The specifics of the corporate model of local self-government and the divergence of modern approaches to self-government at the local level in the Commonwealth countries

The subject of the article is models of local self-government in Commonwealth countries.
The purpose of this article is to substantiate or refute the hypothesis post-corporate model of local self-government is evolved.
Methods of theoretical analysis are used, as well as legal methods, including the formal legal method and the method of comparative law.
The main results and scope of their application. The corporate model of local government can be characterized by the following features: the lack of full constitutional recognition of local government as an independent form of public authority; formal institutional autonomy of municipal units as public (private-public) corporations of a special type that are not included into the system of state power; limited functional autonomy; lack of constitutional recognition of citizens’ or local communities’ right(s) to local self-government; limited accountability of local governments to the population, including the lack of sufficient legislative guarantees for the election of local authorities. These characteristics, grounded also in the historical specificity of local government development in Great Britain and its colonies, as well as in peculiarities of development of municipal units’ status in English law, are determined by the corporate character of municipal government, which does not arise from the power of communities, but is formed by the state "from above". The author also analyzes the differences in approaches to regulation and organization of local government in the Commonwealth countries.

Overcoming the historical heritage, laid by the genesis of municipal corporations, in a number of Commonwealth states, indicates the formation of a new, post-corporate model of local government, which can be characterized by some features: the establishment of constitutional autonomy of local government as a special form of public power, its development as a form of democracy with greater control over the forms of self-government and governance at the local level by the population, as well as the establishment of a link between self-government and the local community. The proposed analysis may become a crucial point for future research in the field of post-corporate model of local self-government.
Conclusions. Such countries as Australia and Ireland can presently be considered in a state of transition to the post-corporate model of local self-government.

1. Local and Regional Democracy in the United Kingdom / Congress of Local and Regional Authorities, Council of Europe. March 26, 2014. 60 p.

2. Final Report by Expert Panel on Constitutional Recognition of Local Government / Expert Panel Secretariat within the Department of Regional Australia, Regional Development and Local Government, Commonwealth of Australia. Canberra, 2011. 119 p.

3. Final Report by the Majority Finding of the Expert Panel on Constitutional Recognition of Local Government: the Case for Financial Recognition, the Likelihood of Success and Lessons from the History of Constitutional Refer-enda / Joint Select Committee on Constitutional Recognition of Local Government, The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia. Canberra, 2013. 70 p.

4. Allen H. Cultivating the Grass Roots: Why Local Government Matters. The Hague: IULA, 1990. 119 p.

5. Wilson D., Game C. Local Government in the United Kingdom, 5th ed. London, Palgrave Macmillan, 2011. 464 p.

6. Local Government Reform: A Comparative Analysis of Advanced Anglo-American Countries / B. Dollery, J. Garcea, E.C. LeSage, eds. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2008. 267 p.

7. Quangos and Local Government: A Changing World / H. Davis, ed. London, 1996. 104 p.

8. Agencies, Boards and Commissions in Canadian Local Government / D. Richmond, D. Siegel, eds. Toronto: Inst. of Public Administration of Canada, 1994. 138 p.

9. Tocqueville A. Democracy in America. Vol. 1. New York, Harper & Row, 1966.

10. Mill J.S. Considerations on Representative Government, Kitchener, Batoche Books., 2001. 219 p.

11. Odgers W.B. Local Government. London: Macmillan, 1899. 293 p.

12. Sancton A. The Doctrine of Local Self-Government in British Political Thought. Oxford: The Queen’s College, 1969. 135 p.

13. Maddicott J. The Origins of the English Parliament, 924–1327. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2010. 526 pp.

14. Vitte S.YU. Po povodu neprelozhnosti zakonov gosudarstvennoj zhizni. Saint-Petersburg, Brockhaus and Efron, 1914. 376 p. (In Russ.).

