Coronavirus pandemic as a reason for limitation of human rights and freedoms

The subject. The article analyzes the phenomenon of the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on the human rights and freedoms. It emphasizes that some information about the corona-virus infection was available several decades ago. At the same time, the specialists unfortunately weren’t ready for the possible mutation of this virus, which has now exposed a large-scales threat to the population of the whole world.

The purpose of the article is to identify the problems of the implementation of the citizens’ rights and offer proposals for improving the Russian and Belarusian legislation and the practice of its implementation in the field of combating the coronavirus infection.

The methodology. The authors take into account the practice of the European Court of Hu-man Rights and the constitutional control bodies of Russia and foreign countries. They make a conclusion on the legitimacy and necessity of the taken restrictive measures. The article is based on the dialectical method, as well as at the logical, historical, systemic methods. Methods of analysis and synthesis were of particular importance. The authors have applied the functional method to research the main areas for ensuring a reasonable balance of private (individual) and public interests.

The main results, scope of application. Modern constitutions, including the Russian and the Belarusian ones, contains the most important principles of the rule of law, enshrine human rights and freedoms as the highest value. Human rights and freedoms continue to be are at the epicenter of many disputes and discussions. The modern system of rights and freedoms is constantly developing; the legal status of a person receives new content as the human civilization develops and the paradigm of values changes. For example, we see how information technology and other advances affect the scope of rights and freedoms. Rights, freedoms and obligations are interconnected and interdependent. All groups of rights are currently in the field of view of international organizations. The problem of equality, the elimination of discrimination, the restoration of violated rights, the assessment of the limits of the state's invasion in human rights and freedoms continues to be relevant nowadays.

The article focuses on the international and national standards for the possible restriction of rights and freedoms in order to protect the health of the population. The international law rules on human rights oblige states to take measures to protect health and provide medical assistance to those in need.

Conclusions. One of the constant problems is the relationship between the rights of a particular person and the rights of other persons, group or society as a whole and the state. At the same time, the coronavirus pandemic forced the public authorities to determine the balance of the priority of human rights and freedoms or the protection of the life and health of citizens. The coronavirus pandemic is the factor that affects the content of the legal regulation of relations in the field of human rights and freedoms. The measures taken by the state affect the right to health protection, freedom of movement, the right to education, right to have sport activity, right to work, freedom of assembly and others.

The article proposes to inform the population more fully about the measures taken by the state and society in this direction, about the wider use of information technologies, about the possible responsibility for non-compliance with the requirements for the use of per-sonal protective equipment and the self-isolation regime.

1. Ignatenkova G. Biopower and Plasma: How COVID-19 Made an ANT Theorist Stop Worrying and Love Foucault. Logos, 2021, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 105-126. DOI: 10.22394/0869-5377-2021-2-105-123 (In Russ.).

2. Chubarov I., Gradinari I. Media Genealogy of the Contagion: Syphilis – AIDS – COVID-19. Logos, 2021, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 83-112. DOI: 10.22394/0869-5377-2021-1-83-109. (In Russ.).

3. Donald A., Speck A.-K. The Dynamics of Domestic Human Rights Implementation: Lessons from Qualitative Research in Europe. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 2020, vol. 12, iss. 1, pp. 48–70. DOI: 10.1093/jhuman/ huaa007.

4. Gafiatulina N. H., Kasyanov V. V., Samygin P. S., Samygin S. I. Russian society in the conditions of self-isolation. Social effects and consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic. Moscow, RUSCIENCE Publ., 2020. 178 p. (In Russ.).

5. Shestakov L. N. Syracuse principles of interpretation of restrictions and deviations from the provisions of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta, 1992, no. 4, pp. 59-69. (In Russ.).

6. Kovalev A. A. International protection of human rights. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2013. 591 p. (In Russ.). 7. Akerkar S. Affirming Radical Equality in the Context of COVID-19: Human Rights of Older People and People with Disabilities. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 2020, vol. 12, iss. 2, pp. 276–283. DOI: 10.1093/jhuman/huaa032.

7. Lungu E.V. COVID-19 pandemic. New challenge for constitutional relations. Pravoprimenenie = Law Enforce-ment Review, 2020, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 69-75. DOI: 10.24147/2542-1514.2020.4(3).69-75. (In Russ.).

8. Mac Amhlaigh C. Back to a Sovereign Future?: Constitutional Pluralism after Brexit. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, 2019, vol. 21, pp. 41-58. DOI: 10.1017/cel.2019.

9. Donskova A. I. Russian system of emergency situations: modes, their features and differences. Mezhdu-narodnyi zhurnal gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk, 2020, no. 4-2, pp. 45-49. (In Russ.).

10. Pereladov A.V. The right to delay rent payments when banning the use of real estate by Rospotrebnadzor. Jurist, 2020, no. 6, pp. 64-73. (In Russ.).

