The principle of legality and the provision “the judge is subject to the law” in the context of the doctrine of the development of law contra legem
https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2023.7(4).15-24
Abstract
The research subject. This study focuses on the correlation between the doctrine of development of law contra legem and the principle of legality, with a specific emphasis on the position that “judge submits to the law”.
The purpose of the research. The objective of this research is to examine the compatibility of the doctrine of development of law contra legem with the principle of legality and evaluate the applicability of the "fourteen-year-old child" formula in assessing legislative regulations.
Methodology. This research utilizes a legal analysis and conceptual examination of the doctrine of development of law contra legem and the principle of legality. It also involves a comparative analysis of legal principles within the post-Soviet context.
Main results of the research. The analysis reveals that strict adherence to the principle of legality may not always align with societal interests. The doctrine of development of law contra legem provides an exception to the principle, allowing judges to evaluate and challenge the illogicality or unfairness of legislative regulations. The "fourteen-year-old child" formula, with its low standards for determining such flaws, safeguards judicial independence and shields judges from potential political pressures.
Scope of application. The findings of this research can be applied within the legal framework, particularly in post-Soviet jurisdictions, where the interplay between the principle of legality and the doctrine of development of law contra legem is of significant relevance.
Conclusion. The strict fulfillment of the requirements of the law (legality) is not a goal, but a means of ensuring the certainty and stability of the rule of law, the harmonization of public life. Based on the doctrine of the development of law contra legem, the communication of the post-Soviet judge and legislator should be viewed from the perspective of a three-layered relationship of “subordination – cooperation – opposition”.
About the Author
A. S. Ghambaryan
Russian-Armenian University; Public Administration Academy of the Republic of Armenia
Armenia
Armenia
Artur S. Ghambaryan – Doctor of Law, Full Professor, Honored Lawyer of the Republic of Armenia; Head, Department of Theory of Law and Constitutional Law; Full Professor
123, Ovsepa Emina ul., Yerevan, 0051
8, Kuevyan ul., Yerevan, 0028
AuthorID: 876506, ResearcherID: AAT-8467-2021
References
1. Hegel G. The Philosophy of Right, transl. by B.G. Stolpner. Moscow, Yurait Publ., 2023. 292 p. (In Russ.).
2. Jhering R. von. Purpose in the right, transl. by V.R. Litsky, N.V. Murav’ev, N.F. Deryuzhinsky, ed. by V.R. Litsky. St. Petersburg, N.V. Murav’ev Publ., 1881. II + VIII + 408 p. (In Russ.).
3. Yakupov R.Kh. Law enforcement in the criminal process in Russia. Legal Problems. Moscow, Moscow Higher School of Militia of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation Publ., 1993. 195 p. (In Russ.).
4. Sumenkov S.Yu. Exceptions in law: theoretical and instrumental analysis, Monograph, ed. by A.V. Mal’ko. Moscow, Yurlitinform Publ., 2016. 372 p. (In Russ.).
5. Ghambaryan A.S. Extra-systemic conflicts and intra-systemic conflicts principles of law: doctrine, practice, technique. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika, 2020, no. 14, pp. 36–45. (In Russ.).
6. Baydarov M.A. The implementation of exceptions to the principles of law: A technical-legal aspect. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika, 2020, no. 14, pp. 551–552. (In Russ.).
7. Davydova M.L. Legal principle as a normative-legal prescription: technique of fixation and mechanism of action, in: Printsipy prava: problemy teorii i praktiki, Proceedings of the XI International Scientific and Practical Conference, in 2 parts, Moscow, Russian State University of Justice Publ., 2017, Pt. 1: Chapter I–IV, pp. 205–216. (In Russ.).
8. Sumenkov S.Yu. Principles of law and legal exceptions: aspects of the relationship. Gosudarstvo i pravo = State and Law, 2009, no. 5, pp. 23–30. (In Russ.).
9. Yakupov R.Kh. Criminal Procedure, Textbook for Higher Education Institutions, ed. by V.N. Galuzo. Moscow, Zertsalo Publ., 1998. 448 p. (In Russ.).
10. Belyaev M.A., Denisenko V.V., Malinovskiy A.A. (eds.). Legality: Modern Interpretations, Monograph. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2019. 168 p. DOI: 10.31085/9785392297214-2019-168. (In Russ.).
11. Radbruch G. Philosophy of Law, transl. from German. Moscow, Mezhfunarodnye otnosheniya Publ., 2004. 240 p. (In Russ.).
12. Alexy R. The Concept and Validity of Law (a Response to Legal Positivism), transl. from German by F. Kalscheuer, A. Laptev. Moscow, Infotropik Media Publ., 2011. 173 p. (In Russ.).
13. Ghambaryan A. Development of law contrary to the legal acts (contra legem) in the Republic of Armenia. Gosudarstvo i pravo = State and Law, 2023, no. 5, pp. 145–157. DOI: 10.31857/S102694520025195-5. (In Russ.).
14. Yasinskaya-Kazachenko A.V. Interpretation of legal facts in court in the course of a labour dispute. Ezhegodnik trudovogo prava = Russian Journal of Labour & Law, 2023, vol. 13, pp. 180–194. DOI: 10.21638/spbu32.2023.112. (In Russ.).
15. Allahverdiyev I.H. Interpretation of contra legem: place in the system of types of interpretation. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava = Theory of State and Law, 2022, no. 4 (29), pp. 48–56.
16. Demidova I.S. Legal limitation of state: evolution and basic theories content. Rossiiskii yuridicheskii zhurnal = Russian judicial journal, 2009, no. 3 (66), pp. 21–26. (In Russ.).
17. Baburin S.N. Modern Society between an unjust law and just lawlessness, in: Soshnikova T.A. (ed.). Sotsial'naya spravedlivost' i pravo: problemy teorii i praktiki, Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference, Moscow, Moscow Humanities University Publ., 2016, pp. 19–25. (In Russ.).
18. Fedotov A.V. Is it possible to applicate «contra legem» in a democratic constitutional state?. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2002, no. 8, pp. 92–99. (In Russ.).
19. Raevich S.I. From questions of the doctrine of the interpretation and application of law. Sovetskoe pravo, 1924, no. 3, pp. 51–75. (In Russ.).
20. Tumanov V.A. Toward a Critique of the Concept of «Judicial Law». Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo, 1980, no. 3, pp. 111–118. (In Russ.).
21. Kleandrov M.I. Justice and equity, Monograph. Moscow, Norma Publ., INFRA-M Publ., 2022. 364 p. (In Russ.).
22. Dvorkin R. Empire of Law, transl. from English by S. Moiseev, ed. by S. Koval’, A. Pavlov. Moscow, Gaidar Institute Publ., 2020. 592 p. (In Russ.).
23. Ghambaryan A.S. The conflict rule “lex posterior” in Armenian law. Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Yuridicheskie nauki = RUDN Journal of Law, 2020, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 1224–1239. DOI: 10.22363/2313-2337-2020-24-4-1224-1239. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Ghambaryan A.S. The principle of legality and the provision “the judge is subject to the law” in the context of the doctrine of the development of law contra legem. Law Enforcement Review. 2023;7(4):15-24. https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2023.7(4).15-24
Views:
420
Email this article 