Preview

Law Enforcement Review

Advanced search

Problems of judicial interpretation of signs of legalization (laundering) of money or other property acquired by criminal means

https://doi.org/10.24147/2542-1514.2019.3(2).105-113

Abstract

The subject. The article is devoted to analysis of the crime - laundering of money or other property obtained by criminal means,-  punished by art. 174, 174.1 of the Russian Criminal Code.

The purpose of the article is to confirm or disprove hypothesis that the current Supreme Court’s official legal interpretation of the rules on the laundering of criminal incomes is too narrow; this interpretation is based on a distorted understanding of the objectives of the analyzed criminal acts.

The main results and scope of their application. According to judicial practice of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, firstly, when the money obtained by illicit trafficking of narcotic drugs were cashed by accused person using electronic payment systems, bank accounts or debit cards, and subsequently were spent there is no corpus delicti of money laundering. Secondly, the corpus delicti of money laundering exists in cases when money obtained by criminal means, are invested to capital stock or companies, to a bank deposit, to purchase of income-generating assets, goods or property.

Conclusions. The specificity of the situation with criminal responsibility for the legalization of criminal incomes is in the fact that it is possible to use criminal income for personal needs for the purchase of luxury goods directly and without legalization due to the lack of control over the citizens expenditures in the Russian Federation. So direct disposal and personal use of property obtained during a crime by criminal in his own needs should not be qualified under art. 174, 174.1 of the RF Criminal Code as money laundering if the purpose of concealing the criminal nature of assets was not proven. However, when making financial transactions or other transactions designed to disguise the criminal source of income, the intention of criminal to spend them on personal needs should not exclude the application of the analyzed norms of criminal law.

About the Author

Alexandra V. Boyarskaya
Dostoevsky Omsk State University, Omsk
Russian Federation

PhD in Law, Associate Professor, Department of Criminal Law and Criminology

RSCI SPIN‐code: 6139‐3134; AuthorID: 790893



References

1. Kuznetsova N.F. Problems of qualification of crimes, Lectures on the special course “Basics of qualifying crimes”. Moscow, Gorodets Publ., 2007. 336 p. (In Russ.).

2. Yusupov N.V. Criminal liability for the legalization (laundering) of property derived from crimes in the sphere of illicit trafficking in narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances or their analogues, Cand. Diss. Thesis. Moscow, 2011. 26 p. (In Russ.).

3. Bystrova Yu.V. The system of warning of the legalization (laundering) of money or other property acquired by criminal means in the Russian Federation, Cand. Diss. Thesis. Moscow, 2010. 20 p. (In Russ.).

4. Tret’yakov V.I. Organized crime and the legalization of criminal income, Doct. Diss. Thesis. Rostov‐on‐Don, 2009. 55 p. (In Russ.).

5. Smagina A.V. Legalization (laundering) of criminally gained income using offshore financial centers: criminal law and criminological aspects, Cand. Diss. Thesis. Moscow, 2006. 25 p. (In Russ.).

6. Lisin A.N. Legalization (laundering) of criminally gained income using offshore financial centers: criminal law and criminological aspects, Cand. Diss. Thesis. Moscow, 2006. 22 p. (In Russ.).

7. Bukarev V.B. Legalization (laundering) of income acquired by criminal means: public danger and qualification issues, Cand. Diss. Thesis. Moscow, 2006. 28 p. (In Russ.).

8. Kuzakhmetov D.R. Legalization (laundering) of money or other property acquired by criminal means: Questions of theory, legislative regulation and practice, Cand. Diss. Thesis. Kazan, 2006. 25 p. (In Russ.).

9. Ganikhin A.A. Legalization (laundering) of property acquired by criminal means: financial, economic and criminal law aspects, Cand. Diss. Thesis. Yekaterinburg, 2003. 23 p. (In Russ.).

10. Filatova M.A., Yani P.S. Interrelated problems of classification of fraud and legalization of proceeds of crime. Zakonnost' = Legality, 2018, no. 7, pp. 33–38. (In Russ.).

11. Krylov O.M. Notion and contents of the "money turnover" legal category. Bankovskoe pravo = Banking law, 2016, no. 5, pp. 54–61. (In Russ.).

12. Filatova M.A. Solution by the Plenum of the Supreme Court of controversial issues of understanding of legalization of proceeds of crime. Ugolovnoe pravo = Criminal law, 2016, no. 3, pp. 86–93. (In Russ.).

13. Zhubrin R.V. Supervision over implementation of laws related to investigation of legalization of proceeds of crime. Zakonnost' = Legality, 2016, no. 5, pp. 14–17. (In Russ.).

14. Zhubrin R.V. Criminological validity of criminal liability for illegal income legalization. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika = The laws of Russia: experience, analysis, practice, 2013, no. 10, pp. 39–47. (In Russ.).

15. Klepitskii I.A. The system of economic crimes. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2005. 572 p. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Boyarskaya A.V. Problems of judicial interpretation of signs of legalization (laundering) of money or other property acquired by criminal means. Law Enforcement Review. 2019;3(2):105-113. https://doi.org/10.24147/2542-1514.2019.3(2).105-113

Views: 962


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2542-1514 (Print)
ISSN 2658-4050 (Online)