Preview

Law Enforcement Review

Advanced search

Judicial reform as a tool for increase efficiency of legal protection of individuals

https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2021.5(2).16-32

Abstract

The subject. The authors analyze the process and results of 30 years of reforming judicial activity in contemporary Russia, formulate and substantiate the conceptual foundations of promising transformations and specific proposals for continuing the reform, increasing the efficiency of the judicial system and protecting human rights, freedoms and legitimate in-terests.

The purpose is to confirm or disprove hypothesis that the Russian judicial reform needs to be adjusted in order to remain the most important factor in building the rule of law and civil society.

The research methodology includes the methods of analysis and synthesis, historical, com-parative legal and formal legal methods.

The main results, scope of application. The court is one of the most democratic and civilized tools for resolving social conflicts and protecting human interests. Judicial reform is a con-ceptually formed, cardinal and progressive transformation carried out in the historical pe-riod in order to organize the optimal model of the judicial system and achieve maximum efficiency of its functioning to protect the rights and freedoms of the individual, the inter-ests of society and the state. The Russian court was transformed, became the real judiciary power and took its place in the state mechanism during the reform period. The judicial sys-tem was built on new principles, procedural legislation was updated, a number of other measures were taken to improve the status of the court and its role in society. It is necessary to generalize the existing practice and regulate all problematic aspects of the formation of the judicial corps at the legislative level. We need to make this process clear and transpar-ent. Justice as a social and legal value and a significant international goal of sustainable development should be implemented in Russian domestic policy and strategic projects. The strategy and tactics of digital transformation of judicial activity, more active introduction of modern tools in it, while ensuring human rights and freedoms in this process, are particu-larly in demand in the context of the coronavirus pandemic,

The conclusion is made that judicial reform is the most important factor in building the rule of law and civil society. However, it has not been completed and its potential for social influence has not been exhausted. Therefore, conceptual foundations and specific proposals for further transformations, increasing the efficiency of the judicial system in order to protect human rights, freedoms and legitimate interests have been formulated and substantiated.

About the Authors

A. V. Malko
Volga Institute (branch) of the All-Russian State University of Justice (RLA of the Ministry of Justice of Russia)
Russian Federation

Alexander V. Malko – Doctor of Law, Professor, Hon-oured Scientist of the Russian Federation; Professor, Department of State and Legal Disciplines

55, im. A.N. Radishcheva ul., Saratov, 410003, Russia

RSCI SPIN-code: 5306-7069



S. F. Afanasiev
Saratov State Law Academy; Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Saratov Branch)
Russian Federation

Sergey F. Afanasiev – Doctor of Law, Professor, Judge Emeritus; Head, Department of Arbitration Proce-dure; Head, Sector of Theory and Branch Problems of Legal Policy

1, Vol’skaya ul., Saratov, 410056, Russia

3 135, Chernyshevskogo ul., Saratov, 410028, Russia

RSCI SPIN-code: 2360-7218



V. A. Terekhin
Penza State University
Russian Federation

Victor A. Terekhin – PhD in Law, Associate Professor, Honoured Lawyer of the Russian Federation; Head, Department of Justice

40, Krasnaya ul., Penza, 440026, Russia

ResearcherID: R-2646-2016

RSCI SPIN-code: 1165-4109



References

1. Kartashkin V. А., Kolesova N.S., Larin A. M., et al. General theory of human rights. Moscow, Norma Publ., 1996. 509 р. (In Russ).

2. Matuzov N.I. Theory and practice of human rights in Russia. Pravovedenie, 1998, no. 4, рр. 22-35. (In Russ).

3. Matuzov N.I. Actual problems of the theory of law. Saratov, Saratov. Gos. Аkad. Prava Publ., 2003. 510 р. (In Russ).

4. Zor'kin V.D. Civilization of law and development of Russia. Moscow, Norma - INFRА-M Publ., 2015. 320 р. (In Russ).

5. Kleandrov M.I. Does Russia need judicial reform. Sud'ya, 2015, no. 2, рр. 50-57. (In Russ).

6. Melkonyan G.P. On the issue of optimization of judicial activity in the Russian Federation. Rossiiskoe pra-vosudie = Russian Justice, 2015, no. 1, рр. 42-46. (In Russ).

7. Kolokolov N.А. 25 Years of the Concept of Judicial Reform: Lost Illusions. Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo = Criminal Judicial Proceedings, 2016, no. 4, рр. 3-7. (In Russ).

8. Mal'ko А.V., Terekhin V.А. Judicial policy as a means of optimizing justice in the Russian Federation. Gosu-darstvo i pravo = State and Law, 2016, no. 7, рр. 11-19. (In Russ).

