Antimonopoly regulation of the activities of digital companies and the operation of Internet platforms in Russia and in the European Union

The subject. The article examines the antimonopoly regulation of relations arising in the course of the activities of modern companies that ensure the operation of certain digital online platforms. The development of digital information technologies has led to the emergence of various new forms of economic and social communications. These forms include, among other things, digital technological platforms operating on the Internet and representing a kind of platform within which information interaction of various subjects takes place, related to the implementation of their professional activities or interpersonal communication. In this regard, the law faces the task of ensuring effective regulation of relations that are formed in the context of the development of electronic market systems and digital services. An important role in this should be assigned to antimonopoly legislation, since the possession of large data sets and the latest information technologies can lead to companies trying to use their resources to violate the rights of other subjects.

The aim of the study is to determine the legal essence of the Internet platform and to identify possible features and limits of antimonopoly regulation of the activities of companies that ensure their work, including taking into account the current Russian and foreign legislation and law enforcement practice in this area.

Research methods are formal – logical interpretation, systemic method and comparative analysis.

The main results, scope of application. Digital technological platform is a complex phenomenon that includes various results of intellectual activity, both subject to and not subject to legal protection, including computer programs, databases, as well as technical means, ensuring the functioning of the digital platform. In addition, the analysis of Russian antitrust legislation and the theory of civil law led to the conclusion that the existing exemptions from the scope of the rules on the prohibition of monopolistic activities established for holders of exclusive intellectual rights could significantly complicate the application of antitrust rules to digital companies that are copyright holders results of intellectual activity that are part of the Internet platform. At the same time, the currently established law enforcement practice actually follows the path of limiting these antimonopoly immunities, despite their legislative consolidation, which is hardly justified. On the other hand, the existence of broad antitrust immunities is also unfounded. In order to bring the antimonopoly legislation in line with the needs of the emerging digitalization relations antitrust immunities are subject to limitations.

Conclusions. There are new criteria for determining the dominant position of digital companies in the relevant markets, which include network effects, large user data and significant barriers to entry into the market.

1. Ermakova E.P., Frolova E.E. Legal regulation of digital banking in Russia and foreign countries (European Union, USA, PRC). Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki = Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences, 2019, no. 46, pp. 606–625. DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2019-46-606-625. (In Russ.).

2. Tihomirov Yu.A., Talapina E.V. Law as an effective factor in economic development. Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 2020, no. 1, pp. 4–26. DOI: 10.17323/2072-8166.2020.1.4.26. (In Russ.).

3. Gubin E.P., Kharitonova Yu.S. Digital platforms in Europe, China and Russia: main approaches and trends in legal regulation. Pravo i ekonomika, 2020, no. 8, pp. 5–13. (In Russ.).

4. Kasymov R.Sh. Control over monopolization in the digital economy conditions. Konkurentnoe pravo, 2019, no. 4, pp. 27–30. (In Russ.).

5. Blazheev V.V., Egorova M.A. (eds.). Digital law, Textbook. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2020. 640 p. DOI: 10.31085/9785392227297-2020-640. (In Russ.).

6. Kartskhiya A.A. Digital technological (online) platforms: Russian and foreign regulation experience. Grazhdanskoe pravo, 2019, no. 3, pp. 25–28. DOI: 10.18572/2070-2140-2019-3-25-28. (In Russ.).

7. Belykh V.S., Konkov K.A., Bolobonova M.O. Problems of improving antitrust legislation in the digital economy: controversial issues of theory and practice. Biznes, menedzhment, pravo, 2020, no. 2 (46), pp. 37–41. (In Russ.).

8. Lyutova O.I. Electronic platform operators as participants of tax relations in the digital era (the case of professional income tax). Pravoprimenenie = Law Enforcement Review, 2020, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 56–67. DOI: 10.24147/2542-1514.2020.4(4).56-67. (In Russ.).

9. Chesalina O.V. Work through Internet platforms as a challenge to labor relations. Trudovoe pravo v Rossii i za rubezhom = Labor law in Russia and abroad, 2019, no. 1, pp. 12–15. (In Russ.).

10. Shuraleva S.V. Workers in the «clouds»: the impact of Internet platforms on the development of labor relations. Trudovoe pravo v Rossii i za rubezhom = Labor law in Russia and abroad, 2019, no. 1, pp. 15–18. (In Russ.).

