RETRACTED: Standards for ensuring the legality of covert activities in criminal proceedings through the prism of European Court of Human Rights

RETRACTED ARTICLE

The subject of research is the implementation of covert activities in criminal proceedings through the prism of international acts, decisions of the European Court of Human Rights.

The purpose of the work is to formulate common standards for ensuring the legality of implementing covert activities in criminal process through the prism of legal positions of the European Court Of Human Rights.

The methodological basis or research isthe totality of general and special scientific methods of scientific cognition. The formal-legal (legal-technical) method was used to study the rules of law, to analyze the features of legal technique; and the hermeneutical method revealed the legal content of the norms, legislative proposals and defects in legal regulation. The statistical method helped to generalize judicial practice of ECHR. While building up the system of the standards for the ensuring the legality of implementing covert activities in criminal process we used the system-structural method.

The main results and conclusions. The analysis of the legal positions of the ECHR made it possible to conditionally single out the following standards for ensuring the legality of the implementation of covert activity in criminal proceedings:

– predictability. Its essence lies in the fact that the grounds, procedural order, conditions, timing, the circle of persons and crimes in relation to which it is allowed to carry out covert activities should be as detailed, clear and accurate as possible in the criminal procedural legislation. Moreover, any person had the opportunity to familiarize himself with the relevant regulatory prescriptions and foresee the actions that can be carried out in relation to him;

– warranty against abuse. The content of this standard can be disclosed by more detailed highlighting of clarifying provisions ("substandards"). These include: control of interference in human rights and freedoms; the certainty of the circle of persons in relation to whom it is possible to carry out secret activities; limited corpus delicti, for the purpose of investigation or prevention of which covert activity is allowed; the existence in national legislation of procedures that facilitate the law of the implementation of covert activity in criminal proceedings; the temporary nature of the implementation of secret activities in the criminal process;

– verifiability. The essence of this standard can be disclosed through the establishment of judicial control over the decision of the issue regarding the possible destruction of information obtained in the course of conducting covert activities, which is not relevant to criminal proceedings, as well as the requirement for the mandatory opening of decisions that were the basis for conducting covert investigative actions;

– exclusivity. The main content of this standard is that covert activity in criminal proceedings can be carried out only in cases where the disclosure or prevention of a crime in another way is impossible or is too complicated;

– proportionality of the intervention and its expediency. The essence of this standard is that the implementation of certain covert coercive actions that are associated with the restriction of human rights and freedoms must be proportionate to the goals for which such actions are directed. Moreover, these goals and the applied coercion must be necessary in a democratic society;

– inadmissibility of tacit interference in the communication of some subjects. First of all, this requirement concerns the need to legislatively guarantee non-interference in communication between a lawyer and his client, a priest and an accused, etc., which means a ban on targeted control over the communication of certain subjects, as well as the obligation to destroy information obtained in the course of an accidental, situational interfering with their communication.

1. Amirkhanov B.K. Covert Surveillance in the Structural Elements of the Criminally-Remedial Averment. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 2016, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 982–988.

2. Bekishev A.K., Kan A.G., Ibrayev A.S., Dyussebaliyeva S.S., Ibrayev N.S. Specifics of Covert Investigative Activities in Criminal Proceedings. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 2019, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 58–65. DOI: 10.14505//jarle.v10.1(39).08.

3. Bernaz V D. Legal nature of the concept and general classification of covert investigative (search) actions. Naukovii visnik Mizhnarodnogo gumanitarnogo universitetu. Seriya «Yurisprudentsiya», 2013, no. 5, pp. 226–230. (In Ukrainian).

4. Blahuta R.I. Covert investigative (search) actions: problems of preparation and conduct. Yuridichnii visnik Natsional’noi akademii vnutrishnikh sprav, 2013, no. 1, pp. 147–152. (In Ukrainian).

5. Holdberh N.O. Ensuring the constitutional rights and freedoms of a person when conducting covert investigative (search) actions in his home and other property. Visnik Luhanskoho derzhavnoho universytetu vnutrishnikh sprav imeni E.O. Didorenka, 2016, no. 2, pp. 47–58. (In Ukrainian).

6. Dolya E.A. Formation of evidence based on the results of operational and investigative activities, Monograph. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2013. 376 p. (In Russ.).

7. Dubonosov E.S. Operational and investigative activities, a textbook for universities. Moscow, Yurait Publ., 2012. 415 p. (In Russ.).

8. Kapkanov V.I. Problems of delimiting the suppression of crimes and provocation of their commission. Ugolovnoe pravo, 2007, no. 6, pp. 116–120. (In Russ.).

9. Orunbaev N.E. Undercover investigative actions under the new Criminal Procedure Code of Kazakhstan. Vestnik Omskoi yuridicheskoi akademii, 2015, no. 3, pp. 75–77. (In Russ.).

10. Pohoretskyi M.A., Serhieieva D.B. Covert investigative (search) actions and operational-search measures: concept, essence and relations. Borot’ba z organizovanoyu zlochinnistyu i koruptsieyu (teoriya i praktika), 2014, no. 2, pp. 137–141. (In Ukrainian).

