THE CONCEPT AND SCOPE OF MUNICIPAL GOVERNANCE ENTITIES’ COMPETENCE IN RUSSIAN FEDERATION AND CANADA
https://doi.org/10.24147/2542-1514.2017.1(1).66-78
Abstract
УДК 342.25
The purpose of this article is to study the concept and the content of "competence" cate-gory in relation to the entities of municipal governance in Russia and Canada. The methods of theoretical analysis, along with legal methods, including formal-legal and comparative law methods are used to achieve this goal.
In the article, the author notes the lack of consensus in legal science in determining the con-tent of "competence" category and its subjective identity. Some authors consider the compe-tence as a set of rights and obligations of public authorities (Yu.A. Tikhomirov, S.A. Avakyan), while others recognize the correct use of the word "competence" in relation to the public territorial collectives and institutions of public power in general (T.M. Byalkina et al.).
The Russian legal model for determining the competence of municipal governance entities also implies the distinction between the concepts of "local issues" and "powers." Unfortu-nately, the domestic legislator does not provide for the clear distinction of these concepts, and there is also a lack of content specification of the issues to be addressed at the local level. Recent changes in law also call into question the relation between the municipalities’ competency model and the constitutional autonomy of local government.
At the base of the approach to the definition of the competence of municipal government entities in Canada, as well as within the Anglo-Saxon model in general, lies the need for decentralization of functions, which cannot be effectively carried out by the central author-ities or the private sector (A. Sancton). The competence carrier here is a municipality as a form of public corporation. This does not lead to contradiction between this carrier and other municipal governance entities (specifically, local authorities), as the latter carry out activities for the competence implementation on behalf of the corporation.
The approach to the municipality as a corporation originally anticipated the use of the ultra vires doctrine, which excludes from municipal jurisdiction the issues and powers not ex-pressly granted by statute. However, the analysis of the dynamics of legislative and judicial practice in Canada demonstrates a departure from this fundamental principle in favor of expanding the municipal competence, based on the goals of municipalities’ activities. The author believes that such an approach is contrary to the legal nature of municipal corporations, and therefore the rules governing the competence of municipalities and the rules governing their legal status in general need to be harmonized.
Based on the above, the author concludes that in Russia and Canada both theoretical and normative work is required to eliminate defects and optimize the functional load of munic-ipal governance entities.
About the Author
A. Larichev
Karelian Branch of Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), Petrozavodsk
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
PhD in Law, Associate Pro-fessor, Head, Department of Сonstitutional and Mu-nicipal Law;
SPIN-code: 5047-7453; AuthorID: 507509
References
1. Tikhomirov Yu.A. The Theory of Competence. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2000, no. 10, pp. 22–32. (In Russ.).
2. Avakyan S.А. Constitutional Lexicon, Dictionary of the Public Law Terminology. Moscow, Yustitsinform Publ., 2015. 640 p. (In Russ.).
3. Larichev A.A. Constitutional and Legal Status of the Republic of Karelia: the Genesis and Contemporary Fea-tures, Cand. Diss. Petrozavodsk, 2008. 224 p. (In Russ.).
4. Kiseleva A.V., Nesterenko A.V. The Theory of Federalism. Moscow, MSU Publ., 2002. 304 p. (In Russ.).
5. Byalkina T.M. Local Government Competence: the Problems of Theory and Legal Regulation, Doct. Diss. The-sis. Saratov, 2007. 56 p. (In Russ.).
6. Kolyushin E.I. Constitutional (State) Law of Russia. Moscow, MSU Publ., 1999. 382 p. (In Russ.).
7. Kovachev D.A. Federation in Foreign Countries: Actual Experience, in: Dogovornye printsipy i formy federa-tivnykh otnoshenii v Rossii, problem and thematic collection. Moscow, INION RAN Publ., 1999, pp. 134–149 (In Russ.).
8. Kelsen H. Pure Theory of Law, Transl. from 2nd German Ed. by Max Knight (reprint). The Lawbook Exchange, 2005. 356 p.
9. Kutafin O.E., Sheremet K.F. The Competence of Local Councils, 2nd ed. Moscow, Yuridicheskaya literatura Publ., 1986. 224 p. (In Russ.).
