Evaluating the effectiveness of models of incentive legal regimes of entrepreneurial activity in the sphere of digital innovations and technologies
https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2023.7(4).66-75
Abstract
Subject. The article explores the issues of assessing the effectiveness of models of incentive legal regimes of entrepreneurial activity in the sphere of digital innovations and technologies.
Purpose. The purpose of the study was to develop approaches to determining the effectiveness of incentive legal regimes of entrepreneurial activity in the field of digital innovation and technology, as well as to develop criteria and methods for evaluating existing models of these legal regimes.
Methodology. The methodological basis of this study are general scientific methods (analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction), private scientific methods (interpretation of legal acts), as well as content analysis, study of reports and analytical references of governmental organizations.
Results. The general approaches to assessing the effectiveness of law and legislation existing both in Russia and abroad are analyzed. The author defines the types of effectiveness of incentive legal regimes of entrepreneurial activity in the sphere of digital innovations and technologies, as well as their criteria. The author's methodology for assessing the effectiveness of incentive legal regimes in the sphere of digital innovations and technologies is proposed.
Conclusions. The methodology proposed in this study for assessing the effectiveness of such legal regimes can be used as part of the actual impact assessment, and the conclusions reached by the authors may form the basis for further future research on legal regimes for entrepreneurial activity.
About the Author
E. A. Gromova
South Ural State University (National Research University)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Elizaveta A. Gromova – PhD in Law, Associate Professor; Deputy Director for international activity, Law Institute; Associate Professor, Department of Entrepreneurial, Competition and Environmental Law
78, Lenina pr., Chelyabinsk, 454092
ResearcherID: AAO-8876-2020
AuthorID: 652593
References
1. Gromova E.A., Petrenko S.A. Quantum Law: The Beginning. Journal of Digital Technologies and Law, 2023, vol. 1, iss. 1, pp. 62–88. DOI: 10.21202/jdtl.2023.3.
2. Gromova E., Ferreira D.B. Tools to stimulate Blockchain: application of regulatory sandboxes, special eco-nomic zones, and public-private partnerships. International Journal of Law in Changing World, 2023, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 17–36. DOI: 10.54934/ijlcw.v2i1.48.
3. Begishev I.R. Criminal-Legal Protection of Robotics: Notion and Content. International Journal of Law in Changing World, 2022, vol. 1, iss. 2, pp. 73–83. DOI: 10.54934/ijlcw.v1i2.33.
4. Ferreira D., Gromova E., Farias B., Giovannini C.J. Online Sports Betting in Brazil and conflict solution clauses. Revista Brasileira De Alternative Dispute Resolution, 2022, vol. 4, iss. 7, pp. 75–87. DOI: 10.52028/rbadr.v4i7.5.
5. Kvanina V.V. Concept and types of legal regimes of entrepreneurship. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Tomsk State University Journal, 2017, no. 424, pp. 234–240. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/424/33. (In Russ.).
6. Kayasan O. The Role of Regimes to Generate A New Form Of Entrepreneurship: Central Asian Perspectives. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2011, vol. 24, pp. 526–539. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.09.123.
7. Winter S.G. Schumpeterian Competition in Alternative Technological Regimes. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1984, vol. 5, iss. 3–4, pp. 287–295. DOI: 10.1016/0167-2681(84)90004-0.
8. Wersching K. Schumpeterian Competition, Technological Regimes and Learning through Knowledge Spillo-ver. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2010, vol. 75, iss. 3, pp. 480–491. DOI: 10.1016/J.JEBO.2010.05.005.
9. Malerba F., McKelvey M. Knowledge-intensive innovative entrepreneurship integrating Schumpeter, evo-lutionary economics, and innovation systems. Small Business Economics, 2020, no. 54, pp. 503–512. DOI: 10.1007/S11187-018-0060-2.
10. Audretsch D.B., Acs Z.J. The Entrepreneurial Regime, Learning, and Industry Turbulence. Small Business Economics, 1990, no. 2, pp. 119–126.
11. Ji I., Goo J. Pre-Entrepreneurs’ Perception of the Technology Regime and Their Entrepreneurial Intentions in Korean Service Sectors. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 2021, vol. 3, iss. 7, pp. 179–183. DOI: 10.3390/joitmc7030179.
12. Desmarchelier B., Djellal F., Gallouj F. Which innovation regime for public service innovation networks for social innovation (PSINSIs)? Lessons from a European cases database. Research Policy, 2021, vol. 50, iss. 9, art. 104341. DOI: 10.1016/J.RESPOL.2021.104341.
13. Desmarchelier B., Regis P.J. Technological regimes and catching up in the product space. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2021, vol. 30, iss. 4, pp. 927–935. DOI: 10.1093/icc/dtab007.
