Preview

Law Enforcement Review

Advanced search

Exclusion of a legal entity from the Unified State Register of Legal Entities: cases of use, procedure and consequences

https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2022.6(2).204-230

Abstract

The subject of research. In 2005, a new institution for exclusion of a legal entity from the Unified State Register of Legal Entities by decision of the registering authority (or, as it is also called "administrative termination of a legal entity"). Subsequently, as a result of a number of changes, including the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, introduced by federal laws in 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2019, this institution was formed in the form in which it currently exists Its importance, at first more technical, has increased significantly after the changes in 2015, when this institution began to be used to conduct a large-scale "cleaning" of the Unified State Register of Legal Entities from inactive legal entities. As a result, millions of legal entities have been excluded from the Unified State Register of Legal Entities in recent years. In addition, the range of situations in which this institution began to be applied has expanded. Accordingly, the increase in the number of disputes is due to the fact that such exclusion affects the rights and interests of many persons (creditors, participants of excluded legal entities, members of their governing bodies). These disputes have often been the subject of close attention of the Russian Constitutional Court (the latest example is the decision of the Russian Constitutional Court of May 21, 2021 No. 20-P). The article examines the goals of this institution, its development, shows the most problematic situations related to the application of the institution of exclusion of a legal entity from the Unified State Register of Legal Entities.

The purpose of the article is to identify the main problems of the institution of exclusion of a legal entity from the Unified State Register of Legal Entities, as well as formulate the main directions for changing this institution. The author's main scientific hypothesis is that during the development of the institution of exclusion of a legal entity from the Unified State Register of Legal Entities, its original goals were lost. New goals and meanings were also formulated (in the legal positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation), which eventually (taking into account the significant shortcomings of the exclusion procedure itself) lead to violation of the rights of a significant number of interested persons. The author believes that in the development of this institution there is clearly a disproportion in terms of its application in relation to limited liability companies and persons controlling such a company. The author also notes the lack of a unified concept of the institution of exclusion from the Unified State Register of Legal Entities, since along with the administrative procedure for the termination of legal personality, the legislation also recognizes the judicial procedure. Description of research methods and methodology. The research is based on a systematic analysis, as well as the use of methods of interpretation developed in the doctrine.

The main results, scope of application. The goals of creating the institution of exclusion of a legal entity from the Unified State Register of Legal Entities are established, the development of this institution is shown taking into account the legal positions of the Russian Constitutional Court, judicial practice, conceptual provisions on reforming civil legislation.

Conclusions. There is a need for a complete renovation of the institution of exclusion of a legal entity from the Unified State Register of Legal Entities. The main directions for improving the institution of exclusion of a legal entity from the Unified State Register of Legal Entities are formulated.

About the Author

A. V. Gabov
Institute of State and Law, Russian Academy of Sciences; Belgorod State National Research University
Russian Federation

Andrey V. Gabov – Doctor of Law, Corresponding member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, full member of the Academy of Military Sciences; Acting Head, Civil and Business Law Sector, Chief researcher Institute of State and Law RAS; Scientific Director, Law Institute Belgorod State NRU. RSCI AuthorID: 292511; IstinaResearcherID (IRID): 1224554; ResearcherID: Q-9357-2017.

10, Znamenka ul., Moscow, 119019; 85, Pobedy ul., Belgorod, 308015



References

1. Gabov A.V. Reorganization and liquidation of legal entities, scientific and practical commentary on articles 57-65 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. Moscow, Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation Publ., INFRA-M Publ., 2014. 203 p. (In Russ.).

2. Gabov A.V. Evolution of the registration system for creating legal entities in Russia: main stages and trends. Uchenye zapiski Kazanskogo universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye nauki = Scientific notes of Kazan University: Humanities Science, 2019, vol. 161, bk. 4, pp. 77–126. (In Russ.).

3. Gabov A.V. Reliability and unreliability of information (data) included or included in the Unified State Register of Legal Entities: history, theory and practice, in: Karelina S.A., Lakhno P.G., Shitkina I.S. (eds.). Predprinimatel’skoe pravo: sovrenennyi vzglyad, Moscow, Yustitsinform Publ., 2019, pp. 364–407. (In Russ.).

