Legitimacy and legitimation of the Russian public authority
https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2021.5(2).145-158
Abstract
The subject. The article is devoted to the legal analysis of the legitimacy of the activities of public authorities and the process of their legitimation in the Russian Federation, as well as other problems of national democracy. The legal understanding of the concept of "people" as the only source of power and the bearer of sovereignty is considered, a distinction is made between these properties.
The purpose of the article is to identify its essential features the category of legitimacy, identify problems related to the reflection of the political will of Russian citizens in the organization and activities of state authorities and local self-government. The purpose of the article is to substantiate also the differences in the characteristics of the people as the only source of power and the bearer of sovereignty, which has a significant impact on the processes of legitimation of public authorities in the Russian Federation.
The research methodology consists of general scientific methods (analysis, synthesis, dialectics) and legal methods (formal-logical, comparative-legal, historical-legal, forecasting method).
The main results and their area of application. The author considers legitimacy not only as the consent of the people with the normative legal acts adopted by public authorities, but also as universal approval and recognition of their organizational activities, expressed by citizens through the institutions of direct democracy. The legitimacy of public authority is an attribute of a constitutional state with a social orientation. The article notes a few features characteristic of the domestic process of legitimizing public authority. The procedure for the formation of the Federation Council of the Federal Assembly, in which Russian citizens do not participate directly, starting from 1995 to the present. The cancellation and return of direct elections of heads of constituent entities of the Russian Federation, the impossibility of electing the heads of municipalities directly by the population (in many cases). A complicated procedure for the implementation of active and passive electoral rights in the Russian Federation, expressed in the establishment of several formal require ments. Constant changes in electoral legislation before election campaigns are among these characteristics.
Conclusions. The results of research are summarized and conclusions are drawn about the current state of legitimacy in the Russian Federation. A few measures are proposed to improve the process of legitimizing public authority. The author proposes to distinguish between the legal characteristics of the people as the bearer of sovereignty, understanding by it all Russian citizens and as the only source of power, which is formed by the voters.
Keywords
Supporting agencies: The reported study was funded by Russian Foundation of Basic Research (RFBR) and Expert Institute of Social Studies, project number 20-011-31740
About the Author
D. A. Avdeev
University of Tyumen
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dmitry A. Avdeev – PhD in Law, Associate Professor, Department of Constitutional and Municipal Law
6, Volodarskogo ul., 625003, Tyumen, Russia
RSCI SPIN-code: 4322-4682; AuthorID: 688180
References
1. Salenko A.V. Constitutional and legal significance of freedom of peaceful assembly: doctrinal and judicial approaches in Russia and Germany. Rossiiskii yuridicheskii zhurnal = Russian juridical journal, 2019, no. 5, pp. 9-17. (In Russ.).
2. Avdeev D.A. Constitutionalization of legitimacy in modern Russia. Vestnik Rossiiskoi pravovoi akademii = Bulletin of the Russian Law Academy, 2017, no. 3, pp. 5-10. (In Russ.).
3. Tabolin V.V. The effectiveness of public power: approaches to understanding and legal nature, in: Larichev A.A. (ed.). Constitutional and legal problems of the effectiveness of public power in Russia and foreign states. Petro-zavodsk: Karelian branch of RANEPA, 2017. P. 7-16. (In Russ.).
4. Sukharev A.I., Krutskikh V.E. (eds.). The Big Law Dictionary. Moscow, INFRA-M Publ., 2001. 704 p. (In Russ.).
5. Weber M. Selected Works. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1990. 808 p. (In Russ.).
6. Easton D. System analysis of political life (1965), in: Vasilik M. A., Vershinin M. S. (comps.). Political science: a reader. Moscow, Gardariki Publ., 2000. P. 319–331. (In Russ.).
7. Filippov A.F. Political sociology. Fundamental problems and basic concepts. Politeia, 2002, no. 2, pp. 146-169. (In Russ.).
8. Shabo J. L. State power: constitutional limits and procedure for implementation. Polis, 1993, no. 4, pp. 155-165. (In Russ.).
