Preview

Law Enforcement Review

Advanced search

Limits of restrictions of human rights and freedoms to ensure security (problem statement

https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2021.5(2).77-85

Abstract

The subject. The world faced a coronavirus pandemic in 2020. Many states, including Russia, adopted harsh measures that were largely based on restricting human rights and freedoms in an effort to counter pandemic spread. Inter-State borders were closed, restrictions were imposed on the operation of public catering organizations and the holding of sports and entertainment events was suspended, some of the fundamental rights were heavily con-strained. This resulted in the growth of public disaffection, falling of incomes and a worsening of the overall economic environment. As a result, the problem of the permissibility of restrictions of human rights and freedoms for the sake of public security, as well as the requirements for such restrictions, had once again become relevant.

The purpose of the article is, firstly, to learn what is the concept of “freedom” nowadays, to define the conditions and principles of application the permissible restrictions on human rights and freedoms, their aims and purpose. The authors dare to analyze the laws and regulations establishing the possibility of restricting human rights and freedoms and to give a description of the procedure for imposing restrictions in situations of greater danger.

The methodology of research includes formal legal interpretation of legal acts, systemic approach to cognition of social relations, analysis and synthesis.

The main results, scope of application. The definition and concept of freedom, its limited character, the regulation of the possibility of its restriction for the purpose of protecting society have been studied and defined. Russian and international legislation on the restriction of human rights and freedoms has been analyzed. The principles on the basis of which it is permissible to restrict human rights and freedoms have been identified. The principle of the inadmissibility of restrictions on all rights and freedoms; the adequacy of the imposed restrictive measures to the existing threat; the principle of economic efficiency; the principle of detailed regulation of the imposed restrictions are among them. It has been found out that there is a threat of establishing tyranny with arbitrary restrictions on human rights and freedoms.

Conclusions. In today’s world, the restriction of human rights and freedoms should be considered as a necessary measure to ensure the security of the individuals and of society as a whole, especially in the situations of a great danger to public interests. At the same time, the imposing restrictions should be strictly regulated and, moreover, possible abuses should be avoided in order to minimize the negative consequences and avoid establishing totalitarian regime.

About the Authors

A. E. Evstratov
Dostoevsky Omsk State University
Russian Federation

Alexander E. Evstratov – PhD in Law, Associate Professor, Department of Theory and History of State and Law

55a, Mira pr., Omsk, 644077, Russia

RSCI SPIN-code: 1295-0330; AuthorID: 317077



I. Yu. Guchenkov
National Research University – Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation

Igor Yu. Guchenkov – Undergraduate, Faculty of Law

3, Bol’shoi Trekhsvyatitel’skii per., Moscow, 109028, Russia



References

1. Aristotle. Essays in 4 vol. Vol. 4. Moscow, Mysl Publ., 1984. 830 p. (In Russ.).

2. Rousseau J.J. On the Social Contract or Principles of Political Right Moscow, Urait Publ., 2019. 146 p. (In Russ.).

3. Voltaire. Philosophical treatises and dialogues. Moscow, EKSMO Publ., 2005. 432 p. (In Russ.).

4. Philosophy in Encyclopédie of Diderot and D'Alembert. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1994. 720 p. (In Russ.).

5. Montesquieu. Spirit of the Laws. Moscow, Mysl Publ., 1999. 674 p. (In Russ.).

6. Seneca L. Letters to Lucilius. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1977. 384 p. (In Russ.).

7. Hegel. Philosophy of Right. Moscow, Mysl Publ., 1990. 524 p. (In Russ.).

8. Cicero. Dialogue. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1966. 224 p. (In Russ.).

9. Hobbs T. Leviathan. Moscow, Mysl Publ., 2001. 478 p. (In Russ.).

10. Locke J. Essays. Moscow, Mysl Publ., 1988. 668 p. (In Russ.).

11. Elagin A.G. Safety and freedom in human life. Trudy Akademii upravleniya MVD Rossii = Proceedings of Management Academy of the Ministry of the Interior of Russia, 2015, no. 1, pp. 5-8. (In Russ.).

12. Lenin V.I. Complete works. Vol. 12. Moscow, Gospolitisdat Publ., 1967. 575 p. (In Russ.).

13. Maklakov V.V. Foreign constitutions: training manual. Moscow, BEK Publ., 1996. 584 p. (In Russ.).

14. Humboldt W. Language and Philosophy of Culture. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1985. 448 p. (In Russ.).

15. Ebzeev B.S. Dialectics of individual and collective in the organization of socium and its contents in the con-stitution (on the methodology of research). Gosudarstvo i pravo = State and Law, 2004, no. 2, pp. 5-12. (In Russ.).

16. Smirnov A.A. Restriction of human rights and freedoms in the defense of the Russian Federation. Cand. Diss. Thesis. Moscow, 2007. 24 p. (In Russ.).

17. Lapaeva V.V. Libertarian understanding of law in the context of vital legal problems of Russia. Ob-shchestvennye nauki i sovremennost' = Social Sciences and Contemporary World, 2008, no. 5, pp. 80-90. (In Russ.).

18. Romanovsky V.G. Limitations of human rights in modern constitutional law of Russia. Nauka. Obshchestvo. Gosudarstvo = Science. Society. State, 2019, pp. 16-21. (In Russ.).

19. Zorkin V.D. (Ed.) Commentary on the Constitution of the Russian Federation. Moscow, INFRA-M Publ., 2013. 1040 p. (In Russ.).

20. Maslow A. Motivation and personality. Saint-Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2008. 352 p. (In Russ.).

21. Lapaeva V.V. Criteria for the restriction of human rights from the standpoint of the libertarian conception of the rule of law. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2006, no. 4, pp. 103-115.

22. Baglay M.V. Constitutional law of the Russian Federation: textbook for universities. Moscow, Norma Publ., 2007. 784 p. (In Russ.).

23. Podmarev A.A. Constitutional regulation of restrictions on rights and freedoms of man and citizen in the conditions of emergency mode in the national legal systems. Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: Yuridicheskie nauki = RUDN Journal of Law, 2014, no. 3, pp. 112-120. (In Russ.).

24. Kondrat I.N. Restriction of individual rights and freedoms: principles, grounds, limits. Zakonodatelstvo, 2012, no. 12, pp. 62-69. (In Russ.).

25. Melnikov V.Yu. State protection of social human rights. Rostov-on-Don, Fond of the science and education Publ., 2020, 492 p. (In Russ.).

26. Egorov A.B. Ancient democracy and the Roman political system (ancient and modern political theories). Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Istoriya. = Vestnik of Saint-Petersburg University. History, 2009, no. 4, pp. 34-47. (In Russ.).

27. Romanovsky G.B. Counter terrorism in Germany: legislative novels. Nauka. Obshchestvo. Gosudarstvo = Science. Society. State, 2019, pp. 33-39. (In Russ.).

28. Sorokin P.A. Social and cultural dynamics. Moscow, Astrel Publ., 2006ю 1176 p. (In Russ.).

29. Beccaria C. On crimes and punishments. Moscow, Stels Publ., 1995, 304 p. (In Russ.).

30. Opaleva S.A. Human rights: constitutional regulations of permissible limitations. Grazhdanin i pravo = Citizen and law, 2006, no. 3, pp. 25-31. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Evstratov A.E., Guchenkov I.Yu. Limits of restrictions of human rights and freedoms to ensure security (problem statement. Law Enforcement Review. 2021;5(2):77-85. https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2021.5(2).77-85

Views: 2545


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2542-1514 (Print)
ISSN 2658-4050 (Online)