11. Serhieieva D.B. The results of covert investigative (search) actions: problematic aspects of the definition. Pravo i gromadyans’ke suspil’stvo, 2014, no. 1, pp. 97–106. (In Ukrainian).

12. Stel’makh V.Yu. Investigative actions limiting the secrecy of communication, Monograph. Moscow, Yurlitinform Publ., 2016. 424 p. (In Russ.).

13. Tagiev S.R. Covert investigative (search) actions in the criminal proceedings of Ukraine. Kyiv, Dakor Publ., 2015. 440 p. (In Ukrainian).

14. Uvarov V.H. Problems of covert investigative (search) actions. Pravo i suspil’stvo, 2013, no. 3, pp. 134–140. (In Ukrainian).

15. Goran I., Bošković M.M. Special measures for covert data collection in criminal proceedings: the judicial perspective. Belgrade Centre for Security Policy Publ., 2015. 32 p. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep04787.

16. Niemczyk Z. The Role of Covert Policing and the Use of Its Results in Criminal Proceedings Involving Unlawful Restraint for Ransom. Internal Security, 2017, vol. 9, iss. 1, pp. 123–140. DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0010.7440.

17. Loftus B., Goold B., MacGiollabhui S. From a Visible Spectacle to an Invisible Presence: The Working Culture of Covert Policing. The British Journal of Criminology, 2016, vol. 56, iss. 4, pp. 629–645. DOI: 10.1093/bjc/azv076.

18. Ross J. The Place of Covert Surveillance in Democratic Societies: A Comparative Study of the United States and Germany. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 2007, vol. 55, iss. 3, pp. 493–579.

19. Harfield C. The Governance Of Covert Investigation. Melbourne University Law Revie, 2010, vol. 34, pp. 773–804.

20. Kudinov S.S., Shekhavtsov R.M., Drozdov O.M., Grinenko S.O. Covert investigative (search) actions and the use of the results of operational and investigative activities in criminal proceedings, a training manual, 3rd ed. Kharkiv, Oberig Publ., 2018. 540 p. (In Ukrainian).

21. Kavkaeva Yu.A., Kalenteva T.A. Legalization of these orders: problems of legal regulation in the light of the decisions of the ECHR. Vestnik Volzhskogo universiteta imeni V.N. Tatischeva, 2019, no. 2, vol. 1, pp. 177–186. (In Russ.).

22. Zhaldak S.I. Regulatory Standards for Covert Investigations in European Criminal Procedure Law. Visnik Akademii advokaturi Ukraini, 2014, no. 3 (31), vol. 11, pp. 107–115. (In Russ.).

23. Koltsov D.V. The requirements of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights for the conduct of operational-search activities "Test purchase" and "Operational experiment". Trudy Akademii upravleniya MVD Rossii, 2019, no. 3 (51), pp. 48–59. (In Russ.).

24. Lapatnikov M.V. Theoretical and applied issues of delimiting provocation from lawful operational-search measures, taking into account the practice of the European Court of Human Rights. Vestnik Nizhegorodskoi akademii MVD Rossii, 2014, no. 2 (26), pp. 97–104. (In Russ.).

25. McBride J. Human Rights and Criminal Procedure. The case law of the European Court of Human Rights, 2nd ed. Council of Europe Publ., 2018. 529 p.

26. Mayorova L.V. Identification of provocations in the operational-search and criminal procedure activities, taking into account the experience of the European Court of Human Rights. Vestnik Sibirskogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii, 2018, no. 3 (32), pp. 21–27. (In Russ.).

27. Tabunkina T.A. The value of the results of operational-search activities in proving a criminal case (taking into account the practice of the European Court of Human Rights). Vestnik Nizhegorodskoi akademii MVD Rossii, 2016, no. 3 (35), pp. 200–205. (In Russ.).

28. Bagrii M.V., Lutsik V.V. Procedural aspects of covert obtaining of information: domestic and foreign experience, Monograph. Kharkiv, Pravo Publ., 2017. 376 p. (In Ukrainian).

29. Kolosovich M.S. Integration of operational-search and criminal procedural activities in the legislation of some states of the post-Soviet space: current state and development prospects. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii, 2016, no. 5, pp. 151–157. (In Russ.).

30. Ahpanov A.N., Han A.L. On the legal nature and differentiation of operational-search measures and covert investigative actions. Vestnik Instituta zakonodatel’stva RK, 2018, no. 3 (52), pp. 45–53. (In Russ.).

31. Kondrat’eva Ya.Yu. (ed.). International experience of using the agency by law enforcement agencies of Europe and the United States, textbook manual. Kyiv, KNT Publ., 2005. 88 p. (In Ukrainian).

32. Hovavko S.M. Legal guarantees of observance of constitutional human and civil rights during operationalsearch activities. Obshchestvo i pravo, 2016, no. 4 (58), pp. 131–136. (In Russ.).

33. Odnoshein I.A. Judicial control is a guarantee of the constitutional rights of citizens involved in the field of operational-search activities. Yurist-Pravoved, 2018, no. 4 (87), pp. 187–192. (In Russ.).