The procedural side of the rule of law in the observations with anthropological bias
https://doi.org/10.24147/2542-1514.2018.2(1).5-16
Abstract
The subject. The article examines a wide range of issues related to the understanding of the role and importance of legal procedures in their relationship with the rule of law. The authors pay special attention to the current state and trends in the development of legislative, administrative and judicial procedures in the Russian Federation.
The purpose of the article is to assess the impact of legal procedures on the rule of law.
The description of methodology. The authors use methods of complex analysis, synthesis, as well as formal-legal, comparative-legal, research methods in combination with the methodology of anthropological science.
The main results and scope of their application. Reconciling public-imperious decisions, the procedure sometimes governs the behavior of the state itself and keeps it in check, bringing statehood closer to rule of law. The rule of law needs urgently and comprehensively a system of different legal procedures: judicial, public, contractual, arbitration, electoral, referendum, parliamentary, federal, municipal and administrative (fiscal, budgetary, licensing, control, jurisdictional). It would simply not be able to meet its purpose without such procedures, and the idea of the rule of law would remain non-binding. Not every form and fiction performs law-saving work and it’s also true for the conditional ability of the authorities to create law and judge law.
Conclusions. Procedures, their combinations are different in origin and in action, but the "non-procedural" legal statehood can not exist. Therefore, procedural violations-encroachments on the judicial, parliamentary, electoral process and other types of processes – are especially dangerous. Legal statehood based on trust is harmed by frequent changes in procedures. The evolutionary capacity of legislative changes is the condition of their viability.About the Authors
K. V. Aranovskiy
Far Eastern Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Judge of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, Honoured Lawyer of the Russian Federation, Doctor of Law, Professor, Chair of Constitutional and Administra-tive Law
AuthorID: 261768
S. D. Knyazev
Far Eastern Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Judge of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, Honoured Lawyer of the Russian Federation, Honoured Scientist of the Russian Federation, Doctor of Law, Professor, Head, Chair of Constitutional and Administrative Law
AuthorID: 344659
References
1. Zor'kin V.D. The legal way of Russia. Moscow, Bibliotechka RG Publ., 2014. 191 p. (In Russ.).
2. Aranovskii K.V., Knyazev S.D. Rule of law and the legal state in the ratio of signs and meanings. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2016. 208 p. (In Russ.).
3. Karnovich E.P. Essays on orders of our administrative, judicial and public. St. Petersburg, Skaryatin Publ., 1873. 260 p. (In Russ.).
4. Aranovsky K.V., Knyazev S.D. Constitution and the security. Gosudarstvo i pravo, 2018, no. 1, pp. 17–28. (In Russ.).
5. Barenboim P. Interrelationship Between the Rule of Law and the Legal State Doctrines as the Main Question for Philosophy of Law and Constitutionalism. Moscow, LOOOM Publ., 2013. 128 p. (In Russ.).
6. Voronkov A.V. Development of the system of administrative law in Russia: international and comparative legal aspects. St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg State University Publ., 2002. 84 p. (In Russ.).
7. Zastrozhnaya O.K. The Soviet administrative process. Voronezh, Voronezh University Publ., 1985. 99 p. (In Russ.).
8. Tikhomirov Yu.A. Course of administrative law and process. Moscow, Yurinformtsentr Publ., 1998. 798 p. (In Russ.).
9. Makhina S.N. Administrative process: problems of theory, perspectives for legal regulation. Voronezh, Voro-nezh University Publ., 1999. 232 p. (In Russ.).
10. Sorokin V.D. Administrative process and administrative procedural law. St. Petersburg, Law Institute Publ., 2002. 474 p. (In Russ.).
11. Panova I.V. Administrative and procedural law of Russia. Moscow, Norma Publ., 2009. 336 p. (In Russ.).
12. Knyazev S.D. Respect for the law does not tolerate legislative fuss. Peterburgskii yurist, 2017, no. 2, pp. 15–22. (In Russ.).
13. Hayek F.A. The Road to Serfdom. Moscow, Ekonomika Publ., 1992. 176 p. (In Russ.).
14. Gorobets D.V. The Parliament of The Russian Federation. Moscow, Academy of management of MIA RF Publ., 1998. 216 p. (In Russ.).
15. Avak'yan S.A. Federal Assembly – the Parliament of Russia. Moscow, Russian Juridical Publishing House, 1999. 432 p. (In Russ.).
16. Romanov R.M. Russian parliamentarism. Moscow, Sovremennaya ekonomika i pravo Publ., 1999. 392 p. (In Russ.).
17. Volkova N.S., Khabrieva T.Ya. Legal position of the constitutional Court of the Russian Federation and the Parliament. Moscow, Norma Publ., 2005. 176 p. (In Russ.).
18. Nadeev R.K. Legal examination of bills in the State Duma. Moscow, Moscow State University Publ., 2005. 78 p. (In Russ.).
19. Chirkin V.E. The Legislature. Moscow, Norma Publ., Infra-M Publ., 2008. 336 p. (In Russ.).
20. Grankin I.V. Parliamentary law of the Russian Federation, course of lectures. Moscow, Norma Publ., Infra-M Publ., 2010, 335 p. (In Russ.).
21. Okulich I.P., Boltunov D.V., Serous A.V. Regulations in the system of normative regulation of activities of the Parliament in the Russian Federation. Chelyabinsk, Rekpol Publ., 2012. 272 p. (In Russ.).
22. Balashov A.N. About the manifestation of goodwise in administrative court of proceedings. Zhurnal admin-istrativnogo sudoproizvodstva, 2017, no. 3, pp. 7–9. (In Russ.).
23. Rumyantsev O.G. Prospects of constitutional reform in the Russian Federation, in: Aktual'nye voprosy razvitiya rossiiskogo parlamentarizma na sovremennom etape, materials of “a round table” (St. Petersburg, March 22, 2012). Moscow, Yuniti-Dana Publ., 2012, pp. 45–49. (In Russ.).
24. Vasil'eva A.F. Service state: administrative and legal research of rendering public services in Germany and Russia. Moscow, RAP Publ., 2012. 332 p. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Aranovskiy K.V., Knyazev S.D. The procedural side of the rule of law in the observations with anthropological bias. Law Enforcement Review. 2018;2(1):5-16. https://doi.org/10.24147/2542-1514.2018.2(1).5-16
Views:
535
Email this article 