Legal regulation of inter-municipal cooperation in European countries
https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2023.7(4).106-115
Abstract
The subject. Financial relations between municipal entities represent a crucial mechanism for enhancing the efficiency of public service delivery in European countries. Collaborative efforts among municipalities can lead to cost savings and the utilization of economies of scale. This is particularly prominent in countries with a high number of small municipalities. This article aims to identify effective forms of financial activities among municipalities across various cooperation domains and assess the applicability of international experience in the context of the Russian Federation.
Methodology. This study analyzes various organizational forms of inter-municipal cooperation, drawing insights from different countries, including Switzerland (associations of districts and cantons), Slovakia (joint municipal institutions, municipal associations, associations of legal entities), and France (syndicates and districts). Special attention is paid to the experience of inter-municipal cooperation in Slovakia, where it is not only a vital component of local government but also a tool for project management, often funded by external sources.
The main results, scope of application. The analysis of international experience in inter-municipal cooperation reveals diverse organizational models, each tailored to specific local contexts. Based on this analysis, the authors propose amendments and enhancements to Russian legislation. Implementation of these suggestions could enhance the efficiency of interactions among Russian municipal entities, improve planning capabilities, enhance labor productivity, and optimize public service expenditure.
Conclusions. Inter-municipal cooperation, as demonstrated by various international models, offers valuable insights for Russia. Adapting and implementing lessons from abroad can lead to improved governance and resource allocation, ultimately resulting in enhanced service delivery and cost-effectiveness for the benefit of the Russian population.
About the Authors
V. V. Olkhovik
Financial Research Institute of the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation; HSE University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vladimir V. Olkhovik – PhD in Economics; Leading Researcher; Associate Professor, School of Finance
3/2, Nastas’inskii per., Moscow, 125375
11, Pokrovskii bul., Moscow, 109028
E. Juchnevicius
University of Gdansk
Poland
Poland
Edvardas Juchnevicius – Doctor of Law, Professor, Department of Financial Law
6, Jana Bażyńskiego ul., Gdańsk, 80-309
References
1. Budds J.G. Report on the status of inter-municipal co-operation, prepared for the OSCE Spillover Monitor Mission to Skopje. Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe Publ., 1 June 2004. 23 p.
2. De Peuter B., Pattyn V., Wayenberg E. Territorial Reform of Local Government: Evaluation Criteria Under-pinning Decisions and Debate in Flanders. Local Government Studies, 2011, vol. 37, iss. 5, pp. 533–552.
3. Ebinger F., Grohs S., Reiter R. The Performance of Decentralisation Strategies Compared: An Assessment of Decentralisation Strategies and their Impact on Local Government Performance in Germany, France and England. Local Government Studies, 2011, vol. 37, iss. 5, pp. 553–575.
4. Pfeil E.S. Hungarian Public Service Reform: Multipurpose Microregional Associations, in: Swianiewicz P. (ed.). Territorial Consolidation Reforms in Europe, Budapest, Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative Publ., Open Society Institute Publ., 2010, pp. 255–264.
5. Steiner R. Interkommunale Zusammenarbeit, in: Bergmann A., Giauque D., Kettiger D., Lienhard A., Nagel E., Ritz A., Steiner R. (eds.). Praxishandbuch Public Management, Zurich, Kissing, Paris, Amsterdam, Wien, 2016, pp. 897–914.
6. Teles F., Swianiewicz P. (eds.). Inter-Municipal Cooperation in Europe. Cham, Palgrave Macmillan Publ., 2017. XIV + 354 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-62819-6.
7. Wollmann H. Local Government Reforms in (Seven) European Countries: Between Convergent and Diver-gent, Conflicting and Complementary Developments. Local Government Studies, 2012, vol. 38, iss. 1, pp. 41–70.
8. Alaverdyan O.A., Avetisyan N.R. Modern Challenges of International Tax Cooperation and Armenia. Finansovyi zhurnal = Financial Journal. 2018, no. 4 (44), pp. 32–37. DOI: 10.31107/2075-1990-2018-4-32-37. (In Russ.)
9. Babichev I.V. Local self-government in a unified system of public power: some analysis of constitutional novels. Mestnoe pravo, 2020, no. 6, pp. 3–12. (In Russ.).
10. Budaev A.M. The President and Local Government in Russia: The Theory and Practice of Interaction. Aktual'nye problemy rossiiskogo prava = Actual Problems of Russian Law, 2020, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 41–47. DOI: 10.17803/1994-1471.2020.121.12.041-047. (In Russ.).
11. Shugrina E.S. Projecting the future: what should be in the foundations of state policy in the field of local self-government. Mestnoe pravo, 2020, no. 3, pp. 3–16. (In Russ.).
12. Byalkina T.M. On some aspects of Russian city self-government in light of the new municipal reform. Kon-stitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo = Constitutional and Municipal Law, 2015, no. 1, pp. 62–66. (In Russ.).
13. Chikhladze L.T. Administrative decentralization in the light of new tendencies of development of relations between organs of state and municipal authority. Obrazovanie i pravo = Education and Law, 2016, no. 3, pp. 71–76. (In Russ.).
14. Shugrina E.S. Legislation on local government: analysis of the situation and tendency of development. Munitsipal'noe pravo = Municipal Law, 2014, no. 4, pp. 2–19. (In Russ.).
15. Gritsenko E.V. Federalism and local self-government in the light of the Russian constitutional reform of 2020. Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie = Comparative Constitutional Review, 2020, no. 4, pp. 80–97.
16. Davydova N.Y. Institute of removal of the head of municipal formation in resignation. Аdvokat, 2009, no. 12, pp. 67–70. (In Russ.).
17. Dityatkovskii M.Yu. Vesting local self-government bodies with separate state powers. Moscow, Yuniti-Dana Publ., 2007. 304 p. (In Russ.).
18. Mironova S.M. Features of the implementation of the financial and legal status of municipalities, included in urban agglomerations. Pravoprimenenie = Law Enforcement Review, 2020, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 85–95. DOI: 10.24147/2542-1514.2020.4(1).85-95. (In Russ.).
19. Olkhovik V.V. Foreign experience of inter-municipal cooperation of the OECD countries. Finansy = Finance, 2020, no. 12, pp. 52–56. (In Russ.).
20. Peshin N.L. The Constitutional Reform of Local Self-Government: The Unity of Public Government as a New Universal Principle of Arranging of Local Self-Government. Konstitusionnoe i munitsipal’noe pravo = Constitutional and Municipal Law, 2020, no. 11, pp. 24–29. (In Russ.).
21. Pylin V.V. Some problems facing the population and the representative body in municipalities. Munitsipal'naya sluzhba: pravovye voprosy = Municipal Service: legal issues, 2010, no. 3, pp. 2–5. (In Russ.).
22. Sheremet K.F. Formation of legislative base of local self-government in the Russian Federation, in: Mestnoe samoupravlenie: sovremennyi rossiiskii opyt zakonodatel'nogo regulirovaniya, Moscow, 1998, pp. 3–55. (In Russ.)
23. Shishkina O.E. State power and local self-government in modern Russia: on the issue of the divergence of the constitutional, legislative and factual model of relations. Lex Russica, 2013, vol. 95, no. 8, pp. 839–846. (In Russ.).
24. Schepachev V.A. Evaluation of local government performance as a form of social control. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo = Constitutional and Municipal Law, 2017, no. 2, pp. 57– 61. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Olkhovik V.V., Juchnevicius E. Legal regulation of inter-municipal cooperation in European countries. Law Enforcement Review. 2023;7(4):106-115. https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2023.7(4).106-115
Views:
212
Email this article 