9. Ochered'ko V.P. Judicial reforms in Russia (in connection with anniversaries). Rossiiskoe pravosudie = Russian Justice, 2016, special issue, рр. 12-21. (In Russ).

10. Kleandrov M.I. Legal organization of the mechanism of justice in the Russian Federation: problems of im-provement. Moscow, Norma - INFRА-M Publ., 2017. 288 р. (In Russ).

11. Terekhin V.А. Judicial reform in Russia at the turn of XX-XXI centuries. Moscow, Yurlitinform Publ., 2017. 376 р. (In Russ).

12. Polyakov M.P., Smolin А.Yu. Digital technologies in the service of justice: ideological prerequisites and tech-nical perspectives. Vestnik Nizhegorodskoi akademii MVD Rossii, 2018, no. 2, рр. 245-249. (In Russ).

13. Terekhin V.А. World justice in modern Russia: from the idea of revival to constitutional status. Rossiiskaya yustitsiya = Russian Justitia, 2020, no. 7, рр. 2-5. (In Russ).

14. Prokhorov V.N. Regulation of judicial load as a measure of increasing the efficiency of justice. Rossiiskoe pravosudie = Russian Justice, 2020, no. 10, рр. 26-31. (In Russ).

15. Shakhray S.M., Krakovskiy K.P. The court that is fast, right, merciful and equal for all: to the 150th anniver-sary of the judicial reform in Russia. Moscow, Kuchkovo pole Publ., 2014. 536 р. (In Russ).

16. Gessen I.V. Judicial reform. St. Petersburg, Typographiya F. Vaysberga i P. Gershunina, 1905. 267 р. (In Russ).

17. Petukhov N.А., Bobrenev V.А. Judicial system in justice in the pre-reform period. Prerequisites for judicial reform in the Russian Federation. Rossiiskoe pravosudie = Russian Justice, 2011, no. 11, рр. 5-22. (In Russ).

18. Pashin S.А. The concept of judicial reform in the Russian Federation. Moscow, Respublika Publ., 1992. 111 р. (In Russ).

19. Zor'kin V.D. Russia and the Constitution in the XXI century. View from Ilyinka. Moscow, Norma Publ., 2007. 399 р. (In Russ).

20. Efremova N.N. Historiography of the Russian state and law: a short sketch. Gosudarstvo i pravo = State and Law, 2016, no. 3, рр. 23-27. (In Russ).

21. Kashepov V.P. Constitutional principles of the judiciary of the Russian Federation. Moscow, Yurispru-dentsiya Publ., 2011. 336 р. (In Russ).

22. Ozhegov S.I. Explanatory dictionary of the Russian language. Moscow, Mir i obrazovanie, 2019. 1376 р. (In Russ).

23. Terekhin V.А., Gerasimova А.А. Functions of the judiciary in the mechanism of the Russian state. Moscow, Yurlitinform Publ., 2015. 296 р. (In Russ).

24. Krasheninnikov P.V., Аbova T.E., Fabrichniy S.Yu., Yarkov V.V. The concept of a unified Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2015. 224 р. (In Russ).

25. Borodin S.V., Kudryavtsev V.N. On the judiciary in Russia. Gosudarstvo i pravo = State and Law, 2001, no. 10, рр. 21-27. (In Russ).

26. Kryazhkov V.А. How the 2020 constitutional reform changed the Constitutional Court of the Russian Fed-eration. Gosudarstvo i pravo = State and Law, 2020, рр. 18-32. (In Russ).

27. Kovler А.I. Judgments adopted by the European Court of Human Rights in respect of the Russian Federation in 2009. Rossiiskoe pravosudie = Russian Justice, 2010, no. 2, рр. 5-18. (In Russ).

28. Morozova L.А. Execution of court decisions, or Respect for the court. Rossiiskoe pravosudie = Russian Jus-tice, 2015, no. 11, рр. 31-38. (In Russ).

29. Mal'ko А.V., Terekhin V.А. Judicial policy as a means of optimizing justice in the Russian Federation. Gosu-darstvo i pravo = State and Law, 2016, no. 7, рр. 11-19. (In Russ).

30. Kleandrov M.I. On the Council of the Judicial Power of the Russian Federation. Moscow, Norma: INFRА-M Publ., 2016. 160 р. (In Russ).


Review

For citations:


Malko A.V., Afanasiev S.F., Terekhin V.A. Judicial reform as a tool for increase efficiency of legal protection of individuals. Law Enforcement Review. 2021;5(2):16-32. https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2021.5(2).16-32

Views: 661


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2542-1514 (Print)
ISSN 2658-4050 (Online)