Topical issues of the realization and protection of human rights in the practice of smart contract technology application

The subject and the aim of the study. The article analyzes the approach to smart contract technology, which is reflected in the scientific literature and legislation of Russia and foreign countries, formulates the advantages and disadvantages of a smart contract that affect the implementation and protection of certain constitutional rights, including freedom of contract, the right to protect, the right to manage personal data.

Methodology. Guided by formal dogmatic and comparative law methods in research, the author formulates approaches to the concept of a smart contract that has been developed in the practice of foreign countries and deduces how each of the approaches affects the implementation of constitutional human rights. The paper notes that the use of a smart contract based on the federal blockchain does not allow the full implementation of such rights as freedom of contract, the right to self-defense, and the right to manage personal data. In addition, the transnational nature of smart contracts usage, their pseudonymity and failure to unified concept of legal regulation create obstacles to the effective implementation of the right to judicial protection.

The main results. The practice of legal regulation of smart contracts in foreign countries, aimed at minimizing the negative consequences of the use of technology is considered. Some countries follow to the concept of recognizing a smart contract as a form of contract (Italy, United States, Republic of Belarus) and a way of guaranteeing fulfilment of obligations (China, Italy, Republic of Belarus, Russian Federation). The second concept is considered as being the most restrictive for digital progress from one side but being able to guarantee protection of human rights such as right to judicial protection or freedom of contract. The first concept which shows smart contract being a type of contract carries additional risks associated with conclusion of a treaty - inconsistency of the smart contract with the actual will of the parties. The third concept considered smart contract as a type of contract is accepted in the Republic of Malta. The Republic of Malta regulated procedure of voluntary certification for smart contracts that allow to eliminate such threats as violation of human rights and the use of smart contracts for criminal purposes. The experience of legal regulation of smart contracts in the Republic of Malta is recognized as reasonable and effective, however, it is concluded that certification will achieve its goals only if it will be implemented in the legal system of wide range of the countries.

Conclusions. It is concluded that despite the fact that the smart contract technology has high potential for its implementation in various fields of social and economic life, the effective implementation of smart contract technology in various spheres of society requires the formation of general legal principles for their application, the definition of areas in which the use of smart contracts is prohibited, as well as the development of international standards for their safe execution.

1. Szabo N. Smart contracts: building blocks for digital markets. EXTROPY: The Journal of Transhumanist Thought, 1996, no. 16, vol. 8, iss. 1, pp. 50–53, 61.

2. Salmerón-Manzano E., Manzano-Agugliaro F. The Role of Smart Contracts in Sustainability: Worldwide Research Trends. Sustainability, 2019, vol. 11, iss. 11, art. 3049. DOI: 10.3390/su11113049.

3. Diadkin D., Usoltsev Y., Usoltseva N. Smart-Contracts in Russia: Prospects for Legislative Regulation. Universum: Ekonomika i yurisprudentsiya, 2018, no. 5 (50), available: http://7universum.com/ru/economy/archive/item/5806. (In Russ.).

4. Savelyev A.I. Contract Law 2.0: "Smart Contracts" and the Beginning of the End of the Classic Contract Law. Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava = Civil Law Review, 2016, no. 3, pp. 32–60. (In Russ.).

5. Chub D.V. Legal Regulation of Smart contracts in France. Aktual'nye problemy rossiiskogo prava = Actual Problems of Russian Law, 2019, no. 8 (105), pp. 151–158. DOI: 10.17803/1994-1471.2019.105.8.151-158. (In Russ.).

6. Raskin M. The Law and Legality of Smart Contracts. Georgetown Law Technology Review, 2017, vol. 1, iss. 2, pp. 305–341.

7. Rodionova O.M. Civil-Legal Nature of the Consequences of Signing Smart Contracts. Probely v rossiiskom zakonodatel'stve = Gaps in Russian Legislation, 2017, no. 6, pp. 183–185. (In Russ.).

8. Khatoon A. A Blockchain-Based Smart Contract System for Healthcare Management. Electronics, 2020, vol. 9, iss. 1, art. 94. DOI: 10.3390/electronics9010094.

9. Kirli D., Couraud B., Robu V., Salgado-Bravo M., Norbu S., Andoni M., Antonopoulos I., Negrete-Pincetic M., Flynn D., Kiprakis A. Smart contracts in energy systems: A systematic review of fundamental approaches and implementations. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2022, vol. 158, art. 112013. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.112013.

10. Schmitt G., Mladenow A., Strauss C., Schaffhauser-Linzatti M. Smart Contracts and Internet of Things: A Qualitative Content Analysis using the Technology-Organization-Environment Framework to Identify Key-Determinants. Procedia Computer Science, 2019, vol. 160, pp. 189–196. DOI: 10/1016/j.procs.2019.09.460.