11. Kiseleva A.V., Melnikov V. Yu. Development of Russian legislation in the context of combating the pandemic. Gumanitarnye, sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie i obshchestvennye nauki = Humanities, Social-economic and Social Sciences, 2020, no. 5, pp. 217-220. DOI: 10.23672/t5720-8730-2871-j. (In Russ.).

12. Popov M. Yu., Samygin P. S., Samygin S. I. To discussion on the restriction of human rights and freedoms in the context of a pandemic. Gumanitarnye, sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie i obshchestvennye nauki = Humanities, Social-economic and Social Sciences, 2020, no. 4, pp. 143-147. (In Russ.).

13. Doroshenko E.N. Constitutional Law Foundations for the Restriction of Human Rights in Connection with the New COVID-19 Pandemic. Aktual'nye problemy rossiiskogo prava = Actual Problems of Russian Law, 2020, no. 12, pp. 48-56. DOI: 10.17803/1994-1471.2020.121.12.048-056. (In Russ.).

14. Carver R. Forum: Human Rights Practice in the Age of Pandemic. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 2020, vol. 12, iss. 2, pp. 247–249. DOI: 10.1093/jhuman/huaa037.

15. Seyhan E. Pandemic Powers: Why Human Rights Organizations Should Not Lose Focus on Civil and Political Rights. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 2020, vol. 12, iss. 2, pp. 268–275. DOI: 10.1093/jhuman/huaa035.

16. Gready P. The Implications of and Responses to COVID-19: Localizing Human Rights in the City of York (UK), Journal of Human Rights Practice. 2020, vol. 12, iss. 2, pp. 250–259. DOI: 10.1093/jhuman/huaa036.

17. Alston P. The Populist Challenge to Human Rights, Journal of Human Rights Practice. 2017, vol. 9, iss. 1, pp. 1–15. DOI: 10.1093/jhuman/hux007.

18. Komarov V.M., Akimova V.V. Strategies for sustainable transport: best world practices. Ekonomicheskaya politika = Economic policy, 2021, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 82-103. DOI: 10.18288/1994-5124-2021-1-82-103. (In Russ.).

19. Samuels H. A National Treasure? The Role of Civil Society in Promoting and Enforcing Human Rights in the United Kingdom. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 2020, vol. 12, iss. 3, pp. 711–729. DOI: 10.1093/jhuman/huaa046.

20. Kovaleva T.K. National Security and Pandemics. Rethinking Biosecurity Governance: a nature of discussions and search for the success formula. Innovatsii i investitsii = Innovation & Investment, 2021, no. 1, pp. 187-192. (In Russ.).

21. Murray R., Sandoval C. Balancing Specificity of Reparation Measures and States’ Discretion to Enhance Implementation. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 2020, vol. 12, iss. 1, pp. 101–124. DOI: 10.1093/jhuman/ huaa008.

22. Blower E., Donald K., Upadhyay S. The Human Rights Implications of Contemporary Patterns of Social Control. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 2012, vol. 4, iss. 2, pp. 187–212. DOI: 10.1093/jhuman/hus009.

23. Bandurin A. P., Samygin P. S., Sizova N. M. Problems of protection of constitutional rights and freedoms of Russian citizens during the pandemic. Gumanitarnye, sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie i obshchestvennye nauki = Human-ities, Social-economic and Social Sciences, 2020, no. 6, pp. 75-79. DOI: 10.23672/l9668-2409-3981-w (In Russ.).

24. Howe R.B., Covell K. Meeting the Challenge of Populism to Children’s Rights: The Value of Human Rights Education. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 2021, February. DOI: 10.1093/jhuman/huab002.

25. Noskova A.V., Goloukhova D.V., Proskurina A.S., Nguen T.H. Digitalization of the Educational Environment: Risk Assessment of Distance Education by Russian and Vietnamese Students. Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher education in Russia, 2021, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 156-167. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2021-30-1-156-167. (In Russ.).

26. Lobova S.V., Ponkina E.V. Online Courses: To accept Impossible to Ignore. Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher education in Russia, 2021, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 23-35. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2021-30-1-23-35. (In Russ.).

27. Goncharov I. V. Restrictions on human and civil rights and freedoms as an element of their maintenance. Trudy Akademii upravleniya MVD Rossii = Proceedings of Management Academy of the Ministry of the Interior of Russia, 2020, no 3, pp. 111-117. (In Russ.).

28. Ely Yamin A. A Wake-Up Call in Our Upside-Down World: Three Starting-Points for Advancing Health Rights and Social Justice in a Post-Pandemic Future. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 2020, vol. 12, iss. 2, pp. 260–267. DOI: 10.1093/jhuman/huaa033.

29. Vileykis A. The first quarantine: how the plague become a political disease. Logos, 2021, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 127-142. DOI: 10.22394/0869-5377-2021-2-127-140. (In Russ.).