Exemption of a joint stock company from the obligation to provide information to a shareholder

The subject of research. Issues concerning the exercise of the right of shareholders to receive information are analyzed. The focus is on the issues of exemption of a joint-stock company from providing information. The development of the institute of the information provision to shareholders by joint stock companies are consistently analyzed. The main trends in the development of this institute are shown: gradually narrowing the ability of shareholders to exercise their right to receive information through such means as restriction, differentiation and exemption from providing information. Special emphasis is placed on the institute of exemption from providing information.
The purpose of the article is to show the main drawbacks of the existing model of exemption of a joint-stock company from the obligation to provide information to shareholders and to formulate directions for the development of legislation. The author's main scientific hypothesis can be summarized as follows. The Federal law «On joint-stock companies» contained an initial defect in the description of information exchange between a shareholder and a joint-stock company. The shareholder's right to information was not described, in fact, it was «embedded» in the obligation of the joint-stock company to provide information. The subsequent changes to the law resulted in a narrowing of the rights of the shareholder, practically depriving the minority shareholder of the right to information. This defect has led to significant legal uncertainty when the joint-stock company exercises its right to be exempt from providing information. This uncertainty should be eliminated, because the regulatory goals for granting joint-stock companies an exemption from the obligation to provide information to shareholders (article 92.2 of the Federal law «On joint-stock companies» that counters sanctions pressure) are absolutely correct. At the same time, some of the grounds for exemption from the obligation to provide information to shareholders (article 92.1 of the Federal law «On joint-stock companies») must either be excluded or reformulated. The author notes the complete «break» between the current regulation and the ideas about information exchange between a shareholder and a joint-stock company, that initially inspired the creation of the law on joint-stock companies. The inclusion of sanctions in the law on joint - stock companies as a factor affecting the performance by a joint-stock company of its obligation to provide information to shareholders should be fully welcomed. However, the legal and technical design of the corresponding political and legal idea cannot be considered optimal. In this part, the legislation requires a complete renovation based on the principle of balancing constitutional values and the interests of the state, majority and minority shareholders.

Description of research methodology. The research is based on a systematic analysis, as well as the interpretation of Russian legislation and doctrine.
Information about the main scientific results. The development of legislation on joint-stock companies in terms of providing information is shown. It is shown that if legislator taking into account sanctions when regulating the obligation of a joint-stock company to provide information, the goals of legislative regulation fully comply with constitutional principles, but specific legal decisions cannot be considered optimal. Conclusions. It is concluded that development of legislation on joint-stock companies has led to a significant restriction of the ability of shareholders to receive information. The author formulated the priority of regulatory goals in countering sanctions pressure and offered specific directions for improving legal regulation.

1. Ivanova E.V. Abuse of the right of a shareholder to receive information about a joint-stock company. Leningradskij yuridicheskij zhurnal = Leningrad Law Journal, 2008, no. 4, pp. 163–178. (In Russ.).

2. Barabanshchikov V.N. Problems of implementation and protection of shareholder rights to information. Zhurnal pravovyh i ekonomicheskih issledovanij = Journal of Legal and Economic Studies, 2008, no. 1, pp. 34–42. (In Russ.).

3. Povarov Yu.S. Joint-stock law of Russia: textbook. Mosccow, Vyshee obrazovanie; Yurayt-Izdat, 2009. 660 p. (In Russ.).

4. Dvoichenkova I.V. The right of shareholders to information about the company's activities. Predprinimatel'skoe pravo = Entrepreneurial law, 2016, no. 1, pp. 32–39. (In Russ.).

5. Vavulin D.A. Disclosure of information by joint-stock companies. Moscow, Justicinform Publ., 2012. 184 p. (In Russ.).

6. Shevchenko O.M. Provision and disclosure of information by a joint-stock company in connection with the general meeting of shareholders. Zakony Rossii. Opyt. Analiz. Praktika, 2013, no. 12, pp. 33–40. (In Russ.).

7. Lomakin D.V. Corporate legal relations: General theory and practice of its application in business companies. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2008, 511 p. (In Russ.).

8. Bezprozvanniy V.I. Legal mechanism for providing shareholders with information about the activities of a joint-stock company in which they are participants. Cand. Diss. Thesis. Moscow, 2012. 23 p. (In Russ.).

9. Lomakin D.V. The right of a shareholder to information: changing the approach of a legislator. Yuridicheskij vestnik Samarskogo universiteta = Juridical Journal of Samara University, 2018, Vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 31–40. (In Russ.).

10. Lomakin D.V. The right of a shareholder to information. Hozyajstvo i pravo = Business and law, 1997, no. 11, pp. 162–171. (In Russ.).

11. Gubin E.P. (ed.). Legal regulation of joint-stock companies (law of associations). Moscow, Zertsalo Publ., 1999. 256 p. (In Russ.).