10. Khabrieva T.Ya (ed.). Ratio of the legislation of the Russian Federation and legislation of subjects of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Olita Publ., 2001. 776 p. (In Russ.).
11. Kanavina O.S. The Distribution of Competence and the Problems of the Interim Exercise of Certain Local Government Powers by Governmental Authorities, Cand. Diss. Khabarovsk, 2009. 215 p. (In Russ.).
12. Dityatkovskiy M.Yu. Empowering Local Government with Certain Powers of State. Moscow, Yuniti-Dana Publ., 2007. 304 p. (In Russ.).
13. Nepomnyashchikh S.S. Local Issues as an Element of Local Government Competence. Gosudarstvennaya vlast' i mestnoe samoupravlenie, 2012, no. 5, pp. 22–24. (In Russ.).
14. Markvart E., Savranskaya O. On the Issue of Issues. Munitsipal'noe pravo, 2004, no. 4, pp. 2–9. (In Russ.).
15. Larichev A.A. Legal Framework of Local Government in Russian Federation and Canada: A Comparative Study. St. Petersburg, Yuridicheskiy tsentr Publ., 2015. 205 p. (In Russ.).
16. Kostyukov A.N. Unified Factory concept in organizing local self-government in Russia. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo, 2015, no. 8, pp. 75–79. (In Russ.).
17. Tabolin V.V. The Law of Municipal Governance. Moscow, Elig Publ. 1997. 115 p. (In Russ.).
18. Dzhagaryan A.A. Municipal Law-making: the Nature, Specificity, Effectiveness. Munitsipal'naya sluzhba: pravovye voprosy, 2011, no. 2, pp. 6–9. (In Russ.).
19. Belousova E.V. Formation of the local self-government as a kind of public authority in foreign countries. Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe i chastnoe pravo, 2016, no. 1, pp. 31–34. (In Russ.).
20. Kazannik А.I., Kostyukov А.N. (eds.). Constitutional Law: a University Course, in 2 volumes. Vol. 2. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2015. 528 p. (In Russ.).
21. Chikhladze L.T., Khazov E.N. (eds.). Topical Issues of Municipal Law. Moscow, YUNITI-DANA Publ., 2016. 559 p. (In Russ.).
22. Fenenko Yu.V. Municipal Systems of Foreign Countries: Legal Issues of Social Security. Moscow, MGIMO-Universitet Publ., 2004. 401 p. (In Russ.).
23. Sancton А. Canadian Local Government: an Urban Perspective. Toronto, Oxford University Press, 2011. 356 p.
24. Babichev I.V. Subjects of Local Government and their Interaction, Cand. Diss. Thesis. Moscow, 1999. 27 p. (In Russ.).
25. Bazhenova O.I. Municipality as a Subject of Law. Moscow, MSU Publ., 2010. 256 p. (In Russ.).
26. Porovskaya A.Ya. Municipal formation as object and agent of strategic management at modern stage of Russian economy development. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Tomsk State University Journal, 2010, no. 331, pp. 145–148. (In Russ.).
27. Makuch S., Craik N., Leisk S.B. Canadian Municipal and Planning Law, 2nd ed. Torontoб Thomson Carswell Publ., 2004. 273 p.
28. Gray S. An Overview of Changes to the Municipal Act 2001 Made by Bill 130. Toronto, Ontario Bar Associa-tion, 2007.
29. Oudekerk T. Municipal Law Materials. London, ON, University of Western Ontario, 2012. 86 p.
30. Larichev А.А. Ombudspersons’ Control over Municipal Authorities: the Canadian Experience and its Ap-plicability in Russia. Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie = Comparative Constitutional Review, 2016, no. 5, pp. 83–96. (In Russ.).
31. Danilov S.Yu. Evolution of Canadian Federalism. Moscow, VShE Publ., 2012. 303 p. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Larichev A. THE CONCEPT AND SCOPE OF MUNICIPAL GOVERNANCE ENTITIES’ COMPETENCE IN RUSSIAN FEDERATION AND CANADA. Law Enforcement Review. 2017;1(1):66-78. https://doi.org/10.24147/2542-1514.2017.1(1).66-78
Views:
2864
Email this article 