14. Efremov A.A., Dobrolyubova E.I., Talapina E.V., Yuzhakov V.N. Experimental legal regimes: foreign experience and Russian start. Moscow, Delo Publ., 2020. 126 p. (In Russ.).
15. Grozina E.V. Legal regime and legal regulation. Vestnik Vostochno-Sibirskogo Instituta MVD Rossii = Vestnik of the East Siberian Institute of the MIA of Russia, 2017, no. 4 (83), pp. 1577–1580. (In Russ.).
16. Kozhevnikov V.V. Efficiency of law norms and effectiveness of their application: the problem of correla-tion. Pravo I gosudarstvo: teoriya I praktika, 2017, no. 3 (147), pp. 39–44. (In Russ.).
17. Zhinkin S.A. Some problems of types of law effectiveness. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava, 2004, no. 2, pp. 30–33. (In Russ.).
18. Pashkov A.S., Chechot D.M. Efficiency of legal regulation and methods of its detection. Sovetskoe gosu-darstvo i pravo, 1965, no. 8, pp. 3–11. (In Russ.).
19. Gerasimova N.R., Demin A.V. The effectiveness of the norms of the law. Sotsial’no-politicheskie nauki = Sociopolitical Sciences, 2012, no. 3, pp. 50–52. (In Russ.).
20. Kudryavtsev V.N., Nikitinsky V.I., Samoshchenko I.S., Glazyrin V.V. Efficiency of legal norms. Мoscow, 1980. 260 p. (In Russ.).
21. Tikhomirov Yu.A. (ed.). Problems of efficiency of work of administrative bodies. Мoscow, 1973. 437 p. (In Russ.).
22. Chervonyuk V.I. Theory of state and law, Textbook. Мoscow, INFRA-M Publ., 2008. 238 p. (In Russ.).
23. Bakulina L.T., Nugaeva N.R. The legal norms efficacy’s problem in the context of law the conflictology. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki = Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences, 2009, iss. 2 (4), pp. 9–13. (In Russ.).
24. Leist O.E. The essence of law. Problems of theory and philosophy of law, ed. by V.A. Tomsinov. Moscow, Zertsalo Publ., 2008. 339 p. (In Russ.).
25. Belyaeva G.S. Legal regime: a general theoretical study, Doct. Diss. Thesis. Kursk, 2013. 56 p. (In Russ.).
26. Odintsova M.I. Economics of law, Textbook for students of higher educational institutions, studying in the direction of training “Economics”. Moscow, HSE Publ., 2007. 78 p. (In Russ.).
27. Terziev V., Dimitrova S. Cost Effectiveness Analyses Models in the Defence. China-USA Business Review, 2014, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 495–512. DOI: 10.17265/1537-1514/2014.08.001.
28. Terziev V.K., Stoyanov E.N. Social efficiency as a measure of activity in the society. Innovatsionnaya nauka = Innovation science, 2016, no. 3, pp. 224–234. (In Russ.).
29. Kopylov M., Mensah C.M. The concept of sustainable development in the ECOWAS format. Pravo i uprav-lenie. XXI vek = Journal of Law and Administration, 2015, no. 2 (35), pp. 79–84. (In Russ.).
30. Bogolyubov S.A. The Potential of Environmental Norms of the Russian Constitution. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2018, no. 5, pp. 16–25. DOI: 10.12737/art_2018_5_2. (In Russ.).
31. Shamsutdinov M.R. Theoretical and methodological problems of ecologization of the Russian legislation, Cand. Diss. Thesis. Ufa, 2009. 27 p. (In Russ.).
32. Gromova E.A. Ecologization of legislation on territories with a special regime of economic activity. Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya "Pravo" = Bulletin of the South Ural state university. Series: Law, 2020, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 23–29. (In Russ.).
33. Yurkov S.A. Socio-legal mechanisms of nature management, Analytical review. Novosibirsk, Nova Publ., 1995. 151 p. (In Russ.).
34. Sul’dina O.V. Efficiency as a criterion performance of companies. Perspektivy nauki i obrazovaniya = Per-spectives of Science and Education, 2014, no. 4 (10), pp. 162–166. (In Russ.).
35. Belyaev M.A. Evaluation of legal regimes from the point of view of the system approach: some theoretical background, in: Frolova N.A., Panchenko V.Yu. (eds.). Otsenka pravovykh rezhimov: podkhody i metody, Collection of scientific papers, Krasnoyarsk, Siberian Federal University Publ., 2018, pp. 42–49. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Gromova E.A. Evaluating the effectiveness of models of incentive legal regimes of entrepreneurial activity in the sphere of digital innovations and technologies. Law Enforcement Review. 2023;7(4):66-75. https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2023.7(4).66-75
Views:
256
Email this article 