11. Khan S.N., Loukil F., Ghedira-Guegan C., Benkhelifa E., Bani-Hani A. Blockchain smart contracts: Applications, challenges, and future trends. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, 2021, no. 14, pp. 2901–2925.

12. Efimova L.G., Sizemova O.B. The Legal Nature of a Smart Contract. Bankovskoe pravo = Banking law, 2019, no. 1, pp. 21–28. DOI: 10.18572/1812-3945-2019-1-21-28. (In Russ.).

13. Vashkevich A.M. Smart Contracts: what, why and how. Moscow, Simploer Publ., 2018. 89 p. (In Russ.).

14. Volos A.A. (ed.) The Concept of the Legal Regulation of Relations Connected with Smart Contracts. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2021. 224 p. DOI: 10.31085/9785392335817-2021-224. (In Russ.).

15. O’Shields R. Smart Contracts: Legal Agreements for the Blockchain. North Carolina Banking Institute, 2017, vol. 21, iss. 1, pp. 177–195.

16. Durovic M., Janssen A. The Formation of Smart Contracts and Beyond: Shaking the Fundamentals of Contract Law?, in: DiMatteo L., Cannarsa M., Poncibo C. (eds.) Smart Contracts and Blockchain Technology: Role of Contract Law, Cambridge University Press, 2019, pp. 61–79. DOI: 10.1017/9781108592239.

17. Camilleri L. Blockchain based Smart-Contracts’ Legal Enforceability in Malta and the UK: a Square peg in a Round Hole? University of York Publ., 2019. 58 p.

18. Efimova L.G., Mikheeva I.V., Chub D.V. Comparative Analysis of Doctrinal Concepts of Legal Regulating Smart Contracts in Russia and Foreign States. Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki = Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 2020, no. 4, pp. 78–105. DOI: 10.17323/2072-8166.2020.4.78.105. (In Russ.).

19. Truntsevky Yu.V., Sevalnev V.V. Smart Contracts: from Identification to Certainty. Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki = Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 2020, no. 1, pp. 118–147. DOI: 10.17323/2072-8166.2020.1.118.147. (In Russ.).

20. Barbry E. Smart contracts... Aspects juridiques! Réalités Industrielles, 2017, August, pp. 77–80. (In France).

21. Szwed M. Constitutional protection of freedom of contract in the European Union, Poland and the United States and its potential impact on the European contract law. Central European University Publ., 2014. 87 p. Available at: http://www.etd.ceu.hu/2014/szwed_marcin.pdf.

22. Karapetov A.G., Savel’ev A.I. Freedom of contract and its limits, in 2 volumes. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2021. Vol. 1. 452 p. (In Russ.).

23. Braginskii M.I., Vitryanskii V.V. Contract Law: general provisions. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2020. 848 p. (In Russ.).

24. Salikov M.S. (ed.) The right to access the Internet, anonymity and identification of users (constitutional legal problems). Yekaterinburg, UMC UPI Publ., 2020. 167 p. (In Russ.).

25. Ferrer E.C. The blockchain: A New Framework for Robotic Swarm Systems, in: Arai K., Bhatia R., Kapoor S. (eds.) Proceedings of the Future Technologies Conference (FTC) 2018, Springer Publ., 2018, vol. 2, pp. 1037–1058. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-02683-7_77.

26. Afanasyev I., Kolotov A., Rezin R., Danilov K., Mazzara M., Chakraborty S., Kashevnik A., Chechulin A., Kapitonov A., Jotsov V., Topalov A., Shakev N., Ahmed S. Towards Blockchain-based Multi-Agent Robotic Systems: Analysis, Classification and Applications. 2019. 10 p. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.07433.

27. Pasquier T., Bacon J., Eyers D. Personal Data and The Internet of Things. Communications of the ACM, 2019, vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 32–34. DOI: 10.1145/3322933.

28. Hewa T., Hu Y., Liyanage M., Kanhare S., Ylianttila M. Survey on Blockchain-Based Smart Contracts: Technical Aspects and Future Research. IEEE Access, 2021, no. 9, pp. 87643–87662. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3068178.

29. Minbaleev A.V. The Place and Role of Self-regulation in the Development of Digital Technologies. Obrazovanie i pravo, 2019, no. 1, pp. 253–256. (In Russ.).

30. Filippi P., Hassan S. Blockchain technology as a regulatory technology: From code is law to law is code. First Monday, 2016, vol. 21, no. 12. DOI: 10.5210/fm.v21i12.7113.

31. Juels A., Kosba A., Shi E. The Ring of Gyges: Investigating the future of criminal smart contracts, in: CCS '16, Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, New York, NY, United States, Association for Computing Machinery Publ., 2016, pp. 283–295. DOI: 10.1145/2976749.2978362.