11. Tereshchenko L.K. State control in personal data protection. Pravo. Zhurnal Vyssheishkoly ekonomiki, 2018, no. 4, pp. 142–161. DOI: 10.17323/2072-8166.2018.4.142.161. (In Russ.).

12. Bolobonova M.O., Khrupalov V.A. Legal regulation of data circulation in the activities of digital platforms: controversial issues of theory and practice. Biznes, menedzhment, pravo, 2020, no. 2, pp. 42–46. (In Russ.).

13. Tsarikovskii A.Yu., Ivanov A.Yu., Voinikanis E.A. (eds.). Antitrust regulation in the digital age: how to protect competition in the face of globalization and the fourth industrial revolution, Monograph. Moscow, HSE Publ., 2018. 311 p. DOI: 10.17323/978-5-7598-1750-5. (In Russ.).

14. Pozdnyakova A.E., Kotova D.A., Semenova E.V. Competition on the social network market. Zakon, 2020, no. 2, pp. 74–85. (In Russ.).

15. Yuchinson K.S. Big data and legislation on competition. Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 2017, no. 1, pp. 216–245. DOI: 10.17323/2072-8166.2017.1.216.245. (In Russ.).

16. Avliyarova V.A. The practice of recognizing abuse of dominant position in digital markets in the USA, Germany and Russia, in: Pravovoi vzglyad, proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference, May 30, 2021, Penza, 2021, pp. 160–161. (In Russ.).

17. Egorova M.A. Peculiarities of the statutory regulation of the digital economy and issues of the antimonopoly regulation in digital markets as a national interest protection means. Yurist, 2018, no. 11, pp. 7–10. DOI: 10.18572/1812-3929-2018-11-7-10. (In Russ.).

18. Gabov A.V. Digital platform as a new legal phenomenon. Permskii yuridicheskii al'manakh, 2021, no. 4, pp. 13–82. (In Russ.).

19. Gorodov O.A. On new forms of use of information technologies in the field of entrepreneurship, in: Vaipan V.A., Egorova M.A. (eds.). Pravovoe regulirovanie ekonomicheskikh otnoshenii v sovremennykh usloviyakh razvitiya tsifrovoi ekonomiki, Moscow, Yustitsinform Publ., 2019, pp. 85–96. (In Russ.).

20. Istomin V.G. Intellectual rights and antitrust regulation: assessment of the admissibility and limits of antitrust immunities in the context of balancing interests. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2019, no. 12, pp. 102–112. DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2019.12.8. (In Russ.).

21. Vorozhevich A.S. Antitrust vs patent rights: why the interference of the antimonopoly service will affect innovations. Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya Rossiiskoi Federatsii, 2018, no. 1, pp. 72–112. (In Russ.).

22. Pisenko K.A. On legislative problems of countering monopolistic activities related to the use of objects of exclusive rights. Konkurentnoe pravo, 2012, no. 1, pp. 29–34. (In Russ.).

23. Eremenko V.I. Issues of unfair competition in the framework of «the fourth antimonopoly package». Konkurentnoe pravo, 2016, no. 1, pp. 3–12. (In Russ.).

24. Deryugina T.V. The legal nature of an agreement mediating origination of legal relationships involving an aggregator. Grazhdanskoe pravo, 2018, no. 6, pp. 3–6. DOI: 10.18572/2070-2140-2018-6-3-6. (In Russ.).

25. Molotnikov A.E., Arkhipov E.V. Social networks and aggregators: legal aspects of operations. Predprinimatel’skoe pravo, 2017, no. 4, pp. 38–47. (In Russ.).

26. Dozortsev V.A. Intellectual Rights: Concept. System. Codification tasks, Collection of articles. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2005. 416 p. (In Russ.).

27. Bashlakov-Nikolayev I.V. To the issue of anti-monopoly regulation of digital economy and of certain elaborated regulations regarding the fifth antimonopoly package. Pravo i tsifrovaya ekonomika = Law and digital economy, 2019, no. 1, pp. 25–27. DOI: 10.17803/2618-8198.2019.03.1.025-027. (In Russ.).

28. Ivanov A.Yu. Merger review in the digital age: episode one in discussions on the fifth competition law reform package. Zakon, 2018, no. 2, pp. 106–119. (In Russ.).

29. Zaynullina E.R., Pavlov S.Yu. Fifth antimonopoly package: significance, features, prospects. Nauka i obrazovanie: novoe vremya, 2018, no. 4 (27), pp. 142–145. (In Russ.).