THE LEGAL NATURE OF THE REMUNERATION TO THE GUARDIAN OF THE ADULT INCAPACITATED CITIZENS
https://doi.org/10.24147/2542-1514.2017.1(1).48-56
Abstract
УДК 347.163
The main purposes of present article are the research of regulatory framework of establishment of repayment for tutors of emancipated incapable persons and legal practice of set-tlement of disputes in abovementioned sphere. Accumulation of methods of scientific cog-nition is a methodological outline of present research, the main methods are system-defined, technic and comparative ones.
Based on deep analysis of federal and regional provisions of legislation maintained terms and conditions of payments of repayment for tutors of emancipated incapable persons the social and interim nature of aforementioned payments is concluded. Current state law actually allows to conclude that the state care for the socially vulnerable categories of the citizens, including the elderly and disabled citizens, with limited material resources, encourages the legislator to seek new alternative ways of its implementation. To those should be referred "social outsourcing", that is, privatization of "unprofitable" social services in order to optimize the budgetary resources. Meanwhile, the reduction of costs for the implemen-tation of the social functions of the state should not take place to the detriment of the content component.
In the scientific literature there is no unanimity of views on the legal nature of the payments made by the trustees for the performance of such duties. Comparison of remuneration of trustees with a monthly payment for child care until the age of 1.5 years to achieve it possible to identify common objectives of establishing these payments, as well as the identity of their social and interim nature. Confirmation designated theses is to analyze the provisions of the legislation of the Russian Federation, in which the caregiver award is regarded as one of the ways to sequence the elimination of in-patient care and social services at home, which also contribute to the strengthening of social protection of this category of citizens.
However, the practice of implementation of the provisions in the legislation found a num-ber of fundamental problems. In particular, the regulation of these relations norms different industry sector is the cause of the ambiguity of their interpretation. Judicial authorities misinterpreted the purpose of the above payments, ignoring their legal entity. The current judicial practice does not allow to achieve the objectives the legislator and has a negative impact on the social security of citizens.
About the Authors
M. Sedelnikova
Dostoevsky Omsk State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
PhD in Law, Associate Pro-fessor, Head Department of Social Law;
SPIN-code: 4777-0133; AuthorID: 431741
A. Puzyreva
Dostoevsky Omsk State University
Russian Federation
Lecturer, Department of Social Law
Russian Federation
Lecturer, Department of Social Law
References
1. Evdokimova T.P., Zubkov P. Improving guardianship. EZh-Yurist, 2008, no. 19, pp. 1–4. (In Russ.).
2. Meier D.I. Russian civil law. Мoscow, Statut Publ., 2003. 831 p. (In Russ.).
3. Pobedonostsev K.P. The course of civil rights, in 3 volumes. Vol. 2. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2003. 622 p. (In Russ.).
4. Ryasentsev V.A. Representation in the Soviet civil law, Doct. Diss. Мoscow, 1948. 262 p. (In Russ.).
5. Mikhailova I.A. The appointment of guardians under the new Federal law. Grazhdanskoe pravo, 2009, no. 2, pp. 20–25. (In Russ.).
6. Nechaeva A.M. About Federal law “On guardianship and custody”. Zakony Rossii, 2009, no. 7, pp. 85–90. (In Russ.).
7. Uskova Yu.V. Some aspects and problems of establishment of guardianship (guardianship) over minors in the Russian legislation. Nauchyi Zhurnal KubGAU = Scientific Journal of KubSAU, 2014, no. 100, pp. 1647–1664. (In Russ.).
8. Sukhanov E.A. (ed.). Civil law, in 4 volumes. Vol. 1. Мoscow, Wolters Kluwer Publ., 2008. 736 p. (In Russ.).
9. Fetisova O.V. New Laws of Subjects of the Russian Federation on Guardianship over Incapacitated Adult Citizens. Sovremennoe pravo = Modern Law, 2015, no. 5, pp. 65–77. (In Russ.).
10. Pelevin A.A. Patronage over capable citizens and related legal relations. Rossiiskiy sudya, 2008, no. 3, pp. 44–45. (In Russ.).
11. Kirillovykh A.A. The contract on guardianship (custody) of minors. Semeinoe i zhilishchnoe pravo, 2011, no. 4, pp. 36–40. (In Russ.)
12. Krasheninnikov P.V., Sedugin P.I. (eds.). Comments to the Family code of the Russian Federation. Moscow, Norma Publ., Infra-M Publ., 2001. 480 p. (In Russ.).
13. Mikheeva L.Yu. The guardianship: Theory and practice. Moscow, Wolters Kluwer Publ., 2004. 368 p. (In Russ.).
14. Fetisova O.V. Types and forms of guardianship (curatorship). Pravo i politika, 2009, no. 6, pp. 1304–1310. (In Russ.).
15. Urumova T.O. Custody and guardianship of minor children: current problems of legal regulation, Cand. Diss. Thesis. Moscow, 2009. 26 p. (In Russ.).
16. Temnikova N.A. The Character of the Guardianship Agreement. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta, 2009, no. 4 (6), pp. 104–111. (In Russ.).
17. Rabets A.M. The agreement on the implementation of guardianship and guardianship of a minor in the Russian Federation. Uchenye zapiski RGSU, 2013, no. 6 (121), pp. 41–47. (In Russ.).
18. Filipova M.V. (ed.). Social security law. Moscow, Yurist Publ., 2006. 446 p. (In Russ.).
19. Machulskaya E.E. Social security law. Moscow, Yurait Publ., 2014. 587 p. (In Russ.).
20. Fetisova O.V. Execution of custody (guardianship) agreement and its types. Zakony Rossii, 2010, no. 10, pp. 73–76. (In Russ.).
21. Puzyreva A.A., Sedelnikova M.G. Legal problems of compensation of moral damage in social security law. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya “Pravo” = Herald of Omsk University. Series “Law”, 2016, no. 3 (48), pp. 149–158. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Sedelnikova M., Puzyreva A. THE LEGAL NATURE OF THE REMUNERATION TO THE GUARDIAN OF THE ADULT INCAPACITATED CITIZENS. Law Enforcement Review. 2017;1(1):48-56. https://doi.org/10.24147/2542-1514.2017.1(1).48-56
Views:
2957
Email this article 