The constitutional conflictology in the system of constitutional science
https://doi.org/10.24147/2542-1514.2019.3(3).44-52
Abstract
The subject. The article is devoted to process of constitutional conflictology theory formation as separate field of constitutional science, researching constitutional conflicts and different measures for their prevention and solving.
The purpose of the article is to define theoretical base for constitutional conflictology theory formation.
The methodology of the study includes general scientific methods (analysis, synthesis, description) and sociological approach.
The main results and scope of their application. The author describes the genesis of constitutional conflictology theory, its subject, methodology and system. The author substantiates necessity of application of theoretical and methodological bases of conflictology’s science in the constitutional and municipal law for the purpose of forecasting, identification and the resolution of the corresponding constitutional conflicts.
Causes of constitutional conflictology theory formation are:
- accumulation of results of many constitutional researches of different aspects of legal conflict and its expression in constitutional law;
- public power as an object of constitutional relationships and as main cause of conflict situation in society;
- character and scale of constitutional conflict’s aftermaths;
- conflictolgy nature of the Constitution of Russian Federation.
Constitutional conflictology is a research level of legal conflictology exploring constitutional conflict, its causes and methods of prevention and solving, and also constitutional and municipal legal norms with conflictology nature.
A methodology of constitutional conflictology is symbiotic also and contains three different groups of methods:
I group of general scientific methods (dialectical, system, functional);
II group of different scientific methods (historical, logical, statistic);
III group of special methods: legal methods (formal-legal methods, method of a prediction of legal consequences, comparative method), a generic definition description method.
A system of constitutional conflictology consists four interconnected elements:
1) theory of constitutional conflict;
2) methods of prevention and solving constitutional conflicts;
3) constitutional and municipal legal norms with conflictology nature;
4) different types of constitutional conflicts and methods of their solving.
Conclusions. Constitutional conflictology theory has been formating in constitution legal science as a separate field exploring constitutional conflict and all of its aspects.About the Author
Irina A. TretyakRussian Federation
PhD in Law, Lecturer, Department of State and Municipal Law
RSCI SPIN-code: 3455-2600; AuthorID: 762457
References
1. Dahrendorf R. The Modern Social Conflict. Moscow, ROSSPEN Publ., 2002. 284 p. (In Russ.).
2. Orlanova A.I Specifics of development of domestic conflictology. Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Sotsiologiya = RUDN Journal of Sociology, 2003, no. 1 (4), pp. 114–119. (In Russ.).
3. Nikitina A. Typology of constitutional conflicts. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya “Pravo” = Herald of Omsk University. Series “Law, 2016, no. 1, pp. 69–78. (In Russ.).
4. Teterin A.V. Constitutional and legal conflict: theoretical problems and ways of overcoming, Cand. Diss. Moscow, 2018. 268 p. (In Russ.).
5. Ezerov A.A. Naukove doslizhdennya konfliktnosti konstitucijno-pravovih vidnosin yak perspektivnij napryamok rozvitku nauki konstitucijnogo prava. Aktual'ni problemi derzhavi i prava, 2004, no. 22, pp. 274–277. (In Ukrainian).
6. Nikitina A.V. Constitutional and legal disputes. Moscow, Norma Publ., 2018. 320 p. (In Russ.).
7. Tretyak I.A. Constitutional and legal enforcement in the Russian Federation, Cand. Diss. Omsk, 2015. 215 p. (In Russ.).
8. Narutto S.V. Competition constitutional human rights and freedom in interpretations of the constitutional court of Russian Federation. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo = Constitutional and Municipal Law, 2010, no. 2, pp. 56–65. (In Russ.).
9. Karaseva I.A. Competition of constitutional values in practice of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation and constitutional courts of foreign States, Cand. Diss. Moscow, 2014. 244 p. (In Russ.).
10. Rudt Yu.A. Balance of constitutional values, Monograph. Novosibirsk, NSTU Publ., 2017. 142 p. (In Russ.).
11. Mamonov V.V. The Constitutional Values of Modern Russia. Vestnik Saratovskoi gosudarstvennoi yuridicheskoi akademii = Saratov State Law Academy Bulletin, 2013, no. 4 (93), pp. 125–132. (In Russ.).
