From social contradiction to social competition as the basic legal regime (mode) of statehood (Part II)
https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2023.7(4).5-14
Abstract
The subject of the article is social competition as the basic legal regime (mode) of statehood as a systemic channel that determines the functioning of property as a goal and the state as a means.
The aim of the article is to confirm or refute hypothesis that the resolution of social contradictions is a kind of legal regime for the realization of property as the fundamental purpose of the existence of the state.
According to the author's methodology of normative structuralism, the assignment to each mode of property organization of a specific function (social development function, social compromise (convergence) function, social security function) generated the corresponding potential for the emergence and existence of social contradictions, where the state as an artificial (reasonable) sufficiency had to direct the energy of the said contradictions into the normative-legal channel and thus ensure the existence of social competition.
The main results. The restriction and leveling of social competition and the transition to domination as the basic legal regime (mode) of statehood destroys the natural mechanism for resolving social contradictions and transfers this mechanism to the plane of directive political and ideological expediency. As a result, the power of the structural organization of the state is transformed into a goal of its existence, and property only into a means of realizing this goal. There is a disavowal of property as a fundamental goal of the existence of the state; the escalation of its imperialization begins, triggering the destruction of social competition as the basic legal regime (mode) of statehood. There is a danger of an existential rupture between the three most important social institutions of human civilization: property, competition, and the state.
Society, constituting the creation of the state as artificial (reasonable) sufficiency, through the functioning of the structural organization of power has fixed the fundamental purpose of existence - property in the form of an integral structural platform of the main ways of its organization (private (individualized), mixed (corporate), general (collective)), assigning to each of them the execution of the corresponding social function.
Conclusions. Society, realizing the existence of a social contradiction, purposefully forms appropriate ways (rules) to overcome them to ensure its progressive development. The essence of the legal regime as the existence of the resolution of this social contradiction can be defined by the concept of “competition”.
About the Author
A. V. Butakov
Dostoevsky Omsk State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexander V. Butakov – Doctor of Law, Professor, Honoured Lawyer of the Russian Federation; Professor, Department of Theory and History of State and Law
AuthorID: 683256
55a, Mira pr., Omsk, 644077
References
1. Hegel G.W.F. Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences, in 3 volumes. Moscow, Mysl' Publ., 1977. Vol. 3: Philosophy of spirit. 470 p. (In Russ.).
2. Hobbes T. Leviathan, in: Hobes T. Selected works, in 2 volumes. Moscow, Mysl' Publ., 1964, vol. 2, pp. 3–590. (In Russ.).
3. Locke J. Two treatises on government, in: Locke J. Works, in 3 volumes, Moscow, Mysl' Publ., 1988, vol. 3, pp. 135–406. (In Russ.).
4. Montesquieu Ch.L. About the spirit of laws. Moscow, Mysl' Publ., 1999. 674 p. (In Russ.)
5. Mill J.S. Fundamentals of Political Economy, in 3 volumes. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1981. Vol. 3. 450 p. (In Russ.).
6. Sombart W. War and capitalism, in: Zombart V. Сollected works, in 3 volumes. St. Petersburg, Vladimir Dal' Publ., 2008, vol. 3: Research on the history of the development of modern capitalism, pp. 237–476. (In Russ.).
7. Schumpeter J. Theory of economic development. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 2007. 861 p. (In Russ.).
8. Hayek F.A. The meaning of competition. Sovremennaya konkurentsiya, 2009, no. 3, pp. 18–27. (In Russ.).
9. Hayek F.A. Pernicious arrogance. The mistakes of socialism. Moscow, Novosti Publ., Catallaxy Publ., 1992. 304 p. (In Russ.).
10. Hayek F.A. The Political Order of a Free People. London, Overseas Publications Interchange Ltd Publ., 1990. 309 p. (In Russ.).
11. Topornin B.N. (ed.). Legal encyclopedia. Moscow, Yurist Publ., 2001. 1270 p. (In Russ.).
12. Balashenko S.A. (ed.). Belorussian legal encyclopedia, in 4 volumes. Minsk, State Institute of Management and Social Technologies of the Belarusian State University Publ., 2009. Vol. 2. 584 p. (In Russ.).
13. Sukharev A.Ya., Krutskikh V.E. (ed.). Big legal dictionary, 2nd ed. Moscow, INFRA-M Publ., 2003. 703 p. (In Russ).
14. Marchenko M.N. Globalization and the Main Trends in the Development of National and Supranational State Legal Systems in the XXI Century. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2019. 296 p. (In Russ.).
15. Butakov A.V. To the study of the recent history of Russian statehood: Property and the state. Universal and singular. Omsk, 2018. 414 p. (In Russ.).
16. Jhering R. Fight for the right, in: Jhering R. Selected works, in 2 volumes, St. Petersburg, Yuridicheskii tsentr – Press Publ., 2006, vol. 1, pp. 13–86. (In Russ.).
17. Jhering R. Purpose in law, in: Jhering R. Selected works, in 2 volumes, St. Petersburg, Yuridicheskii tsentr – Press Publ., 2006, vol. 1, pp. 87–436. (In Russ.).
18. Engels F. The Communists and Karl Heinzen, in: Marx K., Engels. F. Works, in 50 volumes, 2nd ed., Moscow, Gospolitizdat Publ., 1955, vol. 4, pp. 268–285. (In Russ.).
19. Yanitskii O.N. Globalization and hybridization: towards a new social order. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya = Sociological Research, 2019, no. 8, pp. 8–18. (In Russ.).
20. Vlasenko N.A. The modern Russian state, Essays. Moscow, Norma Publ., 2022. 152 p. (In Russ.).
21. Baburin S.N. Integration constitutionalism. Moscow, INFRA-M Publ., 2020. 264 p. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Butakov A.V. From social contradiction to social competition as the basic legal regime (mode) of statehood (Part II). Law Enforcement Review. 2023;7(4):5-14. https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2023.7(4).5-14
Views:
232
Email this article 