15. Redlich J., Hirst F.W. Local Government in England. Vol. II. London, Macmillan, 1903.

16. Stubbs W. The Constitutional History of England in its Origin and Development. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1875. Vol. 2. 646 p.

17. Seymour C. Jr. Electoral Reform in England and Wales. London: General Books, 2010. 336 p.

18. Cooper A., Cooper S. The Forty-Shilling Freeholder. URL: http://www.chivalryandwar.co.uk/Resource/ THE%20FORTY%20SHILLING%20FREEHOLDER.pdf

19. Loughlin M. Legality and Locality: The Role of Law in Central-Local Government Relations. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996. 427 p.

20. Crawford K.G. Canadian Municipal Government. Toronto: Univ. of Toronto Press, 1954. 407 p.

21. Langrod G. Local Government and Democracy. Public Administration. 1953. Vol. 31. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1953.tb01755.x

22. Austin J. Centralization. Edinburgh Review. 1847. Vol. 85. Pp. 221-258.

23. Tindal, R., Tindal, S. Local Government in Canada, 7th ed. / R. Tindal, S. Tindal. Toronto: Nelson, 2009. 447 p.

24. Kaplan H. Reform, Planning and City Politics: Montreal, Winnipeg, Toronto. Toronto: Univ. of Toronto Press, 1982.

25. Carrel A. Citizens’ Hall: Making Local Democracy Work. Toronto: Between the Lines, 2001. 176 p.

26. Siegel D., Tindal C.R. Changing the Municipal Culture: From Comfortable Subordination to Assertive Maturity. Municipal World. 2006. No. 116. Pp. 37-40

27. Jefferson T. The Solemn Declaration and Protest of the Commonwealth of Virginia, in: Jefferson T. Writings, 1825. Pp. 482-486.

28. Osnovnye teorii mestnogo samoupravleniya: proiskhozhdenie i razvitie. Moscow, 1996. (In Russ.).

29. Eaton A. The Right to Local Self-Government, I. Harvard Law Review. 1900. Vol. 13. no 6.

30. McBain H.L. The Doctrine of an Inherent Right of Local Self-Government. I. The Extent of Its Application by American Courts. Columbia Law Review. 1916. Vol. 16. no 3.

31. Magnusson W. Local Self-Government and the Right to the City. Montreal-Kingston: McGill-Queen's Press, 2015. 360 p.

32. Role of Local Government in the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights. Final Report of the Human Rights Council Advisory Committee / United Nations General Assembly, 2015. 19 p.

33. Magnusson W. Are Municipalities Creatures of the Provinces? Journal of Canadian Studies. 2005. Vol. 39. no. 2.

34. Fenwick F.R. First Nations Governance Act: The Inherent Right to Self-Government. What's In a Name? Law Now. 2004. Vol. 28. no. 3.

35. Grammond S. Identity Captured by Law: Membership in Canada's Indigenous Peoples and Linguistic Minor-ities. Montreal-Kingston: McGill-Queen's Univ. Press, 2009. 197 p.

36. Somerville P. Community Governance and Democracy. Policy and Politics. 2005. Vol. 33. N 1.

37. Sullivan H. Modernisation, Democratisation and Community Governance. Local Government Studies. 2001. Vol. 27. Issue 3.

38. Pillora S., McKinlay P. Evolution in Community Governance. Building on What Works: Literature Review. Vol. 2. Univ. of Technology, Sydney. 2011. 36 p.

39. Smyth P., Reddel T., Jones A. Community and Local Governance in Australia. Sydney: UNSW Press, 2005. 266 p.

40. 2010 to 2015 Government Policy: Localism. Policy Paper / Department for Communities and Local Govern-ment, UK. URL: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/2010-to-2015-government-policy-localism/2010-to-2015-government-policy-localism

41. Pipe J. Two Years on, What Has the Localism Act Achieved? URL: https://www.theguardian.com/local-government-network/2013/nov/02/localism-act-devolution-uk-local-authorities.