Countering abuses at the granting of additional measures of state support to families with children: the possibilities of the legislator and law enforcement practice experience
https://doi.org/10.24147/2542-1514.2018.2(1).69-84
Abstract
The subject of the article is abuses at the granting of additional measures of state support to families with children and measures of its prevention
The purpose of the article is to analyze legal rules governing the provision of additional measures of state support for families with children, to determine their completeness and adequacy for countering abuses in this area.
Characteristic of the problem field. The implementation of the legislation on additional measures of state support for families with children, has proved to be connected with widespread attempts to use the maternity (family) capital by the persons who do not have the right, or to use it contrary to the restrictions established by law. Analyzed legislation has shortcomings that create the conditions for illegal actions.
Methodology. Both general scientific methods (analysis, synthesis, description) and special scientific methods (comparative-legal and formal-legal methods) were used in the research process .
Results. Countering abuses requires improvement (changes and additions) of the law governing the provision of additional measures of state support for families with children. Refinement and extension of powers of the Pension Fund’s of the Russian Federation bodies in this area, however, inevitably entails an increase in the number of organizational actions performed by these bodies when considering applications of the entitled persons. The flip side of strengthening the fight against illegal actions in this sphere can also be the limitation of the possibilities of the entitled persons and the extension of discretion of authorized bodies. When the effective legislative means are absent the judicial practice plays a prominent role in preventing the illegal use of maternity (family) capital. In particular, the qualification of improvement of housing conditions as a necessary result of the contract of purchase and sale of real estate became one of the obstacles to illegal receipt of maternity (family) capital.
About the Author
O. S. Kurchenko
Dostoevsky Omsk State University, Omsk, Russia
Russian Federation
PhD in Law, Associate Professor, Chair of Social Law
Russian Federation
PhD in Law, Associate Professor, Chair of Social Law
References
1. Guseva T.S. Maternal (family) capital: ways to improve legal regulations. Semeinoe i zhilishchnoe pravo = Family and Housing Law, 2012, no. 6, pp. 7–10. (In Russ.).
2. Arkchipov A.V. The subject and objective side of fraud connected with misappropriation of the resources of maternity (family) capital. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Pravo = Tomsk State University Journal of Law, 2014, no. 2, pp. 29–38. (In Russ.).
3. Arkhipov A.V. The problems of classification of fraudulent acts connected with misappropriation of the resources of maternity (family) capital. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Pravo = Tomsk State Univer-sity Journal of Law, 2013, no. 4, pp. 47–57. (In Russ.).
4. Kharlamova M.L. Observance of the minors’ rights in case of allocating of funds from maternity (family) capital to improve housing conditions. Zakonnost’, 2013, no. 6, pp. 46–50. (In Russ.).
5. Mun O. Frauds with the maternity (family) capital. Zhilishchnoe pravo, 2013, no. 6, pp. 7–29. (In Russ.).
6. Majorova E.I. Typical means of stealing of means of maternity capital (criminal-law aspect). Rossiiskii sledovatel' = Russian Investigator, 2015, no. 5, pp. 19–22. (In Russ.).
7. Fioshin A.V. The maternity (family) capital: some of the features of judicial practice. Rossiiskaya yustitsiya = Russian Justitia, 2013, no. 1, pp. 60–62. (In Russ.).
8. Bekreneva T. Maternity capital as a reason for fraud. Zhilishchnoe pravo, 2012, no. 4, pp. 57–63. (In Russ.).
9. Alistarkhov V. Deficiencies in housing legislation regarding the use of the maternity (family) capital. Zhilishchnoe pravo, 2014, no. 3, pp. 81–90. (In Russ.).
10. Kovalyova O.A. Acquisition of a dwelling using mortgage lending and maternity capital: actual problems of law enforcement. Izvestiya Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta, 2015, no. 1, pp. 248–251. (In Russ.).
11. Akhmedshina A.N. The Right to Maternity (Family) Capital in the System of Social Security Measures. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2009, no. 1, pp. 99–107. (In Russ.).
12. Phrick O.V. The oblafation as unilateral contract in the legal relationships system, connected with the registration of the rights to the maternity (family) capital. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya “Pravo” = Herald of Omsk University. Series “Law”, 2009, no. 4, pp. 156–159. (In Russ.).
13. Bratashova V.A. Notarized undertakings in connection with the use of maternity (family) capital: problems of implementation and control. Sud'ya, 2014, no. 7, pp. 31–33. (In Russ.).
14. Mikhailova E.D., Kalmykova E.A. Prosecution bodies carry out monitoring of legislation for improving the regulatory legal acts. Prokuror, 2015, no. 3, pp. 67–70. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Kurchenko O.S. Countering abuses at the granting of additional measures of state support to families with children: the possibilities of the legislator and law enforcement practice experience. Law Enforcement Review. 2018;2(1):69-84. https://doi.org/10.24147/2542-1514.2018.2(1).69-84
Views:
847
Email this article 