The legal framework for smart city concepts: challenges and opportunities
https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2025.9(4).88-99
Abstract
The subject. The content of a smart city as a subject of legal regulation is revealed, taking into account various interpretations of both the concept itself and the models of smart cities developed in world practice and urban theory (technocratic model, triple helix model, quadruple helix model). Various options for legal formalization of the smart city concept in the Russian Federation are considered.
The purpose of the article is to identify problems and deficiencies in the existing legal framework for smart cities in the Russian Federation and to develop proposals for overcoming them.
Methodology. The methodological basis of this research includes, in addition to formal legal method, methods of comparative legal analysis, historical-legal method, and modeling method. Moreover, sociological methods were used.
Main results. Based on the analysis of international legal documents, the necessity of transition to a comprehensive perception of a smart city is substantiated. This perception includes, in addition to the technological element, the achievement of sustainable development goals at the local level, involvement of all stakeholders (science, business, civil society) in the decision-making process, and effective interaction of all levels of public authority.
Conclusions. The legal framework of Russian smart cities, represented by sublegislative acts implementing plans and programs, is characterized by flexibility, mobility, and inconsistency. The practice of implementing the departmental project for digitalization of urban economy in the Russian Federation, as well as related projects of safe city, environmental well-being, and digitalization of state and municipal governance, demonstrates the urgent need for streamlining and internal coordination of indicators included in the smart city standard.
Furthermore, it is necessary to develop a unified approach to basic concepts of territorial structure and spatial development, and to overcome the confusion between municipal and administrative-territorial structure. Only on this basis is it possible to achieve a systematic perception of territories where comprehensive development using information technologies is ensured.
About the Author
E. V. Gritsenko
St. Petersburg University
Россия
Россия
Elena V. Gritsenko – Doctor of Law, Professor; Professor, Department of Constitutional Law
7/9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034
ResearcherID: L-8425-2013
Scopus AuthorID: 56409733700
References
1. Tikhaleva Е.Y. “Smart Cities”: Legal Regulation and Potential of Development. Journal of Digital Technologies and Law, 2023, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 803–824. DOI: 10.21202/jdtl.2023.35.
2. Technologies for smart cities, Report of the Foundation “Center for Strategic Research North-West”. St. Petersburg, 2017. 107 p. Available at: https://csr-nw.ru/upload/iblock/f6e/doklad_tehnologii_dlya_umnyh_gorodov.pdf. (In Russ.).
3. Lyshchikova J.V. Evolution of the „Smart City“ Concept: from Technocratism to Antropocentrism and “Smart Society” . Finansovaya ekonomika, 2019, no. 11, pp. 794–796. (In Russ.).
4. Hall P. Cities of Tomorrow: An Intellectual History of Urban Planning and Design in the Twentieth Century. Oxford, UK; New York, NY, USA, Blackwell Publ., 1988. xvi + 473 p.
5. Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. The Triple Helix: university–industry–government relations: a laboratory for knowledge-based economic development. EASST Review, 1995, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 14–19.
6. Carayannis E.G., Campbell D.F.J. “Mode 3” and “Quadruple Helix”: Toward a 21st Century Fractal Innovation Ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 2009, vol. 46, no. 3/4, pp. 201–234. DOI: 10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374.
7. Carayannis E.G., Campbell D.F.J. Democracy of Climate and Climate for Democracy: the Evolution of Quadruple and Quintuple Helix Innovation Systems. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2021, no. 12, pp. 2050–2082. DOI: 10.1007/s13132-021-00778-x.
8. Kichatinova E.L., Oleynikov I.V. The “Quadruple Helix” Concept and Innovative Development of the Regions. Izvestiya Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya Politologiya. Religiovedenie = The Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series Political Science and Religion Studies, 2019, vol. 29, pp. 53–62. DOI: 10.26516/2073-3380.2019.29.53. (In Russ.).
9. Kirillova E.A., Dli M.I., Kakatunova T.V., Epifanov V.A. Transformation of triple helix model in the conditions of innovative ecosystems formation in industry. Disskussiya = Discussion, 2022, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 16–30. DOI: 10.46320/2077-7639-2022-1-110-16-30. (In Russ.).
10. Aleksandrov N.D. Smart cities management system: domestic and foreign practice. Innovatsii i investitsii = Innovation & Investment, 2020, no. 4, pp. 73–78. (In Russ.).
11. Belotserkovsky K.E. Technologies “Smart City” and “Safe City”: Content and Legal Regulation. Zakonnost‘ i pravoporyadok = Legality and Legal Order, 2024, no. 1 (41), pp. 39–44. (In Russ.).
12. Romanovskaya O.V. The Law and a “Smart City”. Pravovye voprosy nedvizhimosti, 2024, no. 3, pp. 15–18. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Gritsenko E.V. The legal framework for smart city concepts: challenges and opportunities. Law Enforcement Review. 2025;9(4):88-99. https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2025.9(4).88-99
Views:
31
JATS XML
Email this article 