Evolution of the constitutional legal status of the federal territory of the District of Columbia, USA: constitutional legal risks

The subject. The article analyzes seven stages of the evolution of the constitutional legal status of the first federal territory in history the District of Columbia, USA. In the course of this analysis, the author formulates the constitutional legal risks of the existence of federal territories in the state. From the standpoint of identifying constitutional legal risks, an amendment to Article 67 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation on the possibility of the formation of federal territories on the territory of Russia is also analyzed.

The purpose of the paper is to identify constitutional legal risks in terms of the existence of federal territories using the example of the centuries-old struggle of the District of Columbia for autonomy.

The methodology of the study includes general scientific methods (analysis, synthesis, description) and legal methods. In addition to this, historical method was also applicable.

The main results and scope of their application. The author realized, that a certain constitutional risk exists when the federal territory is established as a special public-law entity, because the evolutionary process of the constitutional-legal status of the first federal territory, that was established in constitutional law – the District of Columbia in the United States of America, demonstrated such risk. The author describes seven different stages of the evolutionary process of the DC's constitutional legal status in its pass to autonomy and full political rights: (1) 1800–1870; (2) 1871 – June of 1874; (3) 20 of June 1874 – 1967; (4) 1967–1973; (5) 1973–1983; (6) September of 1983 – 2016; (7) since 2016 until now.

According to these periods, since 1801, DC residents, bound by all obligations of American citizenship, want to be equal to the rest of America's citizens. The United States is the only democratic country in the world today that denies the right to vote for a representative of the capital in the Congress. The Statehood of Washington, DC will correct a long-standing historical injustice that is unique in its nature among all capitals in the world. The author also proposes to consider as a constitutional risk the possibility of negative consequences (legal damage) for the subjects of constitutional law due to the contention of constitutional values.

In addition to this, the author concluded, that there is a risk that the Council of the Federal Territory “Sirius” will lose its representative character due to the absence of the established dependence of the number of elected Council members on the number of voters, as happened in the District of Columbia, where a fixed number of Council members (13) is also established, which cannot be changed by the district and which does not depend on the population living in its territory. It is also necessary to take into account the constitutional risk of the federal territory striving for autonomy within the federation, especially in the case of the formation of a local community on its territory.

1. Vasil'eva N.V., Praskova S.V., Pyatkovskaya Yu.V. The constitutional status of federal territories in Russia: theoretical foundations of legislative regulation. Pravoprimenenie = Law Enforcement Review, 2021, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 124–140. DOI: 10.52468/2542-1514.2021.5(1).124-140. (In Russ.).

2. Fomin M., Ryazantsev S., Bezverbny V., Mikryukov N., Ter-Akopov A. Project federal territories as an object of the spatial development of Siberia and the Far East of Russia. Amazonia Investiga, 2019, vol. 8, no. 19, pp. 107– 119.

3. Byalkina T.M. Organization of public power in federal territories (by the case of the federal territory “Sirius”). Konstitutsionalizm i gosudarstvovedenie = Constitutionalism and state studies, 2021, no. 3 (23), pp. 11–16. (In Russ.).

4. Dzidzoev R.M. Institute of federal territories in the Russian Federation (on the example of the federal territory “Sirius”). Yuridicheskii vestnik Kubanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Legal Bulletin of the Kuban State University, 2021, no. 2, pp. 2–8. (In Russ.).

5. Mayboroda V.A. The concept of the territory of the federal territory “Sirius”. Rossiiskaya yustitsiya = Russian Justice, 2021, no. 3, pp. 55–58. (In Russ.).

6. Musinova N.N. Federal territory: features, foreign experience and Russian project. Samoupravlenie = Selfgovernment, 2020, no. 5 (122), pp. 345–348. (In Russ.).

7. Peshin N.L., Gandaloeva L.B. Strategies for the joint socio-economic development of the municipality and the federal territory: first experience. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 11: Pravo = Bulletin of Moscow University. Law Series, 2021, no. 5, pp. 98–114. (In Russ.).

8. Rasmussen M.V. The Risk Society at War: Terror, Technology and Strategy in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, 2006. 224 p.

