On the issue of standards of proof in the practice of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation in bankruptcy cases
https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2024.8(3).132-141
Abstract
The subject. Paragraph 3 of item 26 of the Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation (SAC) dated June, 22, 2012 No. 35 "On some procedural issues related to consideration of bankruptcy cases" has been interpreted by doctrine and judicial practice as establishing a higher standard of proof for certain disputes considered in bankruptcy cases. However, the SAC does not mention any standards; the court's explanations are dedicated to assessing the reliability of evidence coming from a person interested in the favorable case outcome. Therefore, before concluding that the SAC introduced standards of proof, its approach should be analyzed from the perspective of concepts long known to Russian procedural law, namely: "credibility in evidence", "source of evidence".
The purpose of the study. To determine whether paragraph 3 of item 26 of the Resolution of the Plenum of the SAC dated June, 22, 2012 No. 35 establishes any standard of proof. Methodology. Methods of analysis and comparison based on practice of the SAC, of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, of scientific research in the field of civil procedural law.
The main results of research and the field of their application. The approach of the SAC represents a specification of the universal thesis that credibility in evidence is linked to its source, in relation to bankruptcy cases. The addressed explanation cannot be perceived as introducing higher standards of proof for bankruptcy cases. Evidence is assessed based on properties of its source when resolving any civil law dispute.
Conclusion. The conclusion about existence of a fact cannot be made solely on the basis of evidence which source is a person interested in establishing this fact.
Keywords
bankruptcy,
establishing the size of creditors' claims,
recognition of a fictitious transaction as invalid,
standard of proof,
credibility in evidence,
source of evidence,
balance of probabilities,
clear and convincing evidence
Supporting agencies: The research was financially supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project No. 24-28-00565, "Standards of proof in the Russian legal system", https://rscf.ru/project/24-28-00565/.
About the Author
N. V. Platonova
St. Petersburg University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Natalia V. Platonova – senior lecturer, junior researcher, Department of Civil Procedure
7/9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034
References
1. Argunov V.V., Dolova M.O. On the So-Called Standards of Proof in the Context of the Domestic Judicial Procedure. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa = Herald of Civil Procedure, 2019, no. 2, pp. 76–104. DOI: 10.24031/2226-0781-2019-9-2-76-104. (In Russ.).
2. Barishnikov P.S. Emperical methods in the science of civil procedure. Aktualʹnye problemy rossiiskogo prava = Actual Problems of Russian Law, 2015, no. 11, pp. 26–34. (In Russ.).
3. Glaschenko V.D. On the Correlation between the Category of the Standard of Proof and Related Institutions of the Law of Evidence in a Civil Procedure. Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess = Arbitrazh and Civil Procedure, 2021, no. 10, pp. 34–39. (In Russ.).
4. Glushkov A.N. Case Law of Application of Standards of Proving in Russia. Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess = Arbitrazh and Civil Procedure, 2019, no. 5, pp. 38–43. (In Russ.).
5. Karpova A. The Principle of Free Evidence Assessment and Standards of Proof: The Approaches in German Civil Procedural Law and Judicial Practice and Russian Legal Reality. Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya Rossiiskoi Federatsii, 2023, no. 6, pp. 138–163. (In Russ.).
6. Kozlov M.A. The Genesis of Standards of Proof in European Legal Tradition: a Brief Historical Outline. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa = Herald of Civil Procedure, 2022, no. 3, pp. 105–118. (In Russ.).
7. Sergeeva S.L. Standards of Proving in Insolvency (Bankruptcy) Cases. Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess = Arbitrazh and Civil Procedure, 2023, no. 2, pp. 26–30. (In Russ.).
8. Serditova E.N. Some Aspects of the Application of the Rules on Evidence in the Consideration in the Bankruptcy Case of Completed Disputes on the Inclusion of Requirements in the List of Creditors of the Debtor. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa = Herald of Civil Procedure, 2019, no. 1, pp. 394–410. (In Russ.).
9. Smolnikov D.I. Myths about standards of proof. Zakon, 2015, no. 12, pp. 199–205. (In Russ.).
10. Tereshchenko T.A., Amelchuk V.A. Standards of evidence and diligence in the work of tax authorities and the activities of entrepreneurs (trends). Arbitrazhnye spory, 2023, no. 2, pp. 74–85. (In Russ.).
11. Yaroshenko T.V., Dykhanov I.V. Standards of Proving in Civil Proceedings: Legal Regulation Problems and Prospects. Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess = Arbitrazh and Civil Procedure, 2022, no. 3, pp. 32–34. (In Russ.).
12. Karapetov A., Kosarev A. Standards of Proof: Analytical and Empirical Research, Supplement to Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya Rossiiskoi Federatsii, 2019, no. 5. Moscow, Zakon Publ., 2019. 96 p. (In Russ.).
13. Reshetnikova I.V. Standard of Proof. Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess = Arbitrazh and Civil Procedure, 2021, no. 8, pp. 26–27. (In Russ.).
14. Smola A. Standards, Evidence and the Supreme Court. Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya Rossiiskoi Federatsii, 2018, no. 8, pp. 129–165. (In Russ.).
15. Budylin S.L. Internal Conviction or Balance of Probabilities? Standards of Proof in Russia and Abroad. Vestnik Vysshego arbitrazhnogo suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii, 2014, no. 3, pp. 25–57. (In Russ.).
16. Yudel’son K.S. Judicial evidence and the practice of its use in Soviet civil proceeding. Мoscow, 1956. 251 p. (In Russ.).
17. Treushnikov M.K. Judicial evidence. Moscow, Gorodets Publ., 2016. 304 p. (In Russ.).
18. Fokina M.A. (ed.). Course on Evidence Law: Civil Procedure. Arbitration Procedure. Administrative proceedings. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2019. 656 p. (In Russ.).
19. Treushnikov M.K. (ed.). Civil Procedure, Textbook. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2014. 960 p. (In Russ.).
20. Reshetnikova I.V. (ed.). Handbook of Evidence in Civil Proceedings. Мoscow, 2021. 472 p. (In Russ.).
21. Shershenevich G.F. Course on Trade Law. Vol. IV. Trade Process. Competitive Process. Мoscow, 1912. 596 p. (In Russ.).
22. Karapetov A.G. (ed.). Basic provisions of civil law, Article-by-article commentary on articles 1 - 16.1 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. Moscow, M-Logos Publ., 2020. 1469 p. (In Russ.).
23. Suvorov E.D. Bankruptcy in the Practice of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation for 2014: Acts and Comments. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2015. 400 p. (in Russ.).
24. Aloyan A.E. Problems of Implementation of the Recharacterization Doctrine in the Russian Legal System. Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava = Civil law review, 2017, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 221–240. (In Russ.).
25. Karapetov A.G. (ed.). Transactions, Representation, Limitation of Action, Article-by-Article Commentary on Articles 153 to 208 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. Moscow, M-Logos Publ., 2018. 1264 p. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Platonova N.V. On the issue of standards of proof in the practice of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation in bankruptcy cases. Law Enforcement Review. 2024;8(3):132-141. https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2024.8(3).132-141
Views:
402
Email this article 