12. Laptev V.V. Law of associations. Moscow, Contract Publ.; INFRA-M Publ., 1999. 254 p. (In Russ.).

13. Makarova O.A. Corporate law: textbook. Moscow, Wolters Kluwer, 2005. 432 p. (In Russ.).

14. Shevchenko G.N. Stock as a corporate security. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian law, 2005, no. 1 (97), pp. 37–46. (In Russ.).

15. Dolinskaya V.V., Faleev V.V. Minority shareholders: status, rights and their implementation. Moscow, Wolters Kluwer, 2010. 240 p. (In Russ.).

16. Kuznetsov A. Providing information at the request of a shareholder. Hozyajstvo i pravo = Business and law, 2010, no. 3, pp. 84–96. (In Russ.).

17. Gabov A.V. Securities: questions of theory and legal regulation of the market. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2011. 1104 p. (In Russ.).

18. Makarova O.A. The right of shareholders to information. Jurist, 2012, no. 8, pp.13–17. (In Russ.).

19. Rubeko G.L. Law of associations. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2012. 189 p. (In Russ.).

20. Krokhina M.S. Shareholder's right to information: implementation and abuse. Pravo i ekonomika, 2015, no. 7, pp. 59–66. (In Russ.).

21. Filippova S.Yu. The right to information about the activities of a joint-stock company and its protection. Hozyajstvo i pravo = Business and law, 2017, no. 5, pp. 22–39. (In Russ.).

22. Gentovt O.I. Restriction of rights as a means of preserving the balance of interests on the example of a shareholder's right to information. Predprinimatel'skoe pravo = Entrepreneurial law, 2019, no. 1, pp. 31–38. (In Russ.).

23. Gubin P.E. The right to information and the obligation to provide it as elements of the legal status of a business entity. Cand. Diss. Thesis. Moscow, 2004. 25 p. (In Russ.).

24. Oleneva A.N. Legal regulation of relations between the shareholder and the company in connection with disclosure of information. Trudy Instituta gosudarstva i prava Rossijskoj akademii nauk = Proceedings of the Institute of State and Law of the RAS, 2014, no. 1, pp. 105–119. (In Russ.).

25. Romanova E.M. The right of a shareholder to information on Russian legislation. Cand. Diss. Thesis. Moscow, 2008. 28 p. (In Russ.).

26. Rudnev P.A. Analysis of the rights and obligations of shareholders. Moscow, Narkomyust RSFSR Publ. 1927. 42 p. (In Russ.).

27. Klepach A., Kuznetsov P., Kryuchkova P. Corporate governance in Russia in 1995-1996 (from a Soviet-type enterprise to a firm controlled by managers). Voprosy ekonomiki, 1996. no. 2, pp. 73–87. (In Russ.).

28. Radaev V.V. Corporate governance in modern Russia: experience and prospects. Moscow, National Council for corporate governance, 2007. 92 p. (In Russ.).

29. Black B., Kraakman R., Tarasova A. Guide to the Russian Law on Joint Stock Companies. Moscow, Labyrynth Publ., 1999. 720 p. (In Russ.).

30. Tarasov I.T. The doctrine of joint-stock companies. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2000. 666 p. (In Russ.).

31. Makarova O.A. The right of a shareholder to information: new issues in the order of implementation. Zakony Rossii. Opyt. Analiz. Praktika, 2017, no. 11. pp. 52–55. (In Russ.).

32. Lomakin D.V. Corporate rights of participants in business companies: current problems and prospects of regulation. Predprinimatel'skoe pravo. Prilozhenie “Pravo i Biznes” = Entrepreneurial law. Law and Business, 2018, no. 2, pp. 28–34. (In Russ.).

33. Martyushev S.M., Olenkov D.N. Requirements of the regulator and investors increase the information transparency of Russian companies, in: Porshakov S. (ed.) National report on corporate governance. Issue IV. Moscow, National Council for corporate governance, 2011. 230 p. Available at: URL: https://www.edisclosure.ru/PortalContent/InfoMaterial/164 (accessed on 01.07.2020). (In Russ.).

34. Gabov A.V. Practical aspects of restricting information disclosure (access to information) in relation to the sole executive body of a legal entity in accordance with Russian anti-sanctions regulations. Oboronno-promyshlennyj kompleks: voprosy prava, 2020, no. 3, pp. 70–77. (In Russ.).

35. Gabov A.V. Institute of major transactions in Russian law: main stages, trends and prospects of development. Predprinimatel'skoe pravo = Entrepreneurial law, 2018, no. 3, pp. 3–30. (In Russ.).

36. Stepanov D.V., Kuznetsov A.V. The right of a shareholder to information. Zakon, 2011, no.7. pp. 97–108. (In Russ.).

37. Lovyrev D. The main problems of protecting the rights of minority shareholders in Russian companies, in: Porshakov S. (ed.) National report on corporate governance. Issue VI. Moscow, National Council for corporate governance, 2013. 320 p. (In Russ.).

38. Varvarin A. Improvement of corporate legislation: business view, in: Porshakov S. (ed.) National report on corporate governance. Issue IX. Moscow, National Council for corporate governance, 2017. 288 p. (In Russ.).