9. Habermas J. Problem of legitimation of late capitalism. Moscow, Praxis Publ., 2010. P. 289-296. (In Russ.).
10. Held D., McGrew A., Goldnlatt D., Perraton J. Global transformations. Moscow, Praxis Publ., 2004. 576 p. (In Russ.).
11. Avdeev D.A Global. The legitimacy of public authority in Russia. Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Tyumen State University Herald. Social, Economic and Law Research, 2017, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 99-112. DOI: 10.21684/2411-7897-2017-3-3-99-112 (In Russ.).
12. Zavershinsky K.F. Legitimacy: genesis, formation and development of the concept. Polis, 2001, no. 2, pp. 113-131. (In Russ.).
13. Mamut L.S. Legitimation of the state, in: Grafsky V.V., Slavin M.M. (eds.). Law and society in an era of change. Moscow, ISL RAS Publ., 2008. P. 212-226. (In Russ.).
14. Isaev I.A. Legitimacy and legality in constitutional law. Istoriya gosudarstva i prava = History of State and Law, 2012, no. 6, pp. 2-6. (In Russ.).
15. Ivanov V. Theory of the state. Moscow, Territory of the future Publ., 2010. 272 p. (In Russ.).
16. Marchenko M.N. Problems of the theory of state and law. Textbook. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2001. 760 p. (In Russ.).
17. Primova E. On the question of the legitimacy of power. Vlast' = The Authority, 2013, no. 8, pp. 112-116. (In Russ.).
18. Avdeev D.A. Democratic illusion of people's participation in the formation of public authorities in Russia. Pravovaya politika i pravovaya zhizn', 2011, no. 4, pp. 23-30. (In Russ.).
19. Gorbachev A.A., Skovikov A.K. Trends and contradictions in the formation of Russian parliamentarism. Pravo i politika = Law and politics, 2011, no. 5, pp. 752-761. (In Russ.).
20. Salikov M.S. Centralism and Democracy: Problems of Finding a Balance, in: Avakyan S.A. (ed.). Centralism, Democracy, Decentralization in a Modern State: Constitutional and Legal Issues. Materials of the international scientific conference. Moscow, April 7-9, 2005. Moscow, TK Welby Publ., 2006. P. 73-78 (In Russ.).
21. Kerimov A.A. The legitimacy of political power: problems of definition and basic theoretical models. Izvestiya Ural'skogo federal'nogo universiteta. Seriya 3: Obshchestvennye nauki, 2015, no. 1, vol. 137, pp. 81-91. (In Russ.).
22. Dobrynin N.M. Constitutionalism and the rule of law: theory and practice of interconnection. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo = Constitutional and municipal law, 2012, no. 3, pp. 2-7. (In Russ.).
23. Tsishkovsky E.A., Kuzakbirdiev S.S. The idea of democracy in the Russian legal ideology and doctrine (critical sketch), in: State authorities of the Russian Federation in the conditions of separation of powers. Tyumen, Publishing house of the Tyumen legal institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation, 2005. P. 97-103. (In Russ.).
24. Chirkin V.E. Constitution and modern models of public authority: ideologemes and realities. Gosudarstvo i pravo = State and Law, 2011, no. 6, pp. 5-12. (In Russ.).
25. Romanchuk I.S. Public State Power: Research Methodology and Practice of Restriction. Tyumen, Publishing House of Tyumen State University, 2013. 172 p. (In Russ.).
26. Kostogryzov P.I. Metacategory "people" and the limits of cognition of the science of constitutional law. Lex Russica, 2020, vol. 73, no. 11, pp. 35-42. (In Russ.).
27. Avdeev D.A. The Russian people as a subject of public law. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo = Constitutional and municipal law, 2017, no. 11, pp. 14-17. (In Russ.).
28. Avdeev D.A. Constitutional dimension of modern Russian democracy. Rossiiskoe pravo: obrazovanie, praktika, nauka, 2017, no. 6, pp. 20-28. (In Russ.).
29. Chebotarev G.N. Public representation. Moscow, Jurist Publ., 2017. 160 p. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Avdeev D.A. Legitimacy and legitimation of the Russian public authority. Law Enforcement Review. 2021;5(2):145-158. https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2021.5(2).145-158
Views:
4242
Email this article 