Qualification of a crime jointly committed with a criminally unliaible person
https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2023.7(4).116-125
Abstract
The subject. The qualification’s problem of a crime jointly committed by two or more people, only one of whom is criminally liable, is ambiguously resolved. It is shown that there is a case law tendency to bring into the scope of criminal liability all of people, who have participated in committing a crime together, as accomplices and co-perpetrators. However, it does not correspond to the main theory of complicity, according to which a group of perpetrators being a form of complicity consists exclusively of criminally liable offenders. And, moreover, there is a plenty of sentences, in which courts confirm that a criminally unliaible person is not able to be one of accomplices and co-perpetrators, as a consequence another offender is individually responsible for committing a crime.
The goal of the study is to determine whether joint commission of a crime by two or more people, only one of whom is criminally liable, constitutes complicity and a group of perpetrators. General (analysis, synthesis) and private scientific (formal-dogmatic, historical-legal) methods are used to achieve the goal.
The main results. In case law qualification of joint commission of a crime by two or more people, only one of whom is criminally liable, has gone through several stages in its development and directly depended on a type of the crime. Regional case law often does not coincide with the position of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. There are three main theories in criminal law science, according to which joint commission of a crime by some people, only one of whom is criminally liable: (a) forms both complicity and a group; (b) does not form either complicity or a group; (c) forms a group without signs of complicity.
Conclusion. Joint commission of a crime by two or more people, only one of whom is criminally liable, constitutes a group of perpetrators without signs of complicity. The interpretation dividing complicity and a group of perpetrators into two different institutions allows to take into account a group way of committing a crime as a feature of the objective side and define criminally liable offenders.
About the Authors
V. M. Stepashin
Dostoevsky Omsk State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vitaliy M. Stepashin – Doctor of Law, Professor, Department of Criminal Law and Criminology
55a, Mira pr., Omsk, 644077
I. A. Shekhovtsov
Dostoevsky Omsk State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ivan A. Shekhovtsov – Student, Faculty of Law
55a, Mira pr., Omsk, 644077
References
1. Pudovochkin Yu.E., Babayev M.M. Relationship between Judicial and Legislative Power in the Context of Criminal Policy. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki = Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences, 2021, iss. 1 (51), pp. 153–185. DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2021-51-153-185. (In Russ.).
2. Pudovochkin Yu.E., Babayev M.M. Contradictions of judicial criminal policy. Pravoprimenenie = Law En-forcement Review, 2022, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 174–190. DOI: 10.52468/2542-1514.2022.6(1).174-190. (In Russ.).
3. Pestereva Yu.S., Ragozina I.G., Chekmezova E.I. Role of the Plenum of Russian Supreme Court in the judicial practice formation. Pravoprimenenie = Law Enforcement Review, 2021, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 209–225. DOI: 10.52468/2542-1514.2021.5(4).209-225. (In Russ.).
4. Bibik O.N. Sources of criminal law of the Russian Federation. St. Petersburg, Yuridicheskii tsentr Press Publ., 2006. 243 p. (In Russ.).
5. Kleymenov M.P. Methodology of criminal law forecasting. Pravoprimenenie = Law Enforcement Review, 2022, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 277–288. DOI: 10.52468/2542-1514.2022.6(4).277-288. (In Russ.).
6. Kozlov A.P. Complicity: traditions and reality. St. Petersburg, Yuridicheskii tsentr Press Publ., 2001. 362 p. (In Russ.).
7. Garbatovich D.A. Participation in a crime with a subject that cannot be held legally responsible: problems of literal interpretation of the criminal law. Administrator suda = Court’s Administrator, 2022, no. 4, pp. 32–34.
8. Esakov G.A. Qualification of crime committing jointly with a person not criminally responsible: a new turn in case law. Ugolovnoe pravo = Criminal Law, 2011, no. 2, pp. 10–15. (In Russ.).
9. Makarov S.D. Qualification of complicity in a crime with an improper subject. Rossiiskii sud’ya = Russian Judge, 2005, no. 8, pp. 22–25. (In Russ.).