9. Tat'yanina L.G. (ed.) Risks in law: solutions, Monograph. Moscow, 2020. 160 р. (In Russ.).

10. Kryuchkov R.A. Risk in law: genesis, concept and management, Cand. Diss. Thesis. Nizhny Novgorod, 2011. 27 р. (In Russ.).

11. Kireev V.V. Problems and prospects for the development of constitutional legal riskology. Vestnik YuzhnoUral'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo = The Bulletin of South Ural State University. Series: Law, 2013, no. 3, pp. 71–76. (In Russ.).

12. Tihomirov Yu.A., Shakhrai S.M. Risk and Law. Moscow, Moscow University Publ., 2012. 64 р. (In Russ.).

13. Kireev V.V. The role of science of constitutional rights of Russia in identifying and risk assessment of constitutional. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo = Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University. Series: Law, 2013, no. 27, pp. 28–32. (In Russ.).

14. Maslovskaya T.S. Risks in constitutional law. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava = Russian Law journal, 2016, no. 12, pp. 17–26. (In Russ.).

15. Novikova A.E. Problems of institutionalization of human rights risks in modern constitutional and legal science of Russia. Gosudarstvennaya vlast' i mestnoe samoupravlenie = State Power and Local Government, 2011, no. 10, pp. 21–25. (In Russ.).

16. Kireev V.V. On the theory of risk in the Russian science of constitutional law. Problemy prava = Legal issues, 2012, no. 7 (38), pp. 11–16. (In Russ.).

17. Kireev V.V. Establishment of scientific beliefs on constitutional risks in modern Russia: issues and prospects. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo = Constitutional and Municipal Law, 2017, no. 10, pp. 12–14. (In Russ.).

18. Bezrukov A.V. Identification, minimization and elimination of constitutional risks as means of securing law and order. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo = Constitutional and Municipal Law, 2018, no. 11, pp. 18–22. (In Russ.).

19. Lyubovenko E.S. Constitutional risks of social collisions. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika = Legal Technique, 2019, no. 13, pp. 515–518. (In Russ.).

20. Gubina A.O. Constitutional legal risks. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika = Legal Technique, 2019, no. 13, pp. 668– 670. (In Russ.).

21. Shaikhullin M.S. Constitutional and legal guarantees for the development of local self-government in the Russian Federation, Doct. Diss. Kazan, 2020. 515 р. (In Russ.).

22. Novikova A.E. Risk as an object of constitutional and legal science, Monograph. Moscow, Yur-VAK Publ., 2019. 98 р. (In Russ.).

23. Tihomirov Yu.A. Risk in the focus of legal regulation. Pravo i sovremennye gosudarstva = Law and Modern States, 2017, no. 6, pp. 9–23. (In Russ.).

24. Abzalova A.M. Genesis of federal territories. Vestnik Ufimskogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii = Bulletin of the Ufa Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2021, no. 4 (94), pp. 12–18. (In Russ.).

25. Romero J. Economic History: A Capital Compromise. Econ Focus, 2019, First Quarter, pp. 24–26.

26. Arnebeck B. Through a Fiery Trial: Building Washington, 1790–1800. Lanham, Madison Books Publ., 1991. 744 р.

27. Bryan W.B. A History of the National Capital. New York, Macmillan Co Publ., 1914. 738 р.

28. Markman S.J. Statehood for the District of Columbia. Is it Constitutional? Is it wise? Is it necessary? Washington, DC, National Legal Center for the Public Interest Publ., 1988. 94 p.

29. Salikov M.S. District of Columbia: Legal Status Issues. Rossiiskii yuridicheskii zhurnal = Russian Juridical Journal, 1997, no. 4 (16), pp. 123–137. (In Russ.).

30. Green C.M. Washington: A History the Capital, 1800–1950. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 1962. 558 р.

31. Udler I.M. F. Douglas – publicist in the fight against slavery and its consequences (1861-1865). Vestnik ChelGU = Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, 1997, no. 1, pp. 137–143. (In Russ.).

32. Udler I.M. Life, worldview and journalism of Frederick Douglas. Vestnik ChelGU = Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, 2004, no. 1, pp. 46–66. (In Russ.).