Problematic signs of criminal bankruptcies and rules for their qualification: “signs of bankruptcy” and “inability to satisfy creditors’ claims”
https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2026.10(2).117-126
Abstract
The subject of this study is the provisions of Russian criminal law concerning criminal bankruptcy, as well as the provisions of Russian bankruptcy law regarding the elements of a debtor’s bankruptcy.
The aim of this article is to provide a scientific justification for the hypothesis that the circumstances of the commission of the crime provided for in Article 195 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (“signs of bankruptcy”) are identical in substance to the consequences of the crime provided for in Article 196 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (“inability to satisfy creditors’ claims”) and are determined by the signs of objective bankruptcy.
Methodology. Specialized legal methods were also used. In particular, the comparative legal method was used to compare the provisions of Russian criminal legislation on criminal bankruptcy with Russian bankruptcy legislation in order to identify common features and differences in the examined signs of criminal bankruptcy in these branches of Russian law. The formal-legal method is used to analyze bankruptcy legislation in order to substantively define the characteristics of the provisions on criminal bankruptcy. Using a systemic-structural approach, this study analyzes and systematizes such objective elements of the crimes defined in Articles 195 and 196 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation as “signs of bankruptcy” and “inability to satisfy creditors’ claims.”
Main results. The author proposes rules for distinguishing the provisions of Article 195 from Article 196 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, firstly, by the circumstances in which these crimes are committed and, secondly, by their subjective side (intent).
Conclusions. The “signs of bankruptcy” in Article 195 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and “the debtor’s inability to fully satisfy creditors’ claims for mandatory payments” in Article 196 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation should be understood as the debtor’s total liabilities exceeding the actual value of its assets (objective bankruptcy). Unlike Parts 1, 1.1, and 5 of Article 195 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, the acts provided for in Article 196 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation are committed in the absence of circumstances indicating that the total amount of the debtor’s liabilities exceeds the actual value of its assets (objective bankruptcy), but with the intent to bring about such a situation.
About the Author
R. I. KrokhinRussian Federation
Roman I. Krokhin – Postgraduate Student, Department of Criminal Law, Procedure, and Criminology; criminal defense attorney
3, Bol'shoi Trekhsvyatitel'skii per., Moscow, 109028
3/1, Novinskii bul., Moscow, 121099
References
1. Pestereva Yu.S., Rozhkova O.I., Shaglanova A.N. Criminal Liability for Unlawful Actions in Bankruptcy: the Current State, Problems and Methods of Resolution. Sibirskoe yuridicheskoe obozrenie = Siberian Law Review, 2022, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 407–418. DOI: 10.19073/2658-7602-2022-19-4-407-418. (In Russ.).
2. Sereda I.М., Biryukova E.A. Some problems of qualification on the subject of intentional bankruptcy crimes. Rossiiskii sledovatel' = Russian Investigator, 2012, no. 14, pp. 12–17. (In Russ.).
3. Volzhenkin B.V. Crimes in the sphere of economic activity under the criminal law of Russia. St. Petersburg Yuridicheskii tsentr Press Publ., 2007. 763 p. (In Russ.).
4. Lopashenko N.A. Crimes in the economic sphere: author's commentary on the criminal law (section VIII of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation). Moscow, Wolters Kluwer Publ., 2006. 720 p. (In Russ.).
5. Lyaskalo A.N. Criminal law evaluation of certain objective features of criminal bankruptcies. Zakonnost', 2012, no. 12, pp. 18–19. (In Russ.).
6. Yani P.S. The problems of classification of bankruptcy crimes. Zakonnost', 2014, no. 1, pp. 38–42. (In Russ.).
7. Gorelik A.I., Shishko I.V., Khlupina G.N. Crimes in the sphere of economic activity and against the interests of service in commercial and other organizations. Krasnoyarsk, Krasnoyarsk State University Publ., 1998. 135 p. (In Russ.).
8. Khristenko E.V. The estimated signs and qualification of misconduct in bankruptcy (p. 1 of art. 195 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation). Yurist = Jurist, 2012, no. 11, pp. 15–19. (In Russ.).
9. Subachev A.K. Problems of Establishing Malfeasance in Bankruptcy. Aktualʹnye problemy rossiiskogo prava = Actual Problems of Russian Law, 2021, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 120–127. DOI: 10.17803/1994-1471.2021.122.1.120-127. (In Russ.).
10. Lyaskalo A.N. Criminal and legal risks in the chief accountant activity. Bezopasnost' biznesa = Business se curity, 2018, no. 4, pp. 28–34. (In Russ.).
11. Tkhayshaov Z.A. The scene of crime as an obligatory element of unlawful actions in case of insolvency of a debtor-natural person. Ugolovnoe pravo, 2015, no. 3, pp. 69–73. (In Russ.).
12. Lemyagov A.N. The Objective Side of Intentional Bankruptcy. Rossiiskii sledovatel' = Russian Investigator, 2008, no. 23, pp. 22–24. (In Russ.).
13. Guly A.A. Issues of Qualification of Intentional Bankruptcy by the Objective Side. Rossiiskii sledovatel' = Russian Investigator, 2005, no. 1, pp. 15–17. (In Russ.).
14. Gladkikh V.I., Sukharenko A.N. Counteraction to criminal bankruptcy of individuals. Bezopasnost' biznesa = Business security, 2016, no. 2, pp. 42–46. (In Russ.).
15. Lyaskalo A.N. For the question of subjective attributesof criminal bankruptcy (Articles 195–197 of the Crim inal Code of Russian Federation). Ugolovnoe pravo, 2012, no. 6, pp. 35–40. (In Russ.).
16. Yakovlev A.Yu., Medvedeva Yu.S., Ragulina A.V. Premeditated bankruptcy of banks in modern times. Imush chestvennye otnosheniya v Rossiiskoi Federatsii = Property Relations in the Russian Federation, 2016, no. 4, pp. 83 98. (In Russ.).
17. Subachev A.K. Relation of abuse of authority and premeditated bankruptcy. Ugolovnoe pravo, 2023, no. 9, pp. 63–72. (In Russ.).
18. Ragulina A.V. The objective side of intentional bankruptcy. Sud’ya = Judge, 2016, no. 4, pp. 44–46. (In Russ.).
19. Zatsepin A.M. Distinction of illegal actions during bankruptcy from related acts. Administrativnoe i munitsi pal’noe pravo = Administrative and municipal law, 2010, no. 10, pp. 73–77. (In Russ.).
20. Shishko I.V. Unlawful actions at bankruptcy. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika, 2011, no. 7, pp. 41–47. (In Russ.).
21. Shestakova A., Kashirin A. Criminal bankruptcy. EZh-Yurist, 2008, no. 33, pp. 12–13. (In Russ.).
22. Shimshilova E.S. Crimes of corruption direction, performed in commercial organizations: qualified types. Sovremennyi yurist = Modern lawyer, 2018, no. 4, pp. 134–149. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Krokhin R.I. Problematic signs of criminal bankruptcies and rules for their qualification: “signs of bankruptcy” and “inability to satisfy creditors’ claims”. Law Enforcement Review. 2026;10(2):117-126. https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2026.10(2).117-126
JATS XML
























