St. Petersburg, 2002. 23 p. (In Russ.).

18. Belyaeva G.S. Legal regime: general theoretical research, Doct. Diss. Kursk, 2013. 407 p. (In Russ.).

19. Zor’kin V.D. Speech at the round table dedicated to the tenth anniversary of perestroika, in: Pravovoe gosudarstvo v Rossii: zamysel i real'nost', on the tenth anniversary of perestroika, Moscow, Aprel’-85 Publ., 1995, pp. 27–29. (In Russ.).

20. Marchenko M.N. (ed.). General theory of state and law, Academic course, in 3 volumes, 2<sup>nd</sup> ed. Moscow, Zertsalo-M Publ., 2002. Vol. 2. 528 p. (In Russ.).

21. Makarov V.O. Experimental legal regimes of mobilization type as a method of legal regulation in the context of COVID-19 spread. Pravoprimenenie = Law Enforcement Review, 2021, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 30–42. DOI: 10.52468/2542-1514.2021.5(4).30-42.

22. Chucha S.Yu. Modernization of the Legal Regulation of Remote Labor in Russia: Prerequisites, Conditions, Prospects. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya “Pravo” = Herald of Omsk University. Series “Law”, 2021, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 64–73. DOI: 10.24147/1990-5173.2021.18(2).64-73. (In Russ.).

23. Chucha S.Yu. Social dialogue in Russia: constitutionalization and expanding the legal content of the concept. Pravoprimenenie = Law Enforcement Review, 2021, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 249–261. DOI: 10.52468/2542-1514.2021.5(3).249-261.

24. Chucha S.Yu. Legal means of protection of creative labor as a traditional Russian spiritual and moral value. Gosudarstvo i pravo = State and Law, 2024, no. 6, pp. 111–119. DOI: 10.31857/S1026945224060096. (In Russ.).

25. Chucha S.Yu. Social Partnership as an Institution for Ensuring the Interests of the Russian State in the Field of Employment. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya “Pravo” = Herald of Omsk University. Series “Law”, 2024, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 57–66. DOI: 10.24147/1990-5173.2024.21(1).57-66. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Chucha S.Yu. Hybrid legal regimes: problems of employment. Law Enforcement Review. 2025;9(3):104-113. https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2025.9(3).104-113

Views: 35


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2542-1514 (Print)
ISSN 2658-4050 (Online)