The idea of a welfare state in the aspect of state-legal monism and pluralism

The problem of implementing the idea of a social state is considered from the point of view of state-legal monism and pluralism at the level of humanity, that is the possibility of the emergence of a universally recognized model of such a state or the inevitability of the coexistence of various such models due to national, economic, cultural factors operating in specific countries.

Attention is drawn to the fact that such a problem is also relevant in relation to the ideas of a democratic and rule-of-law state. In general, the coincidence of formal characteristics of states reflected in modern constitutions is accompanied by statements about the absence of unified concepts of democracy and human rights. To an even greater extent, this is characteristic of the search for a solution to the so-called social issue. The theses underlying the concept of the welfare state by L. von Stein are presented. In particular, it is indicated that, in his opinion, the simple development of the social security system of the poor class is not enough to solve the “social issue”. The further development of the idea of a social state is shown, discussions are touched upon regarding the understanding of its essence and the problems that were revealed during the social reforms carried out by socio-democratic and liberal forces in capitalist states at the end of the 19th and 20th century.

The main approaches to the constitutionalization of the social state are revealed (the “simple” proclamation of “social” statehood in the constitution; the clear formation of the goals and objectives of such a state; the absence of an indication of the social nature of the state). The classifications of the welfare state carried out by G. Esping-Andersen, as well as modern researchers of Russia and neighboring countries are analyzed. It is established that the very existence of a “social issue” and the importance of one or another of its solutions are gradually becoming generally recognized. Despite this, the fixation of the social character of the state has not yet received the same universal distribution as, for example, theses about the democratic and legal nature of the state. Both the implementation of the idea of a welfare state where it is legally recognized, and its declared “projects” are very diverse, while the typology of the welfare state is subject to further study. The social model, the framework of which determines the position of the state in relation to society, is, on the one hand, the result of the evolution of a complex of factors specific to each country, and on the other, the result of a conscious choice. Different models of the welfare state are characterized by different degrees of realization of the interests of different social classes, a different relationship between the beginnings of society and the state. Accordingly, these models are “attractive” to representatives of the haves and have-nots to varying degrees, they compete with each other at the international level. It is concluded that the idea of a social state can be reduced to a certain unity, whereas the ways of its implementation are inevitably multiple.

1. Santos B. de S. Toward a New Legal Common Sense: Law, Globalization, and Emancipation. New York, Cambridge University Press, 2020. 665 p.

2. Helliwell C., Hindess B. The ‘Empire of Uniformity’ and the Government of Subject Peoples. Cultural Values, 2002, vol. 6, pp. 139–152. DOI: 10.1080/1362517022019784.

3. Fukuyama F. The End of History and the Last Man. New York, Free Press, 1992. 418 p.

4. Kant I. The Idea of a Universal History on a Cosmopolitical Plan, in: Kant I. Essays, in 6 volumes, Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 1966, Vol. 6, pp. 7–24. (In Russ.).

5. Ogorodnikov V.P. Monism or pluralism?. Rossiiskii gumanitarnyi zhurnal = Liberal Arts in Russia, 2015, no. 1, pp. 50–56. DOI: 10.15643/libartrus-2015.1.7. (In Russ.).

6. Tully J. Strange Multiplicity. Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity (The Seeley Lectures). New York, Cambridge University Press, 1995. 336 p.

7. Sinha S.P. Non-Universality of Law. Archives for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy, 1995, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 185–214.

8. Romano S. The Legal Order. Abingdon, Oxon Publ., New York, Routledge Publ., 2017. 145 p.

9. Berman P.S. The Oxford Handbook of Global Legal Pluralism. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2020. 1118 p.

10. Kartashkin V.A., Lukasheva E.A. International legal standards of human rights: universalism, regionalism, realities. Gosudarstvo i pravo = State and Law, 2010, no. 7, pp. 37–45. (In Russ.).

11. Lukasheva E.A. Man, law, civilizations: normative and value measurement. Moscow, Norma Publ., 2009. 384 p. (In Russ.).

12. Zor’kin V.D. Modern world, law and Constitution. Moscow, Norma Publ., 2010. 544 p. (In Russ.).

13. Baburin S.N. The moral state: a Russian perspective on the values of constitutionalism. Moscow, Norma Publ., 2020. 536 p. (In Russ.).

14. Stein L. History of the social movement in France since 1789, Translated from the 2nd German ed. St. Petersburg, A.M. Kotomin Publ., 1872. Vol. 1: The basic concept of society and the social history of the French Revolution before 1830. IV + CXXVI + 305 p. (In Russ.).

15. Stein L. The doctrine of management and the law of management with a comparison of the literature and legislation of France, England and Germany. St. Petersburg, A.S. Gieroglifov Publ., 1874. XIV + 594 p. (In Russ.).

16. Evstratov A.E. Welfare state and political regime. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya «Pravo» = Herald of Omsk University. Series “Law”, 2014, no. 4 (41), pp. 35–40. (In Russ.).

17. Evstratov A.E. The welfare state theory (fundamental idea). Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya «Pravo» = Herald of Omsk University. Series “Law”, 2015, no. 2 (43), pp. 22–35. (In Russ.).

18. Esping-Andersen G. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1990. 248 p.

19. Goiman V.I. Action of law (methodological analysis). Moscow, Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation Publ., 1992. 182 p. (In Russ.).

20. Miletsky V.P. Institutional aspects of the formation of the welfare state in Russia. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya 6: Filosofiya, politologiya, sotsiologiya, 1998, iss. 2, pp. 45–49. (In Russ.).

21. Namchuk V.A. Models of the social state. Strategіya regіonal`nogo rozvitku: formuvannya ta mekhanіzmi realіzatsії, Odesa, 2008, pp. 219–221. (In Ukrainian).

22. Kchoma N.M. Approach to the typology models of the social state. Nauchnye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoriya. Politologiya, 2013, no. 1, pp. 137–143. (In Russ.).

23. Ivanenko V.A., Ivanenko V.S. Social human rights and social obligations of the state: international and constitutional legal aspects. St. Petersburg, Yuridicheskii tsentr Press Publ., 2003. 402 p. (In Russ.).

24. Kalashnikov S.V. Functional theory of the welfare state. Moscow, Ekonomika Publ., 2002. 188 p. (In Russ.).

25. Blyakhman B.Ya. On the social value of the state. Sibirskii yuridicheskii vestnik = Siberian Law Herald, 2003, no. 4, pp. 8–14. (In Russ.).

26. Blyakhman B.Ya. Civil society and the state: relationship problems. Kemerovo, Kuzbassvuzizdat Publ., 2005. 204 p. (In Russ.).

27. Baglai M.V. Constitutional law of the Russian Federation. Moscow, Norma Publ., Infra-M Publ., 2018. 767 p. (In Russ.).

28. The Concept of the welfare state (discussions in western literature in the 1980s), Pt. 1: Theoretical foundations of the “welfare state”. Moscow, INION Publ., 1988. 218 p. (In Russ.).

29. Molitor B. Marktwirtschaft und Wohlfahrtsstaat. Hamburg, Weltarchiv Publ., 1982. 364 p. (In German).

30. Evstratov A.E. Theory and practice of social state formation. Omsk, Omsk State University Publ., 2018. 104 p. (In Russ.).

31. Rodionova O.V. Problems of development of theory and practice of modern social state. Lex Russica, 2015, no. 1, pp. 28–40. (In Russ.).