12. Taeva N.E. Norms of constitutional law in the system of legal regulation of the Russian Federation, Doct. Diss. Moscow, 2019. 480 p. (In Russ.).
13. Presnyakov M.V. Conflict of constitutional rights: the problem of ensuring a fair balance. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo = Constitutional and Municipal Law, 2008, no. 20, pp. 12–16. (In Russ.).
14. Starodubtseva I.A. Conflicts of the constitutional legislation at the level of subjects of the Russian Federation, Voronezh, 2004. 163 p. (In Russ.).
15. Kotelevskii D.V. Institute of Federal intervention in the constitutional law of the Russian Federation, Cand. Diss. Omsk, 2002. 171 p. (In Russ.).
16. Bartsits I.N. Federal intervention: foundations and mechanisms. Pravovedenie, 2000, no. 4, pp. 62–74. (In Russ.).
17. Constitutional law, University course, in 2 volumes. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2016. Vol. 1. 432 p. (In Russ.).
18. Davydova N.Yu. Constitutional legal enforcement in the mechanism of ensuring the legality bodies and officials of local self-government activities, Cand. Diss. Moscow, 2011. 195 p. (In Russ.).
19. Smirnov P.V. Measures of constitutional legal enforcement in the electoral law of the Russian Federation, Cand. Diss. Surgut, 2005. 197 p. (In Russ.).
20. Surkova I.S. Constitutional legal enforcement, applied to regional state authorities in the system of federal relations, Cand. Diss. Omsk, 2008. 232 p. (In Russ.).
21. Bogomolov N.S. Constitutional legal responsibility of state bodies and officials of the subjects of the Russian Federation, Cand. Diss. Moscow, 2012. 22 p. (In Russ.).
22. Vinogradov V.A. Subjects of constitutional responsibility, Cand. Diss. Moscow, 2000. 190 p. (In Russ.).
23. Gorokhovtsev O.V. Constitutional responsibility in the Russian Federation, Cand. Diss. Thesis. Moscow, 2008. 24 p. (In Russ.).
24. Skifskii F.S. Constitutional offenses, Cand. Diss. Tyumen, 1998. 143 p. (In Russ.).
25. Gadzhiev G.A. Constitutional Foundations of Legal Responsibility and Constitutional Legal Responsibility. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2014, no. 1, pp. 7–15. DOI: 10.12737/1808. (In Russ.).
26. Kolosova N.M. Constitutional responsibility in the Russian Federation. Moscow, 2000. 192 p. (In Russ.).
27. Kondrashev A.A. Constitutional legal responsibility in the Russian Federation: theory and practice. Moscow, 2006. 345 p. (In Russ.).
28. Shugrina E.S., Narutto S.V., Zabolotskikh E.M. Responsibility of public authorities: legal regulation and law enforcement practice. Moscow, 2014. 347 p. (In Russ.).
29. Gubinskii M.Sh. Legal conflictology. Moscow, Norma Publ., INFRA-M Publ., 2019. 176 p. (In Russ.).
30. Karyakin Yu.V. Object and subject of science. Uspekhi sovremennogo estestvoznaniya = Advances in current natural sciences, 2008, no. 1, pp. 76–79. (In Russ.).
31. Sadykova E.Yu., Chuprynina I.Yu. (eds.). Monitoring of conflict escalation. Conflicts: theory and practice of resolution. Experience of foreign studies. Almaty, Conflict center Publ., 2002, Vol. 3. 342 p. (In Russ.).
32. Petrovskaya L.A. About the conceptual scheme of socio-psychological analysis of the conflict, in: Andreeva G.M., Bogomolova N.N. (eds.). Teoreticheskie i metodologicheskie problemy sotsial'noi psikhologii. Moscow, Moscow University Publ., 1977, pp. 126–143. (In Russ.).
33. Antsupov A.Ya. Social and psychological problems of prevention and resolution of interpersonal conflicts in the relationship of officers. Moscow, Humanitarian Academy of the Armed Forces Publ., 1992. 262 p. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Tretyak I.A. The constitutional conflictology in the system of constitutional science. Law Enforcement Review. 2019;3(3):44-52. https://doi.org/10.24147/2542-1514.2019.3(3).44-52