THREE MODELS OF NATIONAL CRIMINAL POLICY IN THE CONTEXT OF GLOBALIZATION

The author identifies three models of national criminal policy: the sovereign, reformist and experimental. The main criteria of such differentiation are the exposure to global influence, the criminological soundness and stability of criminal policy. Identification of the model of criminal policy in a particular state is a complex task that requires independent research.
The subject. The article is devoted to modeling of the national criminal policy in modern conditions of globalization. The article discusses various models of criminal policy in the conditions of globalization.
The purpose of the author is to describe the basic models of national criminal policy in modern conditions of globalization.
The methodology. The author uses the method of analysis and synthesis, formal legal method as well as sociological methods (survey).
The results, scope of application. The author identifies three models of national criminal policy: the sovereign, reformist and experimental. The main criteria of such differentiation are the exposure to global influence, the criminological soundness and stability of criminal policy. The sovereign model is based on doctrine of weak state and a strong combat criminal activity. It is distinguished by the pursuit of the realization of the equality of all before the law, criminal strategic and political planning system with a clear definition of goals and objectives; criminological security. The reform of criminal policy is characterized by

uncertainty goals and objectives, utopianism and pretentiousness, dependence on standards of the international organization, the lower prestige of criminology, reduction of social programs, lobbying of group interests, permanent amendments to the criminal and criminal procedure legislation. Experimental model of criminal policy is connected with approbation of such technologies of management of society that are criminal and contrary to human experience in fighting crime.
Conclusions. Criminal policy of the various states tends by globalist influence more or less. The desire for sovereignty in every sphere, including criminal justice, results the imposition of sanctions by the globalist structures. Reformist penal policy expresses the loss of a strategic, informed criminological development goals of criminal justice, and, as a rule, corresponds to the group, not the public interest. Experimental criminal policy demonstrates a high rate of development and takes a growing place in the globalist projects with an anti-Russian content.

1. Chaadaev S.G. Сrime Control in States of the Anglo-Saxon system of law, Doct. Diss. Thesis. Moscow, 1992. 41 p. (In Russ.).

2. Golovko L.V. J. Pradel. Comparative criminal law, a review. Gosudarstvo i pravo, 1996, no. 6, pp. 158–160. (In Russ.).

3. Esakov G.A. Foundations of comparative criminal law. Moscow, Elit Publ., 2007. 152 p. (In Russ.).

4. Ivanov S.V. Criminal policy of the Russian Federation: politological and criminological and criminal-legal aspects, Cand. Diss. Thesis. Yekaterinburg, 2006. 27 p. (In Russ.).

5. Luneev V.V. Crime in the USSR: basic trends and patterns. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo, 1991, no. 8, pp. 90–97. (In Russ.).

6. Kleymenov I.M., Pronnikov A.V. Criminal legal policy in the sphere of counter economic crime. Omsk, KAN Publ., 2010. 195 p. (In Russ.).

7. Fukuyama F. State building. Governance and World Order in the Twenty-First Century. Moscow, AST Publ., 2010. 222 p. (In Russ.).

8. Tsibulya A.N., Gordin V.A. On the issue of the state of informational security of the state in conditions of contemporary challenges and menaces.Voenno-yuridicheskii zhurnal = Military-law Journal, 2014, no. 3, pp. 20–24. (In Russ.).

9. Marshall J. Zero Tolerance Polycing, Information bulletin no. 9. Office of Crime Statistics, March 1999. Available at: http://www.ocsar.sa.gov.au/docs/information_bulletins/IB9.pdf (accessed July 14, 2017).

10. Lafitsky V.I. (ed.). Comparative Law: National Legal Systems. Vol. 3. Аsian legal systems. Moscow, The Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation Publ., Kontrakt Publ., 2013. 704 p. (In Russ.).

11. Belyakov A.V. The fight against corruption and organized crime in China in the reform period, and openness (1978-2005), Cand. Diss. Thesis. Moscow, 2005. 32 p. (In Russ.).

12. Pan Dunmay. The problem of juvenile crime and control in China. Lex Russica, 2013, no. 4, pp. 391–400. (In Russ.).

13. Xin Yan, Yablokov N.P. Anti-mafia in China. Moscow, Norma Publ., 2006. 192 p. (In Russ.).

14. Lampietti J., Banerjee S., Branczic A. People and Power: Electricity Sector Reforms and the Poor in Europe and Central Asia. Washington, 2006. 258 p.

15. Perkins J. Confessions of an Economic Hit Man. Moscow, Pretekst Publ., 2012. 272 p. (In Russ.).

16. Kalyashin A.V. To the Subject of Demilitarization of the Penal Enforcement System of the Russian Federation. Administrativnoe i munitsipalnoe pravo = Administrative and municipal law, 2014, no. 12, pp. 1225–1233. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.12.12503. (In Russ.).

17. Duyunov V.K. Reform of criminal legislation should be obosnated steak subs. Vestnik samarskoi gumanitarnoi akademii. Seriya “Pravo”, 2012, no. 1(11), pp. 12–18. (In Russ.).

18. Alekseev A.I., Pobegailo E.F., Ovchinsky V.S. Russian criminal policy: overcoming the crisis. Moscow, Norma Publ., 2006. 144 p. (In Russ.).

19. Voly’nskij А.F., Voly’nskij V.V. IS The new Criminal procedure code of Ukraine the answer to challenges of contemporary crime or…? Rossiskii sledovatel' = Russian Investigator, 2013, no. 5, pp. 39–43. (In Russ.).

20. Naumov A.V. The Problems to codifications russian criminal legislation: the new Penal code or new editing of the Code? Obshchestvo i pravo = Society And Law, 2010, no. 5, pp. 13–17. (In Russ.).

21. Golik Yu.V., Karasev V.I. Corruption as a mechanism of social degradation. St. Petersburg, Yyuridicheskii tsentr Press Publ., 2005. 329 p. (In Russ.).

22. Gerasimov S.I. The organization of criminological prevention in the city of Moscow (experience and perspectives). Moscow, Shchit-M Publ., 2000. 272 p. (In Russ.).

23. Kudryavtsev V.N. The strategy of the fight against crime. Moscow, Yurist Publ., 2003. 352 p. (In Russ.).

24. Koleman D. The Committee of 300. Moscow, Vityaz-M Publ., 2006. 320 p. (In Russ.).

25. Kochoi S.M. “The Islamic State”: from Terrorism to Genocide. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2014, no. 12, pp. 61–72. (In Russ.).

26. Greenwald G. Drug Decriminalization in Portugal. Polit.ru. July, 13, 2009. Available at: http://polit.ru/article/2009/07/13/portugaldrugs/ (accessed July 14, 2017). (In Russ.).

27. Hughes C.E., Stevens A. What can we learn from the Poltugues decriminalization of Illicit drugs? British Journal of Criminology, 2010, vol. 50, pp. 999–1022.

28. Ishchenko E.P. Euthanasia: for and against. Lex Russica, 2013, no. 3, pp. 320–330. (In Russ.).

29. Poroh V., Katrunov V., Zasypkina E. Legal, Medical and Ethical Aspects of Euthanasiaand Prospects for its Legalization in Russia. Sovremennoe pravo = The Modern Law, 2013, no. 2, pp. 62–65. (In Russ.).

30. Kapinus O.S. Euthanasia as a socio-legal phenomenon. Moscow, Bukvoed Publ., 2006. 400 p. (In Russ.).

31. Kleymenov I.M. Comparative criminology: an analysis of legal systems. Omsk, OmIPP Publ., 2004. 258 p. (In Russ.).