Тhe Russian statehood. 2017

Abstract

The subject. The author's research methodology of social processes is represented, by establishing
a bond between the ways of property organization and governmental form – especially
its political regime.
The analysis of methodology is based on the historical materials devoted to Russian statehood
in terms of its transition states during the appropriate industrialization of domestic
production.
The results, scope of application. Since 1861, the Russian statehood during its existence has
experienced a number of important transitional states, where the successful process of
forming the traditional foundations of the corresponding society in different periods (pre-
Soviet, Soviet and post-Soviet) in terms of the author's methodology was and still is untenable.
The basis of this methodology is the existing relationship between the concrete way
of property organization and its social function. Thus, a private way of property organization
reproduces the function of social development. A mixed (corporate) way provides a function
of social compromise (convergence). Finally, the common (collective) way of property
organization can be determined by the function of social security. A concrete way of property
organization arries out only a specific social function. An attempt to change this dependence
leads the corresponding society to the destruction of the foundations of its existence.
Thus, the liquidation (abolition) of the private way of property organization objectively
forms the impossibility of realizing the functions of social development and the functions
of social compromise (convergence) in the society by the common (collective) way of
its organization. There is another aspect of the relationship between a particular way of
organizing property and its social function. Each of the above methods of property organization,
reaching a monopoly state that goes into rent, provides for self-destruction and
transformation of its social function as opposed to: from development to degradation, from
compromise to confrontation, from social provision of society to the provision of clans. A
brief historical digression in the article makes it possible to disclose the content of this
methodology when analyzing the facts of life of Russian statehood, including its latest history
until 2017.

Conclusions. The modern post-Soviet statehood in its various foundations: economic, political,
social and cultural, when realizing the appropriate tendencies of segregation of the
private way of property organization and the growing monopolization of state property,
largely casts doubt on the future development of our society.