The methodology of law enforcement policy
https://doi.org/10.24147/2542-1514.2018.2(4).5-15
Abstract
The subject of the paper is methodology of law enforcement policy, elements and relevance for law enforcement activity.
The main aim of the paper is to confirm or disprove the hypothesis that methodology of law enforcement policy is a system of intellective elements and a part of the higher level system of law enforcement policy simultaneously.
The description of methodology. The methodological basis of research is systematic approach. Authors analyze the methodology of law enforcement policy as a combination of elements influencing on each other. The dialectic and formal-legal methodology is also used when the authors analyze trends in judicial practice.
The main results and scope of their application. Law enforcement policy is a state strategy that defines the main directions, methods and means of implementation of legal regulations. From the standpoint of a systematic approach, law enforcement policy is a system of managerial type that consists of three elements: subject, object and means (methods). The methodology of law enforcement is a system of interacting elements, such as: modeling the main directions of the implementation of the law; specification of the general strategy for the implementation of legal regulations; identifying trends in law enforcement; correction of law enforcement practices; scientific and methodological support of law enforcement policy. The authors analyze each of the listed elements of the law enforcement policy, pointing out their role in improving the practice of law enforcement. The proposed analysis may become a crucial point for research in the field of law enforcement methodology. The results of research may be used as the basis of correction of methodology of law enforcement practice.
About the Authors
M. Kleymenov
Dostoevsky Omsk State University
Russian Federation
Doctor of Law, Professor, Honoured Scientist of the Russian Federation, Head, Department of Criminal Law and Criminology
Russian Federation
Doctor of Law, Professor, Honoured Scientist of the Russian Federation, Head, Department of Criminal Law and Criminology
D. Erokhin
Dostoevsky Omsk State University
Russian Federation
PhD student, Department of Crim-inal Law and Criminology
Russian Federation
PhD student, Department of Crim-inal Law and Criminology
References
1. Voplenko N.N. Law enforcement policy: notion and content, in: Tezisy dokladov 9 nauchnoj konferencii professorsko-prepodavatelskogo sostava VolGU. Volgograd, VolGU Publ., 1992, pp. 96-97. (In Russ.).
2. Kelsen H. Pure Theory of Law. B. 1., Мoscow, 1987. 213 p. (In Russ.).
3. Pound R. Sociology of Law // Twentieth Century Sociology / Ed. by G. Gurvitch and N. E. Moore., N. Y., 1945. P. 297-340.
4. Tyler T.R. Methodology in Legal Research // Utrecht Law Review. 2017. 13(3). pp.130–141.
5. Isakov N.V. Legal policy of modern Russia: theory and practice. Doct. Diss. Rostov on Don, 2004. p. 459. (In Russ.).
6. Kolesnikova A.U. Legal policy of Russia regarding certain categories of persons with disabilities in 1991 – 2004. Pravovaya politika i pravovaya zhizn= Legal policy and legal life, 2014, no. 1 (54), pp. 42-47. (In Russ.).
7. Kudryavtsev V.N. (ed), Eminov V.E. The Causes of crime. Moscow: Norma publ., 2011. 128 p. (In Russ.).
8. Marx K., Engels F. Selected works:in 2 parts. P.2.Мoscow, 1952. 516 p. (In Russ.).
9. Kleimenov M.P., Kleimenov I.M. Criminalization of the state in the context of globalization. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seria «Pravo» = Herald of Omsk University. Series «Law», 2018, no. 2(55). pp. 146-150. (In Russ.).
10. Aguilo-Regla J. Introduction: Legal Informatics and the Conceptions of the Law // Law and the Semantic Web. Berlin, 2005. pp. 18-24.
11. R. Knackstedt, M. Heddier, J, Becker.Conceptual Modeling in Law: An Interdisciplinary Research Agenda // Communications of the Association for Information Systems.2014.Vol. 34. pp. 712-736. URL: http://aisel.aisnet.org/ cais/vol34
12. Kleimenov M.P. Criminological legislation and criminological law in Russia. Lex Russica, 2018, no. 2 (135). pp. 148-158. (In Russ.).
13. D. Dyzenhaus. Dworkin and Unjust Law. URL: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190466411.001.0001/acprof-9780190466411-chapter-7.
14. Kleimenov M.P. Forecasting of enforcement of law. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seria «Pravo» = Herald of Omsk University. Series «Law», 2008, no. 3(16). pp. 10-12. (In Russ.).
15. Chukin S.G., Salnikov V.P., Balakhonsky V.V. Philosophy of Law. Moscow: IMTS GUK Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia publ., 2002. 240 p. (In Russ.).
16. Kleimenov M.P., Ivanov E.S., Kozlovskaya M.G. Monitoring law enforcement in Russia. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seria «Pravo» = Herald of Omsk University. Series «Law», 2017, no. 4(53). pp. 123-129. (In Russ.).
17. Tomin V.A. Lawmaking activities of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation: study guide. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg Institute (branch) of the Academy of the Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation publ., 2017. 96 p. (In Russ.).
18. Panchenko V.A. Modern understanding and law enforcement. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seria «Pravo» = Herald of Omsk University. Series «Law», 2012, no. 4(33). pp. 6-9. (In Russ.).
19. Aminov D.I. On the question of the role of monitoring in the implementation of modern criminal policy. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta MVD Rossii, 2012. pp. 45-47. (In Russ.).
20. Babaev M.M, Pudovochkin Y.E. Problems of the Russian criminal policy. Мoscow: Prospect publ., 2014. 296 p. (In Russ.).
21. Erokhin D.V. The concept and purposes of international criminal policy. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seria «Pravo» = Herald of Omsk University. Series «Law», 2018, no. 3(56). pp. 179-185. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Kleymenov M., Erokhin D. The methodology of law enforcement policy. Law Enforcement Review. 2018;2(4):5-15. https://doi.org/10.24147/2542-1514.2018.2(4).5-15
Views:
855
Email this article 