CONSTITUTIONAL FOUNDATIONS OF THE EXECUTION OF THE ECtHR JUDGMENTS IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
https://doi.org/10.24147/2542-1514.2017.1(1).139-150
Abstract
About the Authors
K. AranovskiyRussian Federation
Judge, Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, Honoured Lawyer of the Russian Federation, Doctor of Law, Professor, Department of Constitutional and Administrative Law;
AuthorID: 261768
S. Knyazev
Russian Federation
Judge, Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, Honored Lawyer of the Russian Federation, Honoured Scientist of the Russian Federation, Doctor of Law, Professor, Department of Constitutional and Administrative Law;
AuthorID: 344659
References
1. Armashova Execution of decisions of the european court under human rights in russia: modern problems of the theory and practice. Obrazovanie i pravo = Education and the Law, 2010, no. 2, pp. 7–42. (In Russ.).
2. Apostolova N.N. Acceptability and implementation of the decisions of the European Court of human rights. Rossiiskaya yustitsiya, 2011, no. 11, pp. 64–67. (In Russ.).
3. Mavrin S.P. The decisions of the European Court of Human Rights in the legal system of Russia. Zhurnal konstitutsionnogo pravosudiya, 2015, no. 6, pp. 1–6. (In Russ.).
4. Schubert T.E. Problems of ECHR Decisions Implementation into Domestic Law. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2015, no. 6, pp. 136–143. (In Russ.).
5. Morshchakova T.G. Constitutional and judicial implementation of the European Convention on human rights. Sravnitelnoe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie = Comparative Constitutional Review, 2016, no. 2, pp. 182–189. (In Russ.).
6. Aranovsky K.V. Conditions of harmonization of practice of supranational and constitutional justice. Zhurnal konstitutsionnogo pravosudiya, 2013, no. 3, pp. 1–10. (In Russ.).
7. Starzhenetsky V. International courts and transformation of national legal systems. Mezhdunarodnoe pra-vosudie, 2013, no. 3, pp. 64–77. (In Russ.).
8. Teubner G. The project of constitutional sociology: irritating nation state constitutionalism. Sravnitelnoe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie = Comparative Constitutional Review, 2016, no. 1, pp. 41–55. (In Russ.).
9. Bushev A.Yu. The Subsidiary role of the European Court of human rights: the limits of the discretion of rhe-nium and national sovereignty, the criterion of the bleeding obvious. Prava cheloveka, 2016, no. 4, pp. 18–21. (In Russ.).
10. Zorkin V.D. The constitutional Court of Russia: doctrine and practice. Moscow, 2017. 592 p.
11. Vaypan G.V., Maslov A.S. From dogma to pragmatics: the decision of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation on the "case Markin" in the context of modern approaches to the interrelation between international and national law. Sravnitelnoe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie = Comparative Constitutional Review, 2014, no. 2, pp. 127–137. (In Russ.).
12. Blankenagel A., Levin I.G. In principle, no... but yes, it is possible! The Russian Constitutional Court and the binding power of decisions of the European Court of Human Rights. Sravnitelnoe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie = Com-parative Constitutional Review, 2015, no. 5, pp. 152–162. (In Russ.).
13. Knyazev S.D. Stability of the Constitution and significance thereof for the modern Russian federalism. Kon-stitutsionnoe i munitsipalnoe pravo, 2015, no. 1, pp. 4–12. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Aranovskiy K., Knyazev S. CONSTITUTIONAL FOUNDATIONS OF THE EXECUTION OF THE ECtHR JUDGMENTS IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION. Law Enforcement Review. 2017;1(1):139-150. https://doi.org/10.24147/2542-1514.2017.1(1).139-150