10. Trukhin A. Crime's accomplice. Ugolovnoe pravo = Criminal Law, 2006, no. 3, pp. 46–50. (In Russ.).
11. Kovalev M.V. To the question of the qualification of an act committed by a person not subject to criminal liability. Vestnik Bryanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = The Bryansk State University Herald, 2019, no. 2 (40), pp. 201–207. (In Russ.).
12. Pudovochkin Yu.Ye. Court practice of qualifying offences committed in complicity. Kriminologicheskii zhurnal Baikal’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ekonomiki i prava = Criminology Journal of Baikal National University of Economics and Law, 2011, no. 2, pp. 5–15. (In Russ.).
13. Arutyunov A.A. Complicity in a crime. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2013. 408 p. (In Russ.).
14. Meleshko D.A. Classification of crimes committed in view of actual participation of persons not subject to criminal liability. Ugolovnoe pravo = Criminal Law, 2016, no. 4, pp. 57–65. (In Russ.).
15. Meleshko D.A. Classification of criminal complicity. Ugolovnoe pravo = Criminal Law, 2017, no. 2, pp. 78 – 85. (In Russ.).
16. Shesler A.V. Perspectives for the improvement of criminal legal norms on co-prepetration in a crime. Lex Russica, 2015, vol. 103, no. 6, pp. 30–38. (In Russ.).
17. Shesler A.A. The content of collaboration in the complicity in a crime. Vserossiiskii kriminologicheskii zhurnal = Russian Journal of Criminology, 2022, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 342–354. DOI: 10.17150/2500-4255.2022.16(3).342-354. (In Russ.).
18. Prozumentov L.M., Shesler A.A. Criminal legal means against combating group crimes. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Pravo = Tomsk State University Journal of Law, 2022, no. 43, pp. 86–96. DOI: 10.17223/22253513/43/7. (In Russ.).
19. Shikhanov V.N. Participation in crime with persons being not liable to criminal responsibility: approaches to legal treatment in modern jurisprudence. Yuridicheskaya nauka i pravookhranitel’naya praktika = Legal Science and Law Enforcement Practice, 2014, vol. 2, no. 28, pp. 52–62. (In Russ.).
20. Yani P.S. The problems of understanding of complicity in judicial practice. Zakonnost’, 2013, no. 7 (945), pp. 44–49. (In Russ.).
21. Tarbagaev A.N., Kurenev D.M. Qualification of murder committed with participation of minor or insane person. Ugolovnoe pravo = Criminal Law, 2011, no. 2, pp. 80–86. (In. Russ.).
22. Gostkova D.Zh. Crimes with a subject that cannot be held legally responsible. Rossiiskii sledovatel’ = Russian Investigator, 2022, no. 11, pp. 15–18. (In Russ.).
23. Klepitskiy I.A. Participation of a mentally ill person in the commission of a crime. Aktual’nye problemy ros-siiskogo prava = Actual Problems of Russian Law, 2022, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 135–140. DOI: 10.17803/1994-1471.2022.135.2.135-140. (In Russ.).
24. Savel’ev D.V. Criminal group: criminal law interpretation. Rossiiskii yuridicheskii zhurnal = Russian Juridical Journal, 1999, no. 1 (21), pp. 94–102. (In Russ.).
25. Morozov V.I., Galkin V.V. Qualification of crimes committed with the participation of pearsons who are not subject to criminal liability. Yuridicheskaya nauka i pravookhranitel’naya praktika = Legal Science and Law En-forcement Practice, 2018, no. 4 (46), pp. 60–73. (In Russ.).
26. Galiakbarov R.R. Qualification of multi-subject crimes without signs of complicity. Khabarovsk, Khabarovsk Higher School of the MIA of the USSR, 1987. 96 p. (In Russ.).
27. Shargorodskii M.D. Selected works. St. Petersburg, Yuridicheskii tsentr Press Publ., 2004. 382 p. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Stepashin V.M., Shekhovtsov I.A. Qualification of a crime jointly committed with a criminally unliaible person. Law Enforcement Review. 2023;7(4):116-125. https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2023.7(4).116-125
Views:
418
Email this article 