4. Gabov A.V. Errors in the information (data) that make up the Unified State Register of Legal Entities: types and methods of elimination. Pravoprimenenie = Law Enforcement Review, 2021, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 209–230. DOI: 10.52468/2542-1514,2021.5(1).209-230. (In Russ.).

5. Shitkina I.S. (ed.). Scientific and practical commentary on the Federal Law "On Limited Liability Companies", in 2 volumes. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2021. Vol. 1. 621 p. (In Russ.).

6. Sarbash S.V. Exclusion from the register of inactive legal entities. Khozyaistvo i pravo = Economy and law, 2005, no. 11, pp. 8–13. (In Russ.).

7. Vitryansky V.V. Reform of the first part of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. Arbitrazhnye spory = Arbitration disputes, 2016, no. 1, pp. 70–83. (In Russ.).

8. Vitryanskii V.V. Reform of the Russian civil legislation: intermediate results, 2nd ed. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2018. 528 p. (In Russ.).

9. Miftakhutdinov R.T. Problems of optimizing the termination of legal entities without succession, Cand. Diss. Thesis. Moscow, 2011. 31 p. (In Russ.).

10. Chukreev A.A. Exclusion of a legal entity from the Unified State Register of Legal Entities by decision of the registering authority, in: Pravovye sredstva stimulirovaniya aktivnoizanyatosti i povysheniya konkurentosposobnosti na rynke truda, Collection of scientific articles, Tyumen, 2019, pp. 134–145. (In Russ.).

11. Spesivtseva E.V. Administrative procedure for the liquidation of a legal entity. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo = Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State University. Series: Law, 2017, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 105–109. (In Russ.).

12. Chinchevich E.V. Termination of an inactive legal entity in the light of recent changes in civil legislation. Vestnik SGYuA = Bulletin of the SGUA, 2015, no. 4 (105), pp. 80–83. (In Russ.).

13. Gordeeva E.V. State registration of legal entities in the draft Civil Code of the Russian Federation. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2013, no. 2, pp. 117–121. (In Russ.).

14. Cherepanova Yu.P. Exclusion of a legal entity from the Unified State Register of Legal Entities. Vestnik arbitrazhnoi praktiki = Bulletin of Arbitration Practice, 2021, no. 4, pp. 46–51 (In Russ.).

15. Shashkin D. The fate of "abandoned" companies. Administrativnoe pravo = Administrative law, 2016, no. 3, pp. 66–69. (In Russ.).

16. Laptev V.A. The procedure for the distribution of the discovered property of a liquidated legal entity (legal aspects). Yurist = Lawyer, 2020, no. 12, pp. 34–39. (In Russ.).

17. Mavrina Yu.F. Distribution of Corporation Property as One of the Consequences of Excluding a Legal Entity from the Unified State Register of Legal Entities: Issues of Theory and Practice. Grazhdanskoe pravo = Civil Law, 2021, no. 4, pp. 31–34. (In Russ.).

18. Sobolev S.I. Preparation of the institution of subsidiary liability in the administrative liquidation of the debtor. Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya Rossiiskoi Federatsii = Bulletin of economic justice of the Russian Federation, 2021, no. 6, pp. 27–73. (In Russ.).

19. Olevinsky E., Solomatina D., Ulezko A. Debts must be repaid. The Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation obliged the heads of liquidated companies to answer to creditors. Administrativnoe pravo = Administrative law, 2021, no. 3, pp. 95–99. (In Russ.).

20. Emshanov I.S. Exclusion of an inactive public association from the Unified State Register of Legal Entities. Yurist = Lawyer, 2010, no. 3, pp. 59–63. (In Russ.).

21. Baranova A.N. Administrative-legal activity of tax authorities on the forced liquidation of commercial organizations, Cand. Diss. Thesis. Voronezh, 2010. 24 p. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Gabov A.V. Exclusion of a legal entity from the Unified State Register of Legal Entities: cases of use, procedure and consequences. Law Enforcement Review. 2022;6(2):204-230. https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2022.6(2).204-230

Views: 511


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2542-1514 (Print)
ISSN 2658-4050 (Online)