Preview

Law Enforcement Review

Advanced search

Adversarial process: urgent problems of modern Russian criminal proceedings

https://doi.org/10.24147/2542-1514.2019.3(1).119-137

Abstract

The subject of the article is realization of adversarial process principle in Russian criminal proceedings.

The purpose of the article is to disclose the list of systemic flaws in modern criminal justice. The hypothesis of the study is the thesis that the ongoing transformation of the criminal procedure did not lead to its transformation on the basis of the principle of the adversarial process.

The authors use formal‐legal and comparative‐legal methods as well as legal interpretation of the text of Russian Criminal Procedure Code and Russian Constitutional Court’s decisions.

The main results and scope of their application. The problem field of the research is the analysis of the latest changes in the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation and their influence on the qualitative modernization of the domestic justice. For optimal understanding of the problem field, the authors used a set of general scientific and private‐scientific methods. The article provides a brief overview of the legal positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation and judicial acts reflecting the views of the law enforcers on the motivation of the sentence. In the introduction, the authors justify the relevance of the study, also discusses possible criteria for the fairness of a judicial decision in criminal justice. The second section analyzes the main trends in overcoming the accusatory bias in criminal proceedings and determines the relationship between constitutional legal and criminal procedural parameters of justice and the validity of judicial decisions. The third section examines the main shortcomings of the elements of judicial control in pre‐trial criminal proceedings and assesses the prospects for the establishment of an investigative judge. In the fourth section, the authors explore the specifics of the legalization of operative information as evidence in a criminal case, taking into account the legal positions of the Constitutional Court. The fifth section is devoted to the analysis of the latest changes in the criminal procedure law regarding the order of consideration of cases in the appellate and cassation instances. In the sixth section, the dynamics of doctrinal views on the systemic flaws of the Russian criminal process are examined.

The main proposals for the improvement of the Russian criminal procedure legislation are formulated in the conclusion. It is concluded that the principle of the adversarial process is not taken into consideration completely during the transformation of the criminal procedure in Russia.

About the Authors

Vyacheslav V. Koryakovtsev
All‐Russian State University of Justice, St. Petersburg Institute (Branch), St. Petersburg
Russian Federation

PhD in Law, Associate Professor; Associate Professor, Department of Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure. RSCI SPIN‐code: 6993‐2457; AuthorID: 564749



Xenia V. Pitulko
All‐Russian State University of Justice, St. Petersburg Institute (Branch), St. Petersburg
Russian Federation
PhD in Law, Associate Professor; Associate Professor, Department of Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure. RSCI SPIN‐code: 3076‐5996; AuthorID: 409209.


References

1. Bocharov T., Volkov V., Dmitrieva A., Titaev K., Chetverikova I., Shklyaruk M. Diagnostics of the work of the judicial system in the field of criminal justice and proposals for its reform, Pt. 1. St. Petersburg, The Institute for the Rule of Law of European University Publ., 2016. 110 p. (In Russ.).

2. Belyaev M.V. Properties of court decisions in criminal proceedings. Moscow, Yurlitinform Publ., 2018. 184 p. (In Russ.).

3. Vedishchev N.P. Selection of jurors in the criminal process in Russia, Monograph. Moscow, Yurlitinform Publ., 2019. 192 p. (In Russ.).

4. Kudryavtseva A.V. Justification of a court decision as a component of a fair trial. Ugolovnaya yustitsiya = Russian Journal of Criminal Law, 2018, no. 11, pp. 61–64. DOI: 10.17223/23088451/11/12. (In Russ.).

5. Sukhanova N.N. Resolution of acquittal in Russian criminal proceedings, Cand. Diss. Irkutsk, 2008. 204 p. (In Russ.).

6. Kornakova S.V., Shcherbakov V.A. Problems of implementation of the principle of justice in the Russian criminal proceedings. Moscow, Yurlitinform Publ., 2019. 144 p. (In Russ.).

7. Azarov V.A., Bekker T.A. The identification of truth as a basis for preventing judicial errors in criminal proceedings. Moscow, Yurlitinform Publ., 2019. 208 p. (In Russ.).

8. Ashirbekova M.T., Stus N.V. On the nature of the proceedings for the revision of the sentence in a higher court. Rossiiskii sud'ya = Russian Judge, 2007, no. 10, pp. 25–27. (In Russ.).

9. Gaivoronskaya L.V. Features of proof in the court of appeal, Cand. Diss. Moscow, 2018. 239 p. (In Russ.).

10. Romanova A.A. Modern appeal proceedings in the criminal process in Russia. Moscow, Yurlitinform Publ., 2018. 176 p. (In Russ.).

11. Kolokolov N.I. (ed.). Appeal, cassation, supervision: application of the norms of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation. Moscow, Yurlitinform Publ., 2018. 464 p. (In Russ.).

12. Altynnikova L.I. Features of the implementation of the principle of competitiveness of the parties in the appeal proceedings in criminal cases. Moscow, Yurlitinform Publ., 2018. 184 p. (In Russ.).

13. Rabtsevich O.I. The right to a fair trial: international and domestic legal regulation. Moscow, Leks‐Kniga Publ., 2005. 318 p. (In Russ.).

14. Aleksandrov A.S., Aleksandrova I.A. Criminal Code + Criminal Procedure = Criminal Law, in: Tarasov A.A. (ed.)., Aktual'nye problemy vzaimosvyazi ugolovnogo prava i protsessa, collection of materials of the All‐Russian scientific‐practical conference with international participation. Ufa, Bashkir State University Publ., 2016, pp. 4–18. (In Russ.).

15. Stoiko N.G. Strategies of the criminal process and their compatibility. Rossiiskii sledovatel' = Russian Investigator, 2006, no. 4, pp. 12–15. (In Russ.).

16. Tsvetkov Yu.A. Formation of investigation power on the post‐Soviet territory. Rossiiskii sledovatel' = Russian Investigator, 2015, no. 11, pp. 9–12. (In Russ.).

17. Sychev D.A. Content and implementation by the prosecutor of the functions of supervision and prosecution in the pre‐trial stages of the criminal process, Cand. Diss. Thesis. Moscow, 2016. 36 p. (In Russ.).

18. Lazareva V.A. Indictment authority: concept, subjects, forms of realization. Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo = Criminal Judicial Proceeding, 2012, no. 1, pp. 14–18. (In Russ.).

19. Shadrin V.S. Modern Condition and Prospects of the Reform of Pre‐Trial Proceeding in the Russian Criminal Process. Rossiiskii zhurnal pravovykh issledovanii = Russian journal of legal studies, 2014, no. 4, pp. 133–137. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Koryakovtsev V.V., Pitulko X.V. Adversarial process: urgent problems of modern Russian criminal proceedings. Law Enforcement Review. 2019;3(1):119-137. https://doi.org/10.24147/2542-1514.2019.3(1).119-137

Views: 576


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2542-1514 (Print)
ISSN